July 12, 2007
Hormone Therapy Not For Older Women
Second Study Finds No Benefit, But Increased Cardiovascular Risk; Trial Stopped Early
-
Play CBS Video Video Hormone Debate Continues Hannah Storm speaks with Dr. Emily Senay about the continued debate over the risks and benefits associated with hormone replacement therapy.
-
(AP / CBS)
-
Interactive Cancer Learn about the most common cancers, who gets them and how they are treated.
-
Interactive Heart Disease Learn more about different types of heart disease, explore different treatments and assess your own risk.
-
Interactive Heart Disease In The U.S. A look at state-by-state estimates of the prevalence of heart disease.
The study, called the WISDOM (Women's International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen after Menopause), was very like the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study:
Because of its early halt, the WISDOM trial followed women only for about a year after starting hormone therapy. Nevertheless, the trial found that hormone therapy has serious risks for older women (the average age of the 5,692 women in the trial was 63).
Researcher Janet H. Darbyshire, MB, is director of the clinical trials unit of the U.K. Medical Research Council, which sponsored the trial.
"There was no evidence of benefit, which we hoped there would be," Darbyshire tells WebMD. "Instead, there was an increase in risk of cardiovascular events."
Within the first year of the trial, 11 women had "cardiovascular events" — that is, angina (chest pain), nonfatal heart attack, or sudden cardiac death. All of these women were assigned to hormone therapy. None of these serious events occurred among women receiving inactive placebo treatment.
By itself, the brief trial proves very little. But the findings are identical to those seen over seven years in the WHI study, Darbyshire says.
That's true, says JoAnn Manson, MD, DrPH, chief of preventive medicine at Harvard's Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Manson is one of the principal researchers for the WHI and is co-author of the book Hot Flashes, Hormones, and Your Health.
"These findings from WISDOM are consistent with WHI," Manson tells WebMD. "In older women using these hormone formulations, the risk outweighs the benefits. There was evidence of increased cardiovascular disease and blood clots."
The bottom line, Manson and Darbyshire agree, is that hormone therapy should not be used for disease prevention.
Both experts also agree that the findings do not apply to the main use for hormone therapy: relief of severe menopausal symptoms.
"There is no one-size-fits-all solution to hormone therapy," Manson says. "The answer depends on the presence of menopausal symptoms that interfere with sleep and disrupt quality of life. And it depends on whether a woman is at risk of heart disease or stroke. If so, there is increased risk with hormone therapy."
For women not already at risk of heart disease, hormone therapy may actually protect the heart.
"Hormone therapy is a two-edged sword. It seems to help the earliest stages of heart disease, but may increase the risk of blood clots and arterial plaque rupture if continued into older age," Manson says.
The WISDOM results appear in the July 11 online issue of the British medical journal BMJ.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
© 2007, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment
- The article says...."Hormone therapy is a two-edged sword. It seems to help the earliest stages of heart disease, but may increase the risk of blood clots and arterial plaque rupture if continued into older age," Manson says.
This seems unreal to me...
I am wondering if what was used was a chemical hormone or a natural hormone, or as natural as they can get.. As it is probably conducted by a drug company it will more than likely be chemical, and I feel that putting more chemicals in the body can only do harm...
I would love to see results from products as close to natural as possible. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
