February 11, 2009 4:29 PM

Home Invasion Suspects' Parole Questioned

Steven Hayes, Joshua Komisarjevsky, Cheshire, Connecticut home invasion suspects

Steven Hayes, Joshua Komisarjevsky, Cheshire, Connecticut home invasion suspects (CBS/AP)

(CBS/AP)  State officials are re-examining their policies after learning two convicted burglars out on parole are accused of killing three family members during a home invasion and arson.

Robert Farr, chairman of the Connecticut Board of Pardons and Parole, said the panel went by the rules, because the suspects didn't have a history of violent crimes.

"That's why this is sort of shocking — because it doesn't fit a normal mode," Farr said.

Farr acknowledged the board did not have as much information as it should have had about the men's records, such as the transcript from a 2002 sentencing. In that hearing, a Bristol Superior Court judge called Joshua Komisarjevsky "a cold, calculating predator."

Farr also said the board has not been receiving transcripts of sentencing hearings, even thought it is supposed to get them.

The board was also unaware that Komisarjevsky had worn night-vision goggles and used a knife to slash window screens in his prior burglaries.

"If we'd had it, we would have a little better picture of the individual," Farr Matt Dwyer of CBS radio affiliate WTIC-AM. "I'm not suggesting these would have made any big difference. Maybe we would have kept them in a little longer, but at some point these guys were both going to get out."

Komisarjevsky, 26, of Cheshire, and Steven Hayes, 44, of Winsted, were arraigned Tuesday on charges of assault, sexual assault, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, arson, larceny and risk of injury to children. Bond was set at $15 million each. They are being held in separate facilities, and apart from other inmates.

The state medical examiner confirmed that Jennifer Hawke-Petit, 48, was strangled and that her daughters, 17-year-old Hayley and 11-year-old Michaela, died of smoke inhalation. The deaths were ruled homicides.

The girls' father, Dr. William Petit Jr., a prominent endocrinologist, was beaten and bound in the basement but managed to escape. He remained in serious but stable condition on Wednesday.

"He's doing OK physically. Emotionally he is devastated and still worried about others," said Petit's pastor, the Rev. Stephen Volpe.

Investigators were still uncertain why Komisarjevsky and Hayes chose the Petit family. They know the pair followed Hawke-Petit and Michaela home from grocery shopping Sunday night, then went to a Wal-Mart to purchase a rope and an air rifle, and waited in their car. But was there some connection with the Petits?

Law enforcement sources told the Hartford Courant that while on parole, Hayes was working for a landscaping company. Police were trying to learn whether that company had done work for the Petits.

Meanwhile, prosecutor Michael Dearington said he had not yet decided whether to pursue the death penalty.

"I know the public consensus is they should be fried tomorrow," he said.

Dearington has only pursued the death penalty in one case, for the murders of a mother and two young children in 2000. The jury did not sentence the killer to death.

He would have ample grounds in this case: Connecticut law allows the death penalty for murder while committing first-degree sexual assault, murder during a kidnapping, murder of two or more people at the same time, and murder of someone under age 16, as well as in three other instances.

"There's five ways you can charge capital felony in this case," the state's most experienced and successful prosecutor in death penalty cases, Waterbury State's Attorney John A. Connelly, told the Waterbury Republican-American


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by yoopermom July 27, 2007 12:12 PM EDT
I think the death penalty would be too good for these monsters. All that will happen if they get the death penalty is they will live in solitude for 10 %u2013 20 years while they waste tax dollars appealing.

If they are in with the general population of a prison they will be suffering abuse every day at the hands of inmates that despise people that rape and kill children. Let the other prisoners take care of these monsters. It will be a lot more painful and quicker than waiting for them to be humanely disposed of.
Reply to this comment
by avadiva July 26, 2007 10:59 PM EDT
Instead of testing on innocent animals, why don't we test on twisted sick individuals like these two child rapers/murders. Perform vivisection on them!
Reply to this comment
by mcstanley July 26, 2007 10:00 PM EDT
Why play around with the "electric chair". These two have had their fun now it's time to pay the piper.

Why continue to waste taxpayers money. Predators cannot be reformed unless they chose to and most of them have made their beds. So let them lie in it .... via a wheelchair.
Reply to this comment
by boston1954 July 26, 2007 8:51 PM EDT
Put them out in Death Valley.
Posted by retmilspouse


No I disagree. I might like to see the Grand Canyon one day and the *** thing would be full to the top...........
Reply to this comment
by mapas-2009 July 26, 2007 8:38 PM EDT
This *** violated Parole, they cowardly murder this family. ? Question...Why the Tax payers will have to pay for their food, Water and Ceiling... and their defense... ?
They should be executed and burned a life !!!
These SOBS do't belong to society.

Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan July 26, 2007 8:19 PM EDT

It is definitely best for everyone when violent criminals are stopped by their intended victims.
Self Defense!
a-human-right.com

Reply to this comment
by donkeyhouse July 26, 2007 5:21 PM EDT
The point is that if the justice system wasn't such a sham, this wouldn't happen. These people are paroled time and time again because people think these animals can be rehabilitated. These guys had a rap sheet 3 miles long and they got out.

And to the moron that loves the UK and their gun laws so much, I can't wait till your neighbors to the east decide they need more Arab lands and you have no way to defend yourselves. I don't think we are going to bale your sorry nation out for the 3rd time.
Reply to this comment
by wheelsup1 July 26, 2007 5:19 PM EDT
The police should have shot them as they chased them down the street. They hit a patrol car (attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, etc.)draw a bead on them and end our misery of them!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by red164 July 26, 2007 5:06 PM EDT
Posted by DonkeyHouse at 01:42 PM : Jul 26, 2007

The blame lays at the feet of these two criminals maybe the system failed is some way but is that an excuse for this type for animalist behavior. Why is it when people do something this sickening that some people turn it into a political statement? You cannot find one rational human being on the planet that is not saddened and outraged over what these two psychos did.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o July 26, 2007 4:53 PM EDT
Let's see mate, where'd the criminals go to get their air rifle? Wal-Mart?

Could they have done the same thing in the UK? No? I rest my case.

Posted by rudy654 at 12:30 PM : Jul 26, 2007

Ahem,.....I think a baseball bat and fire with gasoline was used in this case, the air rifle was a prop. Ban bats and fire? Or gas?
Reply to this comment
See all 58 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook