NEW YORK, June 29, 2007

Poll: Thompson A Factor In GOP Race

CBS: Undeclared Republican Candidate Fred Thompson Is Running Second To Giuliani

  • Play CBS Video Video '08 Democrats On AIDS

    CBS News Raw: Democrats discussed AIDS and the black community during a debate at Howard University In Washington, the first to feature a panel with journalists of color.

  • Former Sen. Fred Thompson is already attracting support, even though he has yet to announce his candidacy for the GOP nomination. Photo

    Former Sen. Fred Thompson is already attracting support, even though he has yet to announce his candidacy for the GOP nomination.  (Getty Images/Chip Somodevilla)

(CBS)  Fred Thompson still hasn't officially entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination, but he's already a strong contender.

Thompson, the "Law & Order" actor and former Tennessee senator, is tied with Arizona Sen. John McCain for second place, behind former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, in the latest CBS News poll.

With Thompson in the mix, Giuliani leads among Republican primary voters with 34 percent. He's followed by Thompson and McCain, at 22 percent and 21 percent, respectively; and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at 6 percent.

Without Thompson in the field, Giuliani jumps up to 42 percent, trailed by McCain at 26 percent and Romney at 8 percent.

IF THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, WHO WOULD YOU WANT AS REPUBLICAN NOMINEE?
(Among Republican Primary Voters)

Giuliani
34 percent
McCain
21 percent
Romney
6 percent
Thompson
22 percent
Someone else/none
7 percent

On the Democratic side, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton maintains her lead in a three-way race over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards.

Forty-eight percent of Democratic primary voters say they'd like to see Clinton as the party's nominee, followed by 24 percent for Obama and 11 percent for Edwards

As in previous polls, Democratic voters are more satisfied with their party's candidates than Republicans are.

IF THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, WHO WOULD YOU WANT AS DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE?
(Among Democratic Primary Voters)

Clinton
48 percent
Obama
24 percent
Edwards
11 percent

Only 30 percent of Republicans say they're satisfied with their choices — the lowest number ever. Sixty-one percent of GOP primary voters want more choices.

Conversely, 61 percent of Democrats are satisfied with their candidates, while just 35 percent want more choices.

A majority of Americans, 53 percent, would like a third party to compete with Democrats and Republicans; 41 percent disagree.

But as of now, most don't know much about New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, whose recent decision to drop out of the Republican Party fueled speculation that he's considering an independent run for the White House.



© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 73 Comments
by fixitdamnit June 29, 2007 7:33 PM PDT
Fred%u2019s rope-a-dope strategy worked%u2026

Dem lightweights done punched themselves out: Sir Hillary %u201CIndian Princess%u201D Rodham-Clinton --- I'm not some Tammy Wynette standing by my man ... screech screech! Barack Hussein %u201CYo%u2019 Mama%u201D Obama --- I%u2019m not some Beach Blanket Dumbo, and don%u2019t tell me I%u2019m not from Selma. Dazzling Eddy --- Oh dear, my can is empty.

The clown act's over, Demwits.
Reply to this comment
by rmsdm4 June 29, 2007 7:35 PM PDT
Lets analyze shall we. Romney took over the Salt lake city olympics and turned it into a winner. Then he ran for governor in the bluest state of all and won. Giuliani took over the largest city in the US that was crime ridden and turned it into a city for the US to be proud of. Then he guided it through one of the biggest attacks in the history of the country. Thompson served in Reagans administration, a successful lawyer, and senator. Clinton has done absolutely nothing since she has been in office. Name one thing. Obama has only been in office for two years. What has he done, nothing. The only quaified candidate is Edwards. He was a very successful ambulance chaser as well as a sentor. I actually thought that the republicans were the least experienced until I looked at the facts.
Reply to this comment
by rmsdm4 June 29, 2007 7:58 PM PDT
Experience. No one has named one thing clinton or obama has done. Come on, I know its hard, but do your research. Name one thing.
Reply to this comment
by fredgrad2000 June 29, 2007 8:00 PM PDT
JackSteen1 - You are SOOOOO intelligent and witty with all the namecalling!! You must have an IQ of almost 75!! Congratulations; your mother must be so proud that you used your special education to come up with "republicunts" and other such witty "insults"!! Too bad you're just another MoveOn.org robot who wouldn't know qualifications if they hit him in the face - Clinton has one term as senator (with no accomplishments by the way) and was first lady (a party hostess!!), Obama has 2 years in the Senate; Edwards one-term which was spent almost fully campaigning for something more. You Dems make me laugh; all your experienced, qualified candidates have been relegated to "second tier" - tell me any of your "top 3" are more qualified than particularly Richardson, Biden, or Dodd? PLEASE!! And let's compare those "top 3" to McCain (what - 4 terms as senator), Giuliani (ran a city larger than at least 30 of our states and completely fixed the mess left by his Dem predecessor), or one our the GOP's long-shots Duncan Hunter (16 term rep; chairman of the armed services committee)? None of the "top Dem 3" have any executive experience, little legislative experience, and no legislative accomplishments (unless you consider flip-flopping on major issues and being able to give different views on every issue depending on who you're speaking to accomplishments).
Reply to this comment
by rmsdm4 June 29, 2007 8:08 PM PDT
hey ainttaken. Like all liberals, when confronted with the facts, you show your true colors. Resorting to name calling. How sad.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 June 29, 2007 8:20 PM PDT
Sorry Fred, but the ONLY race you will be a factor in is the one where all repubs lose. You will just lose less.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 June 29, 2007 8:25 PM PDT
I can not wait till the Neal Bush story comes out and how Fred Thompson saved him, he should be in prison now with the savings and loan deal. All his lobbying in D.C. Yea sure this great God to the Republican Party, you just wait do not be so quick here. You were crazy about Bush and look what we have, what is it about republicans that they always think they are above the law.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug June 29, 2007 8:46 PM PDT
Fred and PeeWee Herman
that's the ticket!
c'mon CBS do better.
Put ol' fred on a treadmill
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 June 29, 2007 8:56 PM PDT
fixitdamnit--Lets analyze your nominees for president if I may Romney---- a Mass. Governor with absolutely no foreign policy experience and today I think that is pretty important. Giuliani---A mayor of New York City again no foreign policy, bad temper, no foreign policy none zilch, he is a clone of Bush, could not sit in on the 9/11 commission had to go and make moola with his speeches, all he did on 9/11 was walk down a street big deal everyone made him a hero the people he sent in war zone of 9/11 are still feeling the effect of that order. He cleaned up N.Y. with the help of the Mafia he recommended this guy to Bush for Homeland Security job and it came out, he thought it was well hidden but it wasn't. So before you brag about your guys Bush was a governor with no foreign policy experience and look where we are.Sorry
Reply to this comment
by rmsdm4 June 29, 2007 9:11 PM PDT
Still no one has given anything that clinton or obama has done. nothing. Give one instance of leadership on a national scale. And by the way, Bill C. had no foreign policy experience and we are still paying for it.
Reply to this comment
by fixitdamnit June 29, 2007 9:34 PM PDT
RMSDM4, Obama and Clinton voted to sellout America...

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00235

Howz that for leadership?
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 June 29, 2007 9:42 PM PDT
Fred Thompson is afraid to debate cuz the public will find out that he's gotten nothing to say without a script in his hand. It says something about America that he's SECOND in the Repub race!

If Paris Hilton is his VEEP, however, I'm sure they'll win.
Reply to this comment
by fixitdamnit June 29, 2007 9:56 PM PDT
starleo146, I am an Independent. Am I likely to vote for more Repubs than Dems? You bet ya.

Dems have no candidates. If Sir Hillary does managed to buyoff enough corps, Indian outsourcing firms, and ethnocentric lobbies, it would take her ten terms in office to payoff her IOUs. I.e., she could not be anything but a corrupt prez. She is a silly and insincere person anyway. She just wants to be the first Henny-Penny in the Oval %u2026 nothing more.

Obama? What the hell is that? Hawaiian cokehead thinks he's a descendent of Alabama slaves.

Edwards? A frickin zero. A Billy Bob wanna be. Everybody knows that by now.

Dems have learned nothing. Get another candidate. America wants a leader, not an enabler. And we sure as hell do not want another Clinton or Bush %u2026 NEVER EVER AGAIN.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign June 29, 2007 10:17 PM PDT
JackSteen1 - You are SOOOOO intelligent and witty with all the namecalling!! You must have an IQ of almost 75!! Congratulations; your mother must be so proud that you used your special education to come up with "republicunts" and other such witty "insults"!!

Posted by fredgrad2000 at 08:00 PM : Jun 29, 2007

fred - lighten up - I read that piece about the Romney trip with the dog on the roof and thought it was funny. At least it wasn't Aunt Edna in the rocking chair!

Reply to this comment
by mymanjones June 29, 2007 10:27 PM PDT
Obviously one ticket will be Clinton/Obama. The other Fred/Rudy.

Rudy will be an easy win over Obama and Fred will have a big money source to fight but he will get Hillary on the talk circuit. Her baggage will kill her on the written circuit.

Don Jones
MyManFred
Reply to this comment
by randalds June 30, 2007 12:51 AM PDT
Of course if he did win that at least we'd have some "Law and Order" in the White House for the first time in 8 years. Of course it'd just be in name only, but the bas*tards there now don't even try to pretend to be honest any longer. Bush and Cheney just screw us over and then flip us off.
Reply to this comment
by jacksteen1 June 30, 2007 5:00 AM PDT
Like I said in the first post in this blog, Mutt Romney, Fred "Basset Face" Thompson, and Rudy Nathan Guiliani are the best the Republishits can do ?

"Right away, Madame President Clinton!"
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 30, 2007 8:37 AM PDT
Obviously one ticket will be Clinton/Obama. The other Fred/Rudy.

Rudy will be an easy win over Obama and Fred will have a big money source to fight but he will get Hillary on the talk circuit. Her baggage will kill her on the written circuit.

Don Jones
MyManFred
Posted by ddonjones at 10:27 PM : Jun 29, 2007

LOL RIGHT! LOL Can you say Madame President? The Fascist have been trying to beat the Clintons for years. They OWN the Southern Nazi's and the Religious Reich, that IS the present day Republican Party Sparky. The chance of them winning anything outside the stupid south is not likely... not after Iraq and the mess this nation is in. Maybe you folks should hole up for another 70 years of so...that's about how long it took to forget the LAST mess you made. Sieg Heil Bush!
Reply to this comment
by mayihavemore June 30, 2007 8:50 AM PDT
Freds voting record will do him in. Look it up! If you were upset about immigration bill you will be livid with his voting record.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 June 30, 2007 9:15 AM PDT
sorry fixitdamnit I went to bed all this Fred Thompson talk made me soooo sleepy or I would have answered (which I thought I did) but actually once you have your mind made up it is hard to change it right. All I was trying to say after the slam you gave the democratic nominees is I want this to be right and we have to forget democrat, republican no more of this unlawful conquering type regime we have to be soooo careful when we pull or press that vote. It is going to take YEARS to straighten this all out. Our military alone has taken such a beaten if a military confrontation happened today our equipment is so broken we could not sustain any military catastrophe whatsoever and that is the truth our military may not be completely broken but it is hurting bad and the meaning of my post was to be vigilant in who is who that is all and we have to stop and think. I think ainttaken explained my post real well and I thank ainttaken.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad June 30, 2007 10:06 AM PDT
stick a fork in him he is a republican they could not get elected dog catcher!
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug June 30, 2007 10:11 AM PDT
"Former Sen. Fred Thompson is already attracting support, even though he has yet to announce his candidacy for the GOP nomination."

Uh yeah sure. Pure propaganda.
Nice try to spin this loser.
Send him back to lobbyville, usa.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales June 30, 2007 10:46 AM PDT
If the CBS poll is accurate, then Americans are well on their way to continuing the foreign policy idiocy of the Bush Administration and expanding the Stupid Peoples' War to Iran-- and Americans fully deserve what they get!

