February 11, 2009 4:27 PM

Obama Vows To Hunt Terrorists In Pakistan

(CBS/AP)  Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday that he would send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists even without local permission if warranted — an attempt to show strength when his chief rival has described his foreign policy skills as naive.

The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf that he must do more to shut down terrorist operations in his country and evict foreign fighters under an Obama presidency, or Pakistan will risk a U.S. troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. military aid.

"Let me make this clear," Obama said in a speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."

Obama's speech comes the week after his rivalry with New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton erupted into a public fight over their diplomatic intentions.

Obama said he would be willing to meet leaders of rogue states like Cuba, North Korea and Iran without conditions, an idea that Clinton criticized as irresponsible and naive. Obama responded by using the same words to describe Clinton's vote to authorize the Iraq war and called her "Bush-Cheney lite."

Asked how he will fight back against allegations that he is inexperienced when he is, in fact, coming into the race without a lot of experience on a national level, Obama told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson: "I'm less concerned with fighting images. I'm concerned about getting policy right."

The big question is whether such tough talk and policy speeches are enough to make Americans elect a relative novice, reports Attkisson. In a new national poll, Hillary Clinton widened her lead over Obama, with voters citing experience as one of her best attributes.

Obama's comments touched on an area of growing concern among members of both parties and the national security establishment about the resurgence of al Qaeda's organization in Pakistan, reports CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. Obama will likely be criticized by some for threatening to send troops into a nuclear-armed Muslim nation without its cooperation. But the tough talk highlights the growing concern about al Qaeda's growing threat to the U.S. homeland and puts Obama out in front of a popular goal — capturing or killing the terrorist group's leadership.

Thousands of Taliban fighters are based in Pakistan's vast and jagged mountains, where they can pass into Afghanistan, train for suicide operations and find refuge from local tribesmen. Intelligence experts warn that al Qaeda could be rebuilding to mount another attack on the United States.

Musharraf has been a key ally of Washington in fighting terrorism since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, but has faced accusations from some quarters in Pakistan of being too closely tied to America.

The Bush administration has supported Musharraf and stressed the need to cooperate with Pakistan, but lately administration officials have suggested the possibility of military strikes to deal with al Qaeda and its leader, Osama bin Laden.

Analysts say an invasion could risk destabilizing Pakistan, breeding more militancy and undermining Musharraf. The Pakistani Foreign Office, protective of its national sovereignty, has warned that U.S. military action would violate international law and be deeply resented.

A military invasion could be risky, given Pakistan's hostile terrain and the suspicion of its warrior-minded tribesmen against uninvited outsiders.

Congress passed legislation Friday that would tie aid from the United States to Islamabad's efforts to stop al Qaeda and the Taliban from operating in its territory. President Bush has yet to sign it.

Obama's speech was a condemnation of President Bush's leadership in the war on terror. He said the focus on Iraq has left Americans in more danger than before Sept. 11, and that Bush has misrepresented the enemy as Iraqis who are fighting a civil war instead of the terrorists responsible for the attacks six years ago.

"He confuses our mission," Obama said, then he spread responsibility to lawmakers like Clinton who voted for the invasion. "By refusing to end the war in Iraq, President Bush is giving the terrorists what they really want, and what the Congress voted to give them in 2002: a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences."

Obama said that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and putting them "on the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." He said he would send at least two more brigades to Afghanistan and increase nonmilitary aid to the country by $1 billion.

He also said he would create a three-year, $5 billion program to share intelligence with allies worldwide to take out terrorist networks from Indonesia to Africa.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by wiccantexan August 1, 2007 3:23 PM EDT
Obama, Obama. This is NOT the way to win friends and influence people. Bad move.
Reply to this comment
by cozzicon August 1, 2007 3:09 PM EDT
"Oh, and he doesn't mind impinging on the sovereignty of Pakistain. Amazing. Watch him get a pass. Oh, RamaLamaObama, you truly are black majic."-- Posted by mudrose

Ya, like we respected sovereignty anywhere else?

Learn how to spell Pakistan you idiot.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup August 1, 2007 3:09 PM EDT
"I LOVE THIS MAN!" bluestardad

Aren't you the idiot that lost a relative in Iraq, and want us out of there? Seems to me, you are also the guy that wanted to re-activate your commission, and your son and daughter joined up, but now you want out of Iraq. And, you love this man ?

I see. The difference is, he is a Democrat. So, while he MIGHT be right in this case - let's all ask the questions we are asking the President right now: What is your exit plan ? How much will this cost in the way of lives ? Are we being lied to ?

You liberals JUST DON'T LEARN do you ? Take some responsibility, will you!
Reply to this comment
by gunshack1 August 1, 2007 3:08 PM EDT
Heck yes, get us in a war with Pakistan. Why not? There may be a few countries over there that don't hate us yet. We can't have that. With any luck maybe we can get India to support us in this endeavor. They don't like Pakistan anyway.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 August 1, 2007 3:03 PM EDT
With all due respect, he's right and you are all wrong.

guyfrompa45,

Al Quaeda in Iraq is a minor subsidiary of Al Quaeda in pakastan/Afghanistan. The people who attacked us on September 11 are there, that's where we need to focus our resources if we truly want to wage the real war on terror.

Your collective responses prove that you're the ones who are all talk!

mudrose,

We didn't wait for the government of Iraq to invite us in. We've given Musharif 6 years to do the job, he has no intention of doing so. Meanwhile, our "leading ally in the war on terror" allows the father of the Islamic bomb(Khan)who gave the supplied the axis of evil with its nukes to walk the streets freely. Some ally.

infidel_US,

I'm proud to defend his remarks, it's what i've been saying all along. He's the only candidate in either party to have the balls or ovaries to say what needs to be said. If Musharif is listening, no action by us will be needed.

Vastr-WCon,

What's been so great about the Rumsfeld-Cheney experience? What's more desparate than the surge in Iraq?

It's not war-mongering in the midst of a war to say, let's fight the right war.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad August 1, 2007 3:00 PM EDT
I LOVE THIS MAN!
Reply to this comment
by dargay August 1, 2007 2:55 PM EDT
Obama will flee Iraq and invade Pakistan? this fool learned nothing from American military debacles in iraq.
Reply to this comment
by grumpas August 1, 2007 2:51 PM EDT
He doesn't sound much better than what's in the White House! He is only playing into a lot George Bush's inane ideas. Terrorism is never going to get solved until our leaders get it though their heads you don't fight terrorism with the Military! Until they start doing like what was done with the first World Trade Center bombing and law enforcement start going after these people and bring them to justice.
Reply to this comment
by vastr-wcon August 1, 2007 2:49 PM EDT
This article illustrates the dangers of having such an ignorant, inexperienced and desperate person running for president.

With the shady real-estate deals with his Partner-in-Crime Rezko and his hypocritical efforts for lobbyists to get $12 Million in special tax breaks for favored businesses, BO has become the poster-boy for the Culture of Corruption. Add to that his war-wongering, he is a person to drop from consideration for any elected office.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us August 1, 2007 2:49 PM EDT
Your "boy" just shot himself in the foot. I can hardly wait to see you libs justify these remarks!!!!! LOL

He's really the "War President", isn't he? If you ask me, he's a pandering loser.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook