Senate Revives Immigration Bill
Key Senators Reach Agreement After President Bush Offers $4.4B For Border Security
-
Photo
President Bush gestures while speaking to the Associated Builders and Contractors meeting in Washington on June 14, 2007. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
-
Interactive
Immigration And Naturalization
Who's coming to America? Find out what's being done to screen for terrorists and take a citizenship quiz.
-
Photo Essay
Immigration Rallies
Demonstrators demand path to citizenship for estimated 12 million illegal immigrants.
-
Photo Essay
Border Insecurity
The slow, sensitive path to tighter security along America's borders.
After a series of meetings, the negotiator for the Democrats, Sen. Ted Kennedy, and the negotiator for the Republicans, Sen. John Kyl, said they would present their plan to their parties' leaders, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.
Reid and McConnell released a statement Thursday night saying the bill will go back to the Seante floor.
"We met this evening with several of the Senators involved in the immigration bill negotiations," it read. "Based on that discussion, the immigration bill will return to the Senate floor after completion of the energy bill."
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
"We're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept," Mr. Bush said, two days after launching a personal rescue mission.
Any agreement is subject to approval by Reid, who has said repeatedly it is up to Mr. Bush and Republicans to line up the votes needed to advance the measure if it is to be brought back to the Senate for debate. Reid, who has expressed misgivings about elements of the bill, sidetracked it last week after supporters gained only 45 of the 60 votes needed.
Republicans accounted for only seven of the 45 votes, and Reid said earlier this week, "We'll move on to immigration when they have their own act together."
President Bush's decision to personally announce support for the accelerated funding reflected concerns expressed by Republican senators at a closed-door meeting on Tuesday. Several told him their constituents doubted the government was capable of following through on a commitment to enforce immigration laws.
In a letter sent to Mr. Bush before the meeting, Georgia Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson wrote, "This lack of trust is rooted in the mistakes made in 1986, and the continued chaos surrounding our immigration laws. Understandably, the lack of credibility the federal government has on this issue gives merit to the skepticism of many about future immigration reform."
Under the legislation as drafted, money for border enforcement would be collected gradually as illegal immigrants pay the fines and fees needed to achieve legal status. The letter asked Mr. Bush to secure the border before other elements of the immigration measure go into effect, and the president agreed in his remarks to the Associated Builders and Contractors.
"One common concern is whether the government will provide the resources to meet the goals in the bill. They say, 'It's fine to talk about it, are you actually going to do something?'" he said.
"To answer these concerns I support an amendment that will provide $4.4 billion in immediate additional funding for securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site," he said.
"By matching our benchmarks with these critical funds, we're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept."
Two Republican supporters of the legislation, Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kyl of Arizona, had previously proposed advanced funding.
"The moment the presidential signing pen meets the paper these funds will be available," Graham said in a statement welcoming Mr. Bush's remarks.
But Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., an opponent of the legislation, took a different view. "I appreciate the effort to fund border security, but there's simply no reason why we should be forced to tie amnesty to it. If the administration was serious about fulfilling the border security promises, then this funding should have been supported all along, not offered at the last minute to attract votes to a bad bill."
Even a decision to return the bill to the Senate floor does not guarantee its passage, given the intense opposition. "We've got people out there on both sides really ready to burn the place down," said Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi, the second-ranking Republican. "I don't think we ought to let that happen."
The calendar, too, presents obstacles to any attempt to pass the measure before the Senate begins a scheduled vacation in two weeks. Should they choose, critics of the immigration measure could slow progress on other measures Reid wants debated in the next two weeks. The effect would be to further reduce prospects for passage of the immigration bill.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 365 CommentsIt goes to show you that our government has no interest in securing the borders and never will.
12+ million illegal immigrants today...
... how many millions more 5, 10, 20 years from now?
What have our soldiers died for over the past 231 years?
We're screwed all the way around.
NAFTA is a POS and always has been. I think at least part of the reason that the government won't enforce the 1986 law against employers is because they are worried that some might just move the business to Mex or Canada.
We're doomed.
NAFTA is a POS and always has been. I think at least part of the reason that the government won't enforce the 1986 law against employers is because they are worried that some might just move the business to Mex or Canada.
We're doomed.
Posted by nottellin1
Virtually all trade agreements are not what they should be or at least what they were sold to the American public on, the premise of creating new jobs abroad and at home simultaneously lifting wages in the nations that sign and promoting freedom. That is why before they are renewed a living wage must be included in them, then they would do what they were intended to do. Our jobs have already moved overseas on account of these agreements to lower wages (slave wages, child labor, mandated abortions etc) only through reform of the treaties and tarriffs can this be rectified.
What We Owe Illegal Immigrants
I agree with your last post 100 percent. If this bill were to pass, most illegals wont 'register' anyway, therefore very few fines will be paid. These are people that are so used to living under the radar, most just wont do it.
Posted by nottellin1 at 07:59 PM : Jun 14, 2007
So drop the fine along with the returning to their home country to get back in line. No one is going to do them anyway so as long as they're in this bill they're just a waste of space.
That's why both parties want to legalized tens-of-millions of illegal immigrants, in hopes to gain a new voting base. Hand a milk-bone to a dog enough times, and you can train it to do whatever you want.
Many illegals come here with minimal to no education in hopes to find work. With the various 'visas' given to them, it's like handing a dog a milk bone. Give the illegal immigrants enough 'perks' (that us taxpayers fork over arms and legs for) and the [future legal] immigrants will completely roll over for the politicians who gave it to them.
The bulk of the politicians in D.C. are self-centered, greedy, evil, whatever you want to call them... but they're not stupid.
(okay, except for Bush).
Posted by RandalDS at 08:00 PM : Jun 14, 2007
Gee if we could agree on that, there'd be no problem. Sorry, I still want them to all go home so that they can come back legally and be counted, preferably with limits. I don't care about the fine but what you are suggesting will not solve the problem of identifying them.
Posted by nottellin1 at 08:24 PM : Jun 14, 2007
Sure it will. If there is no fine and they don't have to return to their home country (two things they won't do anyway) before they can become citizens then they'll come pouring out of the woodwork to sign up. Nearly all of them would rather be here as legal citizens then not and once we have the bulk of them who do sign up taken care of, then we can concentrate our resources on going after the ones who still want to be here illegally. Sort of like let's clear our plate before we go after the bad ones.
(okay, except for Bush).
Posted by acauble1 at 08:04 PM : Jun 14, 2007
You are so right, at least in regard to the illegals that are Mexican. In many parts of Mex you have Jeffe's and peons. The workers are so grateful to the cheifs for their largesse that they happily go along with poor conditions. But our politicians aren't as smart as they believe because in Mex, only 46 percent of eligible voters do in fact vote and 70 percent of that are Jeffes.
Posted by gil3al at 08:36 PM : Jun 14, 2007
That's because the government can't afford to build it without using undocumented workers, just like the company that built the fence in San Diego did.
Posted by abnerm
Completely agree, right on...anyone rationale knows that we cannot jail or round-up and expel the current 12m illegal aliens; but we have to now stop more inflow. The humane, logicial step since we do use the labor of these 12m people (we're at full employment in economic terms here in the US) is once we close off the border to allow the people here, at that point, a path to citizenship - but this issue just exacerbates if border security isn't first.
Two designations:
1. U.S. Citizen
2. Legal - resident alien
That will solve the forged/fake documents issue, (provided the cards include an RFID chip embedded)
This card will replace those old tattered Social Security cards that are a big joke, (since a $50 printer can reproduce similar quality).
1) Overturn this legislation retroactively if it passes; 2) Use the registration list to enable rapid deportation - once they register, we will know who they are; 3) terminate the federal pension system for our government branches and replace it with a 401k plan; 4) terminate the free healthcare for our government branches and replace it with managed health care; 5) require 80% direct participation in government business.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19127991/site/newsweek/
Posted by jeff92706 at 10:12 PM : Jun 14, 2007
Because we, the US, want everyone to think we're great apparently. Oh like some of us that post here do as well. We do need to trade with other countries to some extent, but few other countries are as concerned about our image as the US, or maybe just the US Pres.
Posted by ozilot
Ozzy in some cases it is. Extreme views prove it all the time.
How about we start acting like Americans and not some heartless, mindless people.
Posted by Furman2008 at 10:21 PM : Jun 14, 2007
Furman2008,,,
You are right in one context, but Americans do support legal immigration and are not heartless and mindless. The only problem with our current situation is we are dealing with illegal immigration, illegal criminal immigration line jumpers, criminals always complicate issues. Its bad enough a lot of Americans donot even want legal immigration so to consider illegal immigration and make 12 million criminals legal freaks a lot of Americans out, rubs many the wrong way! As Americans we need to look out for the rights of those waiting in immigration lines legally, who obeyed U.S. Laws and procedures and tried to come to the U.S. the legal, correct way. Where is the sympathy for those people? We need a mix of immigrants from around the world and not all from Mexico. The legal Mexican immigrants can do the same things the illegal Mexican immigrants can do except be exploitation bait! The problem with legal immigrants is that you have to pay them the minimum wage!
Posted by bm6005 at 11:15 PM : Jun 14, 2007
Although I appreciate the sentiment, I don't have much more faith in "working class people" than I do in our CONgressmen. Remember, these are the same working class joes who still think Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11! I'm not sure whether I prefer greedy technocrats or ignorant commoners. Half a dozen of one, six of another.
Really, I think our whole society needs a radical shift in values-- not just our incompetant senators, but us average joes too.
Posted by Furman2008
Both my grandfathers came here from Italy in the early 20th Century. They came thru Ellis Island and made a life for themselves. They learned English, they paid taxes and they raised their families. Of course you couldn't wade the Atlantic but they did it legally. Illegal immigrants today only do two of the three. I'm not heartless but I am hardnosed on this subject. American citizens get my vote no matter what their origin!
Posted by socrates392
They believe that since they've been lied to by the technocrat LAWYER scum who've run our country into the ground. I'm a college graduate and I'm comfortable around these folks. Given the proper data I believe they'd make better dedcisions. Have you ever heard of Quality Circles? They work. Good people rise to the top when given the chance. Now, do I always agree with them? No, but they're not back stabbers like the professional pols!
No problem, take the whole family with you!
people like lou dobbs have a problem with identifying the undocumented aliens who have come to the usa for a better life.
the immigration bill is designed to deal with the problem without animosity and without amnesty
if lou dobbs is really concerned about securing the us borders why does he focus on only one word'amnesty'.
this bill is a total package trying to solve the problem. it may not be perfect but it's a start.
lay off lou dobbs ;
remember securing the borders,knowing who is in the country,solve the problem of 12 million illegals already in the us,
don't worry there is enough room for everyone,you don't have to give up your 300 acres.
p.s you have a bunch of mexicans take care of those 300acres???lol
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 365 Comments