February 11, 2009 4:40 PM

Most Couples OK Giving Embryos To Research

(AP)  A majority of couples with stored embryos from fertility treatments say they would be willing to donate unused embryos for stem cell research, says a doctor who surveyed patients.

"Large numbers of infertility patients ... support using embryos for research, and these are people who have invested emotionally and financially in these embryos," Dr. Anne Drapkin Lyerly of Duke University said in a telephone interview Wednesday.

Use of stem cells derived from embryos is a moral issue that has troubled politicians, religious and medical leaders and couples with stored embryos. And it's an issue with strong advocates on both sides.

The problem is, obtaining stem cells kills the embryo.

Many see this as wrong and argue that they are protecting life. That's what led President Bush to veto a bill Wednesday that would have eased limits on using embryos in research.

Others point out that many stored embryos will be destroyed anyway, and letting them be used in research could lead to lifesaving treatments.

So Lyerly and Ruth R. Faden of Johns Hopkins University decided to ask the opinions of couples who had undergone fertility treatments and who had frozen embryos in storage at treatment centers.

"We knew that infertility patients were facing the morally difficult and very personal decision of what to do with remaining embryos, but we didn't have a lot of data," Lyerly said. They thought that by hearing from these people they might be able to improve counseling and clinical care in the future.

In addition, she said, while there has been a very vigorous public debate on the issue, it has been dominated by lawmakers and religious authorities while the people "most personally and intimately involved have been underrepresented, if at all, so we wanted to bring their voices to the center."

They chose nine fertility centers around the country and randomly selected more than 2,000 couples to be sent questionnaires.

Of 1,020 people who responded by saying they still had embryos in storage, 49 percent said they were likely to donate some or all of them for research. When asked specifically about stem cell research, the portion willing to donate embryos rose to 62 percent.

"It suggests that people are more willing to pursue research when they know more about it and how it might benefit their fellow citizens," Lyerly said.

She added that research was preferred over donating the embryos to other infertile couples, "which brings into question the idea that the more you care about an embryo, the more you want it to become a child."

"This has significant implications for potential policy change on stem cell research," said Lyerly, an obstetrician-gynecologist and bioethicist. She noted that research donations could provide thousands of new stem cell lines for study.

The findings are published in this week's online edition of the journal Science and will appear in the journal's July 6 print edition.

Stem cells have attracted research attention because they can develop into any type of cell present in the body. Thus, scientists hope to find ways to use them to treat diseases ranging from autoimmune disorders to cancer, by generating healthy cells to replace damaged ones.

However, federal funding for embryonic stem cell research is limited to research on stem cell lines derived from embryos before August 2001, and may not be used for research in which an embryo is destroyed. Funding from private or state funding sources is growing, but is still insufficient, Lyerly said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 53 Comments
by aivilo_ June 22, 2007 1:51 AM EDT
I have mixed opinions on this topic. In one perspective, I would be hesitant to give up one of the only 400 eggs in my life for research that is made from MY body, but on the other hand; I would like to contribute to proggressing in research.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 June 21, 2007 4:34 PM EDT
pwrslm,

I wasn't talking about what the Commandment means, I was talking about what you said it means(no exceptions)...there's a difference between the 2.

I'm still waiting to hear what facts about killing embryos that I'm not accounting for. I know that I'll be waiting awhile because you have no facts yourself,only a misinformed opinion. That's why you have to stick to name calling because you know you don't have any facts.

The scientists say that the stem cells are needed, the putz's like you think you know more than the researchers. I think not.

Do you think the meat in your freezer is alive too?OK, that's a joke,but then you don't have a sense of humor, do you? OOPs, I'm slipping out of reality, unlike Mr. Embryos outside the womb are life. Talk about a putz.
Reply to this comment
by sy2502 June 21, 2007 4:04 PM EDT
Those embryo's are alive, and the all the DNA needed to become a fully functional human being.
Posted by pwrslm at 12:58 PM : Jun 21, 2007

Every cell in your body contains your full DNA, does that make every cell a person? And I repeat my question: the placenta is formed from that same collection of cells that makes the embryo: does it mean it's a person?
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 21, 2007 4:03 PM EDT
pwrslm,

What are you talking about?

If you want to verify the claims you can call the Doctor at Duke Med and ask her about the methodology.

Was a sample of 2,000 not large enough for you, because all those Rasmussen polls you all like to trumpet only sample about 500-800 respondents.
Posted by realpatriot1

There you go, still posting irrelevant banter like it actually had meaning.

Its pretty simple to understand what I posted, I think you are the only one that doesnt understand that unverifiable claims about unverifiable/unscientific polls asking unverifiable questions and making unverifiable conclusions about unverifiable answers should not be injected into a discussion of facts.

So your posts are, truely irrelevant.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 21, 2007 3:58 PM EDT
These are embryos that are a few days old. They are a lose collection of cells some of which will become a fetus, some will become the placenta. Is the placenta a human being? Don't be ignorant.
Posted by sy2502

Ignorance is this; denying that life does not begin at conception. Every medical doctor will testify to this fact. Those embryo's are alive, and the all the DNA needed to become a fully functional human being.

Justifying the killing hundreds of thousands, or even millions of embryo's, to do the same thing they can do by modifying living tissue, from a living donor, that stays alive after its all finished.

Thats not to mention, direct solicitation for more embryo's if they need them. The quantity wanted for research will far outstrip the "leftovers" provided by the medical field who legitimately do thier job properly.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 21, 2007 3:52 PM EDT
pwrslm,

God said thou shalt not kill and there are no exceptions.

Posted by some realputz1

No I did not. You need to pay more attention, and try to stay within the boundries of reality, instead of making this stuff up as you go along. Not only do you fail to account for all of the facts about killing embryo's for stem cell research, which is not even needed, but you are totally ignorant of what this commandment means.
Reply to this comment
by sy2502 June 21, 2007 3:28 PM EDT
An embryo is human, and it is alive.
Posted by pwrslm at 11:40 AM : Jun 21, 2007

These are embryos that are a few days old. They are a lose collection of cells some of which will become a fetus, some will become the placenta. Is the placenta a human being? Don't be ignorant.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 June 21, 2007 2:58 PM EDT
pwrslm,

God said thou shalt not kill and there are no exceptions. But people who think like you make exceptions all the time(war,death penalty,hunting,etc.).

To follow your reasoning in this instance, we would have to leave these embryos in their frozen state for eternity.

Sort of like leaving Terri Schiavo's soul in limbo rather than setting it free to be with god.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 June 21, 2007 2:50 PM EDT
pwrslm,

What are you talking about?

If you want to verify the claims you can call the Doctor at Duke Med and ask her about the methodology.

Was a sample of 2,000 not large enough for you, because all those Rasmussen polls you all like to trumpet only sample about 500-800 respondents.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 21, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
The people being polled are the people whose bodies were used to create the embryos, the embryos are part of them.

How should they become more informed on the issue?
Posted by realpatriot1

That doesnt justify hiding behind anonymity, making unverifiable claims about unverifiable polls.
Reply to this comment
See all 53 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook