WASHINGTON, June 13, 2007

More Subpoenas In Fired Prosecutors Probe

Source: Former White House Officials Harriet Miers And Sara Taylor Will Reportedly Be Called To Testify

  • Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers.

    Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers.  (AP Photo)

(CBS/AP)  Two congressional committees are issuing subpoenas for testimony from former White House counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor on their roles in the firings of eight federal prosecutors, according to two officials familiar with the investigation.

Democrats probing whether the White House improperly dictated which prosecutors the Justice Department should fire also are subpoenaing the White House for all relevant documents, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the move had not yet been formally made public.

The Senate Judiciary Committee's subpoena for Taylor compels her to testify on July 11, while the House Judiciary Committee's subpoena for Miers compels her testimony the next day.

"We'll review them and respond appropriately," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

The White House has repeatedly refused to make current and former officials involved in the firings available except in private interviews, without transcripts. Congressional investigators have refused that offer.

"The committees can easily obtain the facts they want without confrontation by simply accepting our offer for documents and interviews." Perino said. "It's clear Senator Leahy and Representative Conyers are more interested in drama than facts."

Asked if the White House will invoke executive privilege, Perino said, "There are many different ways to assert privilege and executive privilege is only one of them."

The subpoenas come a day after newly-released Justice Department documents revealed that Taylor was closely involved in the firings. In a Feb. 16 e-mail, Taylor described a U.S. attorney in Arkansas who was fired last year as "lazy" — "which is why we got rid of him in the first place," according to the documents.

Former prosecutor Bud Cummins, reached Tuesday night for comment, responded: "I'm sure I have some faults, but my work ethic hasn't been one them." Taylor also complained that Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty told senators that Cummins was replaced at the urging of Miers, who was White House counsel at the time.

It's the first time during the five-month investigation that Congress is compelling testimony from White House insiders over the firings. Not yet on the subpoena list is President Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, but only because Democrats have not yet finished interviewing those below him, the officials said.

Democrats say the firings are evidence that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales allowed his traditionally independent federal law enforcement agency to be run, in effect, by the White House.

Republicans point out that U.S. attorneys serve at the president's pleasure and can be fired for any reason, or none at all. Former and current top Justice Department officials have said the list of the eight fired was drawn up on the advice of several senior officials. E-mails made public have shown that Miers, Taylor and Rove were looped into the decision-making process and attended meetings on the firings.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 104 Comments
by homespunlady June 14, 2007 2:54 AM EDT
Here's a way to Give the Republican Party controllers fits:

Register Republican and vote for Ron Paul in the primary.

The lobbyists can't buy or blackmail him. He's consistently received favorable reviews from polls that quickly disappear or are misread and he actually believes in the CONSTITUTION - unlike the current White-house occupier that stated that it was "just a ********ed PIECE OF PAPER. Shows how much HIS OATH OF OFFICE means to him.
Reply to this comment
by homespunlady June 14, 2007 2:42 AM EDT
So, how long before Meirs and Taylor leave for Bahrain and join the rest of the rats that have already deserted the country with MASSIVE piles of cash (for services rendered). Proves prostitution doesn't have to be just oral.

POLITICAL PROSTITUTION has paid extremely well these past 6 years.

Heard a rumor that George prefers his hideaway in Paraguay Rather than Bahrain. Probably wants to get away from the Chaney/Halliburton Mob bosses.


Reply to this comment
by p-syrus June 14, 2007 1:56 AM EDT
I am so disappointed in this congress and their lack of any meaningful progress...

I could care less that 8 republican U.S. attorneys were fired by a republican Attorney General.
Posted by ozilot at 10:09 PM : Jun 13, 2007


Which only shows your own personal faults of impatience & ignorance.

What is important in this case is the apparent misuse of the attorney general's authority for partisan political . That is ILLEGAL under the law. Even more interestingly this illegal activity quite possibly occurred as a result of direction from the Whitehouse if not the Office of the President himself.

It is therefore paramount to establish EXACTLY what happened and EXACTLY who is responsible for it. Hence the time being taken by congress in systematically examining the evidence.

It never ceases to amaze me how utterly NAIVE most american citizens are about the processes of government. Although, they continually display AMPLE evidence of both naivete & ignorance. Remember how popular the Iraq war was in this country just a short time back?

The Bush administration has managed to completely destabilize Iraq and threatens to do the same for much more of the mideast.

So far the only winners from Bush Foreign Policy have been Iran & China. How's that for the "Heir to Reagan"?
Reply to this comment
by imprisonbush June 13, 2007 11:22 PM EDT
To Jedi08:

I am unsure which Bush operative is providing your faulty information, but Hillary has been a US senator for a bit more than two years. In fact, she was elected in 2000 and sworn in in 2001, so -- this being June of 2007 -- she has been a U.S. Senator for more than 6 years. That's the problem with relying upon Rove for your talking points -- they usually lack any kind of basis in fact.
Reply to this comment
by david1737 June 13, 2007 9:57 PM EDT
Funny thing about Rudy is that he was so hated, especially by Repubs, on 9-10-2001.
Reply to this comment
by david1737 June 13, 2007 9:49 PM EDT
Also, I know anyone can run, but I can't beleive the lack of experience in the dems field, but yet they are so fired up about their choices. Obama who gennerally new the the political scene, and Hillary who has two years of senate experience.
Posted by jedi08 at 05:38 PM : Jun 13, 2007

How quickly you forget. Bush's entire 2000 campaign was based on his lack of political experiance. He ran as an "outsider" remember?
Reply to this comment
by david1737 June 13, 2007 9:44 PM EDT
To offer "private interviews, without transcripts"
is an obvious attempt to thwart justice, and implies guilt. The time to invoke impeachment hearings is long overdue.
Reply to this comment
by nyckate June 13, 2007 9:21 PM EDT
perception5 - Rudy qualified - for president?? Are you out of your mind?? Rudy isn't qualified or mature enough or sane enough to be President of US - have you learned nothing from electing George W., America's worst president? Now you want to elect someone even more disturbed than George??? Man -hon - sign in to a ward somewhere - your electric shock treatments are way overdue!!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 13, 2007 9:17 PM EDT
AM A VET AND AM READY TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIS AMERICAN BOYCOT/COOP...

DAVID A BELANGER,VET US ARMY,for-america@hotmail.com

No thanks. I think, at a very minimum, we would insist on a leader who at least knows how to punctuate
Reply to this comment
by nyckate June 13, 2007 9:15 PM EDT
jedi08 - hopefully ALL the so-called front-runners Hillary, Obama and Rudy will burn-out - not one of them is qualified to be President - and Lord only knows that Rudy is probably even more immature than George is -- and probably also much more of an eglomaniac - though they would be even on that one.

Not one of them has offered a plan - lot of soundbites - adn from Rudy of course given that Rove's people are running his campaign a lot of snide remarks and lies and threats - if you don't vote for me Bin Laden will get you - you know - the same threats Bush used in 2004 -- and can you believe it's working for Rudy? Goes to prove that 26% that still supports Geroge and now support Rudy are pretty much braindead and useless to society!
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 June 13, 2007 9:03 PM EDT
time to take up ARMS and take them all out.

EVERYONE THAT WANTS TO HELP WITH THIS SHOULD BE TALKING TO ALL MEDIA OUTLETS AND TELLING THEM THAT AMERICANS ARE READY TO TAKE WASHINGTON ON AND ITS NOT A FEW AMERICANS ITMILLIONS OF AMERICANS THAT WILL TAKE BACK THERE COUNTRY..

I AM WILLING TO GIVE MY BLOOD FOR ALL AMERICANS TO GET OUR COUNTRY BACK TO WHAT OUR FORFATHERS WANTED.

AM A VET AND AM READY TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIS AMERICAN BOYCOT/COOP IF WE THE PEOPLE DONT DO THIS NOW WE WILL BE GIVENING UP ON OUR CONSTITUTION AND WHAT ALL OUR VET HAVE DIED FOR..

DAVID A BELANGER,VET US ARMY,for-america@hotmail.com

ok so wants to join in on this great american REVOLUTION


they cant kill millions of americans at once so if we charge them all at once we will win and take them out and hang them all..

just like in the old days of the west...hang them from the trees in front of the whitehouse and see how many start telling the truth about what they have done to all us americans..


if the american NOW dont stand up and start a NATIONAL REVOUTION ON THIS WASHINGTON BULL S/H/I/T/ THEN we as TRUE AMERICANS can say nothing!!!

its time to take all this *** and take our government back now..

they are the ones that started this and we will finnish it now..we the people will take our country back and everyone in washington can sit there and thinks we the people are ok with what they are doing..go ahead and let them think that we are comming to take them out
Reply to this comment
by meb955 June 13, 2007 8:55 PM EDT
Also, I know anyone can run, but I can't beleive the lack of experience in the dems field, but yet they are so fired up about their choices. Obama who gennerally new the the political scene, and Hillary who has two years of senate experience.
Posted by jedi08 at 05:38 PM : Jun 13, 2007

compared to rudy who has all the experience of a big city mayor (i can't think of anyeone who ever jumped from city hall to the white house in the nation's history) and mitt, who seems to be spending most of his time trying to forget his record in massachusettes.

activists and voters decide who the nominees are. if mccain (the real experienced republican) and biden (a real experienced democrat) don't get it, that's democracy for you.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 13, 2007 8:47 PM EDT
"The committees can easily obtain the facts they want without confrontation by simply accepting our offer for documents and interviews." Perino said. "It's clear Senator Leahy and Representative Conyers are more interested in drama than facts."

In other words, Congress can investigate if they allow the White House to govern the investigation. What an absolute crock!

Since when are the investigated empowered with the ability to dictate to the investigating agency how investigations should be conducted?
Reply to this comment
by socrates392 June 13, 2007 8:44 PM EDT
"...NONE of the Democrats are qualified....... and none come even "close" to either Rudy or Mitt Romney as far as Brains or Experience......not even close..........I can't wait for 2008 !!"

Posted by perception5 at 05:07 PM : Jun 13, 2007

From your screen name, one might think you were pretty perceptive . . . but clearly you are not! "Brains and Experience"?! What kind of experience does Rudy have to prepare him for the presidency?! I'm sorry, but unless you think that extra-marital affairs and divorces count as experience, Rudy isn't a very good candidate.

And then there is Romney, the flip-flopper. How much brains does it take to know that flip-flopping on issues like abortion won't get you into the White House? Doesn't seem too smart to me.

I can't wait until 2008 either, because then the taint of Republican idiocy will finally be washed away and we can begin to rebuild this country again!
Reply to this comment
by tejasdemo June 13, 2007 8:43 PM EDT
...NONE of the Democrats are qualified....... and none come even "close" to either Rudy or Mitt Romney as far as Brains or Experience......not even close..........I can't wait for 2008 !!
Posted by perception5 at 05:07 PM : Jun 13, 2007

I cant wait either !!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jedi08 June 13, 2007 8:38 PM EDT
Your missing my point. Im saying Bush didn't lie. He said what he read in the CIA breifings that he got, the same one that Hillary read. If anyone is to blame, its bad intellagance. Plus I find it funny how when we origainally caught Sadam and took the capital so quickly that Hillary was out there saying she voted for the war, but now that its not popular anymore its all Bushs fault.

Also, I know anyone can run, but I can't beleive the lack of experience in the dems field, but yet they are so fired up about their choices. Obama who gennerally new the the political scene, and Hillary who has two years of senate experience.
Reply to this comment
by meb955 June 13, 2007 8:10 PM EDT
If Bush's lies killed 3500 troups then so did Billary Clintons, she voted for the war, then to fund troops , then said she would always fund the troops then didn't.

I know you guys hate republicans but I can't beleive you cant see threw her BS. Someone name me one thing that qualifies her to even be running for president besides that fact that she was Bills wife. Two years in the senate, give me a break.
Posted by jedi08 at 04:56 PM : Jun 13, 2007

obviously more education is required here to this incredibly dim response. let me try.

VOTING for a war based upon alledged misrepresentation is in no way equivalent to offering that misrepresentation in the first place. and voting FOR the troop package that would try to bring them home is not the same as not funding the troops -- nor is voting against a blank check. at least, it's not to someone who thinks rather than just regurgitates talking points.

and ANYONE can run for president if they meet the constitutional requirements, dimbulb. it's up to the voters to make the determination if they are any good (as they didn't correctly with carter, for instance).

gah. it's tough to be a republican with people like you supposedly on our side.
Reply to this comment
by perception5 June 13, 2007 8:07 PM EDT
Someone name me one thing that qualifies her to even be running for president besides that fact that she was Bills wife. Two years in the senate, give me a break.
Posted by jedi08 at 04:56 PM : Jun 13, 2007


...NONE of the Democrats are qualified....... and none come even "close" to either Rudy or Mitt Romney as far as Brains or Experience......not even close..........I can't wait for 2008 !!
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 June 13, 2007 8:05 PM EDT
That is incredibly faulty reasoning. That says that I can propose going to war based on lies and you are all suppose to stop me. I do not have to think of the best course of action and only propose the best ideas. It is a form of "stop me before I lie and invade again".
Reply to this comment
by jedi08 June 13, 2007 7:56 PM EDT
If Bush's lies killed 3500 troups then so did Billary Clintons, she voted for the war, then to fund troops , then said she would always fund the troops then didn't.

I know you guys hate republicans but I can't beleive you cant see threw her BS. Someone name me one thing that qualifies her to even be running for president besides that fact that she was Bills wife. Two years in the senate, give me a break.
Reply to this comment
See all 104 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: