Poll: 63% Say Clinton "Likely" To Win
CBS/NYT Poll: Majorities Of Both Men And Women Think New York Democrat Will Be Next President
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Democratic Candidate Cartel?
CBS News RAW: A press pool microphone caught Clinton and Edwards allegedly discussing an effort to limit the number of candidates in future debates.
-
Video
Hill And Bill Woo Iowa
Bill Clinton joined Hillary Clinton on a campaign trip through Iowa, where the couple charmed Democrats. But will Hillary's husband help or hurt her campaign? Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Video
"Female Factor" Boosts Clinton
A CBS News/New York Times poll shows women see Hillary Clinton as a strong leader, putting her ahead of her Democratic challengers and Republican rivals. Kelly Wallace has more.
-
Photo
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., during campaign stop in Charles City, Iowa. A new CBS News/New York Times poll shows her with a 19-point lead over her top Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama. (GETTY)
While opinions about the New York senator are strongly divided by gender, majorities of both men (59 percent) and women (65 percent) surveyed think it's very or somewhat likely Clinton will win the presidency.
Even most Republicans (53 percent) think Clinton will win — as do 77 percent of Democrats.
LIKELY CLINTON WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER 2008? (Among registered voters)
All
Very/somewhat likely
Not very/not at all likely
Women
Very/somewhat likely
Not very/not at all likely
Men
Very/somewhat likely
Not very/not at all likely
The poll shows Clinton continuing to hold a solid lead over the rest of the Democratic field. Among likely Democratic primary voters, she has a 43-24 percent edge over her closest rival, Sen. Barack Obama. Former Sen. John Edwards is third at 16 percent.
On the Republican side, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani remains the front-runner at 33 percent, but still-undeclared candidate Fred Thompson, the actor and former senator, is gaining ground, up to 25 percent. Sen. John McCain has slipped to 15 percent, followed by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at 8 percent.
More voters (75 percent) say Clinton is a strong leader, than say this about Giuliani (71 percent) and Obama (68 percent). Obama has a slight lead over Clinton when voters were asked whether a candidate shares their moral values, while Giuliani trails.
Clinton falls behind, however, on the question of believability. More voters think she's likely to say what people want to hear than say that about either Obama or Giuliani.
IF THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, WHO WOULD YOU WANT AS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE? (Among Democratic Primary Voters)
Clinton
Obama
Edwards
IF THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, WHO WOULD YOU WANT AS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE? (Among Republican Primary Voters)
Giuliani
Thompson
McCain
Romney
On specific issues, a majority of voters thinks Clinton would make good decisions on health care (74 percent) and foreign policy (68 percent), while 58 percent think she'd be effective as commander in chief. But many (52 percent) are "uneasy" about her ability to handle an international crisis.
Forty-one percent of voters think Clinton's vote authorizing the Iraq war was a mistake, while 53 percent think it was not. But even those who see it as a mistake don't feel overwhelmingly that she needs to apologize.
There is a significant gender gap on nearly every question asked about Clinton, with women having a more positive opinion of her than men.
The poll suggests that Sen. Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, will not have a major impact on the election. Half of voters think her marriage to him will not influence her support one way or the other; while voters who think the marriage will have an impact are evenly split between those who think it will help her and those who think it will hurt her.
The poll also asked about President Bush and the U.S. Congress, and both receive the same low overall job approval ratings: 29 percent. Majorities say they're disappointed with both the Democrats and the Republicans in Congress.
Pessimism about the overall direction of the country remains high, too, with more than seven in 10 Americans saying the U.S. is on the wrong track.
This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,554 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone July 9-17, 2007. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher. An oversample of women was also conducted for this poll, for a total of 1,068 interviews among this group, by selecting them with higher probability than men in households with both men and women. The weights of men and women in mixed-gender households were adjusted to compensate for their different probabilities of selection. The final weighted distribution of men and women in the sample is in proportion to the composition of the adult population in the U.S. Census.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- Latest in Opinion: CBS News Polls
- Poll: Most Back Public Health Care Option
- Poll: Sotomayor Still An Unknown
- Poll: No Dent In Obama's Popularity



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 565 CommentsThen she will win. Tell people what they want to hear and they will vote for you. She is about to make history.
The NY Times / CBS Polls.
If polls meant anything in the real world, then Kerry would have been president.
Reminds me of the old Batman program of the 60's when the crooks were always shown angled 45 degrees in the camera...
Posted by dnamj at 06:47 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Amen, even the chimp can't issue pardons for international war crimes, though I'm sure the little sawed off punk SOB will try. And let's hope they get the same punishment ordered for Goering and his friends. I'll glady help build the gallows.
The New York Times represents one of America's Corrupt Liberal MSM Wolfpack members.... possibly the "alpha" member.
Earth to NYTimes Zero credibiity
The chances that I would ever vote for a war-mongering Corporate/AIPAC-owned digrace to the American people, like Hillary, is zero.
The only candidates worthy of consideration, in my opinion, are Gravel, Kucinich, and Paul. The others are not qualified for 'dog catcher', and should apoligize and step aside to make way for the legitimate candidates.
Posted by FeelFree1 at 06:57 PM : Jul 19, 2007
And a vote for any of those three is a wated vote. None of them has a chance in hell of getting nominated, let alone winning. They're a waste of time. Anyone want to vote for them? Go ahead, but don't hold your breath.
Posted by perception5 at 06:56 PM : Jul 19, 2007
.Ok I'll answer my own question......yes CBS which stands for:
1. Corrupt Broadcasting Station
2. Crush Bush Station
3. Cheney Bashing Station
4. Clinton Broadcasting Station
.......did I forget anyone?
YOU'RE THE KIND OF GUY WHO PUT BUSHIT IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH THE PATHETIC NADER CANDIDACY.
It's nice to fantasize, and Paul and Kucinich are appealing as honest guys (Gravel seems like a nutcase), but no way they can win. Any splinter candidacy will put the White House right back in the hands of the Neocon Fascist Party.
Posted by perception5 at 06:56 PM : Jul 19, 2007
And so says a FOX Noise lover. LOL!!!
We still don't know whose blond hair it was that was found in the murdered Vince Foster's shorts...I bet it belongs to "Cattle Futures" Clinton.
Posted by Prinzowhales at 06:56 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Naw, it was Ted Haggard's. He thought Foster was just a really sleepy male hooker!
Posted by perception5 at 07:02 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Washington Times, Fox Noise, any Murdoch station or outlet....anything stated by Fat As*s Limbaugh...or Bill Orally...anything stated by you...mudrose...didntinhale...one_american..etc....etc....etc.....
CBS and the NYTimes provides a puff piece with a great smiling picture of Hillary Rotten-Clinton and they combine that with poll numbers "they" put together.
This story is an attempt by these two liberal news outlets to promote their candidate......... it's really unbelievable......beacause their corrupt liberal feather are really showing.... Yet millions of Americans won't even know they are being "contaminated"
Re: "YOU'RE THE KIND OF GUY WHO PUT BUSHIT IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH THE PATHETIC NADER CANDIDACY."
It sounds like you believe that Bush was legitimately elected, when the evidence points to the contrary. You must be quite gullible. It's no wonder that you are so easily fooled/frightened into voting against your own interests.
If you are a supporter of Hillary, just keep in mind that you are supporting the illegal war of aggression against Iraq, and the coming one against Iran. Your candidate sure has/is. Consider yourself complicit, and stop criticizing the policies of your President Bush, when your representation offers no substantial alternative.
an..etc....etc....etc.....
Oooppppps! I forgot to add badaxmofo to the list of people with zero or less credibility! I'm sorry I missed you!!
Posted by perception5 at 07:11 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Don't worry, any American reading this site already knows one who is....you. And will gladly testify to it at your sanity hearing or lawsuit. Just ask! Our pleasure! Really!
Posted by perception5 at 07:11 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Sounds to me like you and all the other NEOCON idiots are scared.... ROTFLMAO........
Same polls predicted a Kerry whitehouse...LMFAO
Since 2004, Cons have been exposed as the party of neocon phoneys, hypocrits, greed filled America hater's, liars, pedophiles, and in the pocket of Corporate America. I even understand that affiliation with the Republicon Party is again less then 39%, whereas in 2004 it was at an all time high of 44%.
You completely fit my definition of a ConDumAss!
Re: "And a vote for any of those three is a (wasted) vote."
I disagree.
Re: "None of them has a chance in hell of getting nominated, let alone winning."
Until, and if the votes are counted, they have the same chances as anyone else. Surrendering control of our government to another AIPAC/Corporate tool, does not seem like a wise move to me.
If these candidates are able to force the AIPAC/Corporate candidates to address issues that they would prefer not to, this is a major victory in itself, in my opinion.
Re: "Anyone want to vote for them? Go ahead"
Thank you. I would like to, but I am not affiliated with either "failure" Party, so I doubt that I will have the opportunity. Maybe Ron Paul?
###
Have you seen this film yet?
www.zeitgeistmovie.com
Posted by Luigi999 at 07:21 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Yet another redneck NEOCON idiot.... No wonder this country is in such bad shape....idiots like you are free to roam around and influence other idiots....
First item up for auction is the presidency
Starting bids will be at 20 billion
DoIhave20Ihave20CanIhave25Ihave25CanIhave30Ihave30CanIhave35Ihave35CanIhave40Ihave40 Etc.
Sold to the lady in red for 40 billion.
A power-hungry cowardly 'ho who probably wouldn't mind Ahmedinejedad giving us a nuclear 9/11 as she didn't mind Lewinsky.
One good thing, though. If she is elected, chances are she won't last more than a few months. The military will never respect a thing like what she is.
Can anyone say "coup 'd etat in America"?
To Obama supporters:
He certainly is more appealing than the other Corporate candidates, but it appears that he has already pledged his allegiance to AIPAC/Israeli extremists, and I would never vote for him for this reason.
"Barack Obama's campaign confirmed receipt. His website had this speech to AIPAC on March 2."
Obama: "...We must stand up for Israel's legitimate right to defend itself. Last summer, Hezbollah attacked Israel. By using Lebanon ...for terrorism, ...Hezbollah has engulfed that entire nation in violence... and threatened the fledgling movement for democracy there."
www.coastalpost.com/07/07/10.html
This is a gross misrepresentation of what happened, it shows that he has a very poor understanding of the situation, and seems to demonstrate that Obama has fallen under the spell of his AIPAC masters.
He has also indicated willingness to launch an illegal war of aggression against Iran, of which Israel extremists would be the main benefactors.
Hillary's botoxed, powdered, air-brush and ready to sell out America!
Wherever happened to character and principle in the Presidency? If it still exists, we will vote in either a Guiliani or a Thompson.
If it doesn't - you'll get what you richly deserve, a political 'ho with no scruples or a hypocrite boy. And then - if our military choose to save us, the first military coup in our nation's history. If they don't - the Islamonazis will take care of us.
Of course Feeljihadi and RandyBozo will love that. They'd collaborate in an instant.
Does Wal-Mart sell Hillary dolls, too?
Posted by US18988 at 07:40 PM : Jul 19, 2007
Well look who finally crawled out of his pre-teen daughter's bed. She tell you you're lousy in bed like her mamma did too? LOL
Americans have had enough of the most un-American presidency in our history. We want our constitution back, our civil liberties, our international reputation for fair and just treatment, and a chance to bring some degree of moderation back to the Supreme Court over time.
Hillary can do these things.
Re: "If and when you vote for her/him, make sure to raise your little sheep tail and say baa. Our empire is crumbling."
Excellent observation.
The best way to get government back is to cut off the money - cut off the spending, then these fools will find another scam.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 565 Comments