President Bush And The National Debt
By CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller.
To hear President Bush tell it, he's on the side of the angels when it comes to federal spending.
In his Saturday radio address, he blasted congressional Democrats for pursuing "tax and spend policies," while trumpeting his own commitment to keep taxes low and restrain federal spending.
He said his plan will produce a balanced federal budget by 2012.
But what Mr. Bush didn't mention, and what he almost never mentions, is the National Debt.
With good reason.
On the day he took office, the National Debt stood at this unfathomable number:
$5,727.776.738,304.64
In fiscal shorthand, that's $5.7 trillion dollars. Trillion with a "T."
Six and a half years later, the Bureau of Public Debt tells us the National Debt clocks in at a staggering:
$8,835,268,597,181.95
That's $8.8 trillion – an increase of $3.1 trillion dollars since January 20, 2001. And that amounts to a jump of 54% during Mr. Bush's watch.
If you wanted to pay it off, dividing it equally among the U.S. population (estimated by the U.S. Census Bureau to be 302,103,675), it would come to $29,245.82 for every man, woman and child.
Sot it's not really hard to understand why Mr. Bush almost never mentions it.
The National Debt has gone up more on his watch than under any other president.
That means it took the Federal Government 225 years to accrue $5.5 trillion in debt under 42 U.S. presidents. But under President Bush alone, it has soared another 35.2%.
And the National Debt is not just a big number, it's an expensive one.
This year alone, it costs taxpayers $247.3 billion in interest payments.
It hardly gives the president bragging rights about fiscal discipline.
Yet, in his Saturday radio address, he skewered Democrats for their fiscal plans.
"They've passed a budget that would mean higher taxes for American families and job creators, ignore the need for entitlement reform, and pile on hundreds of billions of dollars in new government spending over the next five years," he said.
He threatened anew to veto any spending bills he considers excessive, and he says he's got the votes to keep his vetoes from being overridden.
"In the House, 147 Republicans have pledged to support fiscal discipline by opposing excessive spending," President Bush said. "These 147 members are more than one-third needed to sustain my veto of any bills that spend too much."
It should be noted that as a percentage of the nation's Gross Domestic Product, the National Debt is 67.9%. That's up from 57.4% the year Pres. Bush took office. It
was in the 67% range some of Bill Clinton's presidency as well – and he actually produced a federal budget surplus in each of the last three years of his term in office.
After World War II, the National Debt was $260-billion dollars (a mere trifle by today's standards), but that amounted to 117% of GDP in 1945.
For that reason, officials at the Office of Management and Budget say the National Debt is no more of a problem now than a decade ago.
The size of the numbers just makes it seem otherwise.
Mark Knoller
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. To hear President Bush tell it, he's on the side of the angels when it comes to federal spending.
In his Saturday radio address, he blasted congressional Democrats for pursuing "tax and spend policies," while trumpeting his own commitment to keep taxes low and restrain federal spending.
He said his plan will produce a balanced federal budget by 2012.
But what Mr. Bush didn't mention, and what he almost never mentions, is the National Debt.
With good reason.
On the day he took office, the National Debt stood at this unfathomable number:
$5,727.776.738,304.64
In fiscal shorthand, that's $5.7 trillion dollars. Trillion with a "T."
Six and a half years later, the Bureau of Public Debt tells us the National Debt clocks in at a staggering:
$8,835,268,597,181.95
That's $8.8 trillion – an increase of $3.1 trillion dollars since January 20, 2001. And that amounts to a jump of 54% during Mr. Bush's watch.
If you wanted to pay it off, dividing it equally among the U.S. population (estimated by the U.S. Census Bureau to be 302,103,675), it would come to $29,245.82 for every man, woman and child.
Sot it's not really hard to understand why Mr. Bush almost never mentions it.
The National Debt has gone up more on his watch than under any other president.
That means it took the Federal Government 225 years to accrue $5.5 trillion in debt under 42 U.S. presidents. But under President Bush alone, it has soared another 35.2%.
And the National Debt is not just a big number, it's an expensive one.
This year alone, it costs taxpayers $247.3 billion in interest payments.
It hardly gives the president bragging rights about fiscal discipline.
Yet, in his Saturday radio address, he skewered Democrats for their fiscal plans.
"They've passed a budget that would mean higher taxes for American families and job creators, ignore the need for entitlement reform, and pile on hundreds of billions of dollars in new government spending over the next five years," he said.
He threatened anew to veto any spending bills he considers excessive, and he says he's got the votes to keep his vetoes from being overridden.
"In the House, 147 Republicans have pledged to support fiscal discipline by opposing excessive spending," President Bush said. "These 147 members are more than one-third needed to sustain my veto of any bills that spend too much."
It should be noted that as a percentage of the nation's Gross Domestic Product, the National Debt is 67.9%. That's up from 57.4% the year Pres. Bush took office. It
was in the 67% range some of Bill Clinton's presidency as well – and he actually produced a federal budget surplus in each of the last three years of his term in office.
After World War II, the National Debt was $260-billion dollars (a mere trifle by today's standards), but that amounted to 117% of GDP in 1945.
For that reason, officials at the Office of Management and Budget say the National Debt is no more of a problem now than a decade ago.
The size of the numbers just makes it seem otherwise.
Mark Knoller
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 439 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 67 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 150 Comments
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1224 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 187 Comments














In 1786, Thomas Jefferson, then U.S. ambassador to France, and John Adams, then American Ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the Dey%u2019s ambassador to Britain, in an attempt to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress%u2019 vote of funding. To Congress, these two future presidents later reported the reasons for the Muslims%u2019 hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
%u2026that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.
Sound familiar?
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison defeated the fascist nazi muslims 200 years ago
And again 100 years ago with Theodore Roosevelt
Tunisia in 1881 by France and Libya in 1911 by Italy. By then most of the Islamic world was under Christian domination. With the Ottoman Empire defeated in WW1, secularist Turkish rebels in 1923 overthrew the last Islamic Caliphate,
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?6bdec278-6a71-4436-bc4d-29d1c54b0ad7
THE WAR ON TERROR IS NOT IN IRAQ AND ISRAELI INTEREST ARE NOT THAT OF AMERICA!
QUIT SMOKING THE TEXAS DICKTATER AND DO SOME RESEARCH THEN POST!
AND WE'RE NOT STOPPING NO FREAK'N WAR UNTIL THE JOB IS DONE!
AMERICA IS COMING BACK ITS PEOPLE ARE FED UP WITH BUSH AND HIS SAND DWELLING NEOCONS!
50 YEARS OF SUPPORTING THESE SAND DWELLING SAVAGES IS ENOUGH!
IF YOU LIKE THE GAS PRICES IN EUROPE OR DUBIA GO THERE AND LIVE!
NOT ONE MORE DIME TO ANYONE IN THE MIDDLE EAST NO MATTER WHAT!
AMERICAN SCHOOL KIDS ARE DOING CAR WASHES FOR SCHOOL SUPPLIES AND WE ARE SENDING MONEY BY THE TONS TO THE SAND DWELLERS!