February 11, 2009 4:44 PM

3 GIs Killed In Baghdad Bridge Blast

(CBS/AP)  With a thunderous rumble and cloud of dust and smoke, a suicide car bomb brought down a section of highway bridge south of Baghdad on Sunday, killing three U.S. soldiers and wounding six from a checkpoint guarding the crossing and blocking traffic on Iraq's main north-south artery.

The U.S. military said engineers were dispatched with bulldozers and other heavy equipment to clear the highway, which was partially blocked by debris from the overpass. An Iraqi interpreter also was wounded in the attack, according to the statement that gave the casualty toll.

Donald Campbell, a 40-year-old Scot with the private security firm Armor Group International, and his colleagues were in a passing convoy and worked with a U.S. Army quick reaction force for some 45 minutes to pull trapped men from the rubble, scrambling over the fallen concrete.

U.S. armored vehicles provided cover fire from their cannons after the bombing, which occurred in the area dubbed the "triangle of death" for its frequent Sunni insurgent attacks.

The blast dropped one of two sections of the "Checkpoint 20" bridge, which crosses over the north-south expressway, six miles east of Mahmoudiya.

It appeared that a northbound suicide driver stopped and detonated his vehicle beside a support pillar, said Lt. Col. Garry Bush, an Army munitions officer who was in the convoy, which also carried an Associated Press reporter and photographer and arrived two minutes after the blast.

A U.S. Army checkpoint and a tent structure, apparently a rest area, fell into the shattered concrete. The crossing was believed to have been closed to all but military traffic at the time.

Armor Group security guards, all ex-military, and others in the convoy rushed to the ruins. They found a scene of confusion.

"When that size blast went off, everyone was in shock," said one of the first atop the rubble, Jackie Smith, 53, a former lieutenant colonel now working as a civilian Army munitions expert.

He said he saw what he believed was the engine block of a truck — apparently what remained of the suicide vehicle.

Soon the outpost sergeant in charge was organizing a search for his missing men, Smith said. The Armor Group team climbed up with first-aid kits, stretchers and other aid.

With the Army's quick reaction force, they struggled to lift concrete shards off the men, pinned along the slope of what was once a roadway. At one point, a Bradley armored vehicle with a tow chain pulled a slab off a pinned victim to free him.

Then a shout went up, "Morphine! Morphine!" and a black T-shirt-clad Briton administered painkiller to the freed man.

"Another poor fellow looked crushed beneath a concrete slab," said the Armor Group's Campbell.

During the rescue operation, U.S. armored vehicles opened up with suppressing fire, possibly having spotted movement in the surrounding countryside, flat and baking in 100-degree-plus Fahrenheit temperatures.

In other developments:

  • The House of Commons on Monday rejected a motion by Britain's opposition Conservative Party calling for a formal inquiry into the decision to go to war in Iraq. By a vote of 288 to 253, the lower house of parliament sided with Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has ruled out such an inquiry while British troops are deployed in Iraq.

  • The U.S. military on Sunday reported the deaths of three other American troops. Among them were a U.S. airman killed in a roadside bombing in southern Iraq; and two soldiers — one killed in Baghdad and another who died of injuries in Diyala Province. The deaths raised to at least 3,509 members of the U.S. military who have died since the Iraq war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

  • A suicide truck bomber struck an Iraqi police office in Tikrit Sunday, killing at least 15 people and wounding 50, police said. The explosion destroyed a building housing the highway police directorate in the Albu Ajil village on the eastern outskirts of ousted leader Saddam Hussein's hometown, a police officer said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of security concerns. Tikrit is 80 miles north of Baghdad.

  • Even as the United States has condemned Sudan for its role in the mass killings in Darfur, the Sudanese regime has secretly worked with the CIA to spy on insurgents in Iraq, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

  • The Iraqi parliament voted Monday in a closed session to remove the speaker after a series of scandals involving the controversial lawmaker, legislators said. Mahmoud al-Mashhadani will be replaced by another Sunni Arab, they said. Al-Mashhadani's behavior has repeatedly embarrassed the Sunni Arab partners in Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's coalition government. Many of the house's 275 legislators viewed his behavior as unbecoming and, on occasion, erratic.


  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 161 Comments
    by mh4cbs1 June 13, 2007 1:27 AM EDT
    tbweb says "Thats my impression" about Iran wanting War with the US.

    Nicely stated! It IS your IMPRESSION, because you are so pathetically uninformed by our corporate media. You don't have factual information so you are led through the nose on feelings, fear, impression, slogans...

    You probably thought Saddam had WMDs, just like "the rest of the world".

    It is probably your impression that the "terrorists hate us for our freedom", and that "we must fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here".

    Perhaps you were part of the 50% that thought Saddam was involved in 9-11.

    It may be your impression that Bush and Cheney give a rats a** about Democracy. (really, friendly brutal dictators are much easier to work with).

    It may be your impression that Bush/Cheney care about our troops, that they are worried the war is going badly -- when in fact they use our troops as cannon fodder for their pre-9/11 Iraq plans, and they are just fine with endless war and keeping the troops in Iraq "until the job is done".

    When will people start doing their civic homework, wake up and JAIL these SOBs!
    Reply to this comment
    by mh4cbs1 June 13, 2007 1:14 AM EDT
    When you think about how Cheney/Bush:

    LIED about WMDs, aluminum tubes, bio-mobile labs, mushroom clouds, niger yellowcake uranium

    LIED about Saddam violating the UN 1441, to create the fig-leaf pretext for invasion (Saddam truthfully said he had no WMDs, Saddam DID let UN inspectors have free access to wherever they wanted)...

    EXPLOITED 9-11, with fake Saddam links to Al Qaeda, fake color coded terror alerts to keep us all afraid...

    INVADED a country that was NOT a threat, then builds 14 permanent military bases, a $500 Million US embassy, and claims we will need a military presence in Iraq for decades to come...

    THREATENS Iraq Parliament to pass the Oil Law, giving US corporations access to Iraq's $21 Trillion oil reserves...

    DECLARES "enemy combatants" and then throws them in solitary confinement without ANY trial, hearing, or due process...

    Think about all that Cheney/Bush have done, and ask who they remind you more of, Thomas Jefferson or Adolf Hitler?

    The answer of course is Adolf Hitler. Heil Bush!
    Reply to this comment
    by metalmaji June 12, 2007 7:21 AM EDT
    When Bush says DEMOCRACY, he means WAR. When he says war on TERROR, he means war on ERROR. When he says WATER, he means BLOOD. When he says FREEDom, he means Greed. When he talks, he lies. When he helps someone, his intension is to get something back, like back them on wars. When he says Middle East, he means 'Middle East belongs to 'ME'.
    Reply to this comment
    by metalmaji June 12, 2007 6:49 AM EDT
    Is it possible to attack three birds in one stone. (Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran). Still Bush hasn't got any legal evidence of 911. then why war on Afghanistan. Bush knew there were no WMD in Iraq, then why war on Iraq. Bush hasn't got any evidence of nukes in Iran, then why war in Iran. None of these countries are (or were) threats to America.
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb June 12, 2007 5:52 AM EDT
    If you look at the path Iran is on you can't help but come to the conclusion that sooner or later the U.S. will have to confront Iran. Iran is almost begging for a fight. The U.S. has a serious Naval Armada deployed off Iran's coast and Iran brazenly grabs British Sailors in the face of all that! Iran wants this war, not the U.S.. That's my impression and now Iran is detaining 4 U.S. Citizens almost it seems doing any and everthing to press the U.S.'s buttons! If the U.S. concludes it must confront Iran it may be better to do it before Iran has nuclear weapons. But Iran is not stupid, Iran is stupid like a fox and I think that for Iran to be this brazen Iran must already some way, some how have nuclear weapons, it must, Irans boldness makes no sense! Iran is no match for the U.S. Military so it must have some surprise up its sleeve and it has to nukes, it better be nukes for Irans sake and I think it is! Iran has nukes now!
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 June 12, 2007 2:42 AM EDT
    Re: "3 GIs Killed In Baghdad Bridge Blast"

    "With a thunderous rumble and cloud of dust and smoke, a suicide car bomb brought down a section of highway bridge south of Baghdad on Sunday"

    This event happened yesterday, and was reported elsewhere, yesterday. This leaves the impression that helping Joe Lieberman to foment an illegal and suicidal attack against Iran, is higher on the CBS priority list, than three dead U.S. soldiers.
    Reply to this comment
    by June 12, 2007 2:13 AM EDT
    pwrslm wrote:

    "No, you judged me out of your ignorance. You brought racism into it, thats ignorance, so, you might get off calling me moron, but you truely are a boy.

    And a mental midget. You have been out classed, out argued, and out maneuvered every step of the way, and you still have not figured it out.

    That, my boy, is truely ignorant."

    lol - that from someone who has been calling me a "boy".

    I guess that makes you a sexist pig.

    By the way, I never said anything about your skin color - I was commenting on the fact that you repeatedly kept calling me "boy" - something that I attribute to southern redneck morons.

    Your opinion is of no concern to me - I still think you're a pathetic piece of cowardly cr@p, who is to chicken to answer a few questions.

    Here they are again for you:

    So tell us - are you happy with GW Bush's plans?

    Do you think his plans are working?

    How many more dead Americans will it take for you to realize that GW Bush has no plan other then the "same ol', same ol'"?

    By the way, I bet you can't tell me the color of my skin.

    Moron.
    Reply to this comment
    by pwrslm June 12, 2007 2:09 AM EDT
    "A mind conscious of innocence laughs at the lies of rumor"


    Will Rogers
    Reply to this comment
    by pwrslm June 12, 2007 2:06 AM EDT
    I've judged you not on your skin, but by your own words - boy.

    Moron.
    Posted by mcdazz

    No, you judged me out of your ignorance. You brought racism into it, thats ignorance, so, you might get off calling me moron, but you truely are a boy.

    And a mental midget. You have been out classed, out argued, and out maneuvered every step of the way, and you still have not figured it out.

    That, my boy, is truely ignorant.
    Reply to this comment
    by June 12, 2007 1:56 AM EDT
    pwrslm wrote:

    "To show your ignorance, as if its not already been agreed, the Klan is a white supremacist organization, akin to the aryan brotherhood, of which, my poor boy, I am by the Grace by God excluded from.

    Those white boys dont want nothin to do wit me, in other words.

    Its pretty ignorant of you to reduce you call to that level. It only reinforces what I have been saying all along, you have no credence. Your moraly bankrupt."

    From a moron who keeps calling me "boy", despite never having met me.

    I'm nobody's "boy", especially not yours, you ignorant moron.

    Now, answer the questions instead of avoiding them. Or perhaps the truth is too hard for you to handle?

    Here they are again:

    So tell us - are you happy with GW Bush's plans?

    Do you think his plans are working?

    How many more dead Americans will it take for you to realize that GW Bush has no plan other then the "same ol', same ol'"?

    By the way, are you incredibly stupid or just a moron?

    How do you think I would be able to tell the color of your skin over the internet?

    I've judged you not on your skin, but by your own words - boy.

    Moron.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 161 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook