WebMD/ July 31, 2007, 7:00 PM

Smoking Pot May Damage Lungs

Smoking marijuana regularly may, over time, damage the lungs, a New Zealand study shows.

The researchers included Richard Beasley, MBChB, of the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand in Wellington.

They studied 339 New Zealand adults, including 75 people who only smoked pot, 91 who smoked pot and tobacco, 92 who only smoked tobacco, and 81 who didn't smoke pot or tobacco.

Participants took lung function tests, urine tests, got high-tech lung scans using CTB scanning,and completed surveys about their smoking habits.

All of the pot smokers had regularly smoked marijuana for at least five years. All of the tobacco smokers had smoked cigarettes for at least one year. Their urine tests confirmed their use of tobacco or marijuana.

Pot is illegal in New Zealand, so participants were promised total anonymity. Those who used other illegal drugs were excluded from the study.

Beasley's team wanted to find out whether long-term marijuana use was, like
tobacco, associated with increased risk of emphysema. It wasn't.

However, long-term marijuana use was linked to lung problems including coughing, wheezing, chest tightness, and airflow obstruction.

Beasley's team calculates that, in terms of airflow obstruction, one marijuana joint equaled the effect of smoking 2.5 to five cigarettes at once.
The finding is "of major public health significance," write the researchers.

The results are likely due to differences between tobacco cigarettes and marijuana joints, note the researchers.

"Cannabis is usually smoked without a filter and to a shorter butt length, and the smoke [has] a higher temperature," write Beasley and colleagues, adding that people inhale deeper and hold their breath longer when smoking marijuana.

The study appears in the advance online edition of the journal Thorax.

By Miranda Hitti
Reviewed by Louise Chang
B)2005-2006 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved
© 2007 WebMD, LLC.. All Rights Reserved.
89 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honestabe8 says:
Earthian: Good post. I agree totally. Not only are there arrests, there are asset seizures. Is the government seizing private property consistent with conservative (not republican) principles? All this, and for what? Protection of the legal pushers? The Partnership For A Drug Free America stopped accepting funding from the alcohol and nicotine pushers back in 1997, but still accepts donations from Big Pharma. Yet, you will never hear a peep from PDFA about alcohol or tobacco. Which is a larger threat the the health of the nation, alcohol, nicotine or pot? It seems pretty obvious to me. The whole notion of a "drug free america" sponsored by Big Pharma is enough to make one wretch. To accept that the PDFA wants anything that can be called a drug free america is as absurd as accepting that Billy Boy Clinton's tryst with that 190 lb. humidor was not ***. And, the Office of National Drug Control Policy are nothing but propagandists. There will be no debate regarding drug policy, because those in power know that the majority of people (and getting to be a larger majority as time passes) do not support their prohibition. Prohibition is government price support to organized crime. Cops and criminals, pardon the redundancy. How does one have any respect for this law,or the people enforcing it?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
earthian-2009 says:
USA is a hypocritical nation. We claim to be a bastion of freedom, yet we criminalize things with no justification. That is repression. The police have a job to do and never question authority.
Like a good soldier who never asks questions, they will continue to persecute people because the lawmakers give them the right to do so. The US Constitution says, "There shall only be one law of the land", yet the punishment varies from state to state with no penalties to years of imprisonment.
Sounds like repression.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
latazman says:
Ya live till you die. Pick your poison! Oh yea, and driving a car can lead to all sorts of things!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
klingon69 says:
klingon69

I sure hope for your kids sake,that your wife has a brain.
Posted by erasmus6 at 05:08 PM : Aug 02, 2007
Obviously more than you...now go away troll.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
klingon69 says:
yet the ONDCP and DEA and all those other fvcks seem to still rely on the same "reefer madness" mentality. perhaps they should all go have biblical knowledge of themselves.
Posted by HonestAbe8 at 02:30 PM : Aug 02, 2007
I found one of the "reefer madness" movies on dvd at a local software store, what a hoot...remember seeing once once where a young girl took one hit on a J and started crawling around on floor, meowing like a car. D@mn, I wanna find some sheeeeeeeiiiiiitttt like that.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus6 says:
klingon69

I sure hope for your kids sake,that your wife has a brain.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rushman71 says:
Now could someone please pass me the pretzels, please. I'm dyin' here with the munchies!!! LOL
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honestabe8 says:
rushman71: the major addiction problem with have regarding illegal drugs is the addiction the law enforcement fvcks have with their funding. so, they will concoct all sorts of half truths and outright lies to continue their funding stream (or funding tsunami)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honestabe8 says:
rushman71: good post. back in 1937, most folks did not know about marihuana, other than it was the darker skinned people who smoked it. do we feel the same about pot as we (supposedly) did in 1937? how many of our societal feelings are the same as in 1937? yet the ONDCP and DEA and all those other fvcks seem to still rely on the same "reefer madness" mentality. perhaps they should all go have biblical knowledge of themselves.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rushman71 says:
Klingon69: That sure was a good little toon. If only I new that back in elementary. Man, sure would have made the teacher happy. LOL!!!
reply
See all 89 Comments