WASHINGTON, July 31, 2007

Chief Justice Roberts Leaves Hospital

Day After Suffering Seizure, Roberts Tells Bush He's Fine

  • Play CBS Video Video Justice Roberts Hospitalized

    Chief Justice John Roberts suffered a seizure at his vacation home in Maine. Roberts fell on a dock and was rushed to the hospital. Jim Axelrod has more details.

  • Video Roberts May Need Medication

    Dr. Sean Kenniff talks about seizures like the one suffered by Chief Justice John Roberts. Experts say he and his doctor will decide if medication is needed.

  • Video Roberts Can Still Do The Job

    Chief Justice John Roberts' epilepsy will not affect his work, according to experts. In fact, his medical problem is far less serious than some justices have dealt with. Jim Axelrod reports.

    • Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts leaves the Penobscot Bay Medical Center in Rockport, Maine, on July 31, 2007. Roberts walked out of the hospital Tuesday, one day after he suffered a seizure. Photo

      Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts leaves the Penobscot Bay Medical Center in Rockport, Maine, on July 31, 2007. Roberts walked out of the hospital Tuesday, one day after he suffered a seizure.  (AP)

    • A spokeswoman said doctors are calling the incident that sent Chief Justice John Roberts to the hospital Photo

      A spokeswoman said doctors are calling the incident that sent Chief Justice John Roberts to the hospital "a benign idiopathic seizure." A similar problem in 1993 is described as an "isolated, idiosyncratic seizure."  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive John G. Roberts Jr.

    Confirming a Supreme Court nominee: the timetable, the questioners, the background

  • Interactive The Supreme Court

    History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.

  • Interactive HealthWatch

    Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.

(CBS/AP)  Waving and smiling, Chief Justice John Roberts walked briskly out of a hospital in Maine on Tuesday and resumed his vacation, returning to normalcy a day after he suffered his second seizure in 14 years.

The Supreme Court was mum on whether Roberts would need anti-seizure medication. But specialists say his doctor would have raised that possibility because someone who has had two seizures is at high risk of having another.

Roberts, 52, cheerfully waved to onlookers outside the Penobscot Bay Medical Center in Rockport, Maine, before heading by pontoon boat to his summer home on Hupper Island, off Maine's middle coast. Hours earlier, he had assured President Bush by phone that he felt fine.

Roberts joins millions of adults who have had seizures for no apparent reason. The court said doctors had found no tumor, stroke or any other explanation.

Seizures are essentially little electrical storms in the brain. The resulting symptoms can range from a muscle twitch to loss of consciousness. They generally last 30 seconds to two minutes, and most people report feeling back to normal just minutes after that.

While they're most commonly associated with children, one in 10 adults will have one at some point, according to the Epilepsy Foundation. Roberts' first was in 1993.

Officials would give no details on the chief justice's diagnosis or treatment.

But the definition of epilepsy is having two or more seizures without any other cause. About 3 million Americans meet that definition.

And brain specialists said Tuesday that regardless of whether that term is officially used with Roberts, his highly publicized episode offers a teachable moment about a stigmatized disorder.

"There's nothing about epilepsy that should interfere with him continuing to function at the very highest level," stressed Dr. Orrin Devinsky, chief of New York University's epilepsy center.

Former Supreme Court clerk Ed Lazarus still expects Roberts to serve for many years — comparing him to Justices William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O’Connor, both of whom battled cancer and stayed on the job, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod. Cancer survivor Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg continues to serve, Justice William Brennan served more than a decade after his stroke, and Justice William O. Douglas fought mental illness.

"He's at the extreme low end of the scale of ailments that the Supreme Court justices have persevered with," says Lazarus. "You're talking about people who have had to go through chemotherapy, people who've had to go through surgeries — all kinds of things much more serious than this."

Devinsky has patients for whom seizures are a much bigger concern than a high-court judge — namely, surgeons — who successfully control them with medication.

"There's unfortunately a terrible, terrible stigma in America that maybe this will go a small way to erase," he added. "Epilepsy needs to be thought of as just another disorder."

Indeed, Roberts' prior seizure in 1993 didn't raise concerns at the White House when Bush nominated him to the nation's highest court — or at the Senate Judiciary Committee, which reviewed his health records as part of Roberts' confirmation hearing in 2005.

"Look, it's something that you will take seriously, but obviously upon examining it, they also believed that he would be competent to continue — and still do believe so," White House press secretary Tony Snow told reporters Tuesday.

Roberts was hospitalized after he fell on a dock near his home on Monday. Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said doctors found no cause for concern.

"Idiopathic means they really don't know what caused it," Dr. Emily Senay told CBS' The Early Show, and added that the seizures could have a genetic component to them.

The big question, left unanswered, is whether Roberts will take a daily pill to prevent another seizure.

Once someone has had two seizures, chances of a third can reach as high as 80 percent, said Dr. Gholam Motamedi, epilepsy director at Georgetown University Hospital. Whether someone is on the high or low end of that risk scale depends in part on results of tests, including a measure of brain activity called an EEG.

There are numerous medications to choose from, and while all can cause side effects, they're generally mild in the low dose that would be expected for someone with just two seizures 14 years apart, Motamedi said.

"If you ask 10 neurologists, at least eight would agree he's better off on medication."

But Devinsky offered an example of how to weigh that decision: Say someone with Roberts' two-seizure history always took a bus or walked and hated pills. They might be OK skipping medication. But say that person was required to drive 500 miles a week for a sales job. Devinsky would strongly advise medication as a safety precaution, and because state laws vary widely on the driving restrictions imposed after a seizure.

Roberts has a driver to shuttle him to the Supreme Court. His home state of Maryland decides driving restrictions based on individual circumstances, while Washington, D.C., generally imposes a 12-month seizure-free period.

Are there seizure triggers? Stress "doesn't create seizures in people," Motamedi said. "If you have a stressful life, it doesn't mean you're more likely to become epileptic."

But sleep deprivation is a well-known trigger of seizures in certain people, and stress can lead to poor sleep, Motamedi added. Patients with what he calls "low seizure thresholds" — they have them often — also tell doctors they're more susceptible when stressed.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from Supreme Court

Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by red164 July 31, 2007 12:00 PM PDT
?
Reply to this comment
by red164 July 31, 2007 12:03 PM PDT
By Sherman H. Skolnick
http://www.skolnicksreport.com
skolnick@ameritech.net
1-11-01

Fairy Tale #2: THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HAVE GENERALLY BEEN PERSONS OF HIGH STANDARDS AND THE COURT HAS BEEN HIGHLY REPUTABLE. Realities: In 1856, the high court, promoting the position of slave-owners, made the Dred Scott decision. Blacks were proclaimed and adjudicated to be chattel, mere baggage, that could be transported from place to place. Despite all the later bloodshed, this decision is still on the law books. In the process of U.S. Senate ratification of his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, in 1991, Clarence Thomas, an"Uncle Tom" to some, mouthed off about "natural justice" and was apparently just about to state in his televised hearings, that the Dred Scott decision was proper under his theory of "natural justice".

"The History of the Supreme Court" by Gustavus Myers, a book generally NOT allowed to be on the shelves of law libraries.


Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat July 31, 2007 12:05 PM PDT
CBS News: 'Chief Justice Roberts Leaves Hospital
Day After Suffering Seizure, Roberts Tells President Bush He's Fine'

-How about a tour in Iraq?
Reply to this comment
by wadyaknow July 31, 2007 12:14 PM PDT
I hope he holds off on the next seizure until Jan. 20, 2009.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb July 31, 2007 12:15 PM PDT
Justice Roberts is a bright spot and great Justice and judging from President Bush's other decisions almost seems like a lucky pick, an accident. I personally wish Chief Justice Roberts well.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat July 31, 2007 12:18 PM PDT
Roberts, 52, plans to continue his vacation, said Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg. Doctors found no cause for concern after evaluating Roberts, she said. President Bush's chief spokesman, Tony Snow, reported earlier that Roberts told Mr. Bush in a phone call that he was doing fine.

-Free tour to Iraq, had to be clarify. Gonzales and Cheney are welcome on board. Free walk in the hot streets of Bagdad.
Reply to this comment
by talkingham July 31, 2007 12:27 PM PDT
Idopathic indeed. Very idiopathic. Looks like one of our local car salesmen. Maybe a bright speck, certainly not a bright spot, maybe more like a puce colored smudge.

This dude has some wires crossed and they just can't find them. All it takes is one micro vessel to get twisted wrong and you've got a big problem, not feeling so well here eitherrrrr,
plunk.
Reply to this comment
by gretagreen July 31, 2007 12:49 PM PDT
How can a seizure NOT be a cause for concern??

He shouldn't drive.
Reply to this comment
by processor2 July 31, 2007 12:54 PM PDT
Reading some of these posts from these alleged "tolerant" liberals makes me realize that liberals don't know the definition of the word "tolerant"

...

It WASN'T the Bush administration that used tanks and helicopters to attack & kill Americans on our own soil like the previous administration did at Waco.

Also, it WASN'T the Bush administration that shredded the Constitution by replacing "freddom of speech" with "political correctness".
That was also the previous administration, comrade.

...

Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 31, 2007 1:19 PM PDT
Who cares, he's a Bush azzwipe.

"Idiopathic means.." he's an idiot as in the longer version of that term; idiotpathetic
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 July 31, 2007 1:35 PM PDT
Maybe this is a warning from a Higher Power.

Perhaps Justice Roberts needs to think twice next time he rules to sc*re*w the poor, the weak, the worker, the single mothers and other "lower social status" Americans.

Alito and Scallia also should take notice and repend.

Posted by nikosk1

Gee he did all that? Wow, he's superjudge.

Who cares, he's a Bush azzwipe.

"Idiopathic means.." he's an idiot as in the longer version of that term; idiotpathetic
Posted by newster1

My what an imbecile. Do you walk on all fours, too?
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 July 31, 2007 2:06 PM PDT
Sorry Chief Justice Roberts, but if you can't control your 3 year old son, then you don't belong on the Supreme Court.

Thank You
BC Kelly
Tallahassee Fla

Posted by BC_Kelly

Oh, well I have five boys. Nice decent kids. Respectable, well-behaved. Does that mean I can become a Supreme Court Justice? Do you think?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 July 31, 2007 2:09 PM PDT
Oh, well I have five boys. Nice decent kids. Respectable, well-behaved. Does that mean I can become a Supreme Court Justice? Do you think?
Posted by mudrose at 02:06 PM : Jul 31, 2007


The way Bush appoints stupid people to powerful positions, you have a very good chance.
Reply to this comment
by gretagreen July 31, 2007 2:10 PM PDT
If he must be replaced, I do hope that won't happen until Bush has been replaced.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 July 31, 2007 2:26 PM PDT
"If he must be replaced, I do hope that won't happen until Bush has been replaced."
Posted by GretaGreen
~~
I would hate to see him get a medical retirement at the age of 52 and then be on the Supreme Court payroll until he dies. Remember, these guys are appointed for life.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 31, 2007 2:51 PM PDT
Better luck next time......


"Idiopathic means they really don%u2019t know what caused it," Dr. Emily Senay told CBS' The Early Show"

Sounds like a new way to describe the Bush Presidency. "The idiopathic administration". More and more people are turning against him so fast that soon it'll be hard to find anyone who'll admit to having been foolish enough to have voted for him. No one will know what really caused the Bush election! LOL!
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 31, 2007 3:22 PM PDT
Roberts, 52, plans to continue his vacation, said Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg. Doctors found no cause for concern after evaluating Roberts, she said. President Bush's chief spokesman, Tony Snow, reported earlier that Roberts told Mr. Bush in a phone call that he was doing fine. -Posted by grazinggoat at 12:18 PM : Jul 31, 2007

Yep. When anyone blanks out and takes a tumble to the floor, maybe bobbling around in the throes of a seizure, maybe even a bit of drool with their eyes rolling back....We can see why the Bush Government doctors think there is nothing to worry about.

I second the other poster--if he decides to do the exorcist thing again--hope it happens after the elections an inauguration of a Democratic President. Wouldn't that be a kick in the GOP face? Especially since they whitewashed his problem and tried to leave him in charge. LOL
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 31, 2007 3:25 PM PDT
My what an imbecile. Do you walk on all fours, too? Posted by mudrose at 01:35 PM : Jul 31, 2007


Meaning that you do and are looking for others who also walk on all fours to join you? LOL. TMI mudrose. TMI. Or do you do the doggy/hyena worm butt-scoot across the floor and save the all fours for special occasions? lmao
Reply to this comment
by mcvet July 31, 2007 3:53 PM PDT
Oh, well I have five boys. Nice decent kids. Respectable, well-behaved. Does that mean I can become a Supreme Court Justice? Do you think?
Posted by mudrose at 02:06 PM : Jul 31, 2007

Is it possible for you Nazi's to discuss HONEST reservations brought up by your neighbors and fellow citizens? Must you ALWAYS try to be "Superior" and make light of others concerns. It would appear, concidering the World Wide Hatred for you, that you would want your fellow citizens thinking at least civil toward you. But then what's new about a Nazi attacking the messenger? Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by gretagreen July 31, 2007 3:56 PM PDT
"I would hate to see him get a medical retirement at the age of 52 and then be on the Supreme Court payroll until he dies. Remember, these guys are appointed for life."

I would rather see him get medical retirement and stay off the Bench, then continue on as a Supreme Court Justice. He's too conservative and he is too much of an activist. At least off the Bench, he will not be able to do harm to Americans for generations to come.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 July 31, 2007 4:44 PM PDT
I would rather see him get medical retirement and stay off the Bench, then continue on as a Supreme Court Justice. He's too conservative and he is too much of an activist. At least off the Bench, he will not be able to do harm to Americans for generations to come.
Posted by GretaGreen

You can't be conservative and activist at the same time. If you take a conservative posture that for the Court implies that you will adhere to precedent. If you are activist you would more likely intepret from the bench. One or the other. He will not harm anyone as we have already been harmed, but the likes of Blackburn and Black. Wake up. Don't believe everything on hearsay.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 July 31, 2007 4:49 PM PDT
Meaning that you do and are looking for others who also walk on all fours to join you? LOL. TMI mudrose. TMI. Or do you do the doggy/hyena worm butt-scoot across the floor and save the all fours for special occasions? lmao
Posted by toldyouso21

You're such a pro at it I'd leave it to you to show us how. Speaking of the doggy/hyena worm butt-scott isn't this your specialty? You are always sticking your big fat lips up someone's a/ss. Smacking your lips and pucking up with your brown teeth. You talk of these things with such ease, one would think it comes natural to you. Man who ever stayed with you had to die of some sort of brain injury. You are vulgar. LOL
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 July 31, 2007 4:53 PM PDT
But then what's new about a Nazi attacking the messenger? Sieg Heil Bush!!
Posted by MCVet

I think you need to make out with toldyouso21. She loves to kiss a/ss and you are in need of much love.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar July 31, 2007 5:09 PM PDT
"Roberts told Mr. Bush in a phone call that he was doing fine. "

So what happened to separation of powers. Does the supreme court work for Mr. Bush. Does the chief justice report in the the president, no, in fact he should be adversarial and separate from the president. For example he didn't call Nancy Pelosi, it would be equally absurd an unconstitutional as calling the president that he is supposed to be watching. Looks like Roberts is another bush fellow that wipes his arse with our law.

If anyone would know about the separation of powers, about the strong legal wall separating the president from contact with or attmepts to influence the Supreme Court it would be a Supreme Court justice. If this "Roberts" fellow doesn't even protect that basic aspect of the constitution what can we expect from him but infamy. what can we hope for but more serious seizures, as sad as that is, it is better than tyranny.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat July 31, 2007 5:20 PM PDT
Sounds like a new way to describe the Bush Presidency. "The idiopathic administration". More and more people are turning against him so fast that soon it'll be hard to find anyone who'll admit to having been foolish enough to have voted for him. No one will know what really caused the Bush election! LOL!
Posted by RandalDS

- Simply put, one can call it an idiotic decision.
Reply to this comment
by theusa1st July 31, 2007 5:28 PM PDT
And for all of you 'others' out there who may bring up Gore's son and his recent situation - careful - the Bush Brothers and their daughters leave a lot to be desired.

Thank You
BC Kelly
Tallahassee Fla

Posted by BC_Kelly at 05:21 PM : Jul 31, 2007

So does Ted Kennedy, Geraldine Ferraro's son and many others on the Democratic side...but I'd have to say Ted kennedy beats anybody hands down.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 31, 2007 5:29 PM PDT
I think you need to make out with toldyouso21. She loves to kiss a/ss and you are in need of much love.

Posted by mudrose at 04:53 PM : Jul 31, 2007

Hey take your se*xual fantasies elsewhere! This is not "that" kind of room here! Go get your "relief" where you usually do, in cyber-s*ex chatrooms and leave it out of here. This is a respectable political thread where only political insults and discussion is allowed, not your sick fantasies.
Reply to this comment
by theusa1st July 31, 2007 5:35 PM PDT
If this "Roberts" fellow doesn't even protect that basic aspect of the constitution what can we expect from him but infamy. what can we hope for but more serious seizures, as sad as that is, it is better than tyranny.
Posted by SharnCedar at 05:09 PM : Jul 31, 2007

A little over the top...trying to make a conspiracy theory out of it...how about is't just one human asking another human how they are doing.
Just how do you sleep at night?
Reply to this comment
by terrapin78 July 31, 2007 6:47 PM PDT
- Simply put, one can call it an idiotic decision.
Posted by grazinggoat at 05:20 PM : Jul 31, 2007

Or STOLEN!
Reply to this comment
by jacksteen1 July 31, 2007 7:12 PM PDT
This is what you get when you breed too close in hillbilly Yellowhammer families (see the Romney Family Tree - "No Branches! Straight to Heaven from Salt Lake City!")

It was also not revealed during his confirmation hearings that he has twelve fingers, eleven toes, and a bifurcated tongue, as does his Mother...who is also his Father's sister.

Jerry Falwell's family is still hiding six offspring that were born hydrocephalic (water-heads) that live on mattress boxes in the filthy basement of the Thomasville Road Baptist Church.

Upstanding Republiscum.
Reply to this comment
by global_chick July 31, 2007 7:21 PM PDT
Glad he's doing well.
Reply to this comment
by jonesforch July 31, 2007 9:41 PM PDT
JackSteen1

never mind not stooping that low.
Reply to this comment
by irisheyes222 July 31, 2007 9:44 PM PDT
SLEEP APNEA! No kidding
I had a siezure out of the blue
Was tested for Sleep Apnea, treated and haven't had another since. Sleep with a C-Pap every night.
Worth looking into.
Reply to this comment
by jonesforch July 31, 2007 9:49 PM PDT
Mine was stress the mind shuts down very easy to control with medications..But Mr Roberts is there to stay until HE fills he can no longer stay. Me I have not had a siezure in 15 years.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 31, 2007 9:57 PM PDT
You're such a pro at it I'd leave it to you to show us how. Speaking of the doggy/hyena worm butt-scott isn't this your specialty? You are always sticking your big fat lips up someone's a/ss. Smacking your lips and pucking up with your brown teeth. You talk of these things with such ease, one would think it comes natural to you. Man who ever stayed with you had to die of some sort of brain injury. You are vulgar. LOL
Posted by mudrose at 04:49 PM : Jul 31, 2007


ALL OF THIS...BROUGHT TO YOU BY A THING CALLED MUDROSE. Mudrose, another name for the anusssssss. lmao and no you can't have any.
Reply to this comment
by jonesforch July 31, 2007 9:57 PM PDT
But sleep deprivation is a well-known trigger of seizures in certain people, and stress can lead to poor sleep, Motamedi added. Patients with what he calls "low seizure thresholds" %u2014 they have them often %u2014 also tell doctors they're more susceptible when stressed.


Duh!!!
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 31, 2007 10:53 PM PDT
Well,I try to steer clear of pronouncements like this, but I give everyone exhibit A to the fact that mudrose is not only oblivious to the things it writes, but that it also stands as a shining example why we are still in Iraq, why up is down, bad is good and why they all wear halos.

Let's examine this brief interchange:

toldyouso responded to mudrose comments about a poster walking on all fours with: pointing the finger back at mudrose and also asking if he behaved like a dog with worms and did the butt scoot--

Then mudrose responded with--"You're such a pro at it I'd leave it to you to show us how. Speaking of the doggy/hyena worm butt-scott isn't this your specialty? You are always sticking your big fat lips up someone's a/ss. Smacking your lips and pucking up with your brown teeth. You talk of these things with such ease, one would think it comes natural to you. Man who ever stayed with you had to die of some sort of brain injury. You are vulgar." LOL
Posted by mudrose at 04:49 PM : Jul 31, 2007

Mudrose calls toldyouso21 vulgar, totally oblivious to the implications of what it wrote. Sort of like us invading a country and thinking when we kill the people, they should be grateful. And like outing agents and feeling the treasonous ones are those who seek justice. Or that when foreigners invade a country, bomb, rape, torture, kill and stay...that the people there should welcome them and be grateful.

Perversion at its finest. LOL
Reply to this comment
by nyckate July 31, 2007 11:12 PM PDT
Doctors now say that he may have epilepsy which isn't that big a deal really - but the medication has some terrible sideaffects - such as mental slowing and foregetfulness.

I like the man - he seems to be a good decent guy - but if he has to take medication such as this should he be Chief Justice? He'll have to answer that.

If he decides to step down - man - is Bush going to have an awful time getting someone else through Congress!!!
Reply to this comment
by zertrat August 1, 2007 12:15 AM PDT
Holy moly. Browsing through the posts, I've never seen such a listing of inappropriate diagnoses and medical advice. Please, people, stick to politics, in which you are merely idiots. In medicine, you might as well be a shaman from New Guinea. Actually, New Guinea shamans are pretty smart and effective, so I apologize to all of them. You non-Papuan folks are nuts!

The issue is not his medical condition, which is fine. Seizures are commonplace. The issue is his views on the constitution, religion, and separation of church and state. On those issues, this guy should be placed in intensive care. Or pitched into Papua New Guinea, for a special education.




Reply to this comment
by theusa1st August 1, 2007 7:49 AM PDT
So does Ted Kennedy, Geraldine Ferraro's son and many others on the Democratic side...but I'd have to say Ted kennedy beats anybody hands down.
Posted by theUSA1st at 05:28 PM : Jul 31, 2007
+ report abuse Ted Kennedy should have served time in prison!!!!And you respect him..LOL
Posted by b48151 at 06:15 PM : Jul 31, 2007

I DO NOT respect Ted Kennedy...he is a BIG POS.
What I was saying that he also leaves a lot to be desired (sarcastic). He is lower than whale t-u-r-d in the bottom of the ocean.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 August 1, 2007 8:58 AM PDT
Mudrose calls toldyouso21 vulgar, totally oblivious to the implications of what it wrote. Sort of like us invading a country and thinking when we kill the people, ...that the people there should welcome them and be grateful.

Perversion at its finest. LOL
Posted by toldyouso21

Hearsay, supposition and voodoo mentality. More Lefty propaganda. Then you sit there and brood that I'm oblivious to rants when there isn't one shred of evidence to support your theories. Seems to me we aren't using car bombs and blowing up Iraqis. First fallacy, not to mention the rest, it would take a lifetime and who wants to waste words with you. Then you attach an extraction of a post that was not addressed to you and assault me with vulgar, personal perversions. You are vulgar, you do know that, don't you Brown lips? Seems that my Moniker conjures up all sorts of erotic fantasies for you since you always seem to allude to my derrier. However, whether it's those big brown lips or that little mud-caked *** betwen your legs that longs for me,I'm sorry to inform you that you will NEVER, EVER, HAVE ME. So my suggestion to you is to stop driveling all over yourself with your so-called voodoo theories and your vulgar insinuations and take a cold shower. Yes, Mudrose (the origins of which your gutter and base mind will never figure out)says you are VULGAR.
Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs