February 11, 2009 4:27 PM

Search For Answers In Bridge Collapse

(CBS/AP)  Federal transportation officials arrived in Minneapolis on Thursday to begin investigating the deadly collapse of an interstate bridge into the Mississippi River.

The Homeland Security Department said the collapse did not appear to be terrorism-related, but Hennepin County Sheriff Richard Stanek said the cause was still unknown.

"All indications are that it was a collapse, not an act of someone doing it," Stanek said.

The first step of the federal investigation will be to recover pieces of the bridge and reassemble them, kind of like a jigsaw puzzle, to try and determine what happened, NTSB Chairman Mark Rosenker said.

Investigators also want to review video of the collapse, and were setting up a phone number for witnesses to call with information.

"It is clearly much too early in the initial stages of this investigation to have any idea what happened," Rosenker said.

But speculation was already beginning into what may have caused the eight-lane Interstate 35W bridge to buckle and collapse during the evening rush hour Wednesday

"It's hard to be conclusive so early, but it looks like the main support, the main steel arch, may have given way or something right near it," Richard Stehly, an expert in bridge engineering and co-founder of St. Paul, Minn.-based American Engineering Testing, told CBS News Anchor Katie Couric. "Also, the things that support the main arch, the foundations on either bank, perhaps they did. But investigators will look at everything. They will look at the materials. They will look at all the pieces of debris. And they'll find out the cause, because we need to learn the reason for its failure."

Inspections as far back as 2000 on the bridge identified both corrosion in the steel and a lot of cracking, says Stehly.

Questions are also being raised about a 2005 report in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory which rated the bridge as "structurally deficient" and possibly in need of replacement.

The report said there were fatigued details on the main truss and floor truss system. Yet it concluded there was no need to prematurely replace the bridge because of fatigue cracking, avoiding the high cost associated with such a large project.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty said Thursday that there was no indication from that and other reviews that the bridge should be shut down.

"There are 80,000 bridges in the United States with that designation," Pawlenty told Couric. "Neither the federal officials nor the state officials who did the inspection indicated the bridge needed to be replaced immediately. It was something they foresaw in approximately 2020.

"Clearly, there was fatigue, but it wasn't uncommon and not unlike many bridges," Pawlenty said. "And the inspectors who looked at the bridge, actually looked at the bridge, indicated there was no need for dramatic intervention. In other words it could be monitored and dealt with. They did not call for the closure of the bridge. Had they done that the bridge would have been closed immediately."

Pawlenty ordered an immediate inspection of all bridges in the state with similar designs.

Former NTSB chairman James Burnett was in Minneapolis when the tragedy happened. He told CBS Early Show co-anchor Hannah Storm the 2005 report "does not necessarily mean there was safety inadequacy of the bridge. There are other types of structural deficiency that may not necessarily mean there's an immediate safety problem."

The I-35W bridge, a major Minneapolis artery, was in the midst of being repaired and two lanes in each direction were closed when the bridge collapsed.

Burnett said NTSB inspectors will be looking at the inspection reports of the bridge and "examining the bridge itself and particularly the metal portions to see if reports of fatigue cracking were, in fact, accurate, and whether there was any factor that might have caused those cracks to promulgate more quickly than had been projected. They'll be looking to see if there had been any external damage to the bridge, and also whether or not the construction process may have contributed, even by vibration, to the bridge failure."

Burnett said that in the 25 years he's been following transportation safety, there have been about five interstate bridge collapses.

"Bridge collapses averaging once every five years would be not as frequent, or more frequent, than we're having plane crashes," he said.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by missmead August 3, 2007 10:24 PM EDT
Of course president Bush is not directly responsible for the bridge collapse. He should not even receive a large part of the blame, but he has failed us. He decided to fight the wrong war. He is off spreading democracy to countries that do not really want it.
Anyone who attended the ninth grade should know that if we do not know our history we are doomed to repeat it. The only country that the U.S. reminds me of is Roman Empire. Both of our nations are the only ones to ever place our hands on our hearts. We both feel the need to spread democracy even if it is by force.
I cannot remember what brought down the great nation of the Roman Empire, but I do know that their infrustructure went first.
Reply to this comment
by wilsale August 3, 2007 9:57 PM EDT

Dr. Hamid Saadatmanesh Professor of Civil Engineering from the University of Arizona statement regarding the I-35W Bridge Collapse:

These type of fatigue cracks are the most likely cause of the bridge failure. I have developed a unique solution for strengthening of this type of bridge with composites at a fraction of the cost and time that it will take to do a conventional repair. The repair not only is more cost effective, but also is more technically sound as compared to current technology. To the best of my knowledge, no one else has done this type of work that I have done. Furthermore, I received a NSF grant to do this work and I have received the year's best paper award from the ASCE in 2001 for this work.

Credentials:

EDUCATION
Ph.D. in Structural Engineering, August 1986, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.


2001, The year%u2019s Best Paper in Basic Research, Journal of Composites for Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers, Tavakolizadeh, M., and Saadatmanesh, H.,%u201D Galvanic Corrosion of Carbon Composites and Steel In Seawater and Deicing Salt Solutions,%u201D Journal of Composites for Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.5, No.3, August 2001, pp. 200-210.



Reply to this comment
by rushman71 August 3, 2007 12:20 PM EDT
infidel_us: my bad, didn't see that you put Waco down.
Reply to this comment
by rushman71 August 3, 2007 12:17 PM EDT
infidel_us: don't forget the Branch Davidians back in 93 when Bill "Free my Willy" Clinton was just in office!!!
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us August 3, 2007 11:36 AM EDT
HOW many of these people CUT funding for the Highways? Posted by MCVet at 07:18 PM : Aug 02, 2007

Here's another *******. Show mw where Bush "cut funding for highways", you moron. Liberal democrats are as much of an enemy to America as islamo-fascist terrorists.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us August 3, 2007 11:33 AM EDT
We are able to blame Bush for this disaster, because he is responsiblePosted by barbaraf4 at 08:17 AM : Aug 03, 2007

What a total *******. So, CLinton was to blame for the USS Cole, Waco, WTC '93, etc., etc. It's a shame that idiots like this have the right to vote.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 August 3, 2007 11:17 AM EDT
"Well said thgdriver
I agree, as much as I dislike Bush, how can he possibly be blamed for this?" Posted by ozone-baby
~~~
We are able to blame Bush for this disaster, because he is responsible, until he is able to find a flunkie to blame. He is responsible for everything that happens to this country while he is President. If he is not capable of doing his job, then we need to impeach him and remove him from office.
Reply to this comment
by rocketman454 August 3, 2007 1:46 AM EDT
I think a key structural link gave way to corrosion. This bridge apparently see's much salt every winter and that salt can seep into bolt assemblies and corrode them nearly all the way thru with little or no indication on the surface. Each time the structurs are sand blasted and re-painted their is no visible way to see inside the bolt hole so they simply get painted over. Salt corrosion can bring down ocean liners, aircraft and yes bridges.
Reply to this comment
by jack773 August 2, 2007 11:35 PM EDT
There is, or should be, plenty of money for road maintenance which includes bridges from road use taxes. These are taxes from car and personal license fees, taxes on tires,gas and oil, etc., which used to be dedicated solely to roads. It was perhaps the only truly fair tax we ever had, those who used the roads indirectly paid for them. But then, a long while back, the Feds and the States got into these formerly "exclusive" funds, and dumped them into their general funds. This meant that they could apportion any amount they wanted to roads in spite of the fact that the roads were really paying for themselves. Consequently what has happened with that money is an incredible growth in beaurocracy since the designated road funds were redirected. Face it America. Instead of fixing that bridge you now have a full time bereavement counselor at your seven year old's school, which I guess is necessary when Mom goes down on a bad bridge.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet August 2, 2007 10:22 PM EDT
I agree, as much as I dislike Bush, how can he possibly be blamed for this? Yes, the reports showed damage, just like any structure of that age would. But do you honestly believe that the powers that be would let people drive on it if they thought for one minute this would happen? I don't think so. I am not always in support of politicians and the things they try to get by with but I do think this was just "one of those fluke things" that unfortunately happen in the world.
Posted by ozone-baby at 05:21 PM : Aug 02, 2007

No it isn't just Bush but the whole NeoCon mentality all the way back to Reagan. EVERY SINGLE YEAR that a Fascist has been in the White House those funds have been CUT. Yep, check the record Sparky, EVERY SINGLE YEAR a Fascist was in the White House they FAILED to properly fund the Highway System and it's been falling apart ever since. It's right there in the Congressional Record, repair funds were cut so tax cut's to fund the Trickle Down Economics could be had. READ the RECORD SPARKY!! Sieg Heil Y'all.
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook