RICHMOND, Va. , June 11, 2007

Court Rebuffs Bush On Enemy Combatants

Rules U.S. Can't Detain U.S. Resident Accused Of Terror Ties Without Charging Him

  • Play CBS Video Video Bush Gets Terror Setback

    A federal court ruled against a key part of President Bush's anti-terror plan, saying that a legal U.S. resident suspected of terrorism could not be detained without charge. Wyatt Andrews reports.

  • Alleged al Qaeda sleeper agent Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri has been held in solitary confinment in the Navy jail in Charleston, S.C., since June 2003. He is seen in booking photo at Peoria County, Ill., Sheriff's Office, Dec. 12, 2001.

    Alleged al Qaeda sleeper agent Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri has been held in solitary confinment in the Navy jail in Charleston, S.C., since June 2003. He is seen in booking photo at Peoria County, Ill., Sheriff's Office, Dec. 12, 2001.  (GETTY)

  • Interactive Gitmo Tribunals

    Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.

  • Timeline Enemy Combatant

    A summary of Jose Padilla's alleged activities and his court proceedings.

(CBS/AP)  The court said its ruling doesn't mean al-Marri should be set free. Instead, he can be returned to the civilian court system and tried on criminal charges.

"But the government cannot subject al-Marri to indefinite military detention," the opinion said. "For in the United States, the military cannot seize and imprison civilians — let alone imprison them indefinitely."

Al-Marri is currently the only U.S. resident held as an enemy combatant within the U.S.

Jose Padilla, who is a U.S. citizen, had been held as an enemy combatant in a Navy brig for 3 1/2 years before he was hastily added to an existing case in Miami in November 2005, a few days before a U.S. Supreme Court deadline for Bush administration briefs on the question of the president's powers to continue holding him in military prison without charge.

Federal investigators found credit card numbers on Al-Marri's laptop computer and charged him with credit card fraud. Upon further investigation, the government said, agents found evidence that al-Marri had links to al Qaeda terrorists and was a national security threat. Authorities shifted al-Marri's case from the criminal system and moved him to indefinite military detention.

Al-Marri has denied the government's allegations and is seeking to challenge the government's evidence and cross-examine its witnesses in court.

Lawyers for al-Marri argued that the Military Commissions Act, passed last fall to establish military trials, doesn't repeal the writ of habeas corpus — defendants' traditional right to challenge their detention.

If the government's stance was upheld, civil liberties groups said, the Justice Department could use terrorism law to hold any immigrants indefinitely and strip them of the right to use civilian courts to challenge their detention.

The Bush administration's attorneys had urged the federal appeals panel to dismiss al-Marri's case, arguing that the act stripped the courts of jurisdiction to hear cases of detainees who are declared enemy combatants. They contended that Congress and the Supreme Court have given the president the authority to fight terrorism and prevent additional attacks on the nation.

The court, however, said in Monday's opinion that the MCA doesn't apply to al-Marri, a legal U.S. resident who wasn't captured outside U.S. soil, detained at Guantanamo Bay or on other foreign soil, who has not received a combatant status review tribunal.

"The MCA was not intended to, and does not apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while legally residing in, the United States," according to the court's majority opinion, written by Judge Diana G. Motz.

The court also said that the government failed to back up its argument that the Authorization for Use of Military Force, enacted by Congress immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks, gives the president broad powers to detain al-Marri as an enemy combatant. The act neither classifies certain civilians as enemy combatants, nor otherwise authorizes the government to detain people indefinitely, the court ruled.

The case, which is expected to reach the Supreme Court, could help define how much authority the government has to indefinitely detain those accused of terrorism and to strip detainees of their rights to challenge the lawfulness or conditions of their detention.



© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 129 Comments
by firststate June 13, 2007 2:40 AM EDT
lets see what you say when one of your family is in a be-heading video and the sweetheart whose picture is at the top of this page is the star with the knife in his hand.
Posted by mommajomma

Let's see what you say when one of your family is secretly taken off the streets, with no notice or even admission that they have him/her in custody for years, during which your family member is transferred to foreign countries for torture and interrogation. Would you like it when you found out the whole ordeal was ordered by the bushshit white house? That's the power you want to give to one man, without the opportunity to learn of his/her confinement or to contest it. There is no one who should be so entrusted, we have a Constitution to prevent just such actions. Even if you're willing to give a man the unchecked power of secretly locking you away at his whim, the rest of us and the Constitution disagree. There are dictatorships where you can get that kind of "security" but the U.S. isn't one of those places. You're welcome to write and let us know how safe you feel when you get there.
Reply to this comment
by firststate June 13, 2007 2:40 AM EDT
lets see what you say when one of your family is in a be-heading video and the sweetheart whose picture is at the top of this page is the star with the knife in his hand.
Posted by mommajomma

Let's see what you say when one of your family is secretly taken off the streets, with no notice or even admission that they have him/her in custody for years, during which your family member is transferred to foreign countries for torture and interrogation. Would you like it when you found out the whole ordeal was ordered by the bushshit white house? That's the power you want to give to one man, without the opportunity to learn of his/her confinement or to contest it. There is no one who should be so entrusted, we have a Constitution to prevent just such actions. Even if you're willing to give a man the unchecked power of secretly locking you away at his whim, the rest of us and the Constitution disagree. There are dictatorships where you can get that kind of "security" but the U.S. isn't one of those places. You're welcome to write and let us know how safe you feel when you get there.
Reply to this comment
by firststate June 13, 2007 2:23 AM EDT
Bush/Cheney share more similarities with Hitler than with Bush/Quayle. They've taken the country for a long ride down a very dark road. Bush 41's administration were loyal to and respectful of the Constitution. Perhaps the fact that 41 had actually fought for that document and all that it means to this nation explains their differences. None of us can know whether he lied as he spoke his oath of office, never intending to perform his Constitutional duties, but his actions speak for themselves. He has violated the heart of his oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. What higher treason is there?
Reply to this comment
by mommajomma-2009 June 13, 2007 2:08 AM EDT
lets see what you say when one of your family is in a be-heading video and the sweetheart whose picture is at the top of this page is the star with the knife in his hand.
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 June 13, 2007 12:58 AM EDT
Face it: Cheney/Bush are much closer to Hitler than to Thomas Jefferson.
Reply to this comment
by getcentered June 12, 2007 5:11 PM EDT
"The GOP practically gave the next couple of elections over to the Democrats.

The Democrats got my vote for the next elections, and for me the decision is easy.

It boils down to this: I want a smart government.

You know, one that uses the truth to create peace, or won't hide the truth to create war.

The party that believes our government should play a role in creating a healthy environment, that is free of pollution.

The party that believes we can have a health care system that will provide for all peoples in this country.

The party of SCIENCE, you won't see Democrats trying to force your children to learn "intelligent design" along side of scientifically based evolution.

I truly think Republicans are people who are not prepared to live in a world that can change so quickly, and where the truth is harder to hide.

It%u2019s time to open the door for tolerance, compassion, understanding, and debate.

Real debate!
No B.S. angry Republican rhetoric whose goals are not to educate but to instill fear, or belittle.

I believe the last few election were the last gasp for Republicans, a party that has lost all meaning and whose construct has been %u201Cgiven to god%u201D or %u201Csold to the corporations%u201D.
Reply to this comment
by abbe7 June 12, 2007 4:08 PM EDT
"By the way; Bush IS connected to Hitler by way of his grandfather who was Hitler's banker.
Posted by pauldouglasc at 10:29 AM : Jun 12, 2007"

Yes, you can even say that Prescott Bush made his fortune (fortune without which there wouldn't have been a Bush 41 or 43) thanks to the poor guys dying
in Auschwitz. You won't read that in the MSM ...
Reply to this comment
by pauldouglasc June 12, 2007 1:29 PM EDT
Bush fires back: "I don't need no constipitution...I mean 'constipation'...construction? Consternation! I don't need no consternation to tell me how fight terroristical types, I know how: get rid of all those rights they hide behind. True Americans will understand."

By the way; Bush IS connected to Hitler by way of his grandfather who was Hitler's banker.
Reply to this comment
by grumpas June 12, 2007 12:39 PM EDT
"Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler and I frankly feel that this is unwarranted. I am the biggest critic of Bush and his administration but he has no correlation to Hitler and the Third Reich. ..."
Houser123

We have a duly elected President who has become increasingly fascist!!! When he was elected there wasn't a big sign on him saying fascist! I am certain a lot of American's would not have voted to him. His policies are very reminicent of the good old Hitler days. Except he hasn't started shooting liberal's and dumping them in mass graves. But, he has done about everything else including making people disappear. If you don't see the analogy between the two you need to take a better look at our illustrious leader. Because he is a whole lot like him complete with propaganda to start wars.
Reply to this comment
by mikealford3 June 12, 2007 12:34 PM EDT
Let me add this: did you hear about "Operation Northwoods" ? This is not propaganda, no conspiracy theory, these are officially declassified documents showing what "could" have happened if a good president didn't stop it.
From this I would be tempted to look for similarities too.
Posted by abbe7 at 09:17 AM : Jun 12, 2007


Focus on the word "could" in that statment. This administration is governing on theory and fear tactics and the things that could happen. We need to get out of this "fear" and move on.

If a person lives his whole life affraid to come out of his shell/home, does he really live?
Reply to this comment
by mikealford3 June 12, 2007 12:27 PM EDT
"To sanction such presidential authority to order the military to seize and indefinitely detain civilians, even if the President calls them 'enemy combatants,' would have disastrous consequences for the constitution %u2014 and the country," the court panel said.


Wow, I can't believe it, but I actually believe this and agree with it. No president should have such power to hold people indefinitely without charges.
Reply to this comment
by abbe7 June 12, 2007 12:17 PM EDT
"Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler and I frankly feel that this is unwarranted. I am the biggest critic of Bush and his administration but he has no correlation to Hitler and the Third Reich. ..."
Houser123

Then feel free to explain why you feel that these correlations are unwarranted, what is fundamentally different between a facist state rise through a democratic process (Hitler was elected, and there was no sign of voting machine fraud at the time ;-) and what we see happening nowadays. Maybe this will be different, as some point out, if the people are careful enough and open their eyes soon.

Let me add this: did you hear about "Operation Northwoods" ? This is not propaganda, no conspiracy theory, these are officially declassified documents showing what could have happened if a good president didn't stop it.
From this I would be tempted to look for similarities too.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 June 12, 2007 11:53 AM EDT
This is one more example of just how smart our founding fathers were when they crafted this document. Once again we have proven that our Constitution will prevail and keep all Americans safe.
Posted by Houser123

Houser123, I am not sure if you have been following the news but it appears that Bush loyalists have been given preference over non-partisan job candidates throughout the justice department. Our legal system is still working but make no mistake, it is under attack.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 June 12, 2007 11:48 AM EDT
Posted by jjp735i

You missed substituting news for government generated propaganda.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug June 12, 2007 11:43 AM EDT
"Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler and I frankly feel that this is unwarranted. I am the biggest critic of Bush and his administration but he has no correlation to Hitler and the Third Reich. ..."
Houser123

So shut-up and get on the train. Enjoy the ride and the shower at the end of the stop.
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth June 12, 2007 11:37 AM EDT
"... 4.Lock up citizens with no real charges filed.

5.Disposal.

Bush, Rove and the Republican Right are now at number 4."
jjp735i


Indeed. I have already said goodbye to my son and let him know, as best I can, why Americans may soon be rounded up by Bush and his henchmen and placed into the Guantanamo concentration camp, or just murdered in the woods.
ST


"I begged for the denial of basic human rights for others. Not myself. Please let me go."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave - www.searingtruth.com
Reply to this comment
by jjp735i June 12, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
"Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler".

Well of course they are. This is how a fascist state starts.

1.Preach to the citizens that they are un-Patriotic. This makes people uneasy and they start to worry what others may think of them.

2.Make enough claims against people and they start to fear they will be called un-patriotic and start to back the leader.

3.Remove the rights of people because it is in the best interest of the country.

4.Lock up citizens with no real charges filed.

5.Disposal.

Bush, Rove and the Republican Right are now at number 4.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 June 12, 2007 11:15 AM EDT
===You NEVER and I mean NEVER support or defend the rights in our Constitution.===

You got that right. One cannot claim love of country or defense of it if they do not defend the Constitution of which the country is based upon. Save the country, trash the Constitution is an oxymoron. If people are so fearful that they feel they have to undermine the Constitution to save the country, then the country isn't worth saving. It is times of crisis when the laws of a country most need to be observed.



Reply to this comment
by searingtruth June 12, 2007 11:03 AM EDT
"Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler and I frankly feel that this is unwarranted. I am the biggest critic of Bush and his administration but he has no correlation to Hitler and the Third Reich. ..."
Houser123


Arbitrary and illegal abduction of anonymous citizens from around the world? Indefinite detention in secret prisons, for years, enduring torture, and sometimes even murder?

The mass surveillance, without warrant, of anyone Bush wants in the world?

The manipulation of the United States government, attempting to replace any judge or judicial official who dared, or might dare, to oppose him?

Preemptive war of conquest and mass murder in Iraq, with a penchant for more in Iran?

His claim that he is not subject to any law so long as he wiggles his nose and utters the magical words "national security"?

And you don't see any similarities between Bush and Hitler?

You are obviously not his biggest critic, or even vaguely aware of his unprecedented subversion of our Constitution.
ST


"An elective despotism was not the government we fought for; but one in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among the several bodies of magistracy as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others."
James Madison, Federalist No. 58, 1788

A Future of the Brave - www.searingtruth.com
Reply to this comment
by houser123 June 12, 2007 10:48 AM EDT
Folks are drawing correlations between Bush and Hitler and I frankly feel that this is unwarranted. I am the biggest critic of Bush and his administration but he has no correlation to Hitler and the Third Reich. Yesterday was a great day for the American citiizens and our Constitution. This is one more example of just how smart our founding fathers were when they crafted this document. Once again we have proven that our Constitution will prevail and keep all Americans safe. Whether or not this guy is linked to AQ will be determined in a court of law and not on the whim of any one person. I do not always agree with rulings made by the our Courts but I always value their insight. In this case they got it 100% correct
Reply to this comment
See all 129 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (490 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: