WASHINGTON, June 25, 2007

Dry Cleaner Wins In $54M Pants Case

Judge Rules In Favor Of Company That Was Sued Over A Missing Pair Of Pants

  • Play CBS Video Video $67M Lawsuit Over Lost Pants

    Judge Roy Pearson is suing a Washington, D.C., dry cleaner for $67 million over a lost pair of pants. Harry Smith speaks with legal analyst Mickey Sherman about a lawsuit that may seem frivolous.

  • District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act.

    District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act.  (AP Photo)

  • Blog Court Watch

    CBSNews.com Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen's new blog on the big issues and analyzes important cases of the day.

(AP)  A judge ruled Monday in favor of a South Korean dry cleaner who was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants in a case that garnered international attention and renewed calls for litigation reform.

The owners of Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's consumer protection act by failing to live up to Roy L. Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign that was once placed in the store window, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled.

Bartnoff ordered Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung. Those costs came to just over $1,000, according to the Chungs' attorney. A motion to recover the tens of thousands of dollars they spent in attorney fees will be considered later.

Pearson, an administrative law judge, originally sought $67 million from the Chungs after he claimed they lost a pair of trousers from a blue and maroon suit, then later tried to return a pair of charcoal gray pants that he said were not his. He arrived at the amount by adding up years of law violations and almost $2 million in common law claims for fraud.

Pearson later dropped demands for damages related to the pants and focused his claims on signs in the shop, which have since been removed.

The two-day trial earlier this month drew a standing-room-only crowd, including many Korean and international media outlets covering the story.

In issuing her ruling Monday, the judge wrote that Pearson failed to prove that the pants the dry cleaner tried to return were not the pants he brought in for alterations.

"A reasonable consumer would not interpret 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' to mean that a merchant is required to satisfy a customer's unreasonable demands or to accede to demands that the merchant has reasonable grounds to dispute," the judge wrote.

Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney, praised the ruling.

"Judge Bartnoff has spoken loudly in suggesting that, while consumers should be protected, abusive lawsuits like this will not be tolerated," Manning said in a statement. "Judge Bartnoff has chosen commonsense and reasonableness over irrationality and unbridled venom."

The Chungs have said the trial exacted an enormous financial and emotional toll on them and exposed them to widespread ridicule.

Pearson did not immediately respond to a call and an e-mail seeking comment. Manning said he expected Pearson to appeal.

During the trial, Pearson testified that he wanted only $2 million in damages for himself — for his mental anguish and inconvenience — plus $500,000 in attorney's fees for representing himself. Any additional money that the judge might award would go into a fund "to educate people of their rights under the consumer protection act," he said.

The case garnered international attention and renewed calls for litigation reform.

"This case was giving American justice a black eye around the world, and it was all the more upsetting because it was a judge and lawyer who was bringing the suit," said Paul Rothstein, a Georgetown University law professor.

Rothstein said Monday's ruling "restores one's confidence in the legal system."


© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 108 Comments
by a-ji June 27, 2007 6:45 PM EDT
During the trial, Pearson testified that he wanted only $2 million in damages for himself %u2014 for his mental anguish and inconvenience %u2014 plus $500,000 in attorney's fees for representing himself.

Only $2M?! Shesh! Oh boy! Oh boy! Pearson is really nuts and trully has no common sense and unreasonable. Its a good thing the judge make the right move and favored the owners of the dry cleaner.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught June 26, 2007 1:28 AM EDT
cryon, what's your point? The Bible can be interpreted to support everything. Say it.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught June 26, 2007 12:36 AM EDT
Sorry cryon, but your 'white as snow' quote is utterly irrelevant to my explanation for institutionalized racism. Just to help clear you up, my skin is not white as snow, i'm shade of brownish-pink. And a mormon's deleted post that blamed this article's dispute on race is from a very sick mind.
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 June 26, 2007 12:32 AM EDT
So Moses wife was Black. Now where in the bible does it say Moses was a white man?
Posted by cryonbrian at 07:17 PM : Jun 25, 2007

Hmmm... it doesn't..but Meriam, his sister, was struck dumb for critizing his marrying a black woman. Maybe he was Asian...or Hispanic...there is always someone willing to use the Bible as grounds for arguing.
Reply to this comment
by cecilarea June 25, 2007 11:41 PM EDT
""The bigger overall problem is when frivolous lawsuits like this come before him in his court and he rules in favor of some nut plaintiff.""

It is sad that we have NUTS like the one quoted above that scream tort reform every time there is a silly case like 'missing pants' or 'spilled hot coffee.' The reason these cases MAKE the news is because they seem absurd. So what is the answer? Throw away the legal system? Try fighting a case where your child had his bowels sucked down a faulty water intake in a swimming pool and tell us if you think litigation reform is necessary! No income from the child so you don't need punitive damages for a faulty product do you? Child didn't live long enough to have a big hospital bill so the parents don't need to be reimbursed anything except minor expenses, RIGHT? Caps on everything?
No one needs legal remedy except YOU maybe when you sue for something that happens to you or yours?
Reply to this comment
by Auzzie2006 June 25, 2007 11:03 PM EDT
"litigation reform"....hmmmm...
This whole case sounds like a lie gone really bad...an opportunistic lawyer sees a sign..'Satisfaction Guaranteed', thinks to self..hmmm 'watch this' and tries to scam money, I agree the Chung's deserve the court costs, attorney fees, and perhaps a little more. The headline makes it appear they are getting 54M...that in itself would raise the 'litigation reform' red flag.
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 June 25, 2007 10:57 PM EDT
The article said that The Chungs have said the trial exacted an enormous financial and emotional toll on them and exposed them to widespread ridicule.

These poor people should be compensated for more than they have had to put out, they should be counter sueing for mental and emotional damages.
They have not exposed themselves to widespread ridicule, Pearson is the one who has exposed himself to not only widespread ridicule but to the world thinking he is totally insane and should be locked up for the protection of the people. I live in Australia and am thrilled that Jin Nam and Ki Y. Chung have won and feel so sorry for them for what this fool has put them through..
Mr and Mrs Chung, sue this madman for what he has done to you, I dont know if you would win as he is obviously totally and uttly insane...what a fool he wanted millions for a so called lost pair of pants, he has to be nuts..and I bet he had them at home all the time...
Reply to this comment
by cryonbrian June 25, 2007 10:17 PM EDT
likeitis5050

Don't how the Bible got into this thread, but I'll weigh in...Moses had a black wife.

So Moses wife was Black. Now where in the bible does it say Moses was a white man?
Reply to this comment
by cryonbrian June 25, 2007 10:14 PM EDT
kpgaynor

It has nothing to do with pants. I was correcting what 3 other posters said! Strange you did not say anything about their comments that had nothing to do with pants?
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 June 25, 2007 10:14 PM EDT
Don't how the Bible got into this thread, but I'll weigh in...Moses had a black wife.

Now for the intent of the board...'bout d...am..n time something stupid in the first place got the smack down! That judge and lawyer who represented him need to lose all license in any field of law. Both need to be on lithium drips for life!!!
Reply to this comment
by beadazzle June 25, 2007 10:10 PM EDT
I'm glad the Chungs stood up against this judge. We as american people can not let judges or any other authority push us around anymore.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver June 25, 2007 10:02 PM EDT
The bigger overall problem is when frivolous lawsuits like this come before him in his court and he rules in favor of some nut plaintiff.

Certainly if someone else was suing these poor folks in his court he would have had a rope around their necks.

Impeach him!!!
Reply to this comment
by kpgaynor June 25, 2007 9:24 PM EDT
To 'cryonbrian' who posted a few minutes ago...with all respect given that is due, what do the listed scripture references have to do with a pair of missing pants? If this is the best you can do....my gosh, man, go read the funny papers.
Reply to this comment
by quidproquo57 June 25, 2007 9:18 PM EDT
Typical. Of course I'm sure he got to be a judge based on his merits.....Wake up America! This case is everything that is wrong with this country.....Where is the outrage? Where are all the Duke professors that were so quick to judge the innocent students? It's only getting worse...The Pussification of America"
Reply to this comment
by randalds June 25, 2007 8:32 PM EDT
recover their legal costs they will really clean his pants. Posted by irishmail42
Maybe clean his clock too. Sounds like the smart a55 can use it.
Posted by asor1 at 04:31 PM : Jun 25, 2007

They took him to the cleaners.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug June 25, 2007 8:21 PM EDT
Alright, just picked up my shirts from the cleaners.
My favorite shirt is missing a button.
How much can get? ?
Someone please hurry with the answer,
I've already gone through 2 boxes of klennex.
Reply to this comment
by cryonbrian June 25, 2007 8:05 PM EDT
Klingon69 and weareone2, ctornaught

Here are some scriptures to back up what I am telling and this is in the same bible that the entire world reads. The problem is that you people do not read anything for yourselves. you are quick to speak but have no knowledge.


Numbers 12:10 (KJV)
And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous.

2 Kings 5:27 (KJV)
The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.

2 Kings 5:27 (NIV)
Naaman's leprosy will cling to you and to your descendants forever." Then Gehazi went from Elisha's presence and he was leprous, as white as snow.
Reply to this comment
by mdc76082 June 25, 2007 8:01 PM EDT
Truely and sadly Judge Roy L. Pearson is a grotesque and malignant tumor who has been allowed to grow in an already terminal judicial system. See. We create our own monsters. Maybe he can come and sue me for my response. I'd love to b_itch slap him like the wuss he is. Taking advantage (outside of the normal boundries of human decency) of people shows exactly what kind of person this idiot is. You can tell it btwn the lines of the reporting that Judge Pearson hates all Koreans!
Reply to this comment
by cryonbrian June 25, 2007 7:49 PM EDT
Klingon69


Great! Biblically, life form began in Africa. So I guess what you are saying is that Abel was White? Did the mormons and baptist ever tell you that the first time God ever referenced a white person in the bible was when he turn to people white as snow for stealing tithes from the church!
Reply to this comment
by asor1-2009 June 25, 2007 7:31 PM EDT
recover their legal costs they will really clean his pants. Posted by irishmail42
Maybe clean his clock too. Sounds like the smart a55 can use it.
Reply to this comment
See all 108 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: