WASHINGTON, June 22, 2007
Bush Pushes Vietnam Leader On Human Rights
Hundreds Protest Outside White House As Nguyen Minh Triet Makes Historic Visit
-
-
President Bush meets with Vietnamese President Nguyen Minh Triet in the Oval Office in Washington, June 22, 2007. It was the first visit to the White House by a Vietnamese leader since the end of the Vietnam War. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
-
Demonstrators protest in Lafayette Park across from the White House, June 22, 2007, as Nguyen Minh Triet, the president of Vietnam, was to meet with President Bush. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
-
-
Fast Facts Vietnam Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Interactive The Fall of Saigon Revisit the final chapter of America's struggle in a decade-long war through pictures, maps, video and stories.
"In order for relations to grow deeper, that it's important for our friends to have a strong commitment to human rights and freedom and democracy," he said.
The Vietnamese leader said he's willing to discuss those matters — but hopes they don't impair the larger overall relationship with the U.S., CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports.
Neither leader took questions during the appearance.
Triet is the first leader of his country to visit the White House since the end of the Vietnam War. But some fellow Vietnamese were not rolling out the welcome mat.
Hundreds were outside the White House carrying the flag of the old South Vietnam, as well as banners calling the Vietnamese president a criminal. CBS News correspondent Peter Maer says it was certainly one of the largest demonstrations against a visiting foreign leader in Washington in a long time.
"The young generation, they just want freedom, they just want freedom of speech, they just want freedom of expression," one woman told Maer.
"Minh Triet, go home! Minh Triet, go home!" others shouted.
Republican lawmakers have urged Mr. Bush to encourage President Triet to make stronger efforts to stop what they describe as widespread abuse of Vietnam's citizens.
"Societies are enriched when people are allowed to express themselves freely or worship freely," Mr. Bush said in the Oval Office after the meeting with Triet.
Mr. Bush said he told Triet, "We want to have good relations with Vietnam."
As dozens of protesters outside the White House waved flags, Triet said the two presidents had a "direct and open" conversation about human rights.
"Our approach is that we would increase our dialogue so that we will have a better understanding of each other," Triet said through an interpreter.
He said he is determined not to let differences on the issue damage overall relations.
Triet has attempted to keep the focus on vibrant trade ties between the United States and one of Asia's fastest-growing economies. The countries began a bilateral trade agreement in 2001; trade reached nearly $10 billion last year.
Triet is leading a delegation of more than 100 Vietnamese businessmen. He signed with the United States on Thursday a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement, which sometimes acts as a road map to eventual free trade negotiations.
But during an hour-long private meeting Thursday, senior U.S. lawmakers repeatedly took Triet to task for claims by rights groups that Vietnam has ramped up repression of political activists and religious leaders.
"Human rights was overwhelmingly the dominant issue," Republican Rep. Ed Royce said. "We've got to see a stop to this conduct if this relationship is going to improve."
When asked about Triet's response, Royce answered: "Evasion."
Vietnam tolerates no challenges to Communist one-party rule; it insists, however, that only lawbreakers are jailed. In recent months, Vietnam has arrested or sentenced at least eight pro-democracy activists, including a dissident Roman Catholic priest who was sentenced to eight years in prison.
Rep. Roy Blunt, the No. 2 House Republican, said Triet told lawmakers that Vietnam "had lots of human rights, but the dissidents were somehow endangering the security of the country. We pressed hard for more information about exactly what that means."
Triet, in a speech to business leaders before the congressional meeting, avoided any mention of human rights. He called for more U.S. business investment in his fast-growing country and said the government was working hard to smooth out difficulties that some U.S. companies have experienced.
"We will do our best to help you," Triet told the audience. "We are striving to create a friendly business environment."
Triet said talk of the war was outdated. "Vietnam is peace. Vietnam is friendship. Vietnam is developing dynamically and creatively," he said through an interpreter.
Sherman Katz, a senior associate in international trade at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Vietnam has "got to be aware that part of the price of doing business with the United States, if you expect the U.S. government to help you, is to clean up some of these" human rights problems.
In Los Angeles, Triet's next stop, hundreds of protesters, most of them Vietnamese émigrés critical of the communist leader and his government's human rights record, are expected to demonstrate.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
More From Politics
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 50 CommentsWait...
The only way this makes headline makes sense is if bush is complaning that Vietnam has too many human rights. He probably is complaining that they are not torturing their suspects enough.
Offshoring has only hurt Americans. And America.
Oh good - another trade deficit for the US. Pretty soon we won't be exporting any of our products anywhere.
"In order for relations to grow deeper, that it's important for our friends to have a strong commitment to human rights and freedom and democracy," he said.
Bush said that? Did he get hit by lightening? Did his lips start on fire? Frigg*in hypocrite.
Rep. Roy Blunt, the No. 2 House Republican, said Triet told lawmakers that Vietnam "had lots of human rights, but the dissidents were somehow endangering the security of the country. We pressed hard for more information about exactly what that means."
Sounds like the Bush and the people on this message board that support him. It's no problem for Bush though - he can just rip another chunk out of the Constitution.
As for financial motivation -- I was mad when we opened trade with China and I'll probably be mad about Vietnam too. But if I want to buy my new shirt for $15 instead of $45, someone in a foreign country is going to be enslaved. You can't pay union wages and deliver a product as cheap as we can buy them now. Until America's social conscience gets so sensitive that it says "I" will do without new clothes and live within my income, people in other countries wiil have to work in the sweatshops of the world.
"He signed with the United States on Thursday a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement,"
Do you folks even read the articles. Trust me, this event has nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with human rights. The "human rights" angle means nothing at all, it is a smokescreen to get really, really, really stupid people like yourselves to ignore the actual purpose of the Vietnam butcher's visit, which is to get a massive new trade concession from the United States. Which they got. They came here to sign a document giving them more access to take American jobs. They did that. The "human rights" talk is nothing, its not a document, its not genuine, its for the cameras only. Did ya even read the article?
"Triet is leading a delegation of more than 100 Vietnamese businessmen."
What about that don't you get? Do you really actually think anyone in America's leadership is concerned about "human rights" in Vietnam? They are concerned about getting reelected, and to get reelected, they need money from business, and business wants a free trade agreement with Vietnam. So the butcher of Vietnam came here to meet with businesses and sign an agreement.
"used to find it amusing to go up to people of Asian decent, look them in the eyes and in my most threatening and grizzled voice say, "Didn't I kill your brother?" and watch the emotions play through their heads."
Vietnam's Rumsfeld, McNamara, has himself admitted that the Vietnam threat was also based on lies, and also an unnecessary war.
There were those who knew it then, and protested, but were called "pinkos", "dirty hippies", "the lost generation", etc., turns out we were right all along.
Knowing what you now know, do you still take pleasure in retraumatising Asians, or have any regret for doing so, knowing you just might have killed someones' brother, and for no good reason?
The Bush puppet-Fuhrer (heil) talking about human rights!
That is rich!
Everyone else is already bought and paid for.
Posted by veteran71
Feel ya, Bro, except I don't yet believe Paul or Kucinich is untouchable, they just haven't been made the "offer they can't refuse".
The real power behind Bush (Bechtel, Halliburton, Carlysle, etc.) has enough money to buy anyone, even us. Those firms should be liquidated if any president is to stand a chance of not being bought.
What's this idiot up to now? He's going to p*ss off one of the few international heads who isn't already steamed at us. And I would think the "Vietnam leader" would have a thing or two to push Bushie on, in terms of human rights (Guantanamo, use of the death penalty in US states, Iraq prison abuse, torture of terror "suspects", flying detainees to overseas torture centers, and so on). Where does Bushie get off on lecturing ANYONE on human rights?
Amen... Brother preach it!
I'm not a praying man, but I'll pray for that just in case.
Posted by veteran71 at 09:51 PM : Jun 22, 2007
And of course these days we have a slightly different version of idiots preaching the destruction of America, except in this case it's loonies like swingingdick moaning that there's a Muslim terrorist in every closet, instead of the red under every bed from the 50's and 60's. the communists were supposed to defeat us back then and they did not. Yet these days we're told that in order for us to defeat this new threat we have to surrender all of our rights and freedoms to the government so they can protect them for us and that they'll give them all back when it's "safe'. Yeah. Right. This time the ones who are the biggest threat to us live in the White House, not Hanoi, Moscow or Beijing.
Today, I'm a lot mellower and think it's a good thing that after 30 some years we should be talking to the Vietnamese on an equal level again. Unfortunately though, we're talking down to them as we talk down to everyone who isn't the worlds last remaining superpower.
In this ignoble point in American history, for Bush to be spouting off about Human Rights to the Vietnamese is one of the most hipocritical examples of political hipocracy I have ever witnessed. God bless 'em, Bush has got to be dumb as a bag of rocks to even bring up the subject.
Nonetheless, I'm praying our dipstick in chief stays alive, incontinent or otherwise, for at least another couple of years, lest the mad monk himself Cheney, get his hands on the Constitution.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 50 Comments