WASHINGTON, July 11, 2007

U.S. Report: Al Qaeda Has Strengthened

Intel Reveals Al Qaeda's Rise Since 9/11; Homeland Security Chief Cites "Gut Feeling" About Attack

  • Play CBS Video Video Chertoff On Summer Threat

    CBS News RAW: Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff says he doesn't currently have "specific information that's credible about an imminent threat directed at the homeland this summer."

  • Video Chertoff Fears Terror Attack

    Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff has a gut feeling that the U.S. is entering a period of "increased risk" this summer, with the possibility of an al Qaeda terror attack. Bill Plante reports.

  • Video Chertoff's "Gut Feeling"

    Up to the Minute Military Analyst Col. Mitch Mitchell (Ret.) weighs in on Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's "gut feeling" that the U.S. is vulnerable to a terrorist attack this summer.

  • Michael Chertoff, United States Secretary of Homeland Security. Photo

    Michael Chertoff, United States Secretary of Homeland Security.  (AP Graphics Bank)

  • Interactive America On Guard

    The Homeland Security Department, the terror alert system, preparedness quiz and more.

  • Special Report War On Terror

    Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.

  • Photo Essay Targets Of Terror?

    Here are the buildings that have been idenitified as possible targets of terrorists in the U.S.

(CBS/AP)  U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded al Qaeda has rebuilt its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, The Associated Press has learned.

The conclusion suggests that the group that launched the most devastating terror attack on the United States has been able to rebuild despite nearly six years of bombings, war and other tactics aimed at crippling it.

Still, numerous government officials say they know of no specific, credible threat of a new attack.

A counterterrorism official familiar with a five-page summary of the new government threat assessment called it a stark appraisal that will be discussed at the White House on Thursday as part of a broader meeting on an upcoming National Intelligence Estimate.

The official and others spoke on condition of anonymity because the secret report remains classified.

Counterterrorism analysts produced the document, titled "Al Qaeda better positioned to strike the West." The document pays special heed to the terror group's safe haven in Pakistan and makes a range of observations about the threat posed to the United States and its allies, officials said.

Al Qaeda is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the official said, paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States."

The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001, with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the report as saying.

At the same time, this official said, the report speaks of "significant gaps in intelligence" so U.S. authorities may be ignorant of potential or planned attacks.

John Kringen, who heads the CIA's analysis directorate, echoed the concerns about al Qaeda's resurgence during testimony and conversations with reporters at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday.

"They seem to be fairly well settled into the safe haven and the ungoverned spaces of Pakistan," Kringen testified. "We see more training. We see more money. We see more communications. We see that activity rising."

The threat assessment comes as the National Intelligence Council is preparing a National Intelligence Estimate focusing on threats to the United States. A senior intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity while the high-level analysis was being finalized, said the document has been in the works for roughly two years.

Kringen and aides to National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell would not comment on the details of that analysis. "Preparation of the estimate is not a response to any specific threat," McConnell's spokesman Ross Feinstein said, adding that it would be ready for distribution this summer.

Counterterrorism officials have been increasingly concerned about al Qaeda's recent operations. This week, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a "gut feeling" that the United States faced a heightened risk of attack this summer.

CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer explained that Chertoff will face a "fierce reaction" from Democrats if his warning is fueled by more than a "gut feeling."

Al Qaeda and its sympathizers have shown an interest in summertime attacks. Some examples from recent years:

  • In 2005, London faced two separate sets of transit attacks. The July 7 attacks on three trains and a bus killed 52. A second attack on July 21 was bungled when the detonators failed to light the explosives.

  • Last summer, international counterterror authorities said they foiled a plot to use liquid explosives to take down roughly 10 U.S.-bound airliners leaving Britain.

    Continued



    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from War On Terror

    Add a Comment See all 545 Comments
    by olebd July 11, 2007 7:34 AM PDT
    Usually, a "gut feeling" comes after years and years of doing something. He doesn't have that history in him. He might as well carry around a crystal ball.
    Reply to this comment
    by olebd July 11, 2007 7:40 AM PDT
    "We are entering a period of increased risk for a terrorist attack"

    I don't think the risk has increased or decreased. I think maybe the republican fear tactics have/will increase as we come up on an election year in an effort to retain their influence in the white house.
    Reply to this comment
    by samrensho July 11, 2007 7:43 AM PDT
    Just more republican fear mongering. Wait until they really crank it up in 2008. LMAO
    Reply to this comment
    by getit1776 July 11, 2007 7:44 AM PDT
    Gut feeling? This is how our nation's security is handled? How about some solid intelligence? But then again, that gets so twisted by the White House it's of no use.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad July 11, 2007 7:45 AM PDT
    OH NO MR. BILL!

    RUN AWAY RUN AWAY

    ONLY THE TEXASDICKTATER AND ROVE CAN SAVE US NOW WE SURLEY MUST STAY THE COURSE IN IRAQ BECAUSE IF WE DONT FIGHT THEM OVER THERE WE WILL FIGHT THEM OVER HERE!

    WHERE IS BAGHDAD BOB OR TONY SNOWJOB TO GUIDE US AND TELL US WHAT TO DO?

    MAYBE WE SHOULD ASK THE NEOCONS AT THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE TO MAKE US ANOTHER SURGE PLAN FOR THE MIDDLE EAST!

    JOE LIEBERMAN SAYS THINGS ARE DOING WELL IN IRAQ HE CANT BE WRONG HE IS AN ISRAELI DISQUISED AS AN AMERICAN! 3 SOLDERS DEAD A DAY IS A SMALL PRICE TO PAY FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS NEVER BEEN IN THE MILITARY ANYWAY!
    Reply to this comment
    by jjp735i July 11, 2007 7:48 AM PDT
    Bush's ratings are in the toilet and once again we start hearing about possible attacks. It's never ending. Bush drops in the polls, we get unconfirmed reports of attacks.

    What does the CIA and FBI do with all that data mining information if they can't state a confirmed attack is coming instead of a gut feeling? We all have gut feelings another attack is coming. It does not go away.

    Our boarders are wide open, of course we have a gut feeling an attack is coming. And when it does, Bush cannot claim it was the fault of Congress for tying his hands.
    Reply to this comment
    by trillion1 July 11, 2007 7:49 AM PDT
    True, bush has always used fear to distract the public from any current issue that is making him look bad. But cherthoff is such a total failure as head of DHS he has basically invited our next attack.
    Reply to this comment
    by truth_hurts2 July 11, 2007 7:51 AM PDT
    Why does the administration always get these "feelings" as we approach elections?
    In the summer of 2004, the alert levels were all raised, just a couple months before Bush was re-elected, and there were more "feelings" in the summer 2006...and now as we approach the primaries.

    Who should we really fear?
    Reply to this comment
    by smirk5 July 11, 2007 7:54 AM PDT
    Bush had a gut feeling 4 years ago that he could conquer Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by cathaleen July 11, 2007 7:57 AM PDT
    The left has tied the hands of the CIA & FBI. Every time someone makes strides in trying to protect our country, there goes the liberals sticking up for the terrorists' rights.
    Reply to this comment
    by truth_hurts2 July 11, 2007 7:58 AM PDT
    Great journalism too-now the press publishes Chertoff's "gut" feelings. Are not journalists suppose to look for and print facts, and question some cabinet head who uses his "gut" feelings to himself try and cause a little fear in the american people?
    Reply to this comment
    by smirk5 July 11, 2007 8:03 AM PDT
    FBTA

    Faith-Based Threat Assessment
    Reply to this comment
    by truth_hurts2 July 11, 2007 8:06 AM PDT
    Hey Cathaleen,

