September 22, 2009 11:08 AM

The Republicans' Divine Comedy

By
David L Miller
(The New Republic)  This column was written by Michelle Cottle.

Now let's see if I've got this straight: This week, an Iowa pastoral supporter of Republican POTUS wannabe, ex-Arkansas governor, and ordained Baptist minister Mike Huckabee was caught e-mailing around disparaging remarks about rival Senator Sam Brownback's conversion from Methodism to Catholicism.

This comes less than two months after an Iowa field operative for Brownback was busted for sending out an e-mail talking trash about Mormonism, the faith of choice of rival Mitt Romney.

And that episode occurred only a couple of weeks after Rudy Giuilani's deputy web-campaign manager helpfully sent a blogger an article from the Utah media that tied Romney to a whacked-out prophesy asserting that a Latter Day Saint will save the Constitution.

Before even that, there was the April incident in which John McCain's campaign chairman in Warren County, Iowa, took it upon himself to share a number of illuminating tidbits about the Mormon Church (it funds Hamas, it supports Taliban-like treatment of women...) at a monthly meeting of GOP activists.

And, of course, who could forget Focus on the Family founder, conservative kingmaker, and unofficial Newt Gingrich shill James Dobson's March pronouncement that actor, lobbyist, and former Senator Fred Thompson is not a real Christian? (Culturally conservative, yes. But on the road to hell nonetheless.)

This, in turn, spurred protestations by Thompson's camp, who cited their man's lifelong standing as a Church of Christer. But that only served to spark Web debate about whether Thompson is a member of the fundamentalist Churches of Christ (as he reportedly professed) or of the more liberal United Church of Christ, in which he and wife Jeri were married in 2002. One political science professor at a Church of Christ-affiliated college went so far as to issue an online challenge, offering $100 to anyone producing evidence that Thompson had attended an assembly of the conservative sect in the past 20 years.

Wow. Talk about a tough crowd. I realize this is a religious nation, and that, more specifically, the GOP has been in hock to Christian conservatives for several elections now. Plus, the "value-voter" hysteria spurred by the 2004 exit polls has even Democratic presidential contenders brandishing their basic spiritual bona fides this time around. But the sectarian skirmishes on the Republican side are getting so vicious it's unclear whether St. Peter himself would be pure enough to escape unsullied. At this point, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that one of the more desperate campaigns had focus-grouped the idea of hosting a combination pig roast/auto-de-fé at next weekend's straw poll.

OK. I would be surprised. But not shocked.

What exactly is going on here? Sure, Mitt Romney's Latter Day Sainthood is creeping out some of the base and so makes for an irresistible target. But what of the heavy breathing over Thompson's Jesus credentials or, weirder still, Brownback's — a man so ostentatiously devout I feel the urge to genuflect every time I see him on C-SPAN. The answer to this puzzle lies in who most notably is not getting tarred in this religious war: Rudy Giuliani. I mean, if Thompson's degree of protestant zeal is of concern to a single soul, one might reasonably expect the serially unfaithful, thrice-wed, pro-gay, proudly pro-choice New Yorker — quite possibly the shabbiest Catholic in the history of the modern church — to be burned in effigy daily by the party's wingnuts.

But for now, it seems the ideologically heretical Giuliani is regarded as an entirely different animal, and so the rest of the pack is busy jockeying to be the base-friendly non-Rudy in this race. I mean, why bother picking on Giuliani's spiritual shortcomings when America's Mayor is already taking a beating for the full range of his noxiously liberal views on conservative websites like Redstate.com and RightWingNews.com? Best to set yourself up as the conservative alternative and hope that eventually Rudy goes the way of the once formidable, now barely conscious McCain campaign.

Unfortunately for the competition, there just aren't that many red meat issues by which to starkly distinguish oneself from the pack. Most everyone in this group (thanks to a few strategic adjustments by Mitt in recent years) opposes abortion and gay marriage, loves guns, and cannot wait to round up America's 12 million illegal immigrants and send them home in cattle cars. As for the war on terrorism, it's hard to get to the right of Rudy, whose entire candidacy is based on his swaggering machismo and endless reminders that he is the Big Dog who helped New York survive 9/11. Mitt Romney took a stab at out-toughing Rudy by sharing with us his presidential dream to "double" Gitmo. But since even George W. Bush is talking about disbanding the facility, Romney's grand plan doesn't make him look manly so much as confused.

This is not to say that there aren't plenty of policy differences between the guys battling for the base. But we're talking here about pressure points that play on a visceral level with the God-fearing grassroots — meaning the issue needs to involve sex, drugs or rock n' roll. Barring that, the only thing left is to play the God card. Most of the electorate will snigger and roll their eyes and dismiss it as empty pandering. But many of the GOP faithful will know exactly what you're talking about and will share your doctrinal concerns. (As noted, the Southern Baptists' chief political spokesman and Fred Thompson groupie, Richard Land, has been lecturing Mitt Romney about the need to publicly address his Mormonism if he wants to win over evangelicals.)

Such divinely inspired whispering may not be enough to dramatically alter the landscape. But these guys are short on options. And at least the strategy makes for entertaining politics, as the rest of us sit back and watch the party of moral purity kneecap its own candidates in the name of God.
By Michelle Cottle
If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion and analysis

The New Republic
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by drputt45 August 7, 2007 4:30 PM EDT
Politicians are crooks and liars. Democrats and Republicans and Independents are Politicians, therefore Dems, Reps and Inds are crooks and liars. How can you ever tell the difference?
Reply to this comment
by condumism August 7, 2007 9:14 AM EDT
GOP: the USA's Military Industrial Complex Party
GOP: Practices the Ideology of Fascism
GOP: the me, myself, and I party
GOP: Israel over America Party
GOP: FEAR MONGERING Party
GOP: Contempt for the Laws of the USA
GOP: War on the American People
GOP: a Regional Southern Party of WHITE TRASH
GOP: Bought and paid for by CORPORATE AMERICA!
GOP: #1 reason USA dependent on foreign oil.
GOP: Policies create the SUV!
GOP: Marijuana the same drug as Heroin.
GOP: No oversight of BIG TOBACCO!
GOP: JUST SAY NO TO STEM CELLS RESEARCH!
GOP: the NEOCON NUTT CASE party!
GOP: "PEDOPHILES R US"
GOP: the "WE HATE YOUR FREEDOM" party
GOP: US Constitution only a piece of paper
GOP: Cronyism over competence!
GOP: 40 % prefer Nazi style GOV.
GOP: It's all Bill Clinton's fault
GOP: Support needless Military bases across USA!
GOP: Perjury/Obstruction of Justice Party!
GOP: Avg. IQ of less than 89!
GOP: Privitize Social Securuty!
GOP: $8.9 TRILLION National Debt!
GOP: $500 BILLION annual Interest on US Debt.
GOP: gets all news from FASCIST FOX News channel
GOP: NO Bid Contract Party
GOP: LLC (Limited Liablity Corporation) Zero Accountability Corporation!
GOP: USA's FRAUD, WASTE and ABUSE Party!
GOP: the one issue voter party.
GOP: Illegal Wiretaps of American's

PLEEZ CONDUMMIES, refute for any of US that you are not really the American Nazi Pary in disguise.
Reply to this comment
by rayuk-2009 August 7, 2007 1:19 AM EDT
The 28% who still support Bush must be totally Christian Right. Therefore, I can say with confidence:

If anyone of these poor fools make it thru the golden gates into heaven, the rest of us have nothing to worry about, guaranteed.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 August 6, 2007 11:42 PM EDT
The Republicans remind me of the old, "My dad can beat up your dad," routine, only in this case, it is my God can beat up your God.
They are pitiful, short-sighted, un-Christian like, and laughable.
Reply to this comment
by alienateddem August 6, 2007 7:48 PM EDT
No White House Wedding for Caroline Giuliani

AP Reports:

The daughter of Republican hopeful Rudy Giuliani has signaled she's backing Democrat Barack Obama for president.

According to her Facebook profile, Giuliani's 17-year-old daughter, Caroline, belonged to Democrat Barack Obama's Facebook group "Barack Obama (One Million Strong for Barack)." She left the group Monday morning after the online magazine Slate sent an inquiry.

Her profile can be viewed by Facebook users who have access to New York City's Trinity School or Harvard University networks. Caroline, who is Giuliani's daughter with his second wife, Donna Hanover, recently graduated from Trinity and will attend Harvard in the fall.

Slate posted a screen shot of her profile, which uses a slightly different last name. She lists herself as having liberal political views.

Giuliani, campaigning in Iowa, declined to comment on his daughter's political preference.


GOP-Americans want a White House Wedding. It doesn't appear that the Bush Twins will provide one. Therefore, it appears logical that the next GOP Presidential Candidate debate forum should include a discussion of whose daughters will remain faithful to the classic Family Values dog-and-pony-show.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug August 6, 2007 5:27 PM EDT
Edwards hair looked good and obama does have big ears even though they are not to be mentioned.
Posted by janem4

So the ideal candidate would have bad hair and small ears.
I will begin the search.
Should make a nice reality show.
Reply to this comment
by aaabee-2009 August 6, 2007 3:06 PM EDT
This is the most biased and inconsequential article I have read yet about the Republicans. How absurd and discriminatory" Posted by jack3213 at 08:58 AM : Aug 06, 2007

Is anyone as sick of moral hypocrisy as I am?

Why is any negativity about the GOP and its Christian base bias and inconsequential? There are valid points in this article.

Rush Limbaugh and company are just as bias and inconsequential, but they continue on with no squack from Jack3213 and the other 28%.

Mr. Thompson's Christianity is a matter between him and God, not the GOP. This is what happens when a relationship with God is reduced to 1-hour Christianity on Sundays and on Monday, back to business as usual, where God plays no part in one's life other than a face mask over the usual human evils.

Pretty soon we will all be praying to the new trinity: Dobson,Limbaugh,and the Holy GOP.

Judge not, unless you are a Republican? The Chistian Right needs to be playing this game with higher standards and morals than the average man. But they are by far the least forgiving, the least humble, the least servitude-spirited. Dobson leads the wolf-pack, bearing his cross and his moral millions down to the wide gate.

Republicans need to remember something about removing the plank in their own eye before removing the speck in their brother's eye. And before you jumb on me, they are the ones who claim to speak for God, liberals do not.
Reply to this comment
by tejasdemo August 6, 2007 3:05 PM EDT
Republicans are crooks and liars.
Reply to this comment
by random_radar August 6, 2007 2:54 PM EDT
If there were a possibility of a Republican candidate winning the election, then people would be anxious to rally around a reasonable candidate. But since the election will be won by a Democrat, then people feel free to wage a partisan fight over who ought to be approved. If you know you are going to lose, you might as well battle for idealogical purity as a pyric victory.
Reply to this comment
by elz523 August 6, 2007 2:34 PM EDT
So, lib pundits, how would you call that? Thisis so typical and comical. See, all of them are a comedy and not very divine. The whole pack of them. And by the way, I thought hill looked a bit dowdy in her pink jacket at the snowman debate.
Edwards hair looked good and obama does have big ears even though they are not to be mentioned.
Posted by janem4 at 06:49 AM : Aug 06, 2007

Hey Janem4, this came from the New Republic who tends to fry both sides. What you want to read, if there is only one point of view that you wish to view, is the vacous garbage that comes from the National Review. CBS posts its fair share of that con rag everyday.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook