Obama Campaign Pulls In Big Money
Illinois Senator Rakes In $32.5M For Second Quarter, $10M More Than Hillary Clinton
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Critical Week For '08 Hopefuls
Mitt Romney is poised to beat Presdient Bush's record fundraising number of $37 million in the first quarter of his campaign. Joie Chen reports on the race to raise campaign cash.
-
Video
Edwards' Wife Rebukes Coulter
Harry Smith speaks with Elizabeth Edwards about her public exchange with conservative political commentator Ann Coulter.
-
Photo
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, left, hit a record for campaign fundraising by a Democratic presidential candidate, with $32.5 million raised over the last three months. Se. Hillary Clinton, right, raised $21 million for the second quarter. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
The first-term senator surpassed the former first lady by $10 million in second-quarter contributions that can be spent on the Democratic presidential primary contest.
Obama's campaign on Sunday reported raising at least $31 million for the primary contest and an extra $1.5 million for the general election from April through June, a record for a Democratic candidate.
Clinton's campaign announced late Sunday that she had raised $21 million for the primary. With general election contributions added, aides said her total sum would be "in the range" of $27 million. Candidates can only use general election money if they win their party's nomination.
Asked if Obama's fundraising made him uneasy, Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe told CBS's The Early Show Monday, "You're always nervous in these campaigns.
"What's clear is both candidates will have all the money they need in order to run an effective race," he said.
The whopping amount for Obama, who hopes to become America's first black president, ensures his place as a top contender for the Democratic nomination. It steals the spotlight from Clinton, who hopes to be the first woman president. And it establishes the two of them as the fundraising juggernauts of the entire presidential field.
For Obama, vaulting ahead of Clinton in the money race is an important achievement. Despite broad public interest in Obama's candidacy, he trails Clinton in national polls.
Counting this quarter's surge of donors, Obama has received donations from more than 258,000 donors through the first half of the year, an extraordinary figure at this stage of the campaign. He raised $25.7 million in the first three months of the year.
Meanwhile, Democrat John Edwards raised more than $9 million from April through June and relied on nearly 100,000 donors during the first half of the year.
The campaign has said it is on track to raise $40 million by the Iowa caucuses in January.
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson was at Edward's heels, with his campaign reporting more than $7 million raised. But Edwards' six-month total was $23 million, compared with more than $13 million for Richardson.
The figures that some campaigns released Sunday are estimates. Details of how much the campaigns raised and spent in the latest period will not be available until the candidates file financial reports with the Federal Election Commission by July 15.
While several Democrats revealed their total sums, Republicans were not expected to announce their figures until Monday or later in the week.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 61 CommentsWow! I guess P.T. Barnum was right....
No matter how much money he raises, I will not vote for Barack after he stated (I'm paraphrasing) that Bush and Cheney have not done anything that deserves impeachment.
Obama and Edwards are by far the best the 2008 race has to offer. Problem: American's are so dumb and gullible, they voted for Bush/Cheney, TWICE! and Ronald Reagan, TWICE! These two scumbags are why the USA is TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON FOREIGN OIL! Although you may not agree with Obama, he or Edwards are the best the field has to offer. Look at the GOPigs.......... running on empty, and terrorizing their base of FOOLS!
This is what really pisses me off too about racism. Its become the art of who looks the better, and its bullshyyyt.
Ya wanna know why Bush won, Mr. Obama? Because he studders. People who don't studder pull fast ones like slick.
Pretty funny huh? Maybe the Presidency is free of criticism. I could be guessing though..
I am for tax dollars to offset private contributions. Check that $5 box on your tax return. It comes out of the general fund and helps the people have a say in what goes on.
He's an independent wrapped in a GOP flag. He's one of the few in the GOP who actively opposes the GOP and Dem platforms.
Besides that, he's intelligent. A rare commodity in Washington.
Cyber-bullies who plague internet chat rooms with obscene and insulting comments will be banned under the first national scheme to strip them of their anonymity.
People going online will be forced to provide their real names and social security numbers under a new law that makes internet portals responsible for policing message boards and weblogs.
The law has been introduced in South Korea, and is certain to be closely monitored by other countries where there is concern over online abuse.
The move, which is decried by some as an overly fierce infringement of online liberties, aims to curb the most damaging excesses of so-called %u201Ckeyboard warriors%u201D %u2013 people who concoct ***-scandals, fraud allegations and other libels that chiefly target figures in the public eye
Welcome to "1984"
Why should anyone be anonymous on the Internet?
The Internet is a public medium or thoroughfare, same as a newspaper, highway or sidewalk. People should not be allowed to don disguises and vandalize websites.
We can thank trolls for this eventuality.
I can't say I support it, but with trolls running amok all over the Internet, it has to come sooner or later.
Trolls are no different than criminals who vandalize any other property. And, they should be identified and prosecuted, same as all other vandals.
Besides that, no one is anonymous on the Internet. That is an urban legend. Governments' agents can identify most us if they really wanted to. ISP's maintain records of their subscribers. And, everyone must use an ISP, even trolls.
Oh man, you should see me in person. I'm a timid.. cowardly.. little fella who always does what people say. Once I was walk'n in my apartment? And just this guy walk'n out, he grabbed me by the collar and threw me up against the mailboxes, and then left. And I thought noth'n of it.
But once I git behind that wheel.. holy moley. Dr. Jeckyl, Mr. Hyde.
Thanks to the radical in the world it is not limited to the internet.Phones, bank accounts, credit cards, associations etc. are now available for the government to look into our personal lives.Thanks, KKK, OBL, Hamas, Hezzbollah, Al Queda, Ayran Nation etc. for slowly stripping the world of its freedoms.
Trailblazing opportunities oftentimes only arise in the wake of extreme corruption and incompetence of the status quo (ie Bush). And yeah, I'm not sure whether frustration with Bush will necessarily translate to rejection of the Republican candidate if they too reject Bush.
It's frustrating to see headlines of domestic terrorism all over Britain on one page and presidential candidates instead of addressing people's concerns about anti-terrorism policy counting the $$$ in their coffers on the other page. Hopefully Mayor Bloomberg will be the different candidate that many of us are thirsting for (?)
I really really wonder.. if a black man.. can take that kind of criticism.
And I don't think so.
AND YOU CAN'T TAKE THAT STUFF! YOU CRACK!
If you tell me he has been at these meetings then I'll believe he is being groomed for the presidency, otherwise he's just another ploy or game by thos who manipulate the elections.
He is honestly our best chance at breaking up the oligarchy thats running things in DC. I get the feeling that if we vote in Hillary..we will only get more of the same.....
Im just a normal Joe but Ive donated to Obama once..and Ill do it again. Every lil bit helps.
---
You are not alone in this sense of backroom politics. Wherever the big money flows, you can bet promises are being made, compromises understood. This does not inspire confidence in the process or the players.
For the GOP, at least, such pre-convention, backroom markets in political stock is largely business as usual. Ever since Reconstruction, GOP nomination has been a game between monied players.
For the Democrats, we might be forgiven for thinking it should be different. With Obama, in particular, the major concern of mine is Obama can play both sides of the corporate street just as well as Clinton, and already has.
For example, when the bill to permit American seniors to import their drugs at considerable cost savings came to a vote, Obama did not participate. Whether Obama was merely "in" the lobby at the time, or a lobbyist has no effective difference.
Being neither a Clinton nor a Republican gives Obama a tremendous advantage.
I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.
I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars. So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president."
26 October 2002
Barak Obama
full speech: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech
You want a fight, President Bush? Let%u2019s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.
You want a fight, President Bush? Let%u2019s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.
26 October 2002
fullspeech:http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech
IT WON'T WORK. She will get the nomination and Obama supporters will support her in the general election. This time its the Republicans who are going into the election wounded and argueing amongst themselves. GO HILLARY!
***Oh***, ***speaking*** ***of*** ***marginal*** ***candidates*** ***that*** ***rely*** ***on*** ***their*** ***spouses*** ***for*** ***campaigning***, ***I*** ***think*** ***it***'***s*** ***hilarious*** ***that*** ***Ann*** ***Coulter*** ***is*** ***a*** ***better*** ***campaigner*** ***for*** ***John*** ***Edwards*** ***than*** ***even*** ***Edwards*** ***is***. ***That*** ***sorry*** ***S***.***O***.***B***. ***can***'***t*** ***even*** ***generateinterest*** ***in*** ***his*** ***own*** ***campaign***. ***Coulter*** ***is*** ***forcing*** ***a*** ***bunch*** ***of*** ***losers*** ***to*** ***donate*** ***their*** ***hard***-***earned*** ***money*** ***to*** ***a*** ***losing*** ***cause***. ***Edwards*** ***will*** ***never*** ***get*** ***the*** ***nomination***. ***I*** ***hope*** ***Ann*** ***Coulter*** ***keeps*** ***draining*** ***the*** ***pocketbooks*** ***of*** ***Edwards***' ***supporters***. ***When*** ***the*** ***primaries*** ***are*** ***through***, ***those*** ***folks*** ***may*** ***just*** ***have*** ***well*** ***thrown*** ***their*** ***money*** ***into*** ***the*** ***toilet***, ***taken*** ***a*** ***dump*** ***on*** ***it***, ***and*** ***flushed*** ***it*** ***away***.
We need someone in the White House who knows what she is doing!
GO HILLARY! She has been training for this job for decades.
Vote for the most qualified - PLEASE!
***Hillary*** ***voted*** ***for*** ***the*** ***war***. ***She*** ***voted*** ***for*** ***W***.'***s*** ***tax*** ***cuts*** ***for*** ***the*** ***rich***. ***And*** ***she*** ***voted*** ***for*** ***the*** ***Patriot*** ***Act***. ***Twice***.
***I*** ***can***'***t*** ***think*** ***of*** ***a*** ***reason*** ***to*** ***vote*** ***for*** ***Hillary*** ***over*** ***Barak*** ***Obama***. ***Unless*** ***you*** ***are*** ***a*** ***Republican***, ***that*** ***is***....
***Obama*** ***traveled*** ***to*** ***Israel*** ***with*** ***the*** ***rest*** ***of*** ***the*** ***herd*** ***and*** ***has*** ***already*** ***expressed*** ***his*** ***willingness*** ***to*** ***attack*** ***Iran***--***whether*** ***he*** ***gets*** ***more*** ***bucks*** ***than*** &***quot***;***Cattle*** ***Futures*** ***Payoffs***&***quot***; ***Clinton*** ***is*** ***really*** ***irrelevant*** ***for*** ***anyone*** ***interested*** ***in*** ***moving*** ***towards*** ***peace*** ***and*** ***against*** ***corruption***.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 61 Comments