    Not sure what country you live in but in the USA the founding fathers fought for and gave their lives for our Constitution. Too bad you let your fears treat it as if it were nothing more than toilet paper.
    Reply to this comment
    by spargle July 11, 2007 8:07 AM PDT
    We need our military forces in this country, to defend against such attacks, not across the world stirring things up. Where will our 'national guard' be? Where are our 'reserves'? Where are the marines, etc? Off across the globe...
    Reply to this comment
    by ioweign July 11, 2007 8:10 AM PDT
    The left has tied the hands of the CIA & FBI. Every time someone makes strides in trying to protect our country, there goes the liberals sticking up for the terrorists' rights.
    Posted by cathaleen at 07:57 AM : Jul 11, 2007

    What are you saying cathaleen - You want another SLAM DUNK! We now know that was a fraud.
    The CIA has been restricted from operating in the US since its creation. And isn't it something that the US signed the Geneva Convention.
    Reply to this comment
    by lorrieann51 July 11, 2007 8:10 AM PDT
    It's that time of year again, "Fear Factor" returns. It seems that whenever Bush and his crownies are losing at something, the "Fear Factor" comes out. Now, they are losing in Iraq (Mission Accomplished???) even with their own party, so now they will be starting again with the "imminent attack" again. Come on, people, wake up, the only people that will be attacking us is Bush and his crownies (I would not be surprised to see something manufactured by this administration at the time of the 2008 Presidential Election so that he can use his "executive powers" to stop the election).
    Reply to this comment
    by cbs_oliver July 11, 2007 8:13 AM PDT
    Some have a "reasonable suspician" that the Anthrax Attacks were a US government Psych Ops intended to scare up support for the "War on Terror".

    In view of this it is alarming that Michael Chertoff says he has a "gut feeling" about terror attacks in the next three months.
    Reply to this comment
    by nonameabc July 11, 2007 8:17 AM PDT
    Gut feeling?! What a joke! It is telling us there is no "terrorist" and this is just an image giving from the administration to us, threaten us. This kind of alert system is for political use. Imagine and my other gut feeling:
    1. President stole the election,
    2. 911 is under the plan of the administration (www.reopen911.org),
    3. Then, we can find an excuse to Iraq,
    4. Osama bin Laden is a friend of the admin. Come out with video tape to threaten us right on time,
    5. The anti-missile system never work, just waste our $ to the admin. team or their friends,
    6. The admin controls the oil price, they are stealing the $ from the world, including us,
    7. The admin is *** up us... our country.
    Good luck.

    Reply to this comment
    by cathaleen July 11, 2007 8:26 AM PDT
    I would like to remind the pinheads out there that we are at war. Things are different. People are trying to kill us. Just because we're not singing "Over There" doesn't mean everything is fine. Ask the relatives of the people that were killed in the world trade center building and the planes on 9/11. All the liberal nonsense is great in "peace time", but now is the time for us to be a littler more flexible concerning the rights of terrorists.
    Reply to this comment
    by realpatriot1 July 11, 2007 8:31 AM PDT
    cathaleen,

    The greatest restriction on the CIA in memory was the outing of Valarie Plame which led to the exposure of the CIA's anti-WMD front company. As a result, Iran & North Korea have obtained the nuclear material and technology to produsce nuclear weapons.

    Professor Khan, the Pakastani who gave it to them is being protected by the government that the administration considers are key allie in the war on terror. Our Pakastani "allies" are also protecting Bin Laden & Al Zawari and we would rather let them go than offend the Pakastani dictator.

    Conservatives have made their own contributions to our problems.

    I have a gut feeling that whenever Bush is stuck in deep he plays the terror card. I fully suspect that the terrorists will strike soon and I'd like to hear Chertoff offer something other than a gut feeling, I'd like a plan to fight them over here so we don't have to fight them over there.
    Reply to this comment
    by ioweign July 11, 2007 8:31 AM PDT

    Chertoff added, "We could easily be attacked. The intent to attack us remains as strong as it was on Sept. 10, 2001."

    Wow - you have been hard at work with Homeland Security haven't you, Chertie!! How many jobs are still open in your department? No wonder you are going on "gut feelings"!

    What happened to the spin "Fighting them in Iraq is better than fighting them here!"
    Reply to this comment
    by usawatchman July 11, 2007 8:32 AM PDT
    They leave the BORDERS WIDE OPEN
    and ALL he can talk about is his
    BOWEL MOVEMENTS

    YOU KNOW I'M GETTING TIRED
    of the
    BUSH ADMINISTRATION
    and
    OTHER REPUBLICANS / DEMOCRATS

    THREATENING TERRORIST ACTS
    until we
    GIVE UP ALL OUR RIGHTS...
    Reply to this comment
    by gkc99 July 11, 2007 8:34 AM PDT
    "There's going to be a massive auto crash."

    "There's going to be a big fire."

    "There's going to be a bank robbery shootout."

    "There's going to be a terrorist attack."

    Well, duh! Something bad is always going to happen in the future. Does it make you a prophet to predict the obvious.

    There are plenty of people in the world who, for whatever reason, want to attack the US. Sooner or later someone will succeed.

    Is that any reason to trash our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our freedom?

    Especially by an incompetent political hack like Chertoff?

    "You're doing a heck of a job, Mikey!"==George W. Bushit.
    Reply to this comment
    by ioweign July 11, 2007 8:35 AM PDT
    I would like to remind the pinheads out there that we are at war. Things are different. People are trying to kill us. Just because we're not singing "Over There" doesn't mean everything is fine. Ask the relatives of the people that were killed in the world trade center building and the planes on 9/11. All the liberal nonsense is great in "peace time", but now is the time for us to be a littler more flexible concerning the rights of terrorists.
    Posted by cathaleen at 08:26 AM : Jul 11, 2007

    How many Iraqis were involved with 9/11? NONE

    Congress declares war.

    The Geneva Convention is not liberal nonsense.
    Reply to this comment
    by rushlimpdrug July 11, 2007 8:36 AM PDT
    "Summertime seems to be appealing to them," Chertoff said. . .
    He added, "We could easily be attacked."
    Fear, fear, fear. . .let us all continue to increase our fear we have nothing to fear but . .

    Anyway, while on a sailing trip I once had a gut feeling like Michael Chertoff, turned out it was an upset stomach.
    I suggest he take some Pep-tol.
    Reply to this comment
    by usawatchman July 11, 2007 8:37 AM PDT
    I can't tell you ALL how
    MAD I AM
    I wake up this morning to news that
    some BUREAUCRAT (Dept. of LABOR(OSHA))

    http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=19509

    is trying some BACK DOOR ATTEMPT
    TO OVER THROUGH MY COUNTRY

    THIS YEAR ALONE

    I had (have) to call
    MY REPRESENTATIVES and VOICE MY OPINION
    on
    1) the NORTH AMERICAN UNION
    2) the IMMIGRATION BILL and IMMUNITY for ILLEGAL ACTIVITY
    3) a BACK DOOR ATTEMPT on MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS

    DOES ANYONE ELSE BESIDES ME SEE A TREND HERE???

    AM I , and OTHERS GOING TO HAVE TO
    TAKE UP ARMS
    and PUT
    SOME THIRD WORLD BANANA REPUBLIC DICTATOR(s)
    OUT OF BUSINESS
    and TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY

    (NOTE: THE BUSH FAMILY OWNS MORE LAND IN SOUTH AMERICA
    THAN THEY OWN IN NORTH AMERICA..(PARAGUAY / NO EXTRADITION))


    DOES ANYONE ELSE BESIDES ME SEE A TREND HERE??


    85-95% of the PEOPLE
    want our border CLOSED
    and OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS ENFORCED

    and what do we get ???

    CORRUPT POLITICIANS,
    CORRUPT CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT
    and
    CORRUPT COURTS

    I would suggest people
    that everyone buy FOOD, GUNS, and AMMUNITION
    while you still have the right to do so...
    Reply to this comment
    by bobgee_1999 July 11, 2007 8:37 AM PDT
    cathaleen: I wonder how you people would survive a trip to the water cooler/or this website if you didn't have your right-wing radio propaganda to tell you what to think? Who is defending terrorist's rights in this article or in these posts? I personally DO support SUSPECTED terrorist's rights, because a) by the definition this administration uses, everyone with an opinion contrary to Bush's IS a suspected terrorist, and b) because being suspected of something wasn't a crime last time I checked. So howe about slapping a bung in your hole next time you decide to define what the rest of us believe?
    Reply to this comment
    by omega39-2009 July 11, 2007 8:39 AM PDT
    Get that man some Pepto-Bismol. Seriously, with pressure ratcheting up on Bush and his Iraq policy,I expect to live under "red alert" for the next year.
    Reply to this comment
    by rharrin1 July 11, 2007 8:41 AM PDT
    nonameabc - You have some good points but your and idiot. 9/11 setup by our govenment..

    Posted by guyfrompa45 at 08:22 AM : Jul 11, 2007

    guyfrompa45 First responders, firefighters and police are all on the record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be "brought down" and many took that to mean that it was going to be intentionally demolished by means of explosives. Some even reported a 20 second countdown preceding the building's collapse, which can only mean one thing - that it was deliberately imploded according to a pre-determined schedule.

    I am not accusing but I AM asking no building falls straight down or into itself unless it was intended to.
    When buildings are imploded it takes weeks of looking at blueprints and the placing of explosives. Building 7 came down 8 hrs. after first plane can anybody explain how??? ( it's not like just throwing a stick of dynamite )
    Reply to this comment
    by panhandlpete July 11, 2007 8:45 AM PDT
    Ratings are going into the toilet swirl, so how about some scare tactics.

    How can we believe these people are really serious about stopping a terrorist attack when the southern border is open, and the military is recruiting the border guards to go to Iraq? The shipping containers are only inspected at about 5 per cent. Mexican truckers are driving on US highways, and who knows what they bring in. China is shipping us poison pet food, poison fish, and bad toys......that we know about.....is there more?

    Oh, I heard several REPUBS say yesterday on cspan that "the insurgents are on the run, we're getting Al Qaeda...." (They can't be following us home for our military is still over there. Duh!)

    If the 24% vacancies at the HS gets filled with loyalites, then YES, I will be afraid, very afraid, just like someone else noted, that 2008 could motivate an attack for political gain.

    Vigilance from the people could be an effective tool........SAY WHAT.....someone did report the fact that pilots were training in Arizona and Fla and his report got "tossed or ignored."

    Having stories such as this one printed could be covered in one statement: VOTE REPUBLICAN AS WE ARE THE PROTECTORS.





    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales July 11, 2007 8:46 AM PDT
    I don't blame those 'counter-terrorism' experts for speaking "on condition of anonymity". They think al-Zawahiri is hiding in the rugged areas of Afghanistan and northern Pakistan...Did they see the last al-Zawahiri video?--Do they really think he has a video studio with backdrops like the one in the CBS photo the other day?

    The 'Best of Bin Laden' collection gave us nothing like this...It looked like it could have been from 'BREMYA', any eastern Euro or Middle Eastern studio. I would think anything with the molded blue and orange forms and bronze looking plaques would stand out in the minds of anyone in this region of mud huts and rocketed madrasahs.
    Reply to this comment
    by uglyresult July 11, 2007 8:49 AM PDT
    Dear Mr. Secretary:
    We have a mechanism for indicating threat levels based on credible information, it's called the Homeland Security Advisory system. Perhaps we should create a new threat color - Chartreuse which indicates "The director of the agency believes he has a gut feeling". This is different from Taupe which means "The director merely has a case of acid reflux".

    Summer passes with no terrorism incidents - Administration claims they were EXTRA successful at preventing the attack. Summer passes with a terrorism incident (heaven forbid) - Administration says "we told you so".

    Your Doctor: "I have a gut feeling you may come down with brain cancer this summer"

    You: "Oh my god. What tests did you do? Am I going to die?"

    Doctor: "I can't tell you about the tests. I refrain from calling them credible. Yes you might die. Trust me".

    You: "Now I'm filled with anxiety, what should I do to prepare for my brain cancer"

    Doctor: "Be vigilant"

    You: "What? I'm going to die of brain cancer and I'm supposed to be vigilant?"

    Doctor: "Hey hey hey, calm down. I said you might die. It's just my gut feeling"

    Reply to this comment
    by lars008-2009 July 11, 2007 8:49 AM PDT
    what do you call an ideology that:

    kills you if you don't join it...

    http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=82201&ln=eng&txt=islam%20law%20kill%20kaafir

    kills you if you leave it...

    http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=696&ln=eng&txt=kaafir%20kill

    kills you if you don't do what they tell you to do..

    http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=6035&ln=eng&txt=kaafir%20kill

    kills you if you speak against it%u2026.

    http://islamqa.com/index.php?QR=22809&ln=eng

    kills anybody that is not a member of it...

    http://www.hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/koran5.html

    still practices slavery

    http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=12562&ln=eng&txt=slavery

    still practices pagan rituals...

    http://answering-islam.org/Silas/pagansources.htm

    allows the r a p e of babies and animals...

    http://www.homa.org/default.asp?TOCID=2083225445

    a. satanic cult???
    b. islam???
    c. all the above???

    Our Prophet commanded us to fight the kaafirs when we are able and to attack them in their homelands and to give them three choices before we enter their lands: either they become Muslim and be like us, sharing our rights and duties; or they pay the jizyah (poll tax) and feel themselves subdued; or they fight, in which case their wealth, women, children and homes become permissible as booty for the Muslims.
    http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=13759&ln=eng&txt=before%20islam%20arabia%20pagan
    Reply to this comment
    by shanev137 July 11, 2007 8:51 AM PDT
    My "gut feeling" about Michael Chertoff is that working for the Bush Administration will be the last job he ever has, for the rest of his life.
    Reply to this comment
    by drummer94 July 11, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
    Be afraid. Be very afraid. Of your president. Lets see. There was no talk about getting out of Iraq. Yes there is, it's called a "different posturing of forces". I claim "executive privledge"- erroneously. Scoot gets convicted- then sentence is commuted- not pardoned because then he would have to answer questions. The "surge" needs time to work- never gonna happen because our guys are gettin knocked off at an alarming rate. Then there's the Gonzo thing. And on and on and on. Loony-toon needs to go.
    Reply to this comment
    by barbaraf4 July 11, 2007 9:03 AM PDT
    How much are we paying this clown? If "gut feelings" have become valid system of measure, I have several gut feelings I would like to share:
    1. We can dismantle the Homeland Security department, because from now on, Chertoff will be reading tea leaves and entrails to project whatever nonsense Bush wants him to say.
    2. The good Lord can take me home, because now I have seen it all. Instead of a government of checks and balances, we have a government of frat boys networking to keep their naked emperor in power, just long enough to squeeze one more dime out of the taxpayers.
    3. Polls and intelligence data count for nothing, "gut feelings" rule!
    Reply to this comment
    by sandy19731 July 11, 2007 9:05 AM PDT
    FBTA

    Faith-Based Threat Assessment
    Posted by Smirk5 at 08:03 AM : Jul 11, 2007

    good point!!

    We wouldn't want to use science or technology.
    Reply to this comment
    by rushman71 July 11, 2007 9:09 AM PDT
    Kind of funny how you can pull the letters out of the word "liberal" to create the word "liar". You sure can't do that to "conservative".
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 11, 2007 9:10 AM PDT
    guyfrompa45

    Doesn't everyone know the entire war,9-11,terrorist etc. is a farce? It is all a sham designed by the Microsofts gaming division in cooperation with Mattel toys,Pixar and Walt Disney.No one died from terrorism or the war in Iraq those were creations by Pixar and Walt Disney.The Koran is also nonexistent is was created by Bantam Publishing.


    Believe all or part of this and I have some land to sell you in cyberspace.
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 July 11, 2007 9:12 AM PDT
    Hey, Hey, the Bumperstickers are coming the Bumperstickers are coming. But don't be afraid now, remember they're only Bumperstickers!
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 11, 2007 9:16 AM PDT
    Oh I forgot to include Israel the cartoonist creator of Yogi Bear in this as co conspirators along with Mattel, Microsoft,Pixar,Bantam Books and Walt Disney.


    They are all wagging the dog and we are following the tail.

    Land in cyberspace for sale only 1 million a lot.
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 July 11, 2007 9:17 AM PDT
    Kind of funny how you can pull the letters out of the word "liberal" to create the word "liar". You sure can't do that to "conservative".

    Posted by rushman71

    Famous quotes:

    Politicians are the lowest form of life on the earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.

    Another one: Man is war. War is conflict. Fightig is an elemental exposition of the age old effort to survive.

    It is very easy for ignorant people to think that success in war may be gained by the use of some wonderful invention rather than by hard fighting and superior leadership. On this may I add do you see any one with integrity in that Congress?
    Reply to this comment
    by inventagod July 11, 2007 9:19 AM PDT
    Bu$hCo preparing another 9/11?
    Guess the boys have to do something to make those bad poll ratings turn around...
    It worked last time.
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 11, 2007 9:20 AM PDT
    Mudrose wants three lots adjacent to Feelfree1



    Lots in cyberspace come complete with neon headstones.
    Reply to this comment
    by drummer94 July 11, 2007 9:20 AM PDT
    Mudrose- by "hard fighting" do you mean your on your way? Take your masters with you.
    Reply to this comment
    by condumism July 11, 2007 9:21 AM PDT
    "Gut Feeling" based upon the guilt of GOPigs slaughtering thousands of defenseless Muslims, all in the name of the NEOCON SLEEZE MACHINE. Or the guilt of no-bid contractors in Iraq stealing BILLIONS from the US taxpayer. Or the guilt of simply being a greedy GOPig!
    Reply to this comment
    by getit1776 July 11, 2007 9:22 AM PDT
    Kind of funny how you can pull the letters out of the word "liberal" to create the word "liar". You sure can't do that to "conservative".
    Posted by rushman71 at 09:09 AM : Jul 11, 2007

    No instead you get words that include: Vice rat is a neo con
    Reply to this comment
    by cantshutup July 11, 2007 9:22 AM PDT
    Chertoff, why don't you tell us about your dual israeli citizenship...??? you F *UCK...i have a "gut" feeling the replublinazi's are fixin to start terrorizing Americans once again to keep bushit in power and control the sheeple...i also have a "gut" feeling that somewhere somehow someone is gonna grow the BALLS necessary to send you and the entire bushitt administration to the burning depths of H ELL where you all belong!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by dodaz-2009 July 11, 2007 9:23 AM PDT
    GEE, i wish someone had a "GUT" feeling on 9/11, or at least PRIOR to 9/11..oh wait,..they had HARD evidence,not "gut feelings" and did jack-
    *** !!,.. so sorry,.. this "gut" feeling thing is more important..Keep up the great job Brownie, i mean Chertoff..America put it's faith in you ?...LOL
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 July 11, 2007 9:23 AM PDT
    Hey, Hey, the Bumperstickers are coming the Bumperstickers are coming. But don't be afraid now, remember they're only Bumperstickers!

    Gen. Patton, how dare you say that in the futcha all wars will be fought by politicians? They don't carry riffles! Why they sit on their fat butts and think base, oh, hahaha, "the base". How do we keep the base from tossing us out on the street. The base, hahahah, base. Are ya listening Harry? Are ya paying attention Pelosi? The Bumperstickers are coming! Yikes!
    Reply to this comment
    See all 545 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs