BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 2, 2007

U.S. General Points Finger At Iran

Claims Iranian Military Unit Had Advance Knowledge Of January Attack That Killed 5 Americans

    • U.S. soldiers from Charlie Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, Second Infantry Division, on patrol in Baghdad, July 1, 2007. Photo

      U.S. soldiers from Charlie Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, Second Infantry Division, on patrol in Baghdad, July 1, 2007.  (AP)

    • An Iraqi policeman prepares to tow a damaged patrol vehicle in Baghdad, July 1, 2007. Two Iraqi policemen were killed Sunday when a roadside bomb struck their patrol. Photo

      An Iraqi policeman prepares to tow a damaged patrol vehicle in Baghdad, July 1, 2007. Two Iraqi policemen were killed Sunday when a roadside bomb struck their patrol.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Photo Essay Iraq In Pictures

    A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.

(CBS/AP)  A U.S. military official is charging that Iran is using the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah as a "proxy" to arm Shiite militants in Iraq and that the Quds force — an elite military force in Iran — had prior knowledge of a January attack in Karbala in which five Americans died.

These extremist Shiite militia groups are behind much of Iraq's violence, and although the U.S. army has long accused Iran of funding them, today it went further then ever, pointing a finger directly at the Iranian government, reports CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan.

"Our intelligence reveals that senior leadership in Iran is aware of this activity," said U.S. military spokesman Brig. Gen. Kevin J. Bergner.

Bergner said a senior Lebanese Hezbollah operative, Ali Mussa Dakdouk, was captured March 20 in southern Iraq. Bergner said Dakdouk served for 24 years in Hezbollah and was "working in Iraq as a surrogate for the Iranian Quds force."

The general also said that Dakdouk was a liaison between the Iranians and a breakaway Shiite group led by Qais al-Kazaali, a former spokesman for cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Bergner said al-Kazaali's group carried out the January attack against a provincial government building in Karbala and that the Iranians assisted in preparations.

These charges will not improve already frosty relations between the United States and Iran, and they come at a time when the U.S. military is under heavy pressure at home to produce results in Iraq, adds Logan.

In other recent developments:

  • Two Iraqi policemen were killed Sunday when a roadside bomb exploded near their patrol in eastern Baghdad, police said. After the blast, gunmen sped by in a car and showered the policemen with machine gun fire, a police officer said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to media. Three policemen and three civilians in the area were wounded, the officer said.

  • Also Sunday, the bullet-riddled body of a senior police commander was discovered in Basra, Iraq's second-largest city about 340 miles southeast of Baghdad, police said. Col. Nasser Hamoud, who was in charge of the city's prisons, had been kidnapped along with three of his guards the day before, another officer said on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisals. The guards were released a few hours later, he said. Hamoud's hands and legs were bound, and his body showed signs of torture, the officer said. He was a member of the Shiite Fadhila party, an influential Shiite group that controls Basra's provincial government.

  • Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Sunday that provincial elections will be held before the end of the year — a key demand from the United States, which hopes to give Sunnis another chance to take part. The last provincial elections were held on Jan. 30, 2005, and were largely boycotted by the Sunni minority, resulting in a Shiite sweep even in areas of the country with substantial Sunni populations.

  • The U.S. military says two American soldiers have been charged with premeditated murder for allegedly killing three Iraqis and then planting weapons on their bodies to portray them as combatants. The three Iraqis were killed in separate incidents between April and June near Iskandariyah, 30 miles south of Baghdad, the military said in a statement released on Saturday. It says the deaths were investigated after authorities were tipped off by other soldiers.

  • The U.S. military also announced Saturday that a command sergeant major, Edward Ramsdell, was convicted in a court martial, demoted and sentenced to four months in prison for engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a female soldier in his unit, maltreating a soldier and possessing a "large quantity" of alcohol and pornography.

  • Al-Maliki condemned a U.S. raid Saturday in Baghdad's Shiite Sadr City slum — a politically sensitive district for him —in which American troops searching for Iranian-linked militants sparked a firefight the U.S. said left 26 Iraqis dead. The U.S. military said all those killed in the fighting were gunmen, some of them firing from behind civilian cars. But an Iraqi official put the death toll lower, at eight, and said they were civilians. Residents also said eight civilians were killed in their homes, angrily accusing American troops of firing wildly during the pre-dawn assault.

    Sadr City is the Iraqi capital's largest Shiite neighborhood — home to some 2.5 million people — making U.S. raids there potentially embarrassing for al-Maliki's Shiite-led government. The district is also the stronghold of the Mahdi Army, a militia loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who was once al-Maliki's ally.

  • One U.S. soldier was killed and three wounded when an explosively-formed penetrator (EFP) hit their combat patrol in southern Baghdad, the military said Saturday. The soldiers' unit had just detained nine men suspected of making roadside bombs, when they were hit by an EFP on Friday, the U.S. military said in a statement. The victims' names were withheld pending family notification.

  • A suicide bomber exploded himself in a crowd of police recruits Saturday in a market area northeast of Baghdad, killing at least 16 people, police said. The bomber detonated his explosives belt in a market area outside a police station in Muqdadiyah, 60 miles north of the Iraqi capital, a police officer said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information. All of the victims were new police recruits, the officer said.

    The military says U.S. troops uncovered a mass grave with as many as 40 bodies at a site south of Fallujah. It says a tip from a local resident led forces to the location. Between 35 and 40 bodies were found with gunshot wounds and limbs bound.

    Reports of 20 beheaded bodies found south of Baghdad earlier this week were untrue and may have been fabricated by insurgents aiming to incite violence and revenge killings, the U.S. military said Saturday.

    On Thursday, many Iraqi and international media outlets aired news of the bodies, quoting unnamed Iraqi police. The decapitated bodies had allegedly turned up on the banks of the Tigris River near Salman Pak, 15 miles southeast of Baghdad.

    At the time, the Interior Ministry tried to send troops to the area to confirm the discovery, but the visit was called off because the area was too dangerous. On Saturday, the U.S. military issued a statement saying it had investigated the reports of the bodies and ultimately found them to be false. "Anti-Iraqi Forces are known for purposely providing false information to the media to incite violence and revenge killings, and they may well have been the source of this misinformation," the statement said.


    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

    Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
    by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 4:35 AM PDT
    Another US general spreading pointless BS, maybe Bushit will reward him with another star if he is a good little lapdog.

    Anyone who is struggling to fight an occupying force will accept help from anyone offering it, doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure that one out.

    Get the hell out of Iraq, and the groups there won't have the legitimate need to fight you.
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb July 2, 2007 5:04 AM PDT
    brianbwb,,,

    Iran has clearly been operating on the principle of "Its not what you know, its what you can prove!" and aiding in the killing of Americans. Despite the fact that we may need to leave Iraq, I find that principle unacceptable! Iran can't kill Americans with impunity! Even if the U.S. does not go to war with Iran over it, the U.S. can't let Iran get away with it either. The U.S. must leave its calling card with Iran! Maybe the U.S. should not be in Iraq but Iran should not be in Iraq either, especially killing us while they are there! The U.S. has known all along what Iran is doing and don't need any Generals to confirm it! Iran is acting like we won't deal with them but enough is enough!
    Reply to this comment
    by jasonking4 July 2, 2007 5:08 AM PDT
    2 million refugees from Iraq - going to Iraq and Syria. It's common sense that these people may re-engage with their own country, even fighting for their country. To think that wouldn't be the case is stupid. Then blaming the syrians and Iranians for the massive carnage and chaos is about as rich as it gets.

    We should be apologising to Syria and Iran for landing them with millions of refugees.


    .
    Reply to this comment
    by ajmarine1 July 2, 2007 5:38 AM PDT
    Iran is doing a good job of turning it's own people againist them, we should do what we can to support this.
    Reply to this comment
    by smirk5 July 2, 2007 5:58 AM PDT
    We have a moral right to attack Iran for this just like the Soviets had a moral right to attack the U.S. for arming Afghani insurgents in Afghanistan in the 80s. One more thing. Any strategist would easily assume that a border country would become actively involved when another nation invades their neighbor. What exactly was the pre-war plan that Bush put in place to make sure Iran wouldn't become involved? Anything? Or, is this just another sign of the incompetence of the Bush Administration?
    And, Cons, if you want us to bomb Iran for doing something that the Bush Admin forgot to plan for, do you support $8.00 gas? Look at your Ford F150 and say your goodbyes to it.
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales July 2, 2007 8:39 AM PDT
    ***Let***'***s*** ***see*** ***a*** ***picture*** ***of*** ***the*** ***Hezzie***...***Let***'***s*** ***get*** ***independent*** ***confirmation*** ***that*** ***he*** ***is*** ***Lebanese***. ***Just*** ***out*** ***of*** ***curiosity***, ***to*** ***be*** ***sure***. ***His*** ***origin*** ***does*** ***not*** ***justify*** ***an*** ***attack*** ***on*** ***either*** ***Iran*** ***or*** ***Lebanon*** ***as*** ***a*** '***moral*** ***right***'. ***Such*** ***a*** ***putative*** '***right***' ***would*** ***justify*** ***an*** ***attack*** ***on*** ***Poland*** ***by*** ***Britain*** ***because*** ***Count*** ***Pulaski*** ***helped*** ***us*** ***in*** ***our*** ***war*** ***for*** ***freedom*** ***against*** ***the*** '***evil*** ***empire***' ***of*** ***that*** ***day***.
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 2, 2007 8:40 AM PDT
    Authorities suspect the two men who rammed an explosives-laden vehicle into Glasgow's airport on Saturday are the same people who parked two car bombs in central London a day earlier, security sources told CNN.

    Hopefully the Brits have captured all that are involved in this and thwarted any other plans by extremist.
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 2, 2007 8:47 AM PDT
    counter-terror sources report that ten days ago, the US gave the Czech government specific warning of large-scale al Qaeda terrorist attacks in Prague, targeting government buildings, the US embassy, American firms and Jewish and Israel locations in the Czech capital. All American missions and military facilities in Europe were placed on alert.

    France, Germany, Italy, Denmark and Spain have also tightened their anti-terror precautions.

    Our sources add that the London and Glasgow bombing attempts took the Americans by surprise. They had expected the jihadists to strike elsewhere in Europe.
    Reply to this comment
    by huskerarmy July 2, 2007 8:53 AM PDT
    Iran! Maybe the U.S. should not be in Iraq but Iran should not be in Iraq either, especially killing us while they are there
    Posted by tbweb at
    It's puzzeling however that the idea of Shiite Iranians helping Shiite Iraqi's would be a surprise to anyone. Even if we do somehow manage to secure Iraq, Shiites are the majority... these are the folks who will be in power. They will most certainly have empathy with Iran. Our invasion has helped to create a stronghold for Shiite influence in the Middle East. To say one is for the Iraq war is paramount to saying one is pro-Shiite. And it should be noted that this is a sect that believes strongly in religous orthodoxy. According to Amnesty International, the number of so-called "honor killings" has risen sharply and it is, if not sanctioned, all but ignored by the Iraqi Shiite government. Anyone supporting our continuing presence in Iraq should be forced to watch the horrifying spectacle of a 16-year-old girl being stoned to death by an angry mob of religous zealots...
    Reply to this comment
    by micma-2009 July 2, 2007 8:53 AM PDT


    If Iran invaded Canada we'd help Canada. This is what neighbors do. They get involved because they have to. If idiot Bush and his fellow neocon nuts would have listened to wise council before he invaded, we wouldn't be in this quagmire. We now know that he had ample warning that this is how it would unfold but he didn't listen. Now we all have to pay and pay and pay some more.




    Reply to this comment
    by closethippy July 2, 2007 9:01 AM PDT
    If this guy worked for Hizbollah it doesn't mean Hizbollah sent him over there. Even after Hizbollah took the two Isreali soldiers last year they apologized to the Lebanese because they didn't think Israel would react with such savagery.
    I just don't think that Hizbollah now wants to duke it out with the US. It doesn't make sense because they're also trying to work out a political arrangement with their opponents in Lebanon.
    Another reason it wouldn't make sense for Hezbollah, and for that matter Iran, to send anyone to Iraq is because Iraq has more than it needs to fight the Americans: It has the manpower, the knowledge and the ammunition to do so.
    Saddam Hussein's army of 400,000 that was foolishly dismantled by the US in 2003 has plenty of people willing to fight the US.
    If I'm not mistaken that army actually had more Shiites in it than Sunnis, many of whom were not traumatized by Hussein and that actually had careers in the army or outside of it they were looking forward to.
    A lot of them are probably fighting the US and that probably has the US all confused and running in circles trying to figure out what's going on.
    If anything, Hezbollah and Iran are staying at home enjoying the trials and tribulations of the US army in Iraq on TV.

    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 July 2, 2007 9:05 AM PDT
    There is no justification for Irans actions despite all the rhetoric posted here.The war in Iraq is wrong and every excuse given for invading was wrong, since when did two wrongs make a right? These are not sympathizers they are from the Quds force a elite group of Irans military.Is this a call to war with Iran over this? No.
    Reply to this comment
    by gkc99 July 2, 2007 9:06 AM PDT
    ***The*** ***Neocon***'***s*** ***god***, ***Ronald*** ***Reagan***, ***secretly*** ***armed*** ***the*** ***Iranians*** ***to*** ***finance*** ***his*** ***illegal*** ***covert*** ***war*** ***in*** ***Central*** ***America***.

    ***Now*** ***Daniel*** ***Ortega*** ***is*** ***back*** ***in*** ***power*** ***in*** ***Nicaragua*** ***despite*** ***the*** ***CIA***'***s*** ***and*** ***United*** ***Fruit***'***s*** ***best*** ***efforts***, ***and*** ***the*** ***Iranians*** ***giving*** ***weapons*** ***to*** ***people*** ***shooting*** ***at*** ***US*** ***soldiers***.

    ***Clearly*** ***Reagan***, ***North***, ***and*** ***the*** ***rest*** ***of*** ***the*** ***crew*** ***are*** ***guilty*** ***of*** ***treason***. ***American*** ***blood*** ***is*** ***on*** ***their*** ***hands***. ***Reagan*** ***has*** ***gone*** ***to*** ***his*** &***quot***;***reward***&***quot***;, ***but*** ***North*** ***hosts*** ***a*** ***TV*** ***show***!

    ***Yet*** ***the*** ***Repugniscum*** ***fall*** ***down*** ***and*** ***worship*** ***at*** ***the*** ***clay*** ***feet*** ***of*** ***their*** ***god***.
    Reply to this comment
    by smirk5 July 2, 2007 9:07 AM PDT
    ***Arming*** ***our*** ***enemies*** ***is*** ***the*** ***Bush*** ***Admin***'***s*** ***job***, ***not*** ***Iran***'***s***. ***How*** ***dare*** ***they***?
    Reply to this comment
    by bareemperor July 2, 2007 9:17 AM PDT
    Cheney's Forces will not stop until all Middle Eastern oil is under US control.
    The Vice-President's Secret Energy Plan includes re-enstating the draft before the year is out.
    Stay tuned for the Patriot Act III, which abolishes two-party rule in the US, and creates an official slavery class of citizens...
    Reply to this comment
    by starleo146 July 2, 2007 9:26 AM PDT
    Now we know why Al-Maliki took so many trips to Iran the sneak is stalling and everything is hindering our troops, to stop our troops again because we are getting close to finding it all out. Sadr city and Maliki are setting up with Hezbollah's help and Maliki needs to go. I personally have never trusted the sneak there is no telling how much of our money for reconstruction has gone to Iran. Let us watch very closely and see how this snake evolves.
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales July 2, 2007 9:37 AM PDT
    From the very beginning of the occupation, American troops have casually fired at Iraqi civilians. I remember one case in which an Iraqi family was passing a convoy and the creature manning a 50 cal casually fired a burst into the automobile...the convoy moved on, leaving the dead and wounded behind them. This was when they were 'winning hearts and minds' by running tanks back and forth over a cab whose driver collected some firewood that raised the soldiers ire.

    Its time to bring the troops home and bring to trial the animals in Washington who are responsible for the murder of 3,500 of our finest as well as hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
    Reply to this comment
    by condumism July 2, 2007 9:41 AM PDT
    Here we have another propoganda story coming from a spokesman of the USA's MILITARY WELFARE program. A general in this organization these days is only there because they are Bush/Cheney loving fools that couldn't get work in the real world. So their bosses make up stories to find some, ANYONE for these born losers to go off an kill. HEY LOSERS: BOMB ANY AFGHAN WEDDINGS LATELY?
    Reply to this comment
    by klifton2-2009 July 2, 2007 10:34 AM PDT
    We have the nerve to blame others. What about us interfering in the affairs of other nations? It is all right for America to do it but not others. This sort of absurd attitude is what gets us in trouble in the first place and yet we persist!
    Reply to this comment
    by oakishpines July 2, 2007 10:36 AM PDT
    when dealing with people, governments and others rarely go to war to make a point ... 99 plus percent of the time, war is too expensive and too unnecesary to solve a problem ... so why then on some rare occasions do revolutions and civil wars and other actions occur? ... people are not insects of a lawn that are all but incapable of having their minds changed ... to go to war is should not be viewed as foolish most of the time: it should be viewed as foolish all of the time because enough evidence to go to war to prove the 'obvious' is not yet enough evidence to win a war to prove the 'obvious' ... which has a lot more to do with why 99 plus percent of war upstarts fail than does the relative strength of the opposition


    kids age five and less absorb 99 plus percent of punishments as kids age five and less are guilty of 99 plus percent of crimes ... while parents injure and kill 99 plus percent more children than does any other group, soldiers injure and kill 99 plus percent more children per capita than do even the parents

    while civilians suffer 99 plus percent of punishments (and civilians age five and less absorb 99 plus perenct of those punishments), civilians suffer those punishments only because civilians are 99 plus percent more likely to assault an authority than is another authority

    thoush a civilian is 99 plus percent more likely to be injured or killed by assaulting an authority than is another authority
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad July 2, 2007 10:41 AM PDT
    is this forum open?
    Reply to this comment
    by prolegomena July 2, 2007 10:53 AM PDT
    Talk about reducing American credibility... our soldiers are being killed by Iranian forces, and we do nothing...

    Weakness in this part of the world is about the most contemptible position one can take, and has already reduced our ability to influence the fledgling Iraqi government, not to mention the Iranians. And obviously, the real problem is, that our forces are so overstretched they couldn't respond to Iran, anyway.

    Gotta love this...
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales July 2, 2007 2:27 PM PDT
    You don't need a specialist to set up something like Karbala...

    Let's see his documents...how he flitted about so easily in occupied, check-pointed Iraq.

    Let's see his picture and some interviews with family and friends of this fellow. Is it possible that he was captured in the Israeli invasion of Lebanon?

    In the final analysis, it really doesn't matter. He was in Iraq fighting for Iraqi freedom, just as Count Pulaski came from Poland to aid the American freedom fighters against the British oppressors.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim July 2, 2007 3:21 PM PDT
    "U.S. General Points Finger At Iran"

    Duh!

    The US is out there openly trying to destabilize Iran and do 'regime change'.

    Whether this claim is backed by hard evidence or not, Iran would have to be comatose to not be returning the favor for violation of its space and region.
    Reply to this comment
    by boardofcerti July 2, 2007 10:26 PM PDT
    Which finger ?
    Reply to this comment
    by toldyouso21 July 2, 2007 10:32 PM PDT
    Oh my.... dare we complain after all of those years helping the Taliban go after the Russians in Afghanistan?
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 10:57 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    ***valerie*** ***plame*** ***sold*** ***secrets*** ***to*** ***the*** ***iranians***
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    by chinesespy July 2, 2007 11:16 PM PDT
    valerie plame sold secrets to the iranians
    Reply to this comment
    See all 46 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs