Bridges Under Scrutiny As Minn. Mourns
As Many As 30 People Still Missing In Wake Of I-35W Bridge Collapse; At Least 4 Dead, 79 Injured
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Eye To Eye: Bridge Collapse
Survivors, witnesses and rescuers talk about the tragedy and heroism after the I-35W bridge crumpled into the Mississippi River in Minneapolis.
-
Video
Collapse Leaves Hard Questions
The bridge collapse in Minneapolis has left people waiting for news of their loved ones amid questions about why a bridge with known structural problems was not closed. Katie Couric reports.
-
Video
School Bus Survivors
All 61 passengers on a school bus that was on a Minneapolis bridge when it collapsed survived. They recount their close call and the heroics of a counselor to Tracy Smith.
-
-
(TwinCities.com)"/>
Photo
Friends pray together in Gold Medal Park, near the scene of the I-35W bridge collapse. "We don't understand it," says Kelly Hoadley (third from left), "but we still feel God is in control." (TwinCities.com) (AP/PioneerPress/Richard Marshall)
-
Photo
As recovery work continues at the scene of the bridge collapse, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters has called on all states to immediately inspect 756 bridges with the same type of truss design. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
-
Photo
Divers are continuing the meticulous and hazardous work of scouring the Mississippi River for submerged vehicles and cars, with as many as 30 people still missing. (AP Photo/Brad C. Paulson)
-
Photo
Prayers for the dead, the missing, and their loved ones, at St. Olaf's Cathedral in Minneapolis, which was also a community gathering place in other historic times of tragedy, including the JFK assassination. (AP/PioneerPress/RichardMarshall)
-
Photo
A makeshift shrine in memory of Artemio Trinidad-Mena, at the produce company where he worked, in south Minneapolis, Aug. 2, 2007. Trinidad-Mena was killed in the bridge collapse. (TwinCities.com) (AP/Pioneer Press/ScottTakushi)
-
-
Interactive
Span Of The Disaster
Photos, video and a look at the Minneapolis bridge that collapsed during rush hour
-
Photo Essay
Twin Cities Bridge Collapse
A major bridge suddenly turned into a scene of horror as it collapsed into the Mississippi River.
As divers search the river for submerged vehicles and bodies trapped beneath the twisted debris of the I-35W bridge, finger-pointing has already begun over a federal report two years ago that found the bridge was "structurally deficient."
Several teams of investigators are examining the evidence on what may have caused the eight-lane Interstate 35W bridge to buckle and collapse.
"It's hard to be conclusive so early, but it looks like the main support, the main steel arch, may have given way or something right near it," Richard Stehly, an expert in bridge engineering and co-founder of St. Paul, Minn.-based American Engineering Testing, told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric.
"Also, the things that support the main arch, the foundations on either bank, perhaps they did. But investigators will look at everything. They will look at the materials. They will look at all the pieces of debris. And they'll find out the cause, because we need to learn the reason for its failure."
Inspections as far back as 2000 on the bridge identified both corrosion in the steel and a lot of cracking, says Stehly.
Questions are also being raised about a 2005 report in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory that rated the bridge as "structurally deficient" and possibly in need of replacement.
The report said there were fatigued details on the main truss and floor truss system. Yet it concluded there was no need to prematurely replace the bridge because of fatigue cracking, avoiding the high cost associated with such a large project.
When the bridge was built 40 years ago, it was state of the art, a massive steel arch spanning the Mississippi. But the bridge was designed without the extra support common to later designs, which meant that if one component failed, the whole bridge was likely to fall, reported CBS station WCCO-TV in Minneapolis.
Federal officials alerted states Thursday to immediately inspect all bridges similar to the Minneapolis bridge that collapsed.
President Bush, who will travel to the scene of the disaster on Saturday, said the federal government would help rebuild the bridge in the city that will host next year's Republican National Convention.
"We in the federal government must respond, and respond robustly, to help the people there not only recover, but to make sure that lifeline of activity — that bridge — gets rebuilt as quickly as possible," Mr. Bush said.
Still stung by harsh criticism of the government's sluggish response to Hurricane Katrina, Mr. Bush talked with state and local officials in Minnesota, and the administration dispatched officials to the scene.
The House Transportation Committee quickly approved legislation Thursday that would direct $250 million to Minnesota to help it replace the bridge.
The White House said a U.S. inspection of the 40-year-old bridge in 2005 found problems. The Interstate 35W span rated 50 on a scale of 100 for structural stability and was classified as "structurally deficient," transportation officials said.
The designation means some portions of the bridge needed to be scheduled for repair or replacement, and it was on a schedule for inspection every two years. "It didn't mean that the bridge is unsafe," Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 232 CommentsBRANDY C.
COLUMBUS, OHIO
The bridge construction is item #6 on the MNDOT pdf list of Minneapolis construction projects, listed as "Bridge repair, concrete rehabilitation..." I don't know for sure if parts of the concrete deck were removed, cut, or weakened during this repair work, but my theory is that the lane restrictions caused an unbalanced load and the trusses were loaded eccentrically and had a torsion component. The bridge repairs may have disconnected the deck diaphragm from the top chord of the trusses, leaving the top chord, which was in compression, unbraced at a local segment of the truss. The vibration of the train combined with the torsional load and the unbraced top chord may have caused the top chord to have buckled and failed in one spot creating a hinge in the entire truss. The way the bridge pieces are laying on the ground it kind of looks like a lateral torsional failure of the truss as a whole... it looks like the center of the bridge moved quite far in the lateral/horizontal direction.
Ammermantm, you're right.
Besides, this bridge should have been replaced YEARS ago.
It's Clinton's fault!!
...
This bridge was built in 1967...Bush wasn't president in 1967.
Are all liberals as ignorant as you?????
...
This bridge was built in 1967...Bush wasn't president in 1967.
Are all liberals as ignorant as you?????
...
Sweet. All you have to do is have a bridge fall down, and Bush suddenly gives a hoot about the nation's infrastructure.
I bet you if a couple of jets get lost on the nation's air traffic control system and collide, he'll give a hoot about that part of our crumbling infrastructure, too.
Must be a Republican thing; don't ever plan ahead for worst case scenarios, and whenever possible don't plan ahead at all.
When the muslim world see's they succeded, it only inflames thier patriotism....good for recruiting suicide idiots for the next attacks...
they are spending 40 billion a year for keeping up with bridges and roadways already
maybe we should spend another 100 billions, eh?
How much is enough, gotta get rational here.
Posted by Ammermantm
Oooooh, not so fast:
"The bridge was rated as "structurally deficient" 2 years ago and possibly in need of replacement. The deficiency rating is from a complex formula. A score of 80 percent or less indicates some rehabilitation may be needed; a 50 percent score or less indicates replacement may be in order. The bridge was rated at 50 percent.
The data also summarize the bridge's status as "structurally deficient." Bridge components are ranked on a scale of 0 to 9, with 0 being "failed" and 9 being "excellent."
In 2005, the bridge's superstructure was rated at 4. The bridge's deck was rated 5, and the substructure, comprised of the piers, abutments, footings and other components, was rated 6. The report noted "many poor fatigue details" and said certain members of the main truss should be inspected every two years. In addition, the report said, certain sections of the floor trusses had high stress areas that should be inspected every six months.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty said Wednesday night that the bridge was inspected in 2005 and 2006." http://www.startribune.com/10204/story/1338970.html
But what they fail to mention is that Gov Tim Pawlenty cut the MNDOT budget for inspections. They might have inspected the bridges, but it was a shortened version of the standard tests.
Second: why are we having a ground breaking for a new stadium that we dont need when there are bridges falling into water??? we should be taking that money that the tax payers are spending (tax payers who my guess drive more then go to baseball games) and use it to make them safer so they don't die on the way to baseball games. for any minnesotan right now this is a very hard time and the government talking about re-schedualing the ground breaking isn't making it any easier. stop the groud break all together and spend the money on something we NEED not something we dont! we need to feel safe in our state and if we can't feel safe then i am going to guess no one is going want to go to any games no matter how nice the stadium is.
Thank you
Are all liberals as ignorant as you?????"
Posted by processor2
What does the date the bridge was built have to do with maintenance over the last 7 years, other than to suggest that maintenance might be due on a 40 year old bridge.
Are all Bushits as stupid as you?
Posted by pwrslm
Sort of the way the Bushit administration uses attacks to inflame the patriotism of some not-too-bright righties in the USA?
Posted by global_chick
You're right, it isn't Bush's fault. He's just the current poster boi of the right wing fascists who began decades ago running their hoe corporate funded politicians for office who proclaimed their hatred for government. They systematically began deregulating, privatizing and selling off representative democracy to the highest bidders. Our infrastructure has held up for several years due to a once strong american legacy and now that strength is weakening while the private pockets of an ever shrinking number of piggies are walking off with the booty.
That is the Republican modus operandi, isn't it? Offer condolences to the victims and their families after the fact, instead of doing anything to prevent or abate the catastrophe?
9/11, Katrina, Iraq, Tillman, this bridge in Minnesota..same Republican line every single time:
"we're really sorry, and it wasn't our fault."
Posted by global_chick
I'd also add. If it weren't for the loony left a civil society wouldn't exist and people like yourself would be eaten alive or totally pimped off because you certainly wouldn't be at the top of the sociopathic food chain of the right wing.
Posted by global_chick
So I take it being so upstanding as you must be you have spoken out against the horrific trash that Rush Limboob, Ann Coultergeist and the myriad of other fascist haters have spewed out for decades. Global you ain't ....Europeans would kick your sorry a*ss
They only are interested in running the Department of MakeMeRicher, and the Department of EverythingElse can go to he11 for all they care.
They're just like little kids that want to eat the cake but don't want to do any of the work of making the cake or cleaning up the dishes after.
"A report card two years ago from the American Society of Civil Engineers said that 34 percent of major roads are in poor or mediocre condition."
But would the Republicans pay any attention to such news? What, and run the risk of losing their tax cuts so America could return to funding its infrastructure maintenance?
Hah.
Hmmm? Well.... I think we should fix our bridges first before fixing any in Iran.
The poor souls posting here afflicted with Bush Derangement Syndrome should be put out of their misery - and America's.
My advice to them: get involved in your community and volunteer for something that keeps you from dwelling on evil, twisted thoughts and actually *helps* those who live around around you.
"Questions are also being raised about a 2005 report in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory which rated the bridge as 'structurally deficient.'"
very well said! i agree
Between bush's war and his billionaire tax cuts, there's nothing left to invest in the infrastructure that keeps us alive and allows our economy to work.
Posted by global_chick at 01:21 PM : Aug 02, 2007
It is so much more civilized to let the baby be born in some unknown state of health due to defunding of prenatal nutrition plans, and then let it starve to death due to cutbacks in WIC and so on, or let it die of some horrid, crippling disease in early childhood because there was no health insurance to save it.
Why?
Because if the baby dies after it is born...this is where the right-wingers among the Republicans always lose me.
Maintaining infrastructure costs money.
There is a whole segment of America's population that believes it is rational to think that if a bridge, for instance, is not on their daily commute then they shouldn't be taxed to build or maintain it.
The most powerful of them get back and forth via their personal helicopters..and so bridges that fall down are your problem, not theirs.
Regardless of the fact that it was the nation's infrastructure that built the economy that enabled them or their parents to get rich in the first place...
I am curious how they get to the definition "structurally deficient" this was known by someone important and instead of fixing the structure of this bridge they were resurfacing it. so to that means "structurally deficient" is not taken too seriously.
-Posted by motherjones at 01:33 PM : Aug 02, 2007
A perfect example of my previous point. As wacky as the American left is, you really have to give credit where credit is due - they're great entertainers!
Now check out this post:
"It is so much more civilized to let the baby be born in some unknown state of health due to defunding of prenatal nutrition plans, and then let it starve to death due to cutbacks in WIC and so on, or let it die of some horrid, crippling disease in early childhood because there was no health insurance to save it."
-Posted by ibsteve2u at 01:37 PM : Aug 02, 2007
Wow! So WE can decide another human's fate, based on whether or not WE think that child will have a good quality of life. I have a child with a pretty serious disability, and it was known about before her birth. She is one of the happiest kids I've ever met - her physical state doesn't even matter to her. She loves life that much.
well of COURSE she declined tosay what the agency has done about other bridges with defects, the fact that this one COLLAPSED says exactly what they have done- exactly ZERO.
That%u2019s sarcasm%u2026.could you smell it?
-Posted by ibsteve2u at 01:51 PM : Aug 02, 2007
No - a Michael Moore fan.
Posted by mike71067
First, I am happy for you and your child.
However, I would point out that if you have ever used any government-funded medical, nutrition, or educational program to benefit your child then, in the eyes of those on the far right, you are a member of the left - and in the eyes of the left, you are difficult to understand.
If you've gotten by solely via a corporate health care plan, you are fortunate - and a rare American in this day and age.
If you've gotten by just on your personal wealth, you are fortunate, indeed. And that would explain your perspective.
I hope they do a VERY thorough Investigation into what happened... Such a tragedy
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 232 Comments