WASHINGTON, Aug. 3, 2007
Chaos Follows Controversial House Vote
Republicans Walk Out In Protest, Accuse Dems Of Breaking Rules
-
Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., seen in this May 2007 file photo, was among the Republicans to accuse House Democrats of cheating in order to avoid losing a vote Thursday, August 2, 2007. (U.S. Government)
-
Interactive 110th Congress The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
Note: This item originally appeared on The Crypt, Politico's behind-the-scenes blog about Congress.
In a massive flare-up of partisan tensions, Republicans walked out on a House vote late Thursday night to protest what they believed to be Democratic maneuvers to reverse an unfavorable outcome for them.
The flap represents a complete breakdown in parliamentary procedure and an unprecedented low for the sometimes bitterly divided chamber.
The rancor erupted shortly before 11 p.m. as Rep. Michael R. McNulty, D-N.Y., gaveled close the vote on a standard procedural measure with the outcome still in doubt.
Details remain fuzzy, but numerous Republicans argued afterward that they had secured a 215-213 win on their motion to bar undocumented immigrants from receiving any federal funds apportioned in the agricultural spending bill for employment or rental assistance. Democrats, however, argued the measure was deadlocked at 214-214 and failed, members and aides on both sides of the aisle said afterward.
One GOP aide saw McNulty gavel the vote to a close after receiving a signal from his leaders – but before reading the official tally. And votes continued to shift even after he closed the roll call - a strange development in itself.
Whatever the final tally, acrimony quickly exploded between lawmakers on either side of the aisle as Democratic leaders tried to plot a solution, while parliamentarians on either side argued over protocol.
Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., eventually offered a motion to reconsider, according to floor staff on either side, ostensibly giving members a chance to recast their votes. But the maneuver sparked a chorus of angry protests from the Republicans, yelling “shame” on Democrats, while they returned fire with angry volleys of their own.
When Democrats finally moved to consider the spending bill as the last vote of the night, furious Republicans left the chamber en masse to protest the maneuver. The House eventually recessed at 11:18 p.m. But Republicans quickly discovered that there was no longer any record of the controversial vote and immediately charged Democrats with erasing the bad result.
“Obviously, the Democrats don’t want to stand up against illegal immigration – so much so that they’re willing to cheat in order to win a vote,” Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., said in an e-mail. “They’re desperate – and it shows.”
The official House website did not show a record of the vote as of 1 a.m. Friday.
By Patrick O'Connor
© 2007 The Politico & Politico.com, a division of Allbritton Communications Company


Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 188 CommentsAre you ********* me? The estimate for friendly fire casualties for the U.S. forces in Iraq is over 40%. That means that over 1200 of the over 3000 American deaths in Iraq are caused by our own forces.
I wonder how many of those are "gang related?" I also wonder if Tillman's death was gang related.
SEND THEM BACK TO WHEREVER THEY CAME. The questions is HOW! There's so damnn many of them.
The only reason Democrats in congress want to coddle them, THE ONLY REASON, is because if illegals become citizens they will vote Democratic. MORE DEMOCRATIC VOTES!!! That's the same phuckking reason Reagan and the Democratic congress screwed the military back in the early '80s. MORE VOTES!!
Well, I'm willing to sacrifice my party affiliation to keep 12 to 20 MILLION illegals from becoming citizens whithout going through the proper hoops.
I also believe we should have LOWER immigration quotas. Our economy can not handle the influx we currently allow.
Although I am a fiscal conservative and social liberal, this immigration thing is pushing it too far.
The American people are standing up we do not want ILLEGALS getting benefits from this American legislature carte blanche The legal citizens have gone through a long and arduous procedure to become citizens of this country and it is an insult to us and them for these illegals to get anything. They need to apply for citizenship the correct way, and if the Democrats or Republicans don't get it they will, cut out the play for votes congress do the right thing for one d*a*m*n time PLEEZE!!!! Stop all this division you know what you are doing and the American will show you the way one way or the other take my word for it. We are mostly united on this issue do you get it.
The Democrats favor illegal immigrants and the Republicans favor staying in Iraq in which case many Americans may not Vote at all which is also a possibility.
Any Candidate who supports illegal immigration from any Party is skating on thin ice. John McCain learned the hard way and changed his tune! There is no telling what the next Congress will look like, because any Candidate who supports illegal immigration will probably not be elected or reelected. A list of candidates who support illegal immigration will be Posted on the web and available at Voting stations. Americans are serious business about this issue.
neither they or their progeny can EVER become citizens. Now, THAT might be a deterrent to generational illegal chain migration
Posted by toldyouso21 at 11:23 PM : Aug 04, 2007
Posted by lostcountry1 at 11:10 PM : Aug 04, 2007
the sad truth is...many Americans would also not be able to answer those questions or read the information and therefore, would be denied the right to vote, how about a retina scan on file for everyone who is deemed to be a true citizen and if they came in illegally, that though they may get to live here, neither they or their progeny can NEVER become citizens. Now, THAT might be a deterrent to generational illegal chain migration
Well, there is a bridge in Minneapolis where everyone thought the same way---the status quo requires people to assume that things just stay the way they want them to. You probably can pick up that bridge in pieces for cents on the dollar and maybe a few cars, trucks and iron girder parts too---just trawl the river and you can find it.
Posted by nyckate at 04:59 PM : Aug 03, 2007
Sort of like us fighting our war in Iraq and letting Iraqis take the heat and die--so we don't have to fight our own war here isn't it? Really a classy, honorable and courageous way of thinking (NOT)
Actually, you are advocating amnesty and justifying it with saying we need to use them--as if they will stay picking lettuce and not go for higher jobs when they are legal.
Who picked lettuce before these people? What makes you think when they are legal that they will continue to do the ****** labor of picking lettuce--with the entire US opening up to them--why would they? We act (just like we did in slavery times) that illegals just LOVE to do grunt work and will keep doing it willingly and for low pay when they have a choice. Sort of like the stories of the Happy go lucky slave, who liked being owned and forced to work.
I have a suggestion for who could do this grunt work--make it a stipulation that every LEGAL immigrant applicant with no college credentials work for at least 3 years at one of these jobs--they can pick all the low paying jobs you and others are sure Americans won't do. The immigration waiting list is said to extend for up to 25 years--so the employers would have lots to choose from and the best part is--they could use legal applicants and stop rewarding line jumping cheating illegal immigrants.
Whether by error, incompetence, or deliberate manipulation and lying, the 'pro-tem' MUST ADMIT HIS ERROR AND SEND THE MEASURE BACK TO COMMITTEE. To do otherwise condemns the Democratic Party to certain defeat in the '08 elections, and beyond. The American people have made it abundantly clear to Republican and Democrat alike we do not want, we will not accept, and we will not tolerate measures such as this one to sell out our Nation. Congress and the President must cease giving away the rights and the nation of the Americans.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 188 Comments