July 18, 2007

Value Voters Unleash Wrath Against Romney

The Nation: Christian Right Highlights Romney's Porn Connection

  • Play CBS Video Video Candidate Romney

    Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has gone from being a long shot to a top candidate. Romney speaks with Hannah Storm about the controversy surrounding his faith and his stands on abortion and Iraq.

  • Video Politico On Fred Thompson

    Julie Chen speaks with Jim VandeHei, executive editor of Politico.com, about the growing support for senator-turned-actor Fred Thompson's possible run for president in 2008.

  • Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney answers a question during the first Republican presidential primary debate of the 2008 election at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Calif., on May 3, 2007. Photo

    Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney answers a question during the first Republican presidential primary debate of the 2008 election at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Calif., on May 3, 2007.  (AP)

(The Nation)  This column was written by Max Blumenthal.

With onetime Republican presidential frontrunner Senator John McCain in meltdown, Mitt Romney suddenly finds himself under fire from some of the Christian right's most influential activists. Romney's evangelical critics claim the former Massachusetts governor and devout Mormon was complicit in the Marriott hotel chain's sale of pay-per-view porn on its in-room television sets when he served on the corporation's board of directors from 1992 to 2001. Two Christian-right operatives involved in orchestrating the charges have enlisted as Internet organizers for former Senator Fred Thompson, who is preparing to enter the race formally. The tactics of these religious-right players, targeted below the radar against Romney, are calculated to alter decisively the outcome of the Republican primary contest.

The assault was launched on July 5 with an opening shot in the form of a breathless press release issued through the mega-ministry Focus on the Family. In it, veteran anti-porn crusader Phil Burress called Romney's failure to take action against pay-per-view hotel porn during his tenure on Marriott's board "extremely disturbing." That same day, a Focus on the Family spokesman took to the radio airwaves to ask whether Romney would "turn a blind eye" to pornography if elected president. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, which functions as Focus's Washington lobbying arm, immediately joined the pile-on. He briefed The Associated Press on the record, explaining that Romney must "take some responsibility" for his supposed connection to Marriott's porn profiteering. The AP report on the accusation against Romney was subsequently reprinted in the pages of major outlets from the Boston Globe to the Washington Post. It only took a full six years after Romney resigned from Marriott's board for the Christian right's leading lights to profess their outrage — and only hours for the press to echo it.

This carefully sequenced attack on Romney over hotel porn is just the opening volley in what appears to be a concerted effort to doom his candidacy. Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association's Michigan chapter, told me, "This is just part of a broader pattern of concern over Mitt Romney's record of aggressively promoting abortion on demand, the homosexual agenda and gun control. We are judging Romney by his record." Glenn is a leading Christian-right operative in the home state of Romney's late father, former Republican Governor George Romney, one of Romney's bases within the Republican Party. Glenn is also a member of the DC Group, a conference of 15 anti-porn activists that meets four times a year to plot political strategy. The DC Group devised its plan to undermine Romney at its most recent gathering, Glenn revealed to me.

The hostility of segments of the Christian right to Romney coincides with its mounting interest in Fred Thompson. Less than two weeks before Focus on the Family launched its attack on Romney, the Family Research Council began an informal campaign to rally support for Thompson. Without fanfare, the Family Research Council's director of web communications, Joe Carter, and the group's web editor, Jared Bridges, founded Blogs for Fred, a website that alternately shields Thompson from criticism and promotes him as the Great Right Hope. When Carter and Bridges are not plumping for Thompson, they blog on the Web site of the Family Research Council, advancing the causes of faith, family and freedom for the purportedly nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization.

In the meantime, Carter has found time to attack other religious-minded bloggers for alleging that the Family Research Council's criticism of Romney is motivated by political partisanship. When The Rev. Dan Schultz, author of the progressive Christian blog Street Prophets, said, "The Religious Right has decided to stick a shiv in Romney's campaign," Carter posted a petulant response on Schultz's blog accusing him of having a "conspiratorial mindset." Carter also went out of his way to defend his boss, Tony Perkins, from charges that the Family Research Council president might be involved in a plot against Romney, despite his having trashed Romney to the AP. "There is no vast right-wing conspiracy," Carter said. "There are just people advocating for their positions."

Technically, because Thompson is still undeclared, Blogs for Fred is not yet an official entity of his campaign machine. But that may soon change. Carter and Bridges recently have begun offering free pro-Thompson paraphernalia to bloggers who promise to sign on as Thompson supporters. A Kentucky consulting firm, GOP Campaign Masters, provides the campaign knickknacks through a retail outlet called The Fred Store. The firm, as one of its spokesmen admitted, openly seeks a lucrative contract with the Thompson campaign. "We're big supporters of Fred Thompson, and we've had communications with people who are in his [presidential campaign] committee," GOP Campaign Masters director of communications Brien Shea told me. "We're hopeful that we'll be formally affiliated with his campaign in the future." Shea eagerly volunteered that he is a close friend of Bridges.

To be sure, on paper Thompson is by no means the Christian right's perfect candidate. A July 7 Los Angeles Times story revealed that he lobbied in 1991 on behalf of the pro-choice National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association. Fortunately for Thompson, he has Carter in his corner to attempt to protect him from the fallout. On Blogs for Fred, Carter composed a point-by-point refutation accusing the L.A. Times of "sloppy" reporting while attacking the story's source, Judith DeSarno, as unreliable because of her contributions in the past to the political campaigns of Hillary Clinton. Glenn, of the American Family Association, echoed Carter's line of defense, advising me when I raised the issue of Thompson's pro-choice lobbying to "consider the source of the story" — the old bogeyman, the liberal media.

Yet another potential source of friction between Thompson and the Christian right may be his second wife, Republican lawyer/lobbyist Jeri Kehn Thompson. Kehn Thompson is nearly a quarter-century younger than her husband — younger than his daughter from his first marriage — and her revealing dresses have raised eyebrows at Washington galas. A July 8 article in The New York Times Fashion and Style section reported as objective fact that Kehn Thompson is a "trophy wife," posing the question: "Will the so-called value voters accept this union?" If Glenn's labors succeed, indeed they will.

"Jeri Thompson is very sympathetic personally to the concerns that we [right-wing evangelicals] have about the direction of this country," Glenn said. "As the mother of two young children, 2 years old and 6 months old, she understands our concern about the culture and society in which our children will have to raise their children."

Glenn described a May gathering of the highly secretive and influential Council for National Policy, an elite group of several hundred right-wing leaders, as a pivotal moment in the formation of the conservative movement's opinion on Thompson. After entering the meeting to a standing ovation from the audience of conservative financiers and theocratic activists, Thompson launched into a rambling address denouncing Roe v. Wade, the supposed elimination of "God from the public schools and the public square" and, for several minutes, the prosecution and conviction of Scooter Libby. Afterward, Kehn Thompson worked the room, assuring the conservative power brokers of her solid credentials. According to Glenn, many in attendance found her "very appealing."

Perhaps the most salient explanation for the Christian right's sudden swell of support for Thompson may be that he is the lesser of several evils. Glenn explained, "The best way to ensure that Hillary Clinton is the next president is to nominate Rudy Giuliani or John McCain or Mitt Romney, all of whom will give social conservatives sufficient cause to go fishing."

But Glenn's allies, who include movement heavyweights such as Focus on the Family founder James Dobson and his Beltway lieutenant, Perkins, are demanding additional reassurances from Thompson before they leap onto his bandwagon. "Social conservatives are open-minded to the possibility of being supportive of Fred Thompson, but I don't think anybody's going to rush to a decision," Glenn said.

Thus the self-proclaimed shepherds of America's "value voters" are setting the stage for Thompson. If he lets them write his script, he may hope that he can steal the GOP spotlight. But he will discover that this acting job comes with strings attached.



By Max Blumenthal
Reprinted with permission from The Nation.



If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns

Video and Galleries from Opinion

Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by briannorwood July 18, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
You can bet the flip flopperomney will declare tomorrow that he had a change of heart about the porno thing after ordering the "One Night in Paris" video in his hotel room!


No wonder the GOP's number one choice is "None of the Above!"
Reply to this comment
by random_radar July 18, 2007 6:07 PM EDT
"her revealing dresses have raised eyebrows at Washington galas"

"...many in attendance found her 'very appealing.'"

Well, very revealing is very appealing--even among NeoCons.

But if they are so opposed to Porn, why do they like a candidate whose wife is a walking peep show? Sounds hypocritical to me.
Reply to this comment
by snecoleman July 18, 2007 7:38 PM EDT
This is being far too nitpicky. Romney was one man on the board. The board apparently decided as a whole to allow the decision of adults in america to make the decision for themselves whether to watch porn, just as they are left to decide whether to read the Bible or Book of Mormon in the rooms. I'm sorry, but as a board member they are deciding what is best for the business and for their customers and I believe they made that decision.

As to Thompson, it blows me away all the people jumping on his bandwagon with little knowledge. This guy openly talks about his life of living it large and living it up with the ladies when he was single, that's not that conservative to me. What's conservative is a man meeting a wonderful woman, waiting until they are married to have ***, and then having a loving relationship for the remainder of their lives. This is what Romney has done. I guess you can hold it against him for separating business from his personal life, but I certainly try to do the same in mine, hoping to best provide for my family.
Reply to this comment
by nativewoman July 18, 2007 7:54 PM EDT
Sitting on the board of a hotel that, like many other hotels, offers porn is worse than actively lobbying the H. W. Bush Administration on behalf of pro-choice legislation?

Porn that actually has to be ordered by and paid for by the hotel guest is THAT important to the Christian Right?

Goodness! Exactly what ARE the values of the Christian Right? Do they even know where they stand anymore?

Reply to this comment
by johnshaft4 July 18, 2007 8:00 PM EDT
Yo, Romney...Is talking lizard good eatin'?
About them 'gold tablets', are they paper weights or door stops somewhere?
Reply to this comment
by saraxyz July 18, 2007 8:21 PM EDT
I think Fred Thompson is just a big ol' phony. He's been ensconced in the beltway in DC for over 20 years lobbying for "unusual" clients and having a less than stellar Senate career while pretending to be a good ol' boy from Tennessee. He seems sort of slow and plodding. Not really a go-getter or especially bright.

Kind of shocking that so many conservatives seem willing to settle for someone so ordinary without even determining if he can perform under pressure in a debate against Hillary or answer any tough questions not delivered by Sean Hannity. He's not even that conservative!

I like Giuliani and Romney much better. They both seem more qualified and have a lot more enthusiasm and energy for the job. Romney has more executive experience than anyone else and Rudy has the most name-recognition. Mitt and Rudy provide the badly needed CHANGE we need in Washington. Obama, Clinton, Edwards and Fred just offer more of the same, status quo, DC political mess.


Reply to this comment
by mpetrieutah July 18, 2007 8:31 PM EDT
This is completely absurd. These people might as well forget to vote for anyone in this next election because who know how much the states and federal governments make off of taxes on pornographic materials. Our governments, I'm sure, make hundreds of millions of dollars worth of revenues from sales of pornography. Should we assume that because of this the government supports pornography since they profit from it?

It would have been completely wrong for Mitt Romney to impose his personal beliefs on the company if it was not in the best financial interest of the company and stockholders. Mitt was ONE board member and he alone couldn't make any changes. He was paid a measily $25,000 a year as a board member. People say he profitted off of the sales of porn from the hotel. Who says any of the $25,000 was from the sale of porn? Maybe the $25,000 he received actually came from room services.
Reply to this comment
by mpetrieutah July 18, 2007 8:37 PM EDT


It's absolutely rediculous to say, "He didn't do enough!" His job as a board member was to make sure the company was profitable and a success for the stockholders. Mitt is not in favor of banning porn. That's sensorship of a 1st amendment right. He's in favor of keeping it from being so readily accessible to children.

If people accuse Mitt from profitting from room-ordered porn, then George Bush and any other President profits from porn since the government pays the President $400,000 a year and I'm sure some of the money came from porn since the government received taxes from porn. So, again... don't vote for anyone ever again as long as there is a tax on porn or else you're just voting for someone who profits off of pornography.

At least Mitt has the guts to admit he doesn't need the income and will forgo a Presidential salary if he is elected. He's probably the only one in the race who'll not profit from porn while in the White House.
Reply to this comment
by jacksteen1 July 18, 2007 8:45 PM EDT
I am amused that 'Saraxyz' is surprised that conservative voters (spelled "R-e-p-u-b-l-i-s-h-i-t") could think of voting for a less-than-smart candidate like Fred "BassetFace" Thompson. Why, who do you think these same home-skooled, cross-eyed evangelicals voted into office when we had the Shrine of American Intelligence, Ronnie Ragoon, in office...and let's not forget Richard Nixon...who actually LOOKED like the hang-dog crook and liar he turned out to be.

The ignorant bible-belt Crackers that comprise the Republicrap Party's main lifeblood are unschooled, uneducated, and unprepared to make adult decisions based on facts in the voting booth. They listen to their foolish, uneducated, backward preachers and fill out dummy ballots in church the Sunday before elections.

That's why they won't have a winning candidate for at least the next twenty years. Mark it on the calendar, Bubba.

"Yes Ma'am, Madame President Clinton!"
Reply to this comment
by hlynnj1 July 18, 2007 9:02 PM EDT
Phil Burress and Tony Perkins reveal their naiveti regarding corporate governance and the role of a board member. But alas, I guess I shouldn%u2019t expect them to understand such matters as they are professional %u2018Christians%u2019 (LOL). Of course, those of us with real jobs know better. According to their logic, anyone who has ever stayed at a Marriott hotel (or for that matter, any hotel that offers pay-per-view porn) has participated in the sponsorship of pornography. According to their logic, anyone who has filled up at an ExxonMobil gas station or who owns stock in the company in their retirement account has sponsored a company that sells beer, cigarettes, and pornographic magazines behind the counter. I guess we%u2019re all guilty. The attacks of Phil Burress and Tony Perkins are obviously politically calculated. The should stop pretending.
Reply to this comment
by flblueeyes July 18, 2007 9:15 PM EDT
After reading the nit-picking nauseum in this article, and unwarranted attacks on Mitt Romney, I can say this: I am glad that I'm a Catholic whose Church has a 2000 year history dating back to Christ and his apostles.

The professed "value voters" who are quoted here, not only lack spiritual discenment, but political as well. They harm the very cause they profess to believe in and represent.

The Focus on the family affiliates have been trying to sell us Fred, the actor, and his 25 year younger babe* wife (*can we please see more of your clevage? No thank you.) for the Oval office for months.

Fred Thompson has done nothing of significance to warrant "the knight in shining armor" status for our party they've been trying to sell. This is mainly a media driven phenomena.


No offense to Fred, I think he can be funny; but his articles are so boring I can't even get thru them. He has written NOTHING of substance in regard to public policy.

Great U-tube on Castro though.

Christ said: "By their fruits you shall know them."

Irrespective of Gov. Romney's religion or any of the 2008 candidates; Mitt Romney's family speaks volumes about his character and integrity.

Romney's fiscal record and public life are head and shoulders above the other "Christian" candidates, and his life is more Christ like. He the most qualifed candidate to be the next President of the United States.

You go Williard Mitt Romney; the heartland is behind you!
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 18, 2007 9:28 PM EDT
"Two Christian-right operatives involved in orchestrating the [pay-per-view porn] charges have enlisted as Internet organizers for former Senator Fred Thompson"

Thompson says 'why pay for porn when you can get yourself a gold-digger hotty 25 years younger than you?'

The Christian right is being manipulated... not for the first time.
Reply to this comment
by random_radar July 18, 2007 10:02 PM EDT
I was waiting to see if the NeoCons would support Romney. Since they decided to oppose him, he might get my vote...or else Ron Paul.
Reply to this comment
by billfitzger July 18, 2007 10:05 PM EDT
Yo shaft, You'll believe em when ya see em Eh?
Now There's a real leap of faith.
Reply to this comment
by billfitzger July 18, 2007 10:14 PM EDT
Brian, Check the polls, your falling behind on the last several months results.
Reply to this comment
by manner6 July 18, 2007 11:50 PM EDT
This article is the best argument for not letting Republicans keep on running things. These people are completely insane. They also don't have the foggiest idea what democracy is about. There is no difference between the wacko christian right wackos and the wacko islamic fundamentalism wackos. They both want to make entire populations as miserable as they are.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 July 19, 2007 12:09 AM EDT
You have got to be kidding me. Christian right have nothing else to worry about but "pay-per-view" porn? It's always about protecting the children. As if you can keep children in a bubble where they don't see a woman's breasts, no one says a swear word & everyone plays nice.
Wouldn't life be a lot easier if we didn't have organized religion? Want spirituality? Be a Buddhist.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 July 19, 2007 12:36 AM EDT
Two Christian-right operatives involved in orchestrating the charges have enlisted as Internet organizers for former Senator Fred Thompson, who is preparing to enter the race formally. The tactics of these religious-right players, targeted below the radar against Romney, are calculated to alter decisively the outcome of the Republican primary contest.

LOL, MORONS, these people have no morals they crtainly add no value.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide July 19, 2007 1:07 AM EDT
Well, you gotta admit it's pretty cool that the Marriott Family is the largest distributor of porn in the country while most Mormons uphold them as an example of their religion at its finest.

Just make sure there's a Book of Mormon in the hotel room and that justifies the porn. Everyone needs free choice, so let's give it to them, right? Something about opposition in all things: you can't appreciate the good without experiencing the bad.

That sounds about right. What the h3ll is a moral compass anyhow? And what politician has or needs one? Obviously not Romney, so I'm voting for him.
Reply to this comment
by vetsence July 19, 2007 2:16 AM EDT
Let me see now! $660 Million dollar lawsuits for the Catholics, Baptists having the same problems to a somewhat lesser degree, and they are worrying about pay per view porn??? What a scrood up bunch of hypocrits!!!
Reply to this comment
by angelboy29-2009 July 19, 2007 3:55 AM EDT
Why do these christian group support Fred Thompson when Mitt Romney is even more Christ-like than him? What kind of people are these people? Have they gone mad? Or are they spritually blinded? Mitt Romney could not and should not in any case impose his own personal belief onto any company or organizations he do not fully own.

Mormons believe in "Free Agency", the freedom to choose between good and evil. That makes a man accountable unto himself. A persons individual faith should be treated as personal and not public.

To all christian groups, Mitt Romney is your man whom you could proudly represent to the world as a truly conservative christian.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 19, 2007 5:41 AM EDT
Pay per view porn in Marriott hotels?

At the prices they charge for their rooms, it should have been included for free.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito July 19, 2007 8:00 AM EDT
Let's see. McCain's history. Rommey's hated by evangelicals, Giulani not doing much better. Thompson's their last best hope, until they find something wrong with him too.
Reply to this comment
by elz523 July 19, 2007 9:38 AM EDT
Values voters is a misnomer. This is all about money, whcish is the only thing the Christian Right values. Remember, these are the people shucking for your dollars on TV everyday so they can afford their expensive lifestyles and the resources needed to keep an eye on you.
Reply to this comment
by emmac6 July 19, 2007 10:13 AM EDT
Who cares? Almost every major company in America has ties to porn. I bet if someone were to comb Thompson's financial records they would show he has stock in companies that make money in porn. I'm not saying that's a good thing but it's an unfortunate reality. I think the real issue these envangelical's have is that he's Mormon--which should not matter. I'm not Mormon but I know plenty of Mormons and they are just like regular people--usually better than a lot of other people I know.
Reply to this comment
by soldat44 July 19, 2007 10:44 AM EDT
Why do these christian group support Fred Thompson when Mitt Romney is even more Christ-like than him? What kind of people are these people? Have they gone mad? Or are they spritually blinded? Mitt Romney could not and should not in any case impose his own personal belief onto any company or organizations he do not fully own.

Mormons believe in "Free Agency", the freedom to choose between good and evil. That makes a man accountable unto himself. A persons individual faith should be treated as personal and not public.

To all christian groups, Mitt Romney is your man whom you could proudly represent to the world as a truly conservative christian.
Posted by angelboy29 at 12:55 AM : Jul 19, 2007

Ummmm...yea...We're going to move your desk to the basement...we need this space for storage.

Good gravy...
Reply to this comment
by angelboy29-2009 July 19, 2007 11:36 AM EDT
These group of evangelical christians are "I HATE MORMONS GROUP". Oftentimes, this group of people who hate Mormons are unintellectuals, misinformed, bigots, and biased to their own religion. Fred Thompson is nothing compared to Mitt Romney when it comes to spirituality and compassion. I would like to challenge you, christian evangelicals to compared the life and acheivements of Mitt Romney to Fred Thompson.
Reply to this comment
by angelboy29-2009 July 19, 2007 11:37 AM EDT
These group of evangelical christians are "I HATE MORMONS GROUP". Oftentimes, this group of people who hate Mormons are unintellectuals, misinformed, bigots, and biased to their own religion. Fred Thompson is nothing compared to Mitt Romney when it comes to spirituality and compassion. I would like to challenge you, christian evangelicals to compared the life and acheivements of Mitt Romney to Fred Thompson.
Reply to this comment
by angelboy29-2009 July 19, 2007 11:37 AM EDT
These group of evangelical christians are "I HATE MORMONS GROUP". Oftentimes, this group of people who hate Mormons are unintellectuals, misinformed, bigots, and biased to their own religion. Fred Thompson is nothing compared to Mitt Romney when it comes to spirituality and compassion. I would like to challenge you, christian evangelicals to compared the life and acheivements of Mitt Romney to Fred Thompson.
Reply to this comment
by grumpas July 19, 2007 12:24 PM EDT
Why haven't these people gone after Rudy Guiliani??? Or have I missing something here? Guiliani has openly come out for abortion, gay marriage and etc. He appears to be far more secular than Romney. Not that I am going to vote for any of them anyway. I stopped voting for Republican's in the 80's when the religious nuts took over the party! It was bad news for this country then and it's gotten decidedly worse over the years.
Reply to this comment
by oxmyx-2009 July 19, 2007 12:29 PM EDT
Let's see, some schizophrenic (hears voices) walks into the badlands and proclaims himself supreme. Until 1968, in official Mormon publications, blacks were pronounced an inferior race. Multiple wives, to this day in some places. Sounds like a cult to me. It's ALL tribal horse****, just in varying degrees of scale.
Reply to this comment
by chris_umass July 19, 2007 12:41 PM EDT
The only real news here is that CBS news has demonstrated that it has an anti-Republican agenda that strong enough to make them willing to embrace the small and over-the-top splinter of the Christian Right that hates Mormons enough to influence their political judgment. Sadly, no matter who the candidate, elections are such that any activist with a passionate enough attack will get attention by the media no matter how much lacking in substance. Romney's opponents know that his values, family, and history of Christian-principled leadership are his greatest strengths, and that is why they are attacking him so hard on these things.
Reply to this comment
by hwk_i67 July 19, 2007 1:44 PM EDT
While not a fan of Romney at all (he of the flip flop issues. He waffles more than IHOP), this story is pretty weak. It would be like a candidate getting blasted for a porn connection because he shops at Circle K where they sell Playboy.

American politics at it's finest. It's like John Stewart said last night on the daily show, "And this is what we're striving so hard to bring into Iraq." lol

Peace and tolerance.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 July 19, 2007 2:32 PM EDT
Bring democracy to Iraq has very little to do with things, bringing oil to America has most to do with things.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 July 19, 2007 3:16 PM EDT
Christianity may be the most repressive, intolerant, self-righteous organized religion in the world today.
Reply to this comment
by nativewoman July 19, 2007 3:54 PM EDT
Posted by angelboy29 at 08:36 AM : Jul 19, 2007

ALL religions are biased to their own religions.

Fanatics of any religion all want the same thing. Government by their own religion. All the while they attack other religions for wanting the same thing.

Because, of course, only their religion is the one "true" religion.
Reply to this comment
by glb1969 July 19, 2007 4:20 PM EDT
Let's face it. It doesn't matter what religion this person embraces, they are all just different forms of the same mental disease. No sane person could ever vote for someone who believes there is a make believe "god" entity.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 19, 2007 4:51 PM EDT
The right attacking the right. Nothing but good can come of that. Hopefully, at some point, the mormons in the west will learn that the southern baptists pretty much consider the mormon religion a cult. Anything that can drive a wedge between both of these groups of Republican block voters is good for America.
Reply to this comment
by geschwarz July 20, 2007 3:19 AM EDT
The Evangelicals have been raising the fear that Romney as president would be taking direction from Salt Lake. Isn%u2019t it funny that the Evangelicals are now confounding their own argument by pointing out that while Romney was on the board at Marriott that he did nothing about the pay-per-view porn.

The fact of the matter is that Marriott offers the pay-per-view only to stay competitive because that is what business travelers prefer. Romney is anti-porn. Romney is also a successful businessman. Romney is Pragmatic.

Romney did not take direction from Salt Lake while on the Marriott board, so why should we believe the Evangelicals when they say that Romney will take direction from Salt Lake as president?

Reply to this comment
by ctrandrm July 20, 2007 6:30 AM EDT
This issue is being completely blown out of proportions. These same people fear his faith, but don%u2019t want to be accused of intolerance or bigotry, so they have been waiting for something like this so they could pounce on him and go aha! Now we won%u2019t have to vote for him! Give me a break. By saying that Mitt Romney is a pornographer for serving on the Marriot board is like calling the cable guy a pornographer for installing your cable! The truth of the matter is that the subject probably never came up in these board meetings and for all we know he may have never even knew about that business side of the hotel. By saying he supports pornography for serving on that board is no different by saying everybody who has ever stayed in that hotel was supporting pornography because they were supporting an institution that provided it. Ridiculous! By the way, I want the name of any politician running for president that never ever stayed at a hotel in their entire life that did not offer porno movies other wise by the same reason giving for rejecting Mitt Romney could be used for them all!
Reply to this comment
by laser01 July 21, 2007 5:15 PM EDT
Mitt Romney owns BAIN and SanKaty.

Has holdings or control of BAIN, Sankaty, KB Toys, Stage Stores and more.

It has been documented by Federal Court admittance that non disclosure of Conflict of Interest has occurred in eToys, Stage Stores and KB Toys.

When Dov Avni complained in Stage of statutory violations as a stock holder of $4500 of stock, he was "sanctioned" $380,000 and the US Marshalls were sent upon him 10 times.

In eToys when it was discovered that persons connected to BAIN were inside eToys selling the bankruptcy assets to BAIN the US Trustee made a settlement with the admitted statutory violators with the following illegal language.

WHEREAS the United STates Trustee shall NOT seek to compel any additional disclosures of TBF.

(please see eToys DE Bankr 01-706 from Dec 2004 till now)

Please see 3rd Circuit appeals 07-2360 and the real battle of illusions 3rd Circuit appeal 06-4308.

Using a clandestine Hiring Letter as a contract the parties rewarded Barry for not seeking the Courts approval of his hiring by giving him the CEO position if he did choose not to apply to the Court.

They sold the assets to themselves, have a plan to wipe all the shareholders away and they are now going to be public again as eToys direct is now merging with Baby Universe on NASDQ as POSH.

All while the US Dept of Justice aggressively assist in punishing this whistle blower and defending the errant, illegal behavior.

Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs