$54M Lost Pants Suit Brings Judge To Tears
D.C. Judge Chokes Up While Testifying About His Missing Trousers
-
Photo
In this courtroom sketch, Judge Roy Pearson, left, who is suing Jin Nam Chung, seated at center right, and his wife Ki, seated 2nd right, for $54 million for what he calls "misleading signage" at their dry cleaning business, speaks at DC Superior Court in Washington, D.C. Tuesday, June 12, 2007. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)
-
Blog
Court Watch
CBSNews.com Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen's new blog on the big issues and analyzes important cases of the day.
Administrative law judge Roy L. Pearson had argued earlier in his opening statement that he is acting in the interest of all city residents against poor business practices. Defense attorneys called his claim “outlandish.”
He originally sued Custom Cleaners for about $65 million under the District of Columbia consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims. He is no longer seeking damages related to the pants, instead focusing his claims on two signs in the shop that have since been removed.
He alleges that Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung, owners of the mom-and-pop business, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed “Satisfaction Guaranteed” and “Same Day Service.”
Pearson, representing himself, said in opening that he wanted to examine the culture that allowed “a group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years.”
An attorney for the Chungs portrayed Pearson as a bitter man with financial troubles stemming from a recent divorce who is taking out his anger on a hardworking family.
“This case is very simple. It's about one sign and the plaintiff's outlandish interpretation,” attorney Chris Manning said.
The Chungs were to present their case Wednesday. Manning asked D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff to award them reimbursement for their legal costs if they win.
Pearson called several witnesses Tuesday who testified that they stopped going to Custom Cleaners after problems with misplaced clothes.
Pearson also called himself as a witness, saying his problems began in May 2005 when he brought in several suits for alterations. A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit was missing when he requested it two days later. He said Soo Chung tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants.
As Pearson explained that those weren't the pants for the suit, he choked up and left the courtroom crying after asking Bartnoff for a break.
Pearson originally asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit, which was more than $1,000. But because the Chungs insisted the pants had been found, they refused to pay.
Manning has said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson, but the judge was not satisfied and increased his demands — including asking for money to rent a car so he could drive to another business.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 103 CommentsIs there a therapist in the house?
This poor man needs counseling...good gravy.
I didn't think it could get worse than McDonald's hot coffee. I was wrong.
I hope he wasn't wearing heels a skirt and pantieson his way out.
Where is Jesse Jackson?
Where is Al Sharpton?
This is one pathetic LAWYER.
By the way when she ran out of the courtroom was it as a judge,defendant or lawyer?
Someone needs to get a grip on these headlines
And like most $lut$ this is his way to make some easy money.
JUST MORE FOOLISH NEWS FROM THE CRAZIEST NATION ON THIS EARTH.
Posted by RandalDS
A black republican with no pants crying as he runs out of a courtroom? ?
He's liberal.
Counter - suit!
I think the damages could run pretty high. The city should fine him for wasting the courts time with a blatantly frivilous lawsuit.
And, for some fun - OK, he wears a blue and maroon suit! And he gets teary about his missing pants. And he's a pathetic, moronic, nutcase. Ladies and Gentlemen, Homer Simpson lives! Or is it Peter Griffen? Either way, this guy is a caricature, a full on cartoon character.
ONLY IN AMERICA.
Posted by RandalDS
A black republican with no pants crying as he runs out of a courtroom? ?
Posted by rushlimpdrug at 06:33 PM : Jun 13, 2007
Well it sounds like Ted Haggard to me. LOL!
I'd love to know who appointed him. Near as I can tell, it was a commission in Washington, DC.
This man is neither Republican or Democrat. He's just plain nuts.
quote "A black republican with no pants crying as he runs out of a courtroom? ?
Posted by rushlimpdrug at 06:33 PM : Jun 13, 2007"
Ever heard of Alan Keys? Colin Powell? Rice?
Delusion is not unique to any ethnicity, there are "black" republucans Chinese republicans, Gay republicans...
No wonder his wife took a powder.
Who needs Amos and Andy re-runs when we have someone like this actually practicing law and serving as an administrative law judge.
Geeze, I hope this guy isn't still sitting on the bench trying cases. How can a grown man run crying from a courtroom over a pair of PANTS?? What did I miss? The whole world's gone mad.
"..wouldnt have happened like that in an american owned store thats for *** sure"
Posted by jusred1 at 03:01 AM : Jun 14, 2007
And he's judging the merits of cases filed by other people?
Who needs lawyer jokes when we've got real life examples like this?
Problem is, if this guy wins his case, he will have taken his cleaners to the cleaners.
And nobody will be laughing.
If Every business was required by Law to perform perfectly with no mistakes and perfect customer satisfaction, we'd have a whole New world. but thats not the case. In fact if the Government was held to that standard we'd be 100 times more efficient and effective.
The cleaners offered the man reasonable settlements long ago. Im not saying this business wasnt shoddy, but its their right to be shoddy if they want to be. Its up to people to decide not to go to the business that doesnt perform for their money.
But this case hasnt proved anything but that No less than a Judge is wasting american taxpayer money by even bringing this to court.
what a disgrace!
Seems it happened in an Oval Office but it was a blue dress, not the pants, that were taken to the cleaners.
O, well. That's Washington. First in war, first in peace, and last in common sense.
It appears that someone has finally found out the definition of Martinizing...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 103 Comments