April 14, 2009 12:03 PM

"Hot Fuel" Costing Consumers Big Bucks?

By
Daniel Schorn
(CBS)  Many drivers have been conditioned to know that when summer comes, gas prices seem to head higher with the temperature, thanks to greater seasonal demand.

But what if we told you that you might be paying more, literally because of the temperature?

As CBS News correspondent Susan McGinnis reports, this phenomenon is called "hot fuel" and it's become a burning issue from Main Street to Congress.

Bill Younger has been driving trucks for 56 years. He's been on the road about as long as he's been old enough to drive. Even in his 70's, he still clocks about 600 miles a day.

"I've known about the hot fuel issue for about four or five years," he says.

And this little known issue has this lifelong driver worried about losing his livelihood.

Hot fuel boils down to simple physics: when temperatures rise, gasoline expands. So on hotter days, you're getting less usable fuel from a gallon of gas.

But gas is bought by retailers based on a standard temperature of 60 degrees. When it's hotter than that, the argument goes that drivers end up paying the difference.

On a 90-plus degree day, McGinnis decided to take a measurement of the gasoline's temperature – the thermometer settled at 78.5 degrees, a lot higher than the 60 degree standard.

Consumer groups say the difference could cost drivers three to nine cents a gallon more at the pumps, totaling more than $1.5 billion this summer, $2.3 billion for the year.

That's making it a hot issue from the highways to Capitol Hill, where hearings recently got heated over the issue. And about 20 federal lawsuits have accused retailers and distributors of unfairly profiting from hot fuel.

Bill Younger is one of the plaintiffs. "It should be 60 degrees, that's what the government says it's supposed to be," he says. "You're not getting what your paying for."

An oil industry trade association declined comment, but does say more research is needed. They defer to retailers.

Station owners say the only way to fix the problem is to retro-fit pumps with pricey equipment that adjusts for temperature changes, something they say would cost thousands of dollars per pump.

"The average retail station owner who's going to have to spend a lot of money on expensive pumps is really making only a couple of cents in net profit on gasoline," says oil analyst Tom Kloza.

Kloza says that would punish the wrong culprit. "At the end of the day, we're talking about a thimbles' worth of gasoline sometimes when people are fueling up in hot temperatures. And I don't think at the end of the day that makes a difference in getting us out of this energy mess that we're in," he says.

Try telling that to Bill Younger. He fills up two to three times a day and believes everybody loses as a result.

"This isn't just for me. This is for the whole trucking industry. The cost of groceries goes up. Anybody who gets anything from a truck, which is everybody. I mean, if you got it, you eat it, you wear it, whatever. It was brought to you by a truck. So somebody's paying for it. And 'who' ultimately is the consumer," Younger says.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by jetranger7 July 6, 2007 5:16 AM EDT
HO-HO-I HAVE AN IDEA AND A SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM, DR. WATSON :),, REFRIGERATE THE FUEL AS IT COMES OUT FROM THE PUMPS OR UNDERGROUND TANKS, A FAN AND SOME REFRIGERANT, AND YOUR ALL SET CLEO !!! I KNEW MY PARENTS SENT ME TO HARVARD AND YALE FOR SOMETHING !!! NOW, DOES ANYBODY KNOW WHERE I CAN FIND ME A JOB ?????? YA SAY - "CHINA" or "MEXICO" !!!!!!! :(:(
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 July 6, 2007 5:16 AM EDT
cbscrash07, Uh, whatever, the oil companies measure the temperature at the pump in cold climates and ignore the temperature in hot climates. So see, for all that you could just make this simple straight forward observation. You however didn't for some reason.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 July 6, 2007 5:12 AM EDT
alphaa10, In your response to the dimwitted sociopath that made the comment.
----
kesac4650 said, "The consumer pays for everything. He always has, and always will. If he wants it he pays... If it costs too much, he will do without.

The high functioning anti-socials, you know the high society sociopaths who push these rationales in defense or promotion of their callous greed, the Marie Antoinettes as you pointed out are really no different from the thug that breaks into ones home and steals using the rationale, I'm bigger, and stronger and carry a gun. Of course the high functioning sociopaths ruling society these days can't see the comparison but a higher power really sees no difference.
Reply to this comment
by nskduke July 6, 2007 2:56 AM EDT
Here in Nebraska gas is expected to go up, because the Kansas oil refineries are flooded from the rain they are getting.
Reply to this comment
by nskduke July 6, 2007 2:56 AM EDT
Here in Nebraska gas is expected to go up, because the Kansas oil refineries are flooded from the rain they are getting.
Reply to this comment
by cyberdjs4 July 6, 2007 12:38 AM EDT
"You have Got to be kidding me!! Gasoline is in underground tanks it is a constant 60 degrees fahrenheit in these tanks!"--rfsteffen
----------------------------------------------
Good point. Why are we arguing about this?
This is another way for Big Oil to screw us over.
It's time for a revolution.
Walk, carpool, ride a bike, take the bus, get a fuel-efficient car.

Stop spreading your cheeks for The Man.
Reply to this comment
by ooida-2009 July 5, 2007 9:05 PM EDT
There are many myths surrounding this issue. Visit the Turn Down Hot Fuel website for more. TurnDownHotFuel Dot com.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 5, 2007 6:47 PM EDT
kesac4650 said, "The consumer pays for everything. He always has, and always will. If he wants it he pays... If it costs too much, he will do without.
---

This is a variation on Marie Antoinette, when told "The people have no bread!" Smiling coldly at her own wit, the Queen snapped, "Let them eat cake!"

Your comment is people always are in need of something, so this is not human misery but a mere market equation-- a dry exercise in market mechanics. The blind faith in The God of Markets doesn't explain the fear and pain in the faces of investors now-- or back in 1929.

Your indifference to price burdens on your fellow citizens is clear enough, but should we expect to see you smile the next time you are robbed by a monopoly market?

One of the basic tenets of capitalism is the market continually enriches its players. The truth this holds is very small, indeed, at times. Lessez faire capitalism-- ie. greed unrestrained by social democracy-- midwifed revolution and the despair that produced Hitler and Stalin and a host of other sourges.

It is only intelligent, responsible, community-sensitive capital that true capitalists might celebrate. Your view is only social Darwinism, poorly disguised.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 5, 2007 6:28 PM EDT
Processor2 said, "Liberals are amazing in their hypocrisy... They will whine about high gas prices, and then whine about proposals to find more oil."
---
Your whining post about liberals is the only whine seen on this page. The rest of the comments concern Big Oil crooks and con artists masquerading as gentle, beneficient patrons to American consumers. In fact, just a decade or so ago, these crooks scrapped many of their reserve refineries so there would be insufficient capacity to meet consumer demand, thereby driving prices through the roof.

Big Oil strives to maintain monopoly control over America and exploit this country's vulnerability to being held (up) over a barrel of oil. They are no better-- and probably worse-- than any foreign country which tries to hijack our energy market in this fashion, because Big Oil hurts its own citizens.

This behavior makes oil corporations into enemies of the United States. Despite $ billions $ in excess profits taken out of the budgets of average American households, the oil industry is quite content at the distress its skyrocketing prices cause their fellow Americans.
See Bush and Big Oil--2
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 July 5, 2007 6:24 PM EDT
Bush and Big Oil--2
Curiously, Big Oil has people who share their antipatriotic values, among them most (but not all) of the GOP. En masse, however, the GOP voted against any measures to divert even some of their huge, new gas profits into research on energy alternatives. Big Oil simply doesn't want oil alternatives, now or ever-- it cares only about robbing the rest of us.

Your comment about Big Oil needing more money to develop new oil sources is laughable. BP was cited by congress last year for failure to do basic maintenance on its own Alaskan pipelines. In view of its huge income, BP's failures are compelling proof the oil industry spends little money on anything-- let alone exploration and development

Liberals and conservatives with intelligence and foresight favor ending our national dependence on oil-- period. Even if our oil assets last a while, oil is non-renewable and not the long-term answer to our energy needs. We need now to start developing one, and stop making excuses (and foreign policy) on our addiction to oil.

Meanwhile, Bush and most of the GOP is huddled with Big Oil, and only too happy to postpone realistic, immediate measures to avoid continued oil crises. By now, what should Americans expect from Bush and (most of) the GOP, if not more crises?
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook