Bush Rejects Calls For Change On Iraq
Urges Congress To Delay Action Until Top General Issues September Report On Troop Surge
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush's Preemptive Strike
President Bush is asking for more time with the Iraq troop surge as the calls for withdrawal increase. Polls show most Americans want an exit by spring. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Video
Snow Discusses Iraq Report
White House spokesman Tony Snow defends the administration's policy in Iraq, telling Harry Smith that a recent Pentagon report provides only a snapshot of the early days of the troop surge.
-
Video
Meeting Goals In Iraq
CBS News Military Analyst Maj. Mike Lyons (Ret.) weighs in on U.S. goals in Iraq and how it may - or may not- lead to a troop withdrawl.
-
-
Photo
President Bush holds up a Greater Cleveland Partnership bumper sticker that was given to him prior to addressing the organization, Tuesday, July 10, 2007 in Cleveland, Ohio. (AP Photo)
-
Photo
President Bush, right, shakes hands with patrons during visit to Slyman's Restaurant, Tuesday, July 10, 2007 in Cleveland, Ohio. (AP)
-
-
Interactive
Iraq: 4 Years Later
The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Photo Essay
Iraq In Pictures
A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
-
Interactive
Bush Presidency
The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
"That's what the American people expect. They expect for military people to come back and tell us how the military operations are going," Mr. Bush said. "And that's the way I'm going to play it as commander in chief."
Gen. David Petraeus is due in September to present a progress report to Congress on the effects of the recently completed troop build up in Iraq. Frustration in Congress — among leaders of both parties — has led to calls for changes in strategy before then.
But a military official who spoke with Mr. Bush recently says the president told him no matter what the final report in September contains, if the top U.S. commander in Iraq recommends the surge should continue, it will, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod.
For now, Mr. Bush is saying he won't be swayed.
"We just started. We got all the troops there a couple of weeks ago," he told the Greater Cleveland Partnership, a coalition of Northeast Ohio companies.
"I believe it's in this nation's interest to give the commander a chance to fully implement his operations," Mr. Bush said. "And I believe Congress ought to wait for Gen. Petraeus to come back and give his assessment of the strategy that he's putting in place before making any decisions."
The president's comments come amid a new USA Today/Gallup poll that shows 71 percent of Americans want all troops out of Iraq by next April, except for a limited number deployed for counter-terrorism efforts, adds Axelrod.
Tuesday the White House scrambled to respond to a deeply frustrated public and Congress, while also warning that his troop build up needs more time to work.
"I wouldn't ask a mother or a dad — I wouldn't put their son in harm's way if I didn't believe this was necessary for the security of the United States and the peace of the world," Mr. Bush said. "I strongly believe it, and I strongly believe we'll prevail."
Back in Washington, the Senate wrestled with a defense spending bill, including efforts to withdraw troops and other ideas to wind down the war. With Republican support fading, and a new report expected to show little progress, the war continued to hang over Mr. Bush.
Meanwhile, the president was also trying to pressure lawmakers into taking up what's left of his shrinking domestic agenda.
In stops through the Cleveland area, he hoped to draw attention to a strung-together list of topics: energy alternatives, affordable health insurance and restrained spending.
He began in Parma with a tour of GrafTech, a maker of graphite products that are used in fuel cells. Mr. Bush playfully climbed about a fork lift powered by such a fuel cell. He is promoting alternative fuels as a primary way to reduce U.S. consumption of gasoline.
Later, he dug into a heaping corned beef sandwich over lunch with community leaders in Cleveland. He then visited the Cleveland Clinic, a nonprofit hospital where Mr. Bush got hands-on lessons in new ways to repair aneurysms and probe the brain. "Amazing," he said.
The president's itinerary underlined the White House strategy: get beyond the collapse of immigration reform by focusing on what's next — and blame Congress for inaction.
Even though Democrats run the legislative branch, Mr. Bush's own party crushed his bid to legalize millions of unlawful immigrants and strengthen the border. Three-quarters of the Senate's Republicans, including the chamber's leader, voted to derail his immigration bill last month.
The White House sees a chance to regain some advantage in the yearly spending debates. The aim is to simplify the arcane appropriations process into a message that resonates with the public: Mr. Bush will stop Democrats from spending too much of the public's money.
Indeed, Mr. Bush is itching for a fight and promising vetoes. The Democrats' blueprint would increase spending on federal agencies about $22 billion above Mr. Bush's request. He claims it would amount to the largest tax hike in history by allowing some tax cuts to expire.
"The Republican Party has lost a lot of the advantage we used to have," said Charlie Black, a GOP strategist close to the White House. "People used to view Republicans as the party that would keep down spending, keep taxes low and restrain the size of government. This gives us a chance to remind people of the differences."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 398 Comments"WASHINGTON, July 10 (Reuters) - These are tough times for the Democratic-led U.S. Congress, where partisan battles have led to little progress on big issues and have made lawmakers collectively less popular than President George W. Bush.
Congress, typically never all that popular to begin with, starts the second half of 2007 with an anemic job approval rating of about 25 percent, down from 43 percent in January, with one Gallup poll ranking lawmakers at 14 percent.
Experts attribute the woeful rankings to an inability to force a change in direction in Iraq, the priority Democrats campaigned on to gain power in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in last November's elections.
But that is not all. There has been little to show on other priorities, including a change in Social Security and other entitlement programs that will run out of money in the years ahead, in addition to overhauling a health care system that has left millions uninsured and a broken immigration policy."
Wow! 14% in one poll. Maybe if the Dems keep having GOP "political lynching" hearings in Congress they could reach "single digit" approvals by November 2008.
Yes Republcian Senators, how many more need to die in the attempt to save your *****.
That will only happen after American becomes a military dictatorship, like the Japan of Tojo and Yammamoto.
Before then, our U.S. Constitution makes it crystal clear that civilian government (what he contemptuously dismisses as "political figures") as represented by Congress retains all decision making control on military matters.
Such ignorance in a president meets any reasonable definition of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Peace Out!
And get this women out of office Maine Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had said on Monday, "What many of us are looking for is a new strategy that would not be a precipitous pullout with all of the problems that would cause, but rather a plan to exit over the next year." This faux arguments, goop talking points and lies are intended to provide election cover not protect our troops call her on it; show your States strength get her out in 08.
Re: "What we want to see now is whether the surge is working."
###
%u201CI%u2019m fleeing my home today and won%u2019t take anything with me. I cannot see my children dying. ...US troops are invading our houses, shooting at our doors and killing innocent people and I don%u2019t want my loved ones to be the next victims,%u201D said Mamun Ali, 45.
%u201CThey made it clear during their raid on 30 June that they were going to return to finish the militants and surely dozens of innocent Iraqis are going to die just for remaining in their homes,%u201D
%u201CSpiteful%u201D US action
%u201CThe action taken by the US military was spiteful; ...The killed people were only civilians and many locals have started to flee the neighbourhood..."
"Women, children among dead"
"Several women and children were among the dead and injured, according to Lt-Gen Shakarchi. Three women have also disappeared during the raids; witnesses said they were arrested by some Iraqi police officers. The body of one of the women was found on the morning of 1 July in the outskirts of the city. She had been sexually assaulted before being shot, Shakarchi said."
%u201CPeople are scared to leave their homes to buy petrol for their generators or fetch water. Many families will soon start to run out of food and many shops are closed. Locals are desperate and prefer to stay inside their homes rather than get killed while walking on the streets,%u201D
www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=73049
Bushism:
"Give my chance a plan to work."
Re: "No more patience ! Bring the troops home now !"
Agreed.
www.ipetitions.com/petition/OutNow
We need to stay the course and support the troops because these colors don't run.
You forgot Apple pie hateing and Puppy kicking. clearly if I do not agree with you I am against everything you love. it is as simple as that.
Posted by perception5 at 12:19 PM : Jul 10, 2007
So in your Small and insignificant little mind this poll proves what? IF you think the American people are NOT going to hold Republican's Responsible for the continuing of a Policy that has failed so badly, when they do NOTHING but block every effort by Democrats to change the course in Iraq, I think you are going to be one seriously disturbed Conservative. You really need to get out amoung the people Sparky!! Then you would understand why Republican's who face the voters next year are beginning to turn on Bush.
, Half of thier military won't fight thier own people, reconstruction has failed...
. And our military cannot hold the ground they take
, Equipment isn't being repaired or relpaced,
, Many of our troops aren't trained for the mission & come from other branches of services
-------------- FUBAR -------------
As a gay Republican I have to say that Tony Snow is very very cute.
[tony snow - professional liar for bush admin]
no tony ... they are the means for understanding that you won't succeed in iraq ... which history could have told you if you bothered to read it.
We need to stay the course and support the troops because these colors don't run.
--- 3,605 Americans KIA for no gain at all ---
[Posted by doctorwho4 at 01:06 PM : Jul 10, 2007]
sophistry?
don't understand the genghis khan reference but you get points for using the work sophistry.
of course ... you lose all those points for the use of the phrase 'letters to this website'.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
Opposition to the Iraq war has reached a record high, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds%u2026%u2026.Bush approval rating has reached a new low: 29% 26% on other polls and this from the conservative polls%u2026%u2026%u2026...Longest sustained rejection of any President in American history.
Enough already with the Bu$hit.
Did the NeoCons engineer 9/11 for their gain?
The peacemakers are ridiculed as idealists, cowards, and collaborators with the latest enemy our plutocracy has created to justify its endless wars.
We had a war because there are powerful interests in our country that are geared toward making money from war. How? Let us count the ways. There are companies that help break things, by making the tools for violence and destruction, such as Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. There are companies that fix what gets broken, such as Bechtel and Halliburton. There are companies that protect people as they break things and as they fix what's broken, such as Blackwater and Vinnell Corp. There are companies that want our government to smash across borders so they may bring new products and infrastructure, companies that we will see set up shop in that country. There are companies that want our government to smash across other countries' borders so they may suck the resources out from underneath the people there, such as the big oil companies. There are companies that like the US to attack other countries so they may have something entertaining to tell their audiences in the time between commercials: ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CNN.
People, they have been saying this stuff since the war started. To all of those who say 'stay the course', you seriously need to put down the pipe and take a serious look at what has been happening from the get-go in Iraq. Utter disaster. Now all the right-wingers out there keep repeating: 'we're making progress', 'last throes of the insurgency', 'the media isn't reporting the good things there'. After 4 years, where are we now? We have not gained a single inch. Didn't I hear Snow say that stuff about the surge just starting last month, and the month before that? In fact, if you Reps would just remember you had a brain you'd realize that this 'new strategy' is just a revamp of the old one. Iraq is depleting resources that could be used to REALLY
Just how do you recover from a War started by lies, a War that was a Major Strategic Failure from the start ??
How do you recover the 3,605 lives lost for your Failures, bad leadership & incompetencies ???
But it's not just the government that these companies seek to influence. They will try to influence the media and the general public, through think tanks and ad campaigns. They know that if there's a climate of fear, then the public will be assuaged by the government's buying more weapons. Various officials will work to prove they're "tough on defense." Officials who are "weak on defense" will not stay in office long.
The companies also hire lobbying firms. These firms make money from war, too. In fact, the US government has hired PR firms to help the government "sell" its wars, such as the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
http://www.counterpunch.org/foley09152005.html
The peacemakers are ridiculed as idealists, cowards, and collaborators with the latest enemy our plutocracy has created to justify its endless wars.
We had a war because there are powerful interests in our country that are geared toward making money from war. How? Let us count the ways. There are companies that help break things, by making the tools for violence and destruction, such as Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. There are companies that fix what gets broken, such as Bechtel and Halliburton. There are companies that protect people as they break things and as they fix what's broken, such as Blackwater and Vinnell Corp. There are companies that want our government to smash across borders so they may bring new products and infrastructure, companies that we will see set up shop in that country. There are companies that want our government to smash across other countries' borders so they may suck the resources out from underneath the people there, such as the big oil companies. There are companies that like the US to attack other countries so they may have something entertaining to tell their audiences in the time between commercials: ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CNN.
Posted by red164 at 01:24 PM : Jul 10, 2007
.....protect americans. This war was never about protecting America. It was about George Bush's blind ambition and the grudge he had against Iraq. How many more lives have to be spent and how many more Billions of dollars for one man's disasterous zeal? Fight terrorism yes, but do it! Don't bog your troops down in a situation they can't win just because you can't admit you were wrong. Republicans, wake up and smell the stench of 3,500 dead for a lie!
Exactly...........
Opposition to the Iraq war has reached a record high, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds%u2026%u2026.Bush approval rating has reached a new low: 29% 26% on other polls and this from the conservative polls%u2026%u2026%u2026...Longest sustained rejection of any President in American history.
Posted by pepperp1 at 01:20 PM : Jul 10, 2007
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patience my a s s! This war was wrong from the beginning and charges should be filled against the dictators who are responsible for the deaths of over 3600 young American men and women, in additon to the over 20,000 who will be maimed for the rest of their lives.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/0
9/60minutes/main592330.shtml
Posted by harp1963 at 01:19 PM : Jul 10, 2007
From the F-22 fighter jet and B-2 bomber to the Stryker tank and Star Wars, Grand Theft Pentagon chronicles how the Pentagon shells out billions to politically wired arms contractors for weapons that don't work for use against an enemy that no longer exists. St. Clair shows how many of the biggest arms contracts were literally inside jobs, negotiated by Pentagon generals who later went to work for the very same corporations that were awarded the contracts.
July 5, 2007, 8:22 PM EDT
Bill Barto has had heartbreaks in life, but there is one he doesn't think he can ever forget: the day not long ago when he heard through friends that F-14 Tomcat fighter jets -- once the pride of the Navy's fleet -- are being shredded to fine dust.
"It [the F-14] means a tremendous lot to me," said Barto, of Bay Shore, who worked for 20 years at the former Grumman Corp. in Bethpage, most of it as a technical illustrator on the Tomcat program.
Earlier this year, the Pentagon suspended sales of any F-14 parts, Dawn Dearden, a spokeswoman for the Defense Department, said this week. Further, Dearden said, the Pentagon has signed a three-year, $3.7-million contract with a St. Louis firm, Tri-Rinse, to shred F-14s, which cost about $35 million each.
So far, she said, 23 of the planes have been shredded.
WHY?
Removing the restriction opens the door to security clearances for high-profile felons, such as I. Lewis %u201CScooter%u201D Libby, the senior White House aide whose prison sentence was commuted by President Bush last week.
%u201CCould a Scooter Libby be hired by DoD?%u201D Aftergood said. %u201CThe answer is, he wouldn%u2019t be automatically disqualified.%u201D
Those consequences being that the evil Bush cabal will look even more like a$$holes than they do now. I think it's time to quit BSing around and storm the palace and behead the lot of them.
I declare jihad on all jihadis that jihad against my jihad. They are infidels in the eyes of God and must be stopped. May we quicken the coming of Jesus by attacking all Muslim lands for the glory of God All-Mighty!
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Democrats-Terrorism.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I can go on and on, but patience is what the American people are running out of. We continue to spend enormous amounts of taxpayer dollars to support a continuing fiasco.
Many years ago a close relative had to stop construction on a huge federal project. He was villified for his decision. But he told me it was throwing good money after bad. Sometimes you just gotta' cut bait.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, in a language you can understand. You're batting less than .200 and you've made errors at critical times during the game. It's time you were sent to the minor leagues.
There are a total of 87 press releases, would be a representative sample, as well as, obviously, an up to date one.
Only 29 of those 87 press releases mentioned al Qaeda at all; 58, or two-thirds, made no reference to that organization. Further, of those that attributed violent acts to some enemy of the U.S. and the Iraqi government, 37 mentioned persons other than al Qaeda; e.g., "insurgents," an "extremist group," an "IED cell," etc. So, far from focusing on al Qaeda to the "virtual exclusion" of other groups, 55% of the time, the military does not mention al Qaeda at all.
I declare jihad on all jihadis that jihad against my jihad. They are infidels in the eyes of God and must be stopped. May we quicken the coming of Jesus by attacking all Muslim lands for the glory of God All-Mighty!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 398 Comments