Immigration Bill Passes Key Senate Test
Senators Vote To Revive Stalled Measure To Legalize Millions Of Illegal Immigrants
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush On Immigration Reform
CBS News RAW: At a Washington press conference, President Bush spoke about keeping concerns over security and the economy in check through immigration reform.
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Immigration And Naturalization
Who's coming to America? Find out what's being done to screen for terrorists and take a citizenship quiz.
-
Photo Essay
Immigration Rallies
Demonstrators demand path to citizenship for estimated 12 million illegal immigrants.
-
News Tools
Immigration Reform Plan
President Bush lays out his vision for comprehensive immigration reform.
President Bush said the bill offered a "historic opportunity for Congress to act," and appeared optimistic about its passage by week's end.
The pivotal test-vote was 64-35 to revive the divisive legislation.
CBS News correspondent Bob Fuss reports the bill still faces big obstacles. The president is pushing hard for it, but most of the opposition rests with other Republicans who don't want to allow illegal immigrants to gain legal status and eventual citizenship.
Supporters needed 60 votes to scale procedural hurdles and return to the bill. A similar test-vote earlier this month found just 45 supporters, only seven of them Republicans. This time, 24 Republicans joined 39 Democrats and independent Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, to back moving ahead with the bill. Opposing the move were 25 Republicans, nine Democrats and independent Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., an architect of the bill, said he was proud of the vote, calling it "a major step forward for our national security, for our economy, and for our humanity."
"We did the right thing today because we know the American people sent us here to act on our most urgent problems. We know they will not stand for small political factions getting in the way," Kennedy said in a statement following the vote.
Tuesday's outcome was far from conclusive, however. The measure still must overcome another make-or-break vote as early as Thursday that will also require the backing of 60 senators. And there is no guarantee that it will ultimately attract even the simple majority it needs to pass.
The Senate was preparing to begin voting as early as Tuesday afternoon on some two dozen amendments that have the potential to either sap its support or draw new backers.
Republicans and Democrats alike are deeply conflicted over the measure, which also creates a temporary worker program, strengthens border security and institutes a new system for weeding out illegal immigrants from workplaces.
Mr. Bush has mounted an unusually personal effort to defuse Republican opposition to the bill, appearing at a Senate party lunch earlier this month and dispatching two Cabinet secretaries to take up near-constant residence on Capitol Hill to push the compromise.
He called the measure a deal worthy of support. "In a good piece of legislation like this, and a difficult piece of legislation like this, one side doesn't get everything they want," he told business leaders and representatives of religious, Hispanic and agricultural communities earlier Tuesday. "It's a careful compromise."
The vote suggested that key senators and White House officials had succeeded at least for now in bargaining with skeptical lawmakers for a second chance to pass the bill. Several senators who have been promised votes on their amendments, including Sens. Kit Bond, R-Mo., Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Norm Coleman, R-Mo., Pete Domenici, R-N.M., John Ensign, R-Nev., and Jim Webb, D-Va., switched their votes to support moving ahead with the measure.
Still, after a chaotic several weeks in which the legislation survived several near-death experiences, it remained buffeted by intraparty squabbles.
As senators were preparing for the showdown vote Tuesday morning, House Republicans meeting privately on the other side of the Capitol were plotting to register their opposition through a party resolution. The measure never saw a vote for procedural reasons, but an attempt to kill it failed overwhelmingly, signaling deep GOP skepticism.
"It's clear there's a large number of the House Republicans who have serious concerns with the Senate bill," said Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader.
Several of the Republican amendments slated for upcoming Senate votes would make the bill tougher on unlawful immigrants, while those by Democrats would make it easier on those seeking to immigrate legally based solely on family ties.
Particularly worrisome to supporters, including the Bush administration, is a bipartisan amendment by Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Max Baucus, D-Mont., that would change the bill's new program for weeding out illegal employees from U.S. workplaces.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 10
- next
See all 479 CommentsThe right and the left politicians want cheap labor to help run their businesses, mow and clean their gated secured estates.
NO ILLEGALS, CLOSE THE BORDER,
Bush and no one else has explained why we cannot secure the borders, STOP there, get the national id cards and then and only then address what to do with all the illegal immigrants. (like deporting any and everyone who has failed to get a national id and who cannot prove their citizenship or residency)
With that in mind: I am voting out anyone who votes for this immigration reform bill or who even votes to move this issue forward.
Obama and the rest think it's just fine that someone comes into the U.S., takes a job and has no record of citizenship or papers to prove anything. Wow, no system of accounting for illegals and why is it we pay taxes when colonists have more rights priviledges than those who have papers?
We have enough criminal sociopaths, we have enough people with diabetes, mental illness, homelessness etc. Why is it assumed that all Mexicans crossing the border are healthy intact, moral, hard working individuals who have to prove nothing. This country is on crack.
Start with the worthless illegal MS-13 "gang".
One of these is running for President. I planned to vote Democrat for that office--but if he is the candidate, he will NOT get my vote. Not after supporting illegal immigration and helping businesses undercut the American workers.
Start with the worthless illegal MS-13 "gang".
Start here in Northern Virginia with the deporting first.
How many times do we have to say NO AMNESTY!!
All that needs to be done in regard to immigration is to enforce the 1986 law.
They are the drug runners, they are the ones breaking our laws, they are the ones producing false IDs, they are the ones financially breaking our medical institutions.
I'm all for workers coming over to work the farms but must go back when done and most of all must be registered. If they fail, they should be banned forever coming back to the US.
After being around for 2000 years, why is it that the Mexican people still live in a third world environment. They have the highest failure rate in our schools.
Dumb Ronald Regan gave amnesty to 6 million during his presidency, that's enough. Let Mexico and the Mexican's take care of their own.
My cousin's wife is from Brazil and it took her six years to do it right, if she can do so must everyone else.
Mexicans need to start taking some pride in their country and instead of mooching of our the American public to support them. They should be look to their government not ours to have a decent living.
Here are six Senators who are %u2018wavering%u2019 on the cloture vote:
Sam Brownback (R, KS) at (785) 233-2503 and (202) 224-6521
Richard Burr (R, NC) at (336) 631-5125 and (202) 224-3154
Thad Cochran (R, MS) at (601) 965-4459 and (202) 224-5054
Norm Coleman (R, MN) at (651) 645-0320 and (202) 224-5641
John Ensign (R, NV) at (702) 388-6605 and (202) 224-6244
Jim Webb (D, VA) at (804) 771-2221 and (202) 224-4024
Here are six Senators who are wavering on the cloture vote:
Sam Brownback (R, KS) at (785) 233-2503 and (202) 224-6521
Richard Burr (R, NC) at (336) 631-5125 and (202) 224-3154
Thad Cochran (R, MS) at (601) 965-4459 and (202) 224-5054
Norm Coleman (R, MN) at (651) 645-0320 and (202) 224-5641
John Ensign (R, NV) at (702) 388-6605 and (202) 224-6244
Jim Webb (D, VA) at (804) 771-2221 and (202) 224-4024
comments@whitehouse.gov
JUSTSAYNO, JUSTSAYNO, JUSTSAYNO, JUSTSAYNO, JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYN,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO,JUSTSAYNO
- Brings a tear to my eye.
Posted by drivelphobe at 12:05 PM : Jun 26, 2007
I second absolutly everything that you posted.
I hope and pray that this does not pass.
And we see who really wants this POS bill to be passed. Businesses that use these illegals to increase their profits, religious leaders(since most illegals come from Catholic-controlled countries, and catholisism(sp) forbids any form of birth control), they want more slaves to their puppet god, Hispanic groups (like la raza?) and agricultural who want the slave labor for the fields.
64 to 35.... Senate recesses until 2:15pm to move forward to debate this bill.
Sad.
S.1348-S.1639 bills are nothing less than Corporate Welfare and AMNESTY.
Someday all of our taxes will be directed at providing the security for an elite class in power. Sounds a bit like the old European rule doesn't it? Milton Friedman the neo con economist felt that governments only role should be to provide security. Who is the fool to think that all citizens will benefit from that peasantry funded security?
BTW, when a Mexican has a fake social security number...how does that get reported to the IRS and who pays the tax on the income associated with that number. How does this racket work? Anyone know or care?
Sad.
Posted by panhandlpete at 12:38 PM : Jun 26, 2007
Who voted for and who voted against, a comprehensive list would help those who are still quiet about this, to contact their senators/congressmen to tell them NO
Alexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
Warner, John- (R - VA)
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
Th
e House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
info@go
p.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!
democraticparty@democrats.org Democratic Party too!
Posted by l8c6 at 12:46 PM : Jun 26, 2007
I know somewhat how this currently works via my family's farm in Wisconsin, they send employment information to SSA, if a SS number doesn't match up, they usually get a notice about 18 months later and by then the employee has moved on.
Posted by drivelphobe at 12:05 PM : Jun 26, 2007
I second absolutly everything that you posted.
I hope and pray that this does not pass.
Posted by nottellin1
WE'RE PRAYING?
Posted by mudrose at 12:56 PM : Jun 26, 2007
Figure of speech
And this is the kind of DEMOCRACY we are supposed to be giving to Iraq and the world?
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!
We shoulda prayed harder. See what happens when you use prayer as a figure of speech. Next time mean it.
20 million commit a crime entering the country illegally raise their flag and our leaders surrender without a fight.
Posted by bluestardad at 12:51 PM : Jun 26, 2007
Anyone have this phone number or e-mail addy, or both?
20 million commit a crime entering the country illegally raise their flag and our leaders surrender without a fight.
200,000,000 Americans that have been shafted, turn and screw every Illegal Mexican he can they they go home anyway.
Well the shoe was never on the other foot nor will it ever be. But an answer to your question is they would shoot you on the border.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 10
- next
See all 479 Comments