WASHINGTON, Aug. 1, 2007
Senate Panel OKs FDA Regulation Of Tobacco
Landmark Bill Would Require FDA To Restrict Ads, Regulate Warning Labels And Remove Hazardous Ingredients
-
Play CBS Video Video Senate Panel OK's Tobacco Bill In what could be a major shake-up for Big Tobacco, the full Senate will consider a landmark law that would change the way cigarettes are made and advertised in the U.S. Nancy Cordes reports.
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Photo Essay Smoking Bans Some breathe deeply while others fume as tough anti-smoking rules catch on.
-
Timeline Tobacco Road Review a history of the tobacco industry, court battles and smoking's health risks.
The bill, approved 13-8 by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, would require the Food and Drug Administration to restrict tobacco advertising, regulate warning labels and remove hazardous ingredients.
The agency also would be given the authority to set standards for products that tobacco companies advertise as "reduced risk" products.
"There are close to 70 known cancer-causing agents in tobacco products, Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, told CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes. "Today no one has the authority to tell a tobacco company to take any of them out."
"This is an enormous step forward," said Myers. "This could end up being the signature public health action this Congress takes."
The bill has broad bipartisan support in the Senate, where more than 50 senators have signed on as co-sponsors. A similar bill passed the chamber in 2004 but was blocked in the House.
The tobacco legislation was crafted through several years of negotiations led by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., involving health groups and tobacco giant Philip Morris, which broke from its competitors to endorse FDA regulation.
The bill would allow the FDA to reduce the amount of nicotine in cigarettes, but only Congress could permanently ban them.
Misleading terms like "light," "mild" or "low tar" would also have to be eliminated, reports Cordes.
The committee adopted an amendment by Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., that would ban clove cigarettes, reversing a controversial decision by Kennedy to allow the FDA to make that decision.
Kennedy, the panel's chairman, said he was responding to several senators who contacted him with concerns that a ban on cloves would not be compliant with World Trade Organization rules. But Kennedy agreed to the ban after several senators objected.
Most cloves are marketed in Asia, and Philip Morris, a unit of New York-based Altria Group Inc., recently launched a Marlboro cigarette flavored with cloves in Indonesia.
Kennedy said at the meeting that Philip Morris had "nothing to do with our decision" and he supported the clove ban as long as it is WTO compliant.
Phillip Morris argues the bill would "bring predictability and clear standards to the tobacco industry," an industry that over the past decade has been besieged by lawsuits and public resentment, reports Cordes.
Philip Morris' competitors are strongly opposed to the overall bill, saying it would lock in Philip Morris's dominant market share. The panel rejected several amendments by Republican Sen. Richard Burr, who represents R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in his home state of North Carolina. Kennedy said Burr's amendments would undermine the legislation.
After the hearing, Burr said he would not rule out trying to hold up the bill on the Senate floor.
Enzi, the top Republican on the panel, also opposes the legislation and has objected to Philip Morris' involvement.
"If this bill is good for big tobacco, how can it be good for public health?" Enzi asked after the hearing. "The fact is, it can't. This bill is nothing more than a 'Marlboro Protection Act,' written to keep Philip Morris at the top of the tobacco market."
Enzi has introduced his own bill that would aim to greatly shrink the size of the tobacco market over the next 20 years.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
More From Health
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 46 CommentsReading your posts indicates almost all, if not all of your family members suffering some debilitating illness, and yourself several.
Have you ever considered you may be living in a "love Canal" type polluted hot spot, and that smoking may be only a minor contributor to your family's many illnesses? I seem to remember a post from you even alleging abusive relatives, this might be a "Hatfield- McCoy" type of inherited genetic disturbance.
Even counting for genetic predisposition, you family seems to suffer an extraordinary amount and variety of serious health issues, perhaps documenting them all might qualify your family for free health care at a research facility, I think doctors would be very interested in your family...
"Kennedy, the panel's chairman, said he was responding to several senators who contacted him with concerns that a ban on cloves would not be compliant with World Trade Organization rules. But Kennedy agreed to the ban after several senators objected."
Ban on cloves? At best this is insanity, now your thanksgiving turkey is illegal if you tack on the pineapple slices with cloves, which pretty much covers everyone who prepares it. Also your next can of coca cola is now illegal, as its primary flavoring ingredient besides sugar, is clove from Madagascar.
America has no clove industry, the clove is a tropical plant, so since when does the FDA control the spice trade, and since when has clove been a drug subject to FDA regulation?...
My room mate ,56 used to smoke and like Scotty was mindful of others. In 00 he had his first of 5 heart attacks,has diabetes now does the shots,copd,can't sleep that well.His people got him smoking at a young age. He quit cold turkey.
I know the car is nasty ,what comes out the tapl pike. I cough awful when they pass me as does a burning cigerette. It is ban in our home. I am 52 and hate 2rd hand smoke I choose not to smoke.
We've actually done very well, while socialist Utopias like the USSR and Cuba have reverted into third-world countries.
Uh? Russia is more like a 2nd world country, with a far more educated populace than the USA has ever had. They have their problems, for sure, but their culture outshines America anyday of the week. They are atheist's. but far more christian as a whole than America could ever dream of becoming. Same with Ukraine, Belarus, and the Baltic Republics. And yes, American's are dumber than nails, and now clearly the most pathetic, cultureless society on the planet. How do you like being the most hated people on earth? You likely are without a clue, and as most condumbs, I'm certain that you could care less.
It is these chemicals which have been causing so much lung damage and seriously effecting passive smokers. Do it and Do it Now, it's long overdue.
Posted by downtowner97 at 07:17 PM : Aug 01, 2007"
And I suppose you're the model of human health and fitness right? Perfect condition, no body fat, no illnesses ever, don't even need innoculations?
I started smoking when I joined the Navy, and I've had less doctor's visits since then (over 20 years ago) than most 1 year olds today. Tell me how I'm raising your insurance costs?
Get off the holier than thou garbage. Your glass house isn't immune. EVERY type of doctor's or hospital visit raises health insurance...because guess what...the INDUSTRY ITSELF raises health insurance to pocket more of everybody's money. Smokers pay a higher premium for health insurance than non-smokers, so cry somewhere else.
Bothers me at times to smell people who overdose on cologn and perfume that I don't like...ban the industry!!
Nicotine? It will not be outlawed because the addictive drug has the support of Republicans.
There is no room for government theft of corporate profits in the free-market. That behavior is more like socialism or communism.
The Scum that you are trying to protect known as Big Tobacco hav raised the amount of highly addictive nicotine in cigs by 30%, with ZERO OVERSIGHT! Tobacco products serve NO PURPOSE anywhere on earth, except to enrich the pockets of the Fascists Southern Hypocrits that control the Repuglicon Party. American's have had enough of these unrestricted free markets. It is past due time to level the playing field and protect the dumber than nails American consumer from these Fascist Scumbags: aka: the Repuglicon Party of Liars and Thieves.
Vote Barack Obama for PResident: the only candidate to declare that he will ban all Corporat and Foreign Lobbyists from the Halls of Congress! Until this is done, America will remain a land of self-centered fools.
I think everyone involved in the clove ban has lost their minds.
When I moved to rural North Carolina 10 years ago the golden leaf was everywhere. Since the buyout, it's harder to find it on tobacco road than Seven-Pesos.
These days it's grown abroad.
kpokey,
Good point. When they did have the quota buyout it was quite interesting to see that the majority of the quota holders receiving the buyouts weren't mom and pop farmers but huge corporations and many of the same Congressmen who are ******** about regulation now.
Colombia? Afghanistan? Nope, the USA!
Tobacco should be more illegal than pot, by far. It does 100 times the damage, ruins lives, kills millions, but THOSE POOR VIRGINIA DRUG GROWERS (who pay off Repugs and Dems alike).
Regulate tobacco and nicotine the same way as other addictive narcotics, and it would be in Schedule I with the heroin.
Nothing is more phony than the "Drug War" so beloved of neocons. The US government makes trillions off the addiction of tobacco slaves.
Prohibition will never work!
www.leap.cc
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Posted by GunOwnerDan
Gee, you would think that the government would learn that from experience, but its beyond a learning issue. The powers that run Tobacco and Alchohol lobbied very successfuly for the last 80 or so years. Every other drug that would compete with thier virtual empires are illegal.
So who cares? They are railroading people into prisons for doing the same thing with a different choice of drug, taxing our butts to the hilt and playing like they are actually accomplishing something.
The truth is, the War on Drugs is a sham, they can not stop drug trafficing, otherwise they would have. Its all a lie, financed by the Taxpayers, to insure that the Tobacco and Alchohol industries get the lions share of the addicts money.
When I would visit her, she would pull the oxygen tube away from her mouth and light up. The oxygen would explode, I would jump out of my seat, but she was so used to it that she wouldn't bat an eye. I know how highly addictive cigarettes are and what a monumental struggle it is for people trying to quit.
The issue here isn't about compounding the punishment of smokers by further efforts to make them outcasts. It isn't about outlawing cigarettes
or eliminating entirely the risk of smoking.
It's about eliminating additives that exacerbate the negative health effects without improving the "smoking experience". Is there a real crying need to have polyurethane in cigarettes?
Cigarettes, pot, and alcohol should all be legal and available but controlled and a significant portion of the sales proceeds should be used towards the health, cessation,education, and regulatory needs of society resulting from their use.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 46 Comments