Debate Showcases Clinton-Obama Rivalry
Analysis: Showdown On Urban Issues Spotlights Intense Battle For Black Voters
-
Play CBS Video
Video
'08 Democrats On AIDS
CBS News Raw: Democrats discussed AIDS and the black community during a debate at Howard University In Washington, the first to feature a panel with journalists of color.
-
-
Photo
Democratic presidential hopefuls Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., left and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., during the televised Democratic presidential candidates debate at Howard University in Washington on June 28, 2007. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
-
Photo
Democratic presidential hopefuls, from left, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, former Sen. Mike Gravel, D-Alaska and Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. pose before the televised Democratic presidential candidates debate at Howard University in Washington on June 28, 2007. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
-
Thursday night's Democratic debate had little in common with the two that preceded it besides the eight candidates on stage — the venue was in Washington; each hopeful got a crack at answering every question; no one was ever asked to raise their hands; and instead of focusing on Iraq, the questions revolved around issues like education, inner cities and racism.
But even though this debate was unlike those that came before it, the Democrats on stage seemed more comfortable and confident. They were in front of a crowd largely composed of blacks, who have been one of the Democratic Party’s most dependable voting blocs since the Depression. Also, they were addressing issues that have been the bread and butter of their party’s platform for decades.
Even the news events of the day allowed for an easy jumping-off point in a debate held at historically black Howard University, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling that rejected racial integration plans in two school districts and could have sweeping effects nationwide.
Despite this most friendly atmosphere for Democrats, an intense battle was under way between Hillary Clinton, who has seen the support her ex-president husband enjoyed among blacks carry over to her campaign, and Barack Obama, perhaps the most viable black presidential candidate in U.S. history.
While Obama's appearance on the debate stage caused a swell in the opening applause in the auditorium, it was Clinton who drew the night's loudest cheers in discussing the spread of AIDS among black women. "If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34, there would be an outraged, outcry in this country," she said, prompting an enthusiastic audience response.
Throughout the evening, Clinton spoke with the forceful words and aggressive tone that, in previous debates, she used in discussing the war in Iraq and combating terrorism — two subjects that received scant attention in a forum almost entirely devoted to domestic, urban issues. When one international issue — the crisis in Sudan's Darfur region — was raised, however, she was quick to show she would not hesitate to use military force to enforce a no-fly zone over the country. "We should make it very clear to the government in Khartoum," she said. "We’re putting up a no-fly zone. If they fly into it, we will shoot down their planes. It's the only way to get their attention."
Obama, on the other hand, did something none of the other candidates, including Clinton, could do by emphasizing his membership in the black community. In his first words of the night, he invoked the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education. "This is where Thurgood Marshall and the team from Brown crafted their strategy," he said, referring to the late justice who argued Brown before the Court prior to serving on it. "If it hadn't been for them, I would not be standing here today."
But Obama saved most talk about his common kinship with the audience for discussing HIV-AIDS, softly admonishing the black community for not being more open about the epidemic. "One of the things we've got to overcome is a stigma that still exists in our communities," he said. "We don't talk about this. We don't talk about it in the schools, sometimes we don't talk about it in the churches. It has been an aspect of, sometimes, our homophobia that we don't address this issue as clearly as it needs to be."
By David Miller
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 85 CommentsTypical pandering by Hillary saying that if Aids were the leading killer of white women between 20 and 30 something there would be an outrage implying that the white women were shifting this disease to others. What a bunch of low brow politics.
Does anyone in the Democratic party know how aids ravages a population and how to prevent the spread or is it the fault of George Bush?
Disgusting.
Posted by uffdaron
Typical righty response of denial and a pretense of equality.
Posted by infidel_us
"...to da mountain top..." Is that really how Dr. King spoke there infidel? Or is that really just you?
Hillary always seems to me to be a panderer.
And oh by the way, what politician does not pander, I haven't seen one, but she does have just the right position on most things I agree.
Posted by huskerarmy at 09:11 AM : Jun 29, 2007
In all honesty, I really can't remember. It's probably "tha." Given the poor fidelity of the video at the time, it sounds to my ear like "da"....but it's probably just me being prejudiced. :)
Infidel is milking the fact that when Hillary went to Alabama to attend the commemoration of the Selma March she pandered to the crowd by effecting a phony southern accent. It was pretty crass and showed her general pandering nature but was no worse than Guliani pandering to the Confederate flag wavers in South Carolina(a divisive issue that the state had recently reached a compromise on).
He should just go fawn over his own candidates, they apparently have no flaws.
So true. There is SO MUCH involving race that goes unsaid. So much resentment and mistrust running below the facade of "can't we all just get along" and political correctness.
A real cards on the table, honest dialog is needed, and we will never have it. No candidate, republican or democrat, has the stones to bring it up.
We're a lot like an egg left in the sun. Looks great on the outside, but stinks like a mo-fo on the inside! :)
Excellent post! It's rare that anyone of these candidates(or anyone on this blog,for that matter) talks about the future and where we go from here.
So far, all these candidates are doing nothing more than pandering to their base to raise funds and staff their campaigns with activists, and occasionally holding a photo opp to show that they care, but forget specifics.
That's why i'm not supporting or eliminating anyone yet(on the democratic side that is).
Posted by realpatriot1 at 10:08 AM : Jun 29, 2007
I have "fawned" over them......I don't see ONE worth my vote. Some are higher on the food chain than others, but Rudy G is NOT one of them. Neither is McCain.
In his defense, at least Rudy didn't sitck a wad of chew in his mouth and pretend he had a southern drawal.
Devil take Sharpton's smiling face, the plagirist Biden, 'Cattle Futures Payola' Clinton, 'Blast Iran for Israel' Obama, New World Order Richardson, "My Daddy had to Work" Edwards.
Now, how much discussion was there about gunning down of black children in Los Angeles by Latinos who vow to drive blacks and whites from the city? See LA's radio host, Terry Anderson for the details on what is really going on in the 'Other America' that tea-sipping Establishment types like to chat about from the perspective of Park Avenue.
Posted by infidel_us at 10:20 AM : Jun 29, 2007
Oh, and he didn't quote from negro spirituals in a fake black accent......like he was part of the struggle or something. That is race baiting and pandering to a nauseating degree. Even below a democrat's dignity! :)
Like I said....so much resentment lies beneath the facade. And no one contributess to the dialog....the democrat candidates only fan the flames or racial strife for political gain.
If they only realized the damage they are doing. Too selfish to see it, I guess.
OK, I took a bit of a cheap shot.
Actually, I'd like to see Rudy with the wad of tobacco, it might be as much fun as Kerry in a wetsuit.
Posted by nottellin1 at 10:48 AM : Jun 29, 2007
nottellin1 - those are JUICY ponderings there!!!!
They both voted in favor of the ******* amnesty bill.
They both care more about Mexicans and the Rich People than they do about America.
A pox on both their houses.
On the other had, the Democrats have plenty of time to self-destruct before the election. What a waste of our money.
If Ohio had not been stolen from Kerry last time, we would have had a president whose policies were even more bellicose than those of Bush. You can either vote for what the MSM calls the "fringe" or you can vote to continue the wars that the MSM supported from the outset with lies, lies and more lies.
The 'mainstream' has become a running sewer-- step out of it and support real candidates for the American people. The same media that told you there were WMDS in Iraq, that Saddam was working on a nuclear weapon, that he had ties with al Qaeda...they are the same trash denigrating Paul, Gravel and Kucinich as "fringe" candidates.
Posted by realpatriot1 at 10:38 AM : Jun 29, 2007
You know what...YOU'RE RIGHT!!! LOL
"If Ohio had not been stolen from Kerry last time"
I live in Ohio, It was not stolen from Kery; he lost.
If Black men were not running around and having unprotected *** with every woman they can their hands on, maybe there wouldn't be so many Black women with HIV-AIDS.
Another thing, it wasn't just Black people effected by Katrina, white people lived there too.
Our founders' legacy did not stop Hillary from voting for the Patriot Act and then supporting its renewal in 2006 despite revelations that the government was using it to infringe on the very liberties that our founders held sacred. Where was her commitment to our founders when she voted to gut our habeas corpus protections?
As for cronyism -- Hillary has repeatedly authorized billions that the Pentagon gave in no-bid contracts to Halliburton. Even though the Democrats have been in control of Congress for months, they still haven't summoned Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and the other usual suspects to account for the missing millions in reconstruction funding.
When I think about how Congress enabled Bush's corruption and cronyism, I'm reminded of the lines from Shakespeare's Julius Caesar:
And why should Caesar be a tyrant then?
Poor man! I know he would not be a wolf,
But that he sees the Romans are but sheep:
He were no lion, were not Romans hinds.
June 25, 2007
During one of the debates I mentioned that my fellow Democratic candidates scare me. Hillary's speech last week to the Take Back America conference gives me yet another reason to be afraid.
In an indignant voice she decried the Bush administration's ''stunning record of secrecy and corruption, of cronyism run amok. . . It is everything our founders were afraid of, everything our Constitution was designed to prevent.'' Actually, our Constitution grants Congress the power to prevent these ills but Hillary and her colleagues weren't up to the task.
Poll workers in Cuyahoga County have been criminally convicted for not counting all vote. Voting
machines were disproportionately unavailable in Cuyahoga County(the most highly Democratic county in the U.S. and the most populous in the state) and in college communities that vote heavily Democratic while affluent areas in the suburbs had extra machines but no effort was made all day to move them. The electronic machines mandated by The Secretary of State who was Bush's state campaign manager and who refused to recuse himself were manufactured by a comapny owned by a top Bush contributor. ALL voting problems involving undercounts involved these machines.
Maybe the vote wasn't stolen, but I hope we never have aonther election run like that.
We now know from Monica Goodling's sworn testimony and the Rove e-mails that've surfaced that The White House was involved in stealing votes in Florida during the 2004 election..we have it straight from Karl Rove. They sent targeted mailings to the homes of African-American soldiers serving in Iraq marked "do not forward",knowing that the mail would come back. When it did they challenged their registrations so they could have their votes thrown out.
Of course,even though the smoking gun is readily available to the media they aren't reporting it.
They may not have stole Ohio but the evidence shows they were trying to steal Florida again.
The inability to admit a mistake and assume responsibility is not just a morally bankrupt way to walk through life; it is a dangerous and deadly way to lead a nation. When I am president, I will open up all secret files relating to the Iraq war and expose all officials who lied to the public in promoting it. (That's right, *** Cheney, your files too.) My Justice Department will prosecute everyone who lied under oath or ripped off the American taxpayer by exploiting the Iraq reconstruction effort. And I will pardon to no one.
http://ohioelection2004.com/evidence.htm
www.rense.com/general69/evi.htm - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
Cover-Up Of 2000 And 2004 Florida Vote ContinuesThis system of fraud, if still in place, can be used again in the 2004 general election this coming Tuesday, November 2. Dr. Piotr Blass, a U.S. senatorial ...
www.rense.com/general59/FLORID.HTM - 16k - Cached - Similar pages
Something Is Rotten In DenmarkFirst, he was able to sample 2004 exit poll data that was not meant to be .... The untouchable topic is that election fraud rather than gay marriage turned ...
www.rense.com/general59/weu.htm - 25k - Cached - Similar pages
Tell Tale SignsAn Associated Press article, dated November 28, 2004, stated that President ... In the United States, cries of election fraud are still in their infancy. ...
www.rense.com/general60/telltale.htm - 20k - Cached - Similar pages
Purposely Corrupted Diebold Voting TerminalsFindings:; The GEMS central tabulator program is incorrectly designed and highly vulnerable to fraud. Election results can be changed in a matter of seconds ...
www.rense.com/general59/diebold.htm - 21k - Cached - Similar pages
This is something I found.
Steal our votes and you've stolen democracy, July 12, 2006
By Robert Moore (Chicago, IL USA)
So if votes were stolen, how were they? This is a harder question to answer. We know that there was vast voter suppression on the part of the GOP, but actual theft of votes is more in the way of speculation. The data definitely suggests THAT votes were stolen but does not describe HOW it was stolen. The book describes many ways that the votes could have been stolen.
"Of course,even though the smoking gun is readily available to the media they aren't reporting it."
It just blows my mind, if stuff like this is happening, and it seems from what you say, everyone knows it; it should be headline news and people should be going to jail, but in Congress,for the last two months,
they have been going on about some attorneys being fired, go figure.
Do you guys do dope before the meeting?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 85 Comments