Small Nukes, Big Threat
FBI Director Tells CBS News: Small Devices Sought By Terrorists Could Unleash Destruction Worse Than 9/11
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Big Threat From Small Nukes
FBI Director Robert Mueller tells Bob Orr what the United States is doing to try to keep small nuclear devices away from terrorists - and what could happen if it fails.
-
Video
FBI Director On Nuclear Threat
CBS News Exclusive: FBI Director Robert Mueller talks with Bob Orr about the growing threat of a nuclear attack against the U.S. and what authorities must do to prevent it.
-
-
Photo
CBS News exclusive: FBI Director Robert Mueller says terrorists would like nothing better than to hit the U.S. with a nuclear weapon. (CBS)
-
Photo
The FBI and security officials from 28 countries met in Miami on June 13, 2007, to take part in a drill aimed at working together to detect and disrupt terror cells seeking nuclear materials. (CBS)
-
-
Interactive
Nuclear Armed World
The world's nuclear weapons powers, missile defense and a history of the nuclear weapons age.
-
Timeline
Iran Nuclear Chronology
Events in development of Iran's nuclear program since it first came to light.
-
Interactive
Nuclear Disasters
Review some of the worst accidents in the history of nuclear power, see how the body responds to radiation exposure and find out if there's a nuclear plant near you.
Robotic underwater cameras crawl along the hulls of cruise ships looking for explosives and traces of radioactivity.
And from the air, sensors snoop for radiation hot spots. It is the last line of defense against an unthinkable threat.
"Terrorists — al Qaeda, bin Laden — have sought nuclear materials for a number of years now," FBI Director Robert Mueller told CBS News correspondent Bob Orr in an exclusive interview.
Mueller says terrorists would like nothing better than to hit the U.S. with a nuclear weapon.
"When we saw 9/11, everyone I think pretty much looking at those pictures thought this is about as bad as it could get," Mueller said. "Its not as bad as it could get. A nuclear device — if a nuclear device went off, you're talking about devastation that is far, far beyond what we saw on September 11th."
That kind of devastation was portrayed in the film "The Sum of All Fears," when a nuclear bomb leveled much of Baltimore.
That was just a movie, but officials warn the threat is real, and the bomb wouldn't have to be that big. A small nuclear device packed inside a case and left in the heart of Washington could take out the White House and everything else within a square mile.
"It could kill tens of thousands of people, and that's why it is a tremendously serious matter for us to address," Mueller said.
In Miami Wednesday, the FBI and security officials from 28 countries took part in a drill aimed at working together to detect and disrupt terror cells seeking nuclear materials.Watch more of Orr’s interview with FBI Chief Mueller
Read Orr’s blog entry for Couric & Co. on the nuclear threat
Officials say it would not be easy for terrorists to get a nuke or enough material and know-how to make one of their own. But thousands of Cold War weapons remain in Russian stockpiles, and emerging nuclear powers such as Pakistan, Iran, and North Korea could make nuclear fuel more readily available for terrorists.
Since the early '90s, the United Nations' atomic watchdog has confirmed at least 18 cases of illegal trafficking of weapons-grade uranium on the black market. Most recently a Russian man was arrested for trying to sell the bomb material to a radical Islamic terrorist.
Intercepting the material, and keeping it from the terrorists, is the first goal. Nobody at home wants to deal with an explosion after the fact.
"This is a big deal," said New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. "God forbid something like this happens; we have to be as prepared as we possibly can be and do everything we can to deter and detect."
To date, al Qaeda has not been able obtain nukes, but Mueller says they're still desperate to get one.
"It's not hype. It's something we deal with day in and day out," Mueller said. "When you are talking about an improvised nuclear device, it is something that would be horrifying if it fell into the hands of terrorists or terrorists were able to manufacture such a device — and we can not let that happen. We just can not let that happen."
An unthinkable threat — not an impossible one.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- Sotomayor's Big Day Nears
- U.S. Drones Have al Qaeda On the Run
- The Story Behind the Skating Babies
Watch more of Orr’s interview with FBI Chief Mueller
Read Orr’s blog entry for Couric & Co. on the nuclear threat



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 CommentsAll this article is rubbish. I mean the author never knows that Pakistan tested its nuclear capability in 1998. Being an Indian, I know how we live under threat. On every 2nd or 3rd day, Pakistanis test their nuclear warhead capable missiles. Pakistan has more than 50 nukes.
According to him, Pakistan is equivalent to Iran and North Korea in nuclear arsenel! wow.
The mini-nukes were developed thanks to the good ol' US of A. If one of them goes off here, be sure to thank all those loyal scientists at Livermore National Laboratories. They've done so much for the development of the backpack nuke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5864an4_w6Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2o2Be8RtvO4&mode=related&search=
http://911research.wtc7.net/
wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html
more photos .. collapse or controlled demolition ? how did the beams get shot so far horizontally ? curious ...
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/e
vidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U_GISl3aAA&mode=related&search=
Is stopping bin Laden from accessing nukes a Rambo mission?
Or give the job to Bruce Willis?
Get real! A dirty bomb is 100 times more likely to detonate in London than in the US.
Especially after Bush generated thousands of al Queada followers in Iraq. Pre the war there were at most one or two in that sorry excuse for at nation.
Iraq was never a threat to the western world. Iran - and bin Laden ARE.
Both go scott-free while US AND coalition troops waste lives, limbs and time in that hornets nest!
Somewhere in a mountain retreat, bin Laden is having a real laugh, while the US beats about the BUSH. A (G)reat(W)hopping Bush!
Now we know what the Bush regime's plan is for clinging to power. Many of us had already suspected that the Bush regime would need to orchestrate another 'terrorist attack' on U.S. soil, in order to maintain their illegitimate rule, and to be effective, it should be more spectacular than the 9/11/01 events.
We saw the Bush regime quietly introduce 'Executive Orders' giving the regime near dictatorial powers in the event of a 'major crisis', just last month, on May 9.
If we see a nuke detonation, anywhere, in the near future, we can be fairly certain who the terrorists are that are responsible.
The Bush regime could obviously care less how many ordinary people die in their pursuit of the demented, dead-brained, and sub-human PNAC/Corporate agenda.
It is idiotic comments like this that make everything else you say unimportant. To state that the president of our country (my country - I don't know about you) could "care less" about how many ordinary people die over ANYTHING is just inane. He's certainly no saint in my book, and I know he's made many, many hard, but ultimately poor choices, but if you can honestly believe that the leader of the country doesn't care if people die in droves, then perhaps you should skip your sorry *** on over to a friendlier place. Somewhere nice and cozy like, say.. Zimbabwe? Colombia? China? Syria?
In your reply to one of the bloggers, I think YOU
should take off your blinders and WAKE UP.....It is
a fact that Bush is a total disgrace..WAKE UP SISTER. Bush has taken away our rights, including
yours. I am sure that is OK with you though.....
Correction: I meant to say that the unelected Resident and his cabal of global pirates could NOT care less how many ordinary people die in their pursuit of the demented, dead-brained, and sub-human PNAC/Corporate agenda.
We have seen them pointlessly waste 3,513 U.S. soldiers and 1 million Iraqis, so far, in their fraud-based illegal war of aggression against Iraq, alone. There is no way to reliably estimate how many people have been tortured in the Bush regime's secret prisons.
The Bush regime clearly places no value on human life, on the rule of law, or on common decency, and they have demonstrated that they will murder, torture, and imprison as many ordinary people as it takes to maintain power.
'The Third Stage'
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5224963246223576086&q=%22third+stage%22
9/11 indeed was a conspiracy. It was a conspiracy of Saddam Hussein and al-qaeda wich was founded and financed by him. He wanted a revenge because Bushs dad kicked him out of kuwait.
Its sad, really. They should know how to make people trust them. Honestly.
About the 3,500 soldiers we have lost thus far, well, look up "D-Day Invasion" or "Battle of the Bulge"... You see, there was a time when this country had some backbone. You are a nation of wimps... You are bringing the American Empire to its end. Well, one day you will explain to your kids how you didn't know what you were doing and that there was a time when we had religious freedom in this country...
Jesus Christ tried to please everybody and he was hung. How do you expect Bush or Nixon would be loved by everybody? Some people would hate them. Thats natural.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
%u201COn June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden%u2019s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden%u2019s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, %u201CThe reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden%u2019s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.%u201D
Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, %u201CHow this was possible?%u201D Tomb continued, %u201CBin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.%u201D I asked, %u201CHow does that work?%u201D Tomb continued, %u201CThe FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.%u201D
It gave me the creeps and made me want to duck.
some good photos here though - http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/index.html#analysis
how could the twin towers fall at free fall speeds if we are to believe the "pancake" theory? The buildings fell in 9 seconds! If floors were collapsing into the ones below them there would be slight delay before the lower floor gives. If it were a half a second at each floor that would still be nearly 50 seconds - huge steel beams were being ejected hundreds of feet HORIZONTALLY, concrete was pulverized into fine dust, SQUIBS (well-placed charges) are exploding outward up to 30 floors below the collapse wave. All characteristics of a controlled demolition not collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDt3mVlI8mk
Mueller is as contemptible as his masters. If a nuclear attack is launched against the US, you can depend on it being the work of the same elements connected to the Washington Regime responsible for the 9-11 false-flag operation--Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Silverstein, Rockefellar, Tenet, Giuliani, Rice and other co-conspirators.
This been said it was a monumental error in judgement to invade Iraq. We needed to save the troops for afganastan and Iran(If needed). Our options concerning Iran developing a nuclear weapon are now very limited and exteremely limited
As it stands now, insurgents, and terrorists seem to have trouble getting sophisticated conventional weapons let alone extremely sophisticated small nuclear weapons. So far as I understand small nuclear weapons are difficult to make - very sophisticated.
While anything is possible, I think most of us in the US are more likely to be killed by a biological psych ops carried out by our own government than we are to be killed by a suitcase nuclear weapon used by a torrorist.
Maybe the FBI should catch those responsible for the anthrax attacks and murders of a number of years ago rather than talking about this other stuff so much.
Re: "While anything is possible, I think most of us in the US are more likely to be killed by a biological psych ops carried out by our own government than we are to be killed by a suitcase nuclear weapon used by a torrorist."
My money was previously on 'bird flu', but they sure seem to be hyping the nuke angle lately.
Re: "Maybe the FBI should catch those responsible for the anthrax attacks and murders of a number of years ago rather than talking about this other stuff so much."
Very, VERY good point!
If scientists know how to build nuclear weapons and missile defense systems, then isn't if conceivable that ought to be able to build a nuclear missile defense system? Maybe this needs to be another goal in the fight against terrorism, similar to the way the pursuit of fossil fuels like ethanol is intended to wean us off our depedence on Middle East oil . . .
Do you HONESTLY believe that such a massive amount of conspirators could've done that, and STILL kept quiet about it? Almost 6 years later? Or do you believe that Bush is such a wizard that he has controlled all their minds (eventhough you sit and laugh and joke about how stupid he is).
Come on man.
For every single "video" and claim about the government doing the 9/11 attacks, there's a line of experts saying that the collapse of the towers was a very possible reaction to the impact of the planes on the structural integrity of the buildings. So "controlled demolition" is kinda far out there...unless of course you have some proof, in which case I'd love to see it. Proof...not conjecture and freaked out conspiracy theorists with their "opinion."
While I respect anybody who questions authority and doesn't sit down for every line that comes out of government, I just don't understand how some people can just ignore base facts and go with outside theories. Proof works.
P.S. Several of those videos have been checked out and found to be doctored.
Re: "Have you even bothered to consider just how many people would have to 1: be in on the plan, 2: set people up to carry out the plan and 3: carry out the plan"
Roughly as many as it would take to fool the American public into allowing an illegal and catastrophic, fraud-based war of aggression against a non-threatening country, in order to establish a massive military footprint, plunder their resources, and to please their Likudnick masters, by my estimation.
From an efficiency standpoint, it would be desirable to use many of the same people for both efforts.
-This *** is trying to dissipate the pressure on him with regard of what was publish about his overuse of the FBI plane...
-By the same way MUEEEEEEWWWWWWLLAH is preparing the mental of American citizens to expect a nuke detonation in months, years to come... just look at the comments by sjc_1 and you'll understand what I mean. Nice way of masterminding the next catastrophe in the USA, and keeping a fear grip on America... Hollywood could not do better. Could they?
What on God's green pastures does this guy want to prove? Who does he want to influence? What's the political angle?
Sounds again, like THE FEAR FACTOR at work.
Who would like to wager on a "major" threat, maybe even nuclear, being uncovered sometime around the end of the Bush term?
I'd say our appointed officials should shut their mouths - do their job - and avoid playing the political fear game.
...there's nothing they would like better than a Democrat in the White House and Democrat control throughout Congress, to have a nuclear device explode in the U.S. from a terrorist attack.
Millions of GOP lemmings will point the finger of blame at the Democrat president, (even if it was the day after inauguration). Thus forcing tens-of-millions of sheeple to vote Republican purely out of fear.
There's the plan.... just in case you were wondering how Karl Rove would accomplish such a "permanent GOP majority".
It is not anti Semitic to believe there are millions of other good people in the Middle East with valid concerns!
Even Eisenhower had problems with Israeli groups but he did not let them buy him!
READ AS THEY BRAG ABOUT THEIR INFLUENCE ON OUR GOVERNMENT!
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
Founded in 1953 by Isaiah L. "Si" Kenen, AIPAC's original name was the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs. According to UCLA political science professor and author, Steven Spiegel, "the tension between the Eisenhower administration and Israeli supporters was so acute that there were rumors that the administration would investigate the American Zionist Council. Therefore, an independent lobbying committee was formed, which years later was renamed [AIPAC]." Today, AIPAC has over 100,000 members.[1] Activities and stated goals
AIPAC's stated purpose is to lobby the Congress of the United States on issues and legislation "to ensure that the U.S.-Israel relationship is strong so that both countries can work together" to meet the challenges of "stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, [2] It regularly meets with members of Congress and holds events where it can share its views. AIPAC has been effective in gaining support for Israel among members of Congress and White House administrations.
The New York Times described AIPAC on July 6, 1987 as "a major force in shaping United States policy in the Middle East."
There are some in our government who would like nothing more than to have another terrorist attack on America soil, simply so they can call it a "state of emergency" and impose martial law and the destruction of what's left of our constitutional rights.
It's pretty upsetting also to consider that the CIA helped to make Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda possible in the first place.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 Comments