Rep. William Jefferson Pleads Not Guilty
Louisiana Democrat, Indicted On 16 Counts In Bribery Case, Faces Investigation In Congress
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Rep. Jefferson: I'm Innocent
CBS News RAW: Rep. William Jefferson pleaded not guilty to 16 criminal charges that include racketeering, soliciting bribes, wire fraud, money laundering and obstruction of justice.
-
Video
Rep. Jefferson Indicted
The discovery of thousands of dollars in cash in a freezer has ended in the indictment of Louisiana Democratic Rep. William Jefferson, on charges of bribery. Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Photo
Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., who earlier this week was indicted for bribery and corruption, arrives at federal court in Alexandria, Va., June 8, 2007. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
-
Timeline
Jefferson Bribery Probe
La. congressman indicted on 16 counts ranging from racketeering to conspiracy.
-
Interactive
Political Scandals
Politics can be a strange and dirty business. Check out some of the biggest missteps and mishaps in recent history.
-
Interactive
110th Congress
The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
Jefferson said little during the hearing in federal court in Alexandria, but acknowledged that he understood the charges and waived his right to a speedy trial. He was released on $100,000 bond, and a trial date was set for January 16.
A 94-page indictment, handed up Monday, details 11 separate bribery schemes and 16 criminal counts, including racketeering, soliciting bribes, wire fraud, money laundering and obstruction of justice. Jefferson faces a possible maximum sentence of 235 years.
The charges came almost two years after investigators raided Jefferson's home in Washington and found $90,000 in cash stuffed in a box in his freezer.
During Friday's hearing, prosecutor Mark Lytle said the government had eight file cabinets of evidence in the case and extensive tape recordings. He said the government could spend up to a month presenting its case.
U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III has prohibited Jefferson's access to guns kept in his Louisiana home. He has also frozen his bank accounts and other assets.
"I am innocent of these charges and I plan to clear my name," Jefferson said following the hearing.
Standing next to his wife, Andrea, Jefferson spoke of his wife and five daughters, claiming "They are not who the government describes them to be ... bribers, racketeers and conspirators."
"This is not who we are. This is not who I am. This is not what I have done. I am innocent of all the charges and allegations that have been leveled against me. And I and my family with our friends and allies pledge to fight to clear our name and see justice done," he said.
Jefferson said he and his family are at a disadvantage against the Justice Department, which he characterized as not only possessing of unlimited resources but also able to "engineer circumstances, leak information, and even violate the constitution in pursuit of its goals."
He also suggested that the $90,000 cash which was found in the freezer of his Louisiana home belonged to the FBI, as part of their plan to bribe the president of Nigeria.
Earlier this week, the House ordered a quick internal investigation that could oust Jefferson from Congress before his bribery trial.
Jefferson resigned his seat on the Small Business Committee. Democrats already had moved to take that seat from him.
Jefferson admitted no wrongdoing.
Jefferson, who has been under investigation for more than two years, was re-elected last year despite the looming investigation, But the nine-term congressman had few allies among leaders of his own party.
The charges against Jefferson, "if proven true, should lead to the expulsion of the member in question," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who earlier ousted Jefferson from the Ways and Means Committee, issued a similar statement Monday.
That wasn't enough for Republicans, still smarting from losing control of Congress in the November elections partly over ethics breaches of their own members.
Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio offered a resolution directing the Ethics Committee to report on whether the charges in the indictment merit Jefferson's expulsion. The House passed it, 373-26. Thirteen members voted present.
Expelling a House member before a conviction would be unprecedented, according to the Congressional Research Service. But it was not clear that would happen in Jefferson's case, because the Ethics Committee could refuse to rule on whether the nine-term congressman should be thrown out of the House, according to a Democratic leadership aide.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 65 CommentsIt never worked then, and it won't work now. I guess in this case, Mr. Jefferson will be "movin on DOWN!"
The fact that the trial isn't until next January is upseting. I would like to see him forced to give up his congressional seat, so a new election could be held to fill the vacency as soon as possible.
Jefferson: $100,000, but judge who keeps that
kinda' money in da freeza'
Judge: Put up 10% of the $100,000 stupid.
Jefferson: Oh, well that's difrunt I got dat
behind da' ice creem
Notice how the moment that Tom DeLay was indicted, the Republicans kicked him out of his position, even though the case never went to trial and probably won't (the prosecutor doesn't even have a case). But when William Jefferson is caught red-handed demanding a bribe, taking a bribe, and storing his loot in the freezer, the Dumbocrats are still debating whether or not to oust him.
I guess the (D) after his name makes all the difference in the world.
Posted by mike71067 at 11:18 AM : Jun 08, 2007
Worse than that.....Air Pelosi gave him a cushy chairman job even after learning he was under investigation.
Good luck with getting him to give up his seat, willingly. What do you think he is, a republican?
DeLay was just as devious a person except that he was so heavy handed that to call him a politician is a misnomer