HERSHEY, Penn., June 17, 2007

Is America Too Sweet On Sugar?

Sugar Has Been In The American Diet Since Columbus, But It Might Be Time To Cut Down

  • Hershey's candy bars are beloved American originals. But some experts say we need to lose these from our diets.

    Hershey's candy bars are beloved American originals. But some experts say we need to lose these from our diets.  (AP)

  • Quiz Are You Food Savvy?

    Have you consumed myths about diet and nutrition? Take these quizzes to find out.

(CBS)  It seems fair to ask: who's responsible for America's love affair with sugar? Historian Sidney Mintz says you could blame Christopher Columbus.

"Sugar cane was brought to the New World by Columbus on his second voyage," he said.

Cultivation of sugar cane dates back some 12,000 years to New Guinea. By the time of the Greeks, it had spread to Europe.

"There's a description going back to Alexander the Great," Mintz said. "One of his generals writes about finding it in India. He talks about this reed which has this sweet juice in it."

Until the 17th century, sugar was a luxury, only for the rich, who considered it a spice, and sometimes a cure-all.

"In fact, it was mainly used as a medicine at that time," Mintz said. "It was a major ingredient in medicines for the black plague and it was also used by a surgeon who combined the powdered sugar with powdered gold which you'd blow into the eye for eye health."

Soon people began putting more into their mouths than their eyes. Demand grew, and that, says Dr. Mintz, indirectly led to the rise of slavery because sugar cultivation required intensive labor.

"Very difficult and demanding labor; free people wouldn't do it," Mintz said. "I would go so far as to say that the most important reason that slavery was introduced into the New World on a large scale is sugarcane."

By the 19th century, sugar was providing quick, cheap calories to the new factory workers. Commoners were lapping it up — and we're still lapping it up, 200 years later.

Connie Bennett thinks it's time to put on the brakes.

"I tell people, 'Don't believe me, just don't believe me,'" she said. "'Then test it out for yourself. Go a week without sugar and refined carbs, or maybe even two weeks and then just watch yourself like a lab rat.'"

It’s a tough sell, but the anti-sugar crowd insists that life without sugar's fleeting pleasures — or its empty calories — really is twice as sweet.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by raykendrick June 19, 2007 1:23 PM EDT
Heres more info on the subject

www.biblelife.org/myths.htm
Reply to this comment
by drinuk June 19, 2007 12:12 PM EDT
Following the UK Ban on Aspartame, it is now time to ban CORN SYRUP and SLENDA. There is no smoke without fire, for the sake of our kids, IF IN DOUBT, KICK IT OUT
Reply to this comment
by drinuk June 19, 2007 12:06 PM EDT
THIS IS NEWS, THE BEST NEWS SINCE HILTER DIED.
19th JUNE 2007 UK.

ASDA-WALMART & MARKS&SPENCER, major UK food retailers have today announced they will no longer sell products containing ASPARTAME, they have BANNED IT !!! It follows a report from the UK Food Standards Agency and ADD in Children. No doubt the Italian research which states that this junk causes brain tumours had something to do with it. So Come On FDA, your corrupt decision to approve it as been shot to pieces, time to put your hands up and go to jail.
Reply to this comment
by toddpw01 June 18, 2007 11:40 PM EDT
BAN HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP.

I recently bought some Mexico-bottled Coke at the Costco. It uses real sugar and you really can tell the difference. HFCS is either intensely sweet or hollow with a vaguely addictive feeling. Everyone who can't quit smoking because of the calm they get from another hit knows what I am talking about.

The sad fact is that HFCS is a product of our own corn subsidies. It is hypocritical that our government preaches free markets most of the time but then hands out subsidies to many industries who don't need it.

Ironically, the insanity of fuel Ethanol may fix this problem for us. Food prices in the US, Mexico, and China are all ratcheting upwards because of Ethanol production taking farmland away from other staple foods.

Americans are about to be crushed in a vice of rising prices and stagnating wages, that has been slowly building for a long time. Rampant deficit spending and easy credit is finally coming home to roost in the form of price inflation, and Bush's appointments of corrupt government officials ensures that corporations won't be punished for putting profits over the public interest.
Reply to this comment
by sugar-hater June 18, 2007 10:14 PM EDT
Thank you so much for this story. I have been saying for years that I was addicted to sugar and no one would listin to me. Just a few months ago I went to a new Dr and he agreed with me and had me go on THE SOUTH BEACH way of eating. I have now been off sugar for seven weeks and feel so much better. I look at the contents of every package I buy to see how much sugar in in the item. Yes it is hard and takes time and costs moare money but I feel so much better and I can't wait to go back to the DR.

Fast foods are not fast and they are not cheep. They are just easy. People are lazy and if you look around you can tell by all the fat babies, children teens, adults and older people.
Reply to this comment
by alyceo June 18, 2007 7:30 PM EDT
Your story about sugar was very informative, but only touched on the tip of the iceberg. I urge you to reat Michael pollan's book Omnivore's Dilemma. You will learn all about industrial grown corn which in turn will be high fructose corn syrup. These industrial farms are subsidised by the government so that big companies like ADM and Cargill can make more money by providing the pesticides and fertilizer, milling, shipping etc . These companies are the beneficiaries of the farm subsidies that keep the river of cheap corn flowing. Bottom line, we must change the farm subsidy bill.
Reply to this comment
by minminmin-2009 June 18, 2007 6:17 PM EDT
brianbwb --

Unregulated capitalism is to blame? Get real. You still control what you put in your mouth. Nobody decides that for you. There's good food out there if you choose to purchase and, yes, actually get off your a$$ and PREPARE it. I have found I can eat very cheaply if I'm willing to prepare my own food. Last time I checked, water is much cheaper than soda, and better for you. Oh, and if you invest in a small water filtration system, you'll make your $$ back in no time over buying bottled water (just one example).
Reply to this comment
by turtled28 June 18, 2007 5:11 PM EDT
I have to agree with MichelleM99, who stated that it is NOT easy for those who are on a restricted budget or simply have a low income. As a college student working two jobs just to pay my bills (let alone the college loans piling up), I cannot afford to buy fresh fruit and veggies, let alone anything that is even remotely healthy.
I thought I had been trying to be good to myself by not drinking soda, and sticking to teas, but the Splenda I use is still bad for us!
It seems that not only is it a struggle to pay rent with rising energy costs, soaring gas prices and insurance rates make it difficult to keep our cars legal, health insurance is a by-gone luxury in my home, where my significant other is a NURSE, for crying out loud. Then I attempt to be frugal and make home-cooked meals, yet I still can barely afford to feed us without resorting to cheap frozen pizzas, hot-dogs, mac&cheese, or other such high-carb, high-fat, low fiber things.
How on earth can one afford to eat as we are supposed to, while keeping a roof over our heads?
Reply to this comment
by sy2502 June 18, 2007 4:43 PM EDT
We have been made sugar addicts due to all the processed foods that have dumped sugar in everything. Tell me, why does SANDWICH BREAD need to be SWEET??
Posted by tmonta1 at 05:24 PM : Jun 17, 2007

I have to agree with you, when I moved from Europe to the US I had a really hard time adapting to the way food tastes here, mostly because everything is so sweet, including stuff that isn't supposed to be. Like bread for example: when I tasted sliced bread, I thought I had bought some kind of dessert bread by mistake, that's how sweet it tasted. When the Atkins hype started, I would by their low-carb bread only because it container less sugar. I am sure there are several causes to obesity, but wolfing down all that sugar every day surely doesn't help.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 June 18, 2007 2:22 PM EDT
I am a legally blind w/other diabiles and so it is not safe for me to use the stove. I can't cook at all. So at 52,I have to mic everything to eat. Some of us have to. If they come out with healthy mic foods they will price them so high only the rich can buy them. My room mate is diabatic and on shots/type 2. So it is true every thing is so sweet. Had a dish of deit jello and it was steewer than nodenit kind. I don't sugar and don't salt food. I know the proper food to eat but the poor is hurt the most.It is buy the cheapest. Years ago we ate better.They need to get more sugar out and salt as well. I love chot but can't eat much of it miraines. So food will make you sick...
Reply to this comment
by June 18, 2007 10:30 AM EDT
Fewer than 200 years ago, people worked farmland to survive, rising before dawn, putting in a long day's worth of physical labor, and eating basically what they grew or hunted. The winters were brutal. No washing machines for laundry and meat ad to be cured and stored
Posted by tmonta1 at 04:54 AM

200 years ago they did not have grocery stores right down the road, they did not have (junk) fast food resturants on every street corner. They did not have televisions, entertainment was much different. And for that matter no one had cars to drive around. The bottom line is eat right and excersise
Reply to this comment
by tmonta1 June 18, 2007 7:54 AM EDT
I see the point in these last two comments, but do not fully agree with the 'it's this stressful workaholic lifestyle that makes us susceptible to unhealthy habits' take.

Fewer than 200 years ago, people worked farmland to survive, rising before dawn, putting in a long day's worth of physical labor, and eating basically what they grew or hunted. The winters were brutal. No washing machines for laundry and meat ad to be cured and stored.

People died earlier from disease and perhaps fatigue, but they weren't walking around with morbid obesity and rampant diabetes.

The main factor here is not stressful lifestyle, but poor response to it partly due to convenient but just plain CRAPPY processed foods and fast-food restaurants. They're fast, they taste good, and are sometimes cheaper to prepare than a 'fresh' meal. Americans are addicted, and they're paying the price in both health and weight issues.
Reply to this comment
by longbus10 June 18, 2007 4:33 AM EDT
Brianbwb's comment stated it all. Society keeps trying to treat the symptoms instead of fixing the the problem itself.

Yes, we can look at how other societies are not obese, and say it is because it is how they eat, but you also need to look at their lifestyle. Do they have to commute to work over an hour? Do they work 10-16 hour days?
Are they living pay check to pay check, or do they have to have million dollar homes, requiring them to work their life away?

I am so sick and tired of people blaming everyone else for his/her problems. It is time to accountability for your own actions. Stop blaming "Sugar" for societies obesity problem. Look into what the real problem is in your own life. Learn to say NO!

Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 June 18, 2007 3:39 AM EDT
Sugar is not the problem per se, the real problem is generally unhealthy eating habits, stress filled and sedentary lifestyles.

All of these problems can be classed as the unhealthy side effects of unregulated capitalism, making most people work their whole lives just one paycheck above poverty creates stress, which leads to unhealthy eating habits, no recreation, a search for "magic" pills and substitutes, in order to try to dodge the consequences of our lifestyles, and reliance on TV as the only affordable entertainment available, in which advertising reinforces all of the above, by encouraging wasteful consumption.

When do we start to pay more attention to the root cause of disease, rather than just the symptoms?
Reply to this comment
by makeda1999 June 18, 2007 2:21 AM EDT
I, too suffered many years of morbid obesity. At age 42, I found myself at 364 pounds and on two diabetes medicines. I cut out ALL processed sugars and flours and easily lost 190 pounds with very little exercise. I am so glad that the truth is out and maybe others will take heed. Sugar is POISON!!! To hell with moderation. If we could moderate, there would have been no need for this wonderful in depth piece. Thank you CBS for potentially saving many lives.
Reply to this comment
by tmonta1 June 17, 2007 8:24 PM EDT
I've been living in Europe for 18 years. When I arrived, I was 50 pounds heavier than I am today. Lost all that weight (before having 3 kids) by adopting the eating habits over here. Could write a book on it.

But one thing I can say is that now, every time I go back home, everything tastes sweet to me: bread, mayonnaise (the regular kind, not Miracle Whip)sauces...and the normal 'sweet' stuff is sickeningly sweet to me. I used to love Hershey bars, now all I taste is sugar, not chocolate.

We have been made sugar addicts due to all the processed foods that have dumped sugar in everything. Tell me, why does SANDWICH BREAD need to be SWEET??
Reply to this comment
by phidldd June 17, 2007 7:41 PM EDT
I was disappointed they only talked about hypogylcemia rather than insulin resistance/pre-diabetes in the report. Insulin resistance is what is happening in our country and what is ultimately going to kill us.
Reply to this comment
by June 17, 2007 7:36 PM EDT
It's not easy finding a cereal for your kids - even the so-called healthy ones - that's less than 25% sugar. Cheerios at 6% is my favorite.

Additionally to the extra sugar were eating are the larger portions in the restaurants. I remember when a bunch of us 60's teenage fast-food workers, introduced to the prototype, didn't believe a quarter pound hamburger would sell much - who would be gluttonous enough to consistently buy it? Now even the small fries are bigger than the large fries then.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk June 17, 2007 3:16 PM EDT
Valhaus, I think you will find that Big Sugar and Big Pharma have joined forces and gotten Stevia Banned by the FDA. Just like the Apricot Kernel, vitamin B17. Any Natural herb or plant which is good and cannot be patented they lobby and pay for it's exclusion. Crooks and villians the whole bunch of 'em.
Reply to this comment
by salty1954 June 17, 2007 2:33 PM EDT
Why don't the food police get a life? Let folks eat what they want. Mind your own business.

Now pass me a Hershey bar and shut up!
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: