Ben Stein: Why Should I Care?
Sunday Morning Commentator Says The Doings Of Drunken Celebrities Are Less Important In Today's World
-
Ben Stein asks, when the Roman Empire was falling, were its citizens really more interested in the gossipy goings-on of the celebrities of its day? (AP)
-
Special Report Sunday Morning Check out the latest stories, as well as video, photo essays and links.
Can some kindly soul please take pity on little me and explain why it's important that I know about celebrities who get sent to jail, get to leave, and then get sent back again?
Can someone explain why I should care about whether a plastered movie star goes to jail in the first place?
This is a world in which the United States is engaged in a defense and foreign policy nightmare in Iraq and another one in Afghanistan. The same people who killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11 are hurting us badly in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are resurgent all over the Middle East. They threaten to make the Arab-Israeli situation far worse than it already is.
In such a world, who cares what Hollywood stars are drinking or whether they're in jail?
Iran is about to get nuclear weapons, or so it would seem. The North Koreans have nuclear weapons and have breached a deal with the U.S. to stop making them. This is serious business. Why, in times as dangerous as these, do we care about what movie star is dating which other movie star or how many swimming pools their rehabs have?
Why do we spend so much of our day agonizing about movie stars, and big busted blondes, alive and dead? Is it to escape thinking about the real problems we have? If so, it's a mistake. Not too many real problems go away by being ignored.
Is it because we're too stupid to know what's important? When the barbarians were at the gates of Rome, did the Romans gossip about Roman actresses?
Our enemies are serious about beating us. Except for the men and women in uniform, not too many of us seem serious about beating them.
Time to pay a lot more attention to the real stars … the ones in our military wearing battle dress uniforms over body armor in Iraq and Afghanistan … and a lot less about how much time Paris Hilton spends in jail.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 44 CommentsYou know what? I'm also sick and tired of hearing about Paris Hilton. You know what I'm even more sick of?
Being LIED to.
When you LIE, Ben, people don't trust you about important things. Which is why it's getting to the point that Paris Hilton is the only story people will listen to.
Note that the LIAR (Ben) oh-so-carefully phrased it so that it wasn't completely inaccurate - yes, maybe there are a few Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq - at least, there are now, scattered among the thousands of insurgents who are hurting the US. They are there because the US opened the door for them. They weren't in Iraq on 9/11/2001 and Iraq didn't attack us.
The fact that he took so much care to disguise his LIE with a veneer of reality he could hide behind doesn't make him less of a LIAR.
It only makes him a sneakier one.
The MEDIA needs this lecture, not the CBS Sunday Morning viewer. It is the MEDIA that controls what we will hear and learn. The news on TV and the newspapers blast us with top news stories on celebrities, and it is the MEDIA that gives international and defense news a secondary status. I would prefer to not be asked by Ben Stein, "Are we stupid?" but rather how long do "we" have to put up with this, and what can "we" do about the media's focus on celebrities and their problems. What can "we" do to make sure that our top news is news about the war in the middle east, the dying in Darfur, and international nuclear capabilities. And when these stories are reported, what can "we" do about how they are sandwiched between insignificant stories and commercials!
The finger that Ben Stein points out to "us" should be redirected and pointed right back at the news media and broadcast companies that are in control. "We" may be making the mistake of watching, listening, or reading the newspapers.
After the 9/11 attacks Dubya told us we should go about our lives as normal or "the terrorists would win." Part of that is watching celebrities. Bush has not really asked for any sacrifice except from people in the military, and of our civil liberties.
Even when we do pay attention to the war the president shows little interest in listening to people who disagree with him. I am sure some of the powers that be actually like the celebrity obsession since it distracts us from looking at what they are doing on Wall Street and in Washington.
I think you ought to ask Ben Stein, "Is it ever OK to lie?"
I think his superficial comments about Paris Hilton were all a ploy to be able to broadcast the BIGGEST LIE which is the one that links 9/11 with the war in Iraq.
Blame it on her parents. Don't feel sorry because the kid broke the law. Feel sorry for her for the parents that she has!!!
The MEDIA needs this lecture. It is the MEDIA that controls what we will hear and learn. The news on TV and the newspapers blast us with top news stories on celebrities, and it is the MEDIA that gives international and defense news a secondary status. I would like to not be asked "Are we stupid?" but rather ask how long do "we" have to put up with this, and what can "we" do about the media's focus on celebrities and their problems. What can "we" do to make sure that our top news is news about the war in the middle east, the dying in Darfur, and international nuclear capabilities. And when these stories are reported, what can "we" do about how they are sandwiched between insignificant stories and commercials!
The finger that Ben Stein points out to "us" should be redirected and pointed right back at the news media and broadcast companies that are in control. "We" may be making the mistake of watching, listening, or reading the newspapers.
As a social worker in a rural Food Stamp/Medicaid office, the last thing I want at the end of yet another day of my clients' woes is to have to pay attention to yet more grim news about the war in Iraq, the state of the world in general and the U.S. in particular.
If Mr Stein were to sit in my office for one week and listen to the stories of the working poor, the chronically ill and the elderly he might gain a better understanding of their fascination with the media hijinks of rock and movie stars and the rich in general. Paris Hilton's fall from grace and Anna Nicole's baby are therapeutic, distractions from their increasingly grimmer daily lives and the tabloids are serving the same purpose as the movie theaters during the Great Depression.
Mr Stein's CBS Sunday Morning diatribe against this type of reporting was not only offbase, it was actually insulting to the folks like me who enjoy it because of his implication that we don't care about the 'real' issues when nothing could be further from the truth.
The MEDIA needs this lecture. It is the MEDIA that controls what we will hear and learn. The news on TV and the newspapers blast us with top news stories on celebrities, and it is the MEDIA that gives international and defense news a secondary status. I would like to not be asked "Are we stupid?" but rather ask how long do "we" have to put up with this, and what can "we" do about the media's focus on celebrities and their problems. What can "we" do to make sure that our top news is news about the war in the middle east, the dying in Darfur, and international nuclear capabilities. And when these stories are reported, what can "we" do about how they are sandwiched between insignificant stories and commercials!
The finger that Ben Stein points out to "us" should be redirected and pointed right back at the news media and broadcast companies that are in control. "We" may be making the mistake of watching, listening, or reading the newspapers.
The logic of your position is that none of us should enjoy ANY kind of entertainment ANY time, so long as there's some tragedy or suffering in the world, somewhere. How limited, simple, one-track-minded and unable to hold more than one idea in their heads do you think people are?
No, I don't insist you must follow the progress of Paris Hilton's dilemma, but you do seem to have missed the point: that this seemed to be another outrageous example (not unlike OJ Simpson) of a rich and celebrated person receiving better treatment from the authorities than I, or any other Joe Paycheck could ever hope to expect.
The MEDIA needs this lecture. It is the MEDIA that controls what we will hear and learn. The news on TV and the newspapers blast us with top news stories on celebrities, and it is the MEDIA that gives international and defense news a secondary status. I would like to not be asked "Are we stupid?" but rather ask how long do "we" have to put up with this, and what can "we" do about the media's focus on celebrities and their problems. What can "we" do to make sure that our top news is news about the war in the middle east, the dying in Darfur, and international nuclear capabilities. And when these stories are reported, what can "we" do about how they are sandwiched between insignificant stories and commercials!
The finger that Ben Stein points out to "us" should be redirected and pointed right back at the news media and broadcast companies that are in control. "We" may be making the mistake of watching, listening, or reading the newspapers.
The MEDIA needs this lecture, for it is the MEDIA that decides what we will hear and learn. The news on TV and the newspapers provide us with top news stories on celebrities, and it is the MEDIA that gives international and defense news a secondary status when reporting. I would like to not be asked "Are we stupid?" but rather ask how long do "we" have to put up with this nonsense, and what can "we" do about the media frenzy that takes place regarding celebrities and their problems. What can "we" do to make sure that our top news is news about the war in the middle east, the dying in Darfur, and international nuclear capabilities. And when these stories are reported, waht can "we" do about how they are sandwiched between insignificant stories and commercials!
The finger that Ben Stein points out to "us" should be redirected and pointed right back at the news media and boradcast companies that are in control. "We" may be making the mistake of watching, listening, or reading the newspapers.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 44 Comments