February 11, 2009 4:28 PM

U.S. Touts Arab Arms Sales Package

(CBS/AP)  The Bush administration said Monday that a new multibillion-dollar military sales package for Arab nations will help secure Iraq and the Persian Gulf while promoting stability and U.S. influence in a Middle East threatened by terrorism and rising Iranian ambitions.

Embarking on a four-day tour of the region with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the proposed U.S. package, estimated at up to $20 billion, "will help bolster forces of moderation and support a broader strategy to counter the negative influences of al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran."

"We are helping to strengthen the defensive capabilities of our partners, and we plan to initiate discussions with Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states on a proposed package of military technologies that will help support their ability to secure peace and stability in the Gulf region," she said in a statement.

The new sales to Arab countries, notably Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, were not enumerated but will be mainly defensive and be balanced with a more than 25-percent increase in military aid to Israel over the next 10 years, enabling the Jewish state to keep its qualitative military edge over neighbors with which it has no peace deal.

Israel will receive a total of $30 billion in U.S. military assistance, up from about $24 billion, while Egypt, which along with Jordan has made peace with Israel, will get $13 billion as part of the broader package.

Specific figures for Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations like Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, will be determined in the coming weeks, according to Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns, Washington's third-highest ranking diplomat, who will travel to the region in mid-August for follow-up talks.

Rice said she and Gates, who leave for the Middle East on Monday, would open discussions on specifics on their trip going through broad outlines of military shopping lists with the governments involved. Any sales would have to be approved by Congress, where some lawmakers have expressed deep concerns about their impact on the region and Israel.

In 1986, congressional disapproval helped persuade the Reagan administration to cut back an arms package to Saudi Arabia.

In response to initial news reports about the proposals late last week, Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., said that he and others wanted assurances that "these arrangements include only defensive systems" and rejected arguments by some in the administration that Arab states would acquire the weaponry from other countries if not the United States.

"There is no merit to the general argument that if the United States does not sell arms to these countries, they will go elsewhere and we will lose influence in the region," he said in a statement.

In a Monday conference call with reporters, Burns noted that Israel had on Sunday reversed long-standing opposition to boosting Arab military might and said it understood the rationale behind the plans, chiefly the threat posed by Iran, its alleged drive to develop nuclear weapons and support for terrorist groups.

"The Iran element is one factor, it's not the overriding factor in why we're doing this," and the administration would have pursued such sales even if Iran were not perceived by its neighbors as a significant threat, he said.

At the same time, he put the possible threat from Iran in stark terms.

Across the region, "there is a high degree of concern about Iran's quest to become a nuclear weapons power but also about fact that as you know Iran has armed and funded most of the Middle East terrorist groups," Burns said.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesman on Monday criticized the planned arms sales, saying they would undermine security in the Middle East.

"What the Persian Gulf region needs is stability and security," Mohammad Ali Hosseini was quoted as saying on the Web site of the state broadcasting company. "Americans have been trying to disturb it by selling weapons to the region."

The intended military sales were announced as Washington renews appeals for countries in the region to support its efforts in Iraq and the Iraqi government. Burns denied that the proposed packages were meant to buy backing for Iraq.

"There are no formal quid pro quos in this, but it figures that we would want our friends to be supportive of Iraq," he said.

At the same time, Burns said the sales will help maintain a "very strong American presence and influence in the region" at a critical time.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 361 Comments
by firststate July 31, 2007 4:15 PM EDT
$20 Billion among the Arab countries and $30 Billion for the Israelis. I'd be willing to bet that the companies producing the arms fear nothing more than they fear the idea of peace in the Middle East.

We are arming the Saudis.
The Saudis, then arm the Sunnis.
The Sunnis use the arms to kill Americans.
The administration dares to accuse people who question their policies of aiding the enemy, while they provide them arms. That takes big brass ones.
Reply to this comment
by boatquack July 31, 2007 10:33 AM EDT
Did they specify "money" or the ability to purchase said amount of material?
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 July 31, 2007 5:57 AM EDT
Oh my gosh, I don't believe what I read.. these fools need to read the Muslim holy books and maybe they wont be so foolish.. They are playing with our lives..
I can just see these Muslim leaders and clerics laughing behind mosque doors saying what fools we are and how easily influenced and stupid our leaders are.. hasn't all this been done before with Bush senior???
Reply to this comment
by red164 July 31, 2007 3:34 AM EDT
I'm stopping you? I wasn't aware I had that power over you or I would have used it sooner....believe me...I would have.......


Posted by RandalDS at 12:08 AM : Jul 31, 2007

Of course you weren't aware because you lack insight remember. LOL

But what I meant was can you stop you snubbed nosed posting but I see you don%u2019t get it and now you%u2019ll probably reply with more of the same.

Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 July 31, 2007 3:23 AM EDT
GREAT NEWS!!!

More weapons, more war, more hate, more violence. Higher stock prices for the War Machine corporations.

Who needs $20 Billion for health, peace, justice. What a waste that would be.
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 July 31, 2007 3:14 AM EDT
If you look at this news story between the lines, you see that the majority of arms identified are earmarked for Israel.

That's right. No numbers identified for Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

THis news story is a Trojan Horse.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 31, 2007 3:08 AM EDT
Posted by RandalDS at 11:56 PM : Jul 30, 2007

Are you done agreeing with me, because I'm ready to move on?

Posted by red164 at 12:00 AM : Jul 31, 2007

I'm stopping you? I wasn't aware I had that power over you or I would have used it sooner....believe me...I would have.......
Reply to this comment
by red164 July 31, 2007 3:00 AM EDT
Posted by RandalDS at 11:56 PM : Jul 30, 2007

Are you done agreeing with me, because I'm ready to move on?
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 31, 2007 2:56 AM EDT
Posted by RandalDS at 11:38 PM : Jul 30, 2007

Another day on the RandalDS comment board, of course Marx was bright and my implication that your not stands..

Posted by red164 at 11:46 PM : Jul 30, 2007

Yes Marx was a genius in many ways and as for your implication, you've not shown it by your comments or mine.
Reply to this comment
by red164 July 31, 2007 2:46 AM EDT
Posted by RandalDS at 11:38 PM : Jul 30, 2007

Another day on the RandalDS comment board, of course Marx was bright and my implication that your not stands..
Reply to this comment
See all 361 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook