U.S. Report: Al Qaeda Has Strengthened
Intel Reveals Al Qaeda's Rise Since 9/11; Homeland Security Chief Cites "Gut Feeling" About Attack
-
Play CBS Video Video Chertoff On Summer Threat CBS News RAW: Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff says he doesn't currently have "specific information that's credible about an imminent threat directed at the homeland this summer."
-
Video Chertoff Fears Terror Attack Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff has a gut feeling that the U.S. is entering a period of "increased risk" this summer, with the possibility of an al Qaeda terror attack. Bill Plante reports.
-
Video Chertoff's "Gut Feeling" Up to the Minute Military Analyst Col. Mitch Mitchell (Ret.) weighs in on Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's "gut feeling" that the U.S. is vulnerable to a terrorist attack this summer.
-
Michael Chertoff, United States Secretary of Homeland Security. (AP Graphics Bank)
-
Interactive America On Guard The Homeland Security Department, the terror alert system, preparedness quiz and more.
-
Special Report War On Terror Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
-
Photo Essay Targets Of Terror? Here are the buildings that have been idenitified as possible targets of terrorists in the U.S.
Kringen said he wouldn't attach a summer timeframe to the concern. In studying the threat, he said he begins with the premise that al Qaeda would consider attacking the U.S. a "home run hit" and that the easiest way to get into the United States would be through Europe.
The new threat assessment puts particular focus on Pakistan, as did Kringen.
"Sooner or later you have to quit permitting them to have a safe haven" along the Afghan-Pakistani border, he told the House committee. "At the end of the day, when we have had success, it is when you've been able to get them worried about who was informing on them, get them worried about who was coming after them."
Several European countries — among them Britain, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands — are also highlighted in the threat assessment partly because they have arrangements with the Pakistani government that allow their citizens easier access to Pakistan than others, according to the counterterrorism official.
This is more troubling because all four are part of the U.S. visa waiver program, and their citizens can enter the United States without additional security scrutiny, the official said.
The Bush administration has repeatedly cited al Qaeda as a key justification for continuing the fight in Iraq.
"The number one enemy in Iraq is al Qaeda. Al Qaeda continues to be the chief organizer of mayhem within Iraq, the chief organization for killing innocent Iraqis," White House press secretary Tony Snow said Wednesday.
The findings could bolster the president's hand at a moment when support on Capitol Hill for the war is eroding and the administration is struggling to defend its decision for a military buildup in Iraq. A progress report that the White House is releasing to Congress this week is expected to indicate scant progress on the political and military benchmarks set for Iraq.
The threat assessment says that al Qaeda stepped up efforts to "improve its core operational capability" in late 2004 but did not succeed until December of 2006 after the Pakistani government signed a peace agreement with tribal leaders that effectively removed government military presence from the northwest frontier with Afghanistan.
The agreement allows Taliban and al Qaeda operatives to move across the border with impunity and establish and run training centers, the report says, according to the official.
It also says that al Qaeda is particularly interested in building up the numbers in its middle ranks, or operational positions, so there is not as great a lag in attacks when such people are killed.
"Being No. 3 in al Qaeda is a bad job. We regularly get to the No. 3 person," Tom Fingar, the top U.S. intelligence analyst, told the House panel.
The counterterror official said the report does not focus on Osama bin Laden, his whereabouts or his role in al Qaeda. Officials say the network has become more like a "family-oriented" mob organization with leadership roles in cells and other groups being handed from father to son, or cousin to uncle.
Yet bin Laden's whereabouts are still of great interest to intelligence agencies. Although he has not been heard from for some time, Kringen said officials believe he is still alive and living under the protection of tribal leaders in the border area.
Armed Services Committee members expressed frustration that more was not being done to get bin Laden and tamp down activity in the tribal areas. The senior intelligence analysts tried to portray the difficulty of operating in the area, despite a $25 million bounty on the head of bin Laden and his top deputy.
"They are in an environment that is more hostile to us than it is to al Qaeda," Fingar said.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The secrets of tennis legend 



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 28
- next
See all 545 CommentsWatch the 1st hour of the movie "Schindler's List" Lars,,, you will see how close Bush has taken us into a fascist nazi terrorism state.
You ever wonder why we can't get anything accomplished in this country? I don't. Not when I see adults acting like children - both in the government and in the public sphere, like the comments posted in reply to this article.
Seriously, the attacks from the Right and the jabs from the Left start to get embarrassing after a while. You people can barely tolerate each other yet you actually wonder why Sunni and Shia people can't get along? I swear you people would be no different if given the opportunity to express your angst in a similar situation.
BTW - Clinton and Bush were both terrible Presidents. How do you wing-nuts like that? Thanks to those types of Presidents we have a deeply divided country of immature idiots who would rather argue than solve a problem.
One last point : if you people are so insightful and observant how come no one has noticed that the article has changed significantly since yesterday?
Citing his Islamic faith, Ali refused to serve in the U.S. military during the war in Vietnam; his title was revoked and he was sentenced to five years in prison for draft evasion. (The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the conviction in 1971.)
He must be Islamic Missouri Synod. No pardons back then??
Posted by didntinhale at 07:58 AM : Jul 12, 2007
I don't know, but your kind is still blaming Clinton after 7 years, so you would know better than I about expiration dates for blame. I'm sure Al Qaida thanks you for your support.
A) How good is the intelligence this time around?
B) Each time Bush's ratings are in the toilet, we receive Al Qaeda warnings with "no specific, credible threat of a new attack".
C) Bush flat out failed in the war on terrorism if Al Qaeda is getting stronger.
I vote C, but could be B.
BECAUSE WE DIVERTED OUR TROOPS TO IRAQ FOR A POLICY OF ISRAEL INSTEAD OF GOING AFTER OUR TRUE ENEMY IN AFGHANISTAN!
ANOTHER SWING AND A MISS BY THE CHIMP!
Posted by didntinhale at 07:30 AM : Jul 12, 2007
-Oahhh Nooooooooooo! ;)
(AP) "Detailed schematics of a military detainee holding facility in southern Iraq. Geographical surveys and aerial photographs of two military airfields outside Baghdad. Plans for a new fuel farm at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The military calls it %u201Cneed-to-know%u201D information that would pose a direct threat to U.S. troops if it fell into the hands of terrorists. It's material so sensitive that officials refused to release the documents when asked. But it's already out there, posted carelessly to file servers by government agencies and contractors, accessible to anyone with an Internet connection."
"Bush give what one panel member called a "Churchillian" vision of "victory" in Iraq and defend the country's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki. "A constitutional order is emerging," he said. Later that morning, around the same conference table, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden painted a starkly different picture for members of the study group. Hayden said "the inability of the government to govern seems irreversible," adding that he could not "point to any milestone or checkpoint where we can turn this thing around," according to written records of his briefing and the recollections of six participants."
He lied to the American people about the reasons for going...he is liable for the failure of the war by hiring morons like Rumsfeld. This is a lawsuit culture, let's use it.
Think of all of the good this money could have been used for...what would people be saying about America had we turned around and help solve some of the worlds problems with it? Now everyone hates us, which is great for terrorism.
Lawsuit! Ka-ching!!!!!
Posted by MEBoard at 05:17 AM : Jul 12, 2007
Thanks. And, we agree.
I don't know who came up with this incredibly stupid idea that the military was going to impose "democracy" on other people at the point of a gun, but it one of stupidest ideas that ever came down the pike.
For more than an hour, they listened to President Bush give what one panel member called a "Churchillian" vision of "victory" in Iraq and defend the country's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki. "A constitutional order is emerging," he said.
Later that morning, around the same conference table, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden painted a starkly different picture for members of the study group. Hayden said "the inability of the government to govern seems irreversible," adding that he could not "point to any milestone or checkpoint where we can turn this thing around," according to written records of his briefing and the recollections of six participants.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19719435/
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 28
- next
See all 545 Comments