It is not only bad foreign policy you will get from these 'mainstream' candidates...it will be bad immigration policy, bad economic policy, a continuation of the IRS and the abomination known as the income tax.

The only surprise left in the race, perhaps, is whether "Pie Eating" Gore will waddle into the Democratic contest to gobble up Hillary votes.

Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich remain the only candidates outside the other parties who will make a CLEAN BREAK with the horrible policies of the past, put the Stupid Peoples' War behind us and get this nation back on track.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 30, 2007 10:49 AM PDT
funny thing is, all of this condemnation of Thompson

any he still has not officially stated his stand of any of the issues we face

doent that qualify as prejudice, or is it willful ignorance?
Reply to this comment
by condumism June 30, 2007 11:25 AM PDT
Thomplson, another GOP phoney from the Southern States of Hypocrits, Fascists, and America haters! Time to undo the long term damge done to the USA by Republicon Abe Lincoln and DEMAND SOUTHERN STATES SECEDE!
Reply to this comment
by b48151 June 30, 2007 11:26 AM PDT
Still waiting for the mainstream media to report on congress record low approval rating.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 June 30, 2007 11:31 AM PDT
It has been discovered that the Democrats, concerned that Fred Thompson's background as a politician, then movie actor, may hurt them in the "hoped for" Presidential election in 2008, have decided to find a possible candidate with a similar background to counter Thompson's threat. Actors such as Susan Sarandon and Kevin Costner were approached, but refused to make any runs for political office, and Clint Eastwood stated that he would much rather "stare down" GOP candidates than debate them.

Failing to find a movie actor to run against the GOP, it has been decided by Howard Dean that the Democratic front-runners, Hiliary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards, should be given a "crash course" in acting and appear in several TV episodes of "Boston Legal" while one of the 3, possibly Obama, would appear as a contestant on "Dancing With the Stars".

It is hoped by Howard Dean that this would "level the playing field" until such time as Maria Shriver can convince her husband, Arnold "the Terminator" Schwazennager, do convert to Liberalism, become a Democrat, and run against the "manny-panny" GOP neocons.

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!
Reply to this comment
by tell7 June 30, 2007 12:09 PM PDT
Fred will not have to fight for his money and it is all but guaranteed that he will be the Republican nominee. Bush/Cheney/Rove worshipers, he is your man. Want change for our nation ? Fred will be your worst nightmare. Fred is the anointed one. To prove this point one only has to look at Freddy's campaign staff, they are Bush operatives. I will name just three...Mary Matalin, (former Daddy Bush campaign staffer, former adviser to *** Cheney, colleague of Karl Rove, Elizabeth Cheney, (eldest daughter of *** Cheney) and George P. Bush (son of Jeb Bush). Fred is no harmless TV actor, no DC outsider. Due to his lobbyist past and his "chosen one" status he will be copiously funded by the Corporate Machine. This actor's Presidency will be dictated and scripted by BushCo. Republicans, Democrats and Independents, vote as you will, but be aware.
Reply to this comment
by perception5 June 30, 2007 12:44 PM PDT
None of the Democrats are qualified to be President. They all left-wing liberals who don't represent all Americans.

Hillary and Obama voted AGAINST funding for our American troops overseas ..........SO how could either one of these flaming liberals be Commander-in-Chief ??

Won't happen............
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales June 30, 2007 2:36 PM PDT
Good post t_barr! Notice that Edwards slimed his way over to Italy for the Bilderburg confab prior to being named as Kerry's VP pick, to kiss the rings of the New World Order cabal.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 June 30, 2007 2:54 PM PDT
perception5--12:44p.m.- We didn't think Bush would be elected in 2004 either so wishing doesn't make it so
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 June 30, 2007 3:03 PM PDT
They can't help it ainttaken all republicans think alike and honesty is not part of their vocabulary just look at these post. a joke
Reply to this comment
by menofoz June 30, 2007 3:44 PM PDT
Frederick Dalton "Fred" Thompson (born August 19, 1942) is an American lawyer, lobbyist, character actor and former Republican Senator from Tennessee (now residing in McLean, Virginia).[1]

He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

Over about two decades of lobbying, Fred Thompson represented clients including Haitian Presidente Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Canadian-owned cable companies and a British reinsurance company.[14]

In 1982, Thompson lobbied the U.S. Congress for deregulation of the Savings and Loan (S&L) industry. His recommendations were incorporated in the Garn - St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982,[10] which allowed thrifts to invest in potentially more profitable, but riskier, ventures; eliminated interest-rate ceilings on new accounts; and granted additional government support to ailing S&Ls. This Act was a contributing factor to the Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s.
Reply to this comment
by menofoz June 30, 2007 3:48 PM PDT
Fred" Thompson (born August 19, 1942) is an American lawyer, lobbyist, character actor and former Republican Senator from Tennessee (now residing in McLean, Virginia).[1]

In 1982, Thompson lobbied the U.S. Congress for deregulation of the Savings and Loan (S&L) industry. His recommendations were incorporated in the Garn - St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982,[10] which allowed thrifts to invest in potentially more profitable, but riskier, ventures; eliminated interest-rate ceilings on new accounts; and granted additional government support to ailing S&Ls. This Act was a contributing factor to the Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s.


Savings and Loan crisis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980s was a wave of savings and loan association failures in the United States in which over 1,000 savings and loan institutions failed in "the largest and costliest venture in public misfeasance, malfeasance and larceny of all time."[1] The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around USD$150 billion, about $125 billion of which was consequently and directly subsidized by the U.S. government, which contributed to the large budget deficits of the early 1990s. The concomitant slowdown in the finance industry and the real estate market may have been a contributing cause of the 1990-1991 economic recession.

Reply to this comment
by ioweign June 30, 2007 4:15 PM PDT
Fred going to pick Dan Qualyle as his running mate? The Republicans are getting the big guns now. Dan is great in debates and covering broad subjects and will cover Fred's azz.
Reply to this comment
by bill1fj June 30, 2007 6:48 PM PDT
I'm still waiting for a candidate that will come out and say what he/she will do if elected about this whole middle east mess, the health care mess, the education mess, the 20 million illegal aliens here and the people hiring them, and securing our borders.
Lots of complaining from most of them but very few answers.
We don't need another sell out like Bush has become.
Hopefully some one will step up to represent the citizens.
Reply to this comment
by nyteryder2 July 1, 2007 1:04 AM PDT
Fred Thompson is so serious about politics he couldn't wait to get back to acting after his short stint in the senate and as a lobbyist.

A lobbyist for christ sake! Just what we need as president. An actor who played the part of a senator and ended up as a lobbyist. lol!!

Reply to this comment
by menofoz July 1, 2007 1:45 AM PDT
Of course if he did win that at least we'd have some "Law and Order" in the White House for the first time in 8 years. Of course it'd just be in name only, but the bas*tards there now don't even try to pretend to be honest any longer. Bush and Cheney just screw us over and then flip us off.

Posted by RandalDS at 12:51 AM : Jun 30, 2007

No wonder Bush and Cheney just screw you over and then flip you off, you supported the illegal immigration amnesty bill randal.

The Devil's Dictionary

ABSURDITY, n.
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.

Reply to this comment
by randalds July 1, 2007 2:43 AM PDT
MENOFOZ, n. 1. Website showing naked pictures of the men from the HBO series OZ in various homoerotic scenes. 2. Having obsessive fascination of same.

Google it.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 July 1, 2007 5:12 AM PDT
It makes no difference if Thompson, Rudy, or whoever is the Republican nominee for President. The election for Present and most contressional seats are now up to the Democrats to lose. This is because of the illegal immigration issue and the Iraq War. The Republicans are on the wrong side of these two passionate issues and may never be a national force again after 11/2008.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 July 1, 2007 5:26 AM PDT
The Republicans just may nominate Bush 2.0, um, I mean, Fred Thompson. He'll probably be the GOP nominated daddy candidate for 2008. He'll have a problem with women voters. He'll come across as that crotchety grandpa figure that they wouldn't trust to program their VCR. And, his policies will match Bush Jr.'s. Many women won't want that 3rd date. The last date was a disaster.
Reply to this comment
by menofoz July 1, 2007 1:14 PM PDT
MENOFOZ, n. 1. Website showing naked pictures of the men from the HBO series OZ in various homoerotic scenes. 2. Having obsessive fascination of same.

Google it.
Posted by RandalDS at 02:43 AM : Jul 01, 2007

Of course if he did win that at least we'd have some "Law and Order" in the White House for the first time in 8 years. Of course it'd just be in name only, but the bas*tards there now don't even try to pretend to be honest any longer. Bush and Cheney just screw us over and then flip us off.

Posted by RandalDS at 12:51 AM : Jun 30, 2007

No wonder Bush and Cheney just screw you over and then flip you off, you supported the illegal immigration amnesty bill randal.

The Devil's Dictionary

ABSURDITY, n.
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.

Posted by menofoz at 01:45 AM : Jul 01, 2007

randl, never heard of the site unitl you found it, your personal live is of no interest but if that%u2019s what you like to do good for you.


It is sayd there be a raunge of mountaynes in the Easte, on
one syde of the which certayn conducts are immorall, yet on the other
syde they are holden in good esteeme; wherebye the mountayneer is much
conveenyenced, for it is given to him to goe downe eyther way and act
as it shall suite his moode, withouten offence.
*****'s Meditations



Reply to this comment
by menofoz July 1, 2007 1:34 PM PDT
This is because of the illegal immigration issue and the Iraq War. The Republicans are on the wrong side of these two passionate issues and may never be a national force again after 11/2008.

Posted by ramos937 at 05:12 AM : Jul 01, 2007

Ramos, Democrat Party leaders were on the wrong side of the illegal immigration debate and have failed as miserably as the Republicans over the last six years. In fact they maybe worse more Republicans voted against the mass illegal immigration amnesty bill and with the help of a few Democrats that switched their votes, to defeat that horrible Bush/Kennedy bill.

Caesar Chavez opposed illegal immigration to.

The truth about Chavez is much more interesting. A third-generation American citizen from Yuma, Arizona, he was first and foremost a labor leader, as crafty and sometimes ruthless as any effective union boss must be. Today, Mexican-American educators and politicians have one simple priority: more immigration. Every warm body with a brown skin or light increases their clout. But, then and now, union leaders have the opposite need. The UFW's essential problem was the same as all other unions', straight out of Econ 101. Chavez needed to limit the supply of labor in order to drive up wages.

In his prime, Chavez fought constantly against illegal immigration.
Reply to this comment
by horse3farm July 1, 2007 1:48 PM PDT
I didn't vote for Bush. I have no intention of voting republican. But for those who will vote republican, and especially those Americans who will vote republican simply because they always have (turning a blind eye to reality), you should be extremely afraid of electing Guiliani as president. He has much in common with Bush, most notably ZERO knowledge in foreign affairs. The next president had better be top notch in that area, because much will need to be "cleaned up" from the horrifying actions of our present ego-maniacal, totally unqualified, self-serving creepy leader of this country.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 1, 2007 3:53 PM PDT
Posted by menofoz at 01:14 PM : Jul 01, 2007

LOL!
Reply to this comment
by mrhoppy-2009 July 1, 2007 4:03 PM PDT
God what fools the media makes of themselves! I didn't notice Dennis Kucinich for the Democrats and Ron Paul for the Republicans. The Zionist Jewish media in America must go!
Reply to this comment
by menofoz July 1, 2007 4:59 PM PDT
Hi, I'm in California. I have a friend(defendant) who has run into major problems with an LLC he was involved in. I know nothing of the actual facts
Posted by RandalDS

That's so true. He inspires a rage that is almost frightening. If I were not a civilised man who believes that ultimately America will wake up to just how dangerous this as*shole really is, then I'm not sure what I'd do. He is the worst president in American history by far, but still I believe my country will find a way to save itself from as*sholes like him and Cheney. This mother-fu*cker needs to go now!

Posted by RandalDS at 01:33 PM : Feb 20, 2007

When I think that the monkey currently sitting in the Oval Office is occupying the same space as some of thew greatest Americans who have ever lived it turns my stomach. In comparison to the worst of them Bush still comes off a cretin, a moron and a brain-dead idiot. If he had any brains at all he'd ban President's day altogether, because it just points out at least once a year what a pathetic excuse for a human being he really is.

Posted by RandalDS at 02:33 AM : Feb 20, 2007

Amazingly, randalds takes a u-turn, heads over to the oval office, and says o wise one Mr. President how can I help? I%u2019m on board, mass illegal amnesty must be passed and its part of your legacy as the proud American RandalDS says I want to do all I can to screw the US citizens to Mr President.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 1, 2007 5:07 PM PDT
Hi, I'm in California. I have a friend(defendant) who has run into major problems with an LLC he was involved in. I know nothing of the actual facts
Posted by RandalDS

Amazingly, randalds takes a u-turn, heads over to the oval office, and says o wise one Mr. President how can I help? I%u2019m on board, mass illegal amnesty must be passed and its part of your legacy as the proud American RandalDS says I want to do all I can to screw the US citizens to Mr President.
Posted by menofoz at 04:59 PM : Jul 01, 2007

The other posts are mine, though this one is not. Still, while it's sweet of you to re-post them, I do have to remind you that I am straight and can not bring myself to lead into thinking you have a chance with me. Perhaps I can find a ga*y friend for you? I'd be happy to try rather then to see you continue to embarrass yourself by constantly hitting on a straight man such as myself. You're simply not my type. Sorry.

;-)

Oh and while I still think Bush is a bloodthirsty warmonger, it's not my fault that he agrees with me on this one point. You see he wants immigration reform for the cheap labor, which is the big business desire. I, on the other hand, want it so that as citizens the migrant farm workers won't be as easily exploited, which is the liberal point of view (of which I am one). Nice try though.
Reply to this comment
by menofoz July 1, 2007 5:17 PM PDT
If I were not a civilised man
Posted by RandalDS

he is a dingleberry with it wrapped around his brain.
Posted by radiob at 10:59 PM : Jun 26, 2007

ARRRRGGGGUUUUGHHHH!!!!
Posted by RandalDS

The funny thing it IS going to become a Hispanic nation no matter what they do. It's as ineveitable as the sun coming up.
Posted by RandalDS at 06:36 PM : Jun 26, 2007

Nuts. Loony tunes. Whack job. Out of his mind.
And that's besides posting statistics that he just pulls out his as*s.
Posted by RandalDS at 10:57 PM : Jun 26, 2007

I know nothing of the actual facts
Posted by RandalDS

That's so true. He inspires a rage that is almost frightening. If I were not a civilised man who believes that ultimately America will wake up to just how dangerous this as*shole really is, then I'm not sure what I'd do. He is the worst president in American history by far, but still I believe my country will find a way to save itself from as*sholes like him and Cheney. This mother-fu*cker needs to go now!

Posted by RandalDS at 01:33 PM : Feb 20, 2007

In comparison to the worst of them Bush still comes off a cretin, a moron and a brain-dead idiot. If he had any brains at all he'd ban President's day altogether, because it just points out at least once a year what a pathetic excuse for a human being he really is.

Posted by RandalDS at 02:33 AM : Feb 20, 2007
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 1, 2007 5:22 PM PDT
I know nothing of the actual facts
Posted by RandalDS

Posted by menofoz at 05:17 PM : Jul 01, 2007

Again, while it's sweet of you to re-post some of my favorites (no I will NOT go out with you!), they're all mine except for this one. You really should check your source better then that. Otherwise, good job on re-stating my opinions! I'd forgotten to save those ones and they really hit the nail right one the head! Thanks again.
Reply to this comment
See all 73 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs