September 22, 2009 11:07 AM

Americanism 101

By
Kristin Dross
(Weekly Standard)  This column was written by Peter W. Schramm.

This week, I am being honored by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services as an "Outstanding American by Choice." This strikes me as an interesting name for an award. It is meant, of course, to recognize selected citizens who were not born in America. But the idea of being an American by choice points to an important, and perhaps unintended truth: being American is not simply reducible to the happy accident of birth. Americans, both natural and naturalized, must be trained — they must be made — and much of my time these days is devoted to making Americans out of people who just happened to have been born here.

Over fifty years ago, when I was just shy of my tenth birthday, my family fled Hungary during the failed revolution against the Russian Communists. Our family's story was like so many of the refugees from communism, complete with relatives arrested, property seized, and a nighttime dash to freedom. The decision to escape was an easy one to make (although not so easy to execute), but the question I had — the one I distinctly recall asking my father — was "Where are we going?" We could have stayed in Europe — and indeed, the Germans would have welcomed us as Volk deutsche because of our German surname — but this was not my father's plan. "We are going to America," he said. "Why America?" I prodded. "Because, son. We were born Americans, but in the wrong place."

Born Americans, but in the wrong place? I've spent the better part of the last fifty years working to more fully understand these words. Mind you, everyone understood America to be a free and good place where one might prosper unmolested. But in saying that we were "born Americans, but in the wrong place," Dad, in his way, was saying that he understood America to be both a place and an idea at the same time. Fundamentally, it is a place that would embrace us if we could prove that we shared in the idea. We meant to prove it.

Because America is more than just a place, being an American citizen is different than being the citizen of any other country on earth. We Americans do not look to the ties of common blood and history for connection as people the way the citizens of other countries do. Rather, our common bond is a shared principle. This is what Lincoln meant when he referred to the "electric cord" in the Declaration of Independence that links all of us together, as though we were "blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh, of the men who wrote that Declaration."

Because ours is a bond of principle and not of blood, true American citizens are made and not born. This is why, odd as it may seem, we must all learn — those who are born here, and those who come here by choice — what it means to be an American. Regrettably, we are doing a poor job of passing this knowledge on to future generations. Looking to just one practical indicator, the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress shows that 73 percent of twelfth-graders scored below the proficient level in civics, as did 78 percent of eighth-graders, and 76 percent of fourth-graders. To put this into perspective, 72 percent of eighth graders could not explain the historical purpose of the Declaration of Independence.

This ignorance is tragic not merely because it indicates a deficiency in our educational system, but because with it comes a loss of our national identity. And so, I find it somewhat ironic and yet very fitting that fifty years after coming to this great country, I spend my days at an institution where my job is to teach college students and high school teachers what it means to be an American.

In recent weeks, there has been much talk about immigration, but very little informed discussion about what it means to be an American — about what is necessary to make Americans. Yes, there needs to be a sensible policy for accepting new citizens, and for ensuring that those who come here do so legally. But what happens once they are here? I hear frequent conversations about failures in integration and assimilation, even among recent legal immigrants. This is not new. What is new is that America's own natural citizens increasingly have forgotten what it means to be American. Some do not know the basics principles of this country, and still others have embraced the ideology of multiculturalism and self-loathing to such a degree that they can no longer recognize, let alone proclaim, that ours is a great nation built on lasting principles. If we no longer understand or believe in that which makes us Americans, then there is nothing substantive to assimilate into. We become many and diverse people who share a common place, rather than E Pluribus Unum.

We cannot forget who we are. We are Americans. This is a great nation. We Americans insist on holding to the connection between freedom and justice, courage and moderation. We think that equality and liberty have ethical and political implications, and, as we have shown time-and-again throughout our history, we are willing to fight and to die to make men free. We need to impart these principles to succeeding generations.

We Americans correctly demand respect for our rights but, in getting that respect, we must continue to demonstrate that we continue to deserve it. We have to exercise our intelligence and develop our civic understanding so that we may preserve our liberty and pass it on, undiminished to the next generation. If government "of the people, by the people and for the people" is to endure, its endurance can only come from the devotion of Americans — born here and away — who have been so made.
By Peter W. Schramm
©

Weekly Standard
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by sjc_1 July 2, 2007 1:30 PM EDT
***People*** ***do*** ***not*** ***see*** ***today***'***s*** ***immigrants*** ***like*** ***the*** &***quot***;***huddled*** ***masses***&***quot***; ***of*** ***Eastern*** ***Europeans*** ***and*** ***Irish*** ***of*** ***100*** ***years*** ***ago***. ***Those*** ***where*** ***white*** ***people*** ***that*** ***looked*** ***and*** ***acted*** ***a*** ***lot*** ***like*** ***the*** ***people*** ***that*** ***were*** ***here***. ***They*** ***shared*** ***a*** ***common*** ***belief*** ***system***.

***The*** ***more*** ***different*** ***the*** ***people***, ***the*** ***more*** ***suspicion*** ***that*** ***there*** ***is***. ***The*** ***easier*** ***it*** ***is*** ***to*** ***brand*** ***them*** ***as*** &***quot***;***not*** ***like*** ***us***&***quot***; ***and*** ***say*** ***that*** ***they*** ***should*** ***stay*** ***out***, ***that*** ***they*** ***are*** ***not*** ***wanted***.

***If*** ***is*** ***the*** ***content*** ***of*** ***their*** ***character*** ***and*** ***purity*** ***of*** ***their*** ***soul*** ***that*** ***I*** ***look*** ***for***. ***If*** ***they*** ***are*** ***good*** ***people*** ***that*** ***want*** ***to*** ***work*** ***hard*** ***and*** ***obey*** ***the*** ***laws***, ***then*** ***they*** ***can*** ***become*** ***Americans***. ***But*** ***ultimately*** ***WE*** ***decide*** ***who*** ***gets*** ***to*** ***become*** ***Americans***, ***it*** ***is*** ***OUR*** ***country***. ***This*** ***is*** ***not*** ***a*** ***given*** ***right*** ***to*** ***anyone***.
Reply to this comment
by knyghtwolf July 2, 2007 7:53 AM EDT
So how does one define a good American? A bad one, one that is right or wrong? How would you state that being an American means....what, without it being generalized? So does being an American mean being a good human being? If so, then define that too. You will find that being good or bad is a broad spectrum of influences a person has been exposed to from birth as in modeled behavior because modeling has been proven to be the strongest form of learning. Being good or bad is a very generalized idea based on a group of concepts within spectulation. Who told you God is almighty? To be either a republican or democrat, or what to fear or not fear in differences of people, or why women & men live seperate sphere lives, or why one religion is considered mythology while the other is deeply entrenched into "your" culture while having the exact same aspects as mythology? Who gave you your sets of "rights" and "wrongs"? The answer is your parents, friends, peers & finally the strongest one of all, the moral entrepenuers who tend us like flocks of sheepeople with fear, befuddling of truths & lies. Who told them? Now keep going back and asking yourself who told them, so on and so forth. Truth is found within the heart itself, not by repetious behaviors and generalized statements of good or bad.
Reply to this comment
by knyghtwolf July 2, 2007 7:52 AM EDT
So how does one define a good American? A bad one, one that is right or wrong? How would you state that being an American means....what, without it being generalized? So does being an American mean being a good human being? If so, then define that too. You will find that being good or bad is a broad spectrum of influences a person has been exposed to from birth as in modeled behavior because modeling has been proven to be the strongest form of learning. Being good or bad is a very generalized idea based on a group of concepts within spectulation. Who told you God is almighty? To be either a republican or democrat, or what to fear or not fear in differences of people, or why women & men live seperate sphere lives, or why one religion is considered mythology while the other is deeply entrenched into "your" culture while having the exact same aspects as mythology? Who gave you your sets of "rights" and "wrongs"? The answer is your parents, friends, peers & finally the strongest one of all, the moral entrepenuers who tend us like flocks of sheepeople with fear, befuddling of truths & lies. Who told them? Now keep going back and asking yourself who told them, so on and so forth. Truth is found within the heart itself, not by repetious behaviors and generalized statements of good or bad.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 7:23 AM EDT
to rudy654,

"he probably would have agreed with me, that America could learn much from these people."

Of course shortly after Dr. King might have said thusly, he would still have been assassinated...
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 7:05 AM EDT
to rudy654,

You write, "What a joke to suggest that freedom of speech means bloodshed."

I'm sure the Iraqis, the Chechens, the victims of Bosnia, the victims of post Soeharto Indonesia's riots, Wiemar's Germany, and many others throughout history who paid for letting demagogues incite the worst instincts in man, all get your joke and are ROTFLTAO.

By the way, it didn't escape notice that you try to condemn Singapore's "embrace of Islam" as you incorrectly perceive it, then condemn them for what you see as a lack of religious freedom. "Doublethink", I think Orwell called it...
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 6:55 AM EDT
to rudy654,

Still no real answer, so maybe you don't have one.

I'm pretty sure that Dr, King would have surveyed the place, and remarked at the fact that there are no homeless, violent crime per capita is microscopic compared to the US, that government has measures designed to aggressively combat racial and religious discrimination, that there are no slums and neglected neighborhoods of poor people, and the higher overall quality of life compared to the US, that all children have equal educational opportunities, the average test scores place Singapore at #1, while the US struggles to maintain 16th place, and he probably would have agreed with me, that America could learn much from these people.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 July 2, 2007 5:59 AM EDT
"Like I said, you have been lied to, use your own eyes"

Be sure to be looking in the mirror when you say those words.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 July 2, 2007 5:55 AM EDT
"I asked, and you did not answer, what if everybody decided to do as Dr. Chee, would you rather the resulting bloodshed for the sake of unlimited freedom to protest the government?"

This is all I'm going to answer of what you posted. What if everybody had freedom of speech and didn't need permission to speak first, well, gee, let's see, um why don't you ask that question of the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.? What do you think he would say? What a joke to suggest that freedom of speech means bloodshed.

You know what, you are apparently pleased with the restriction on conscience, freedom of speech, presumption of guilt until proven innocent, and other serious human rights violations in Singapore and you really, really belong there! Stay there, but don't be surprised if one day it doesn't come back to bite in your rear end. In the meantime, you have nothing to say about the US or any other country when you defend that kind of crapp. Have fun, you little Hitler you. Any dictator would proud of the likes of you, regardless of your color.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 5:13 AM EDT
to rudy654,

Did you know that the Muslim call to prayer, sung 5 times a day from the minarets through loudspeakers in most Muslim countries, is banned in Singapore, as it is not only proselytizing, but also a disturbance of the peace?

Like I said, you have been lied to, use your own eyes...
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 2, 2007 5:01 AM EDT
to rudy654,

You also repeat the false assertion that Singapore "embraces Islam". Aside from the face that Buddhism Christianity, and Hinduism are also represented and supported equally by government bodies here, the majority of Singaporeans are Chinese Buddhists.

You apparently are a victim of the current propaganda that everything Islam is automatically evil, believing what you read, simply "because it is written" by someone who claims knowledge of the subject.

Your own eyes would tell you that what you read is mostly untrue, and then you would better understand the agenda of those who wrote it.
Reply to this comment
See all 51 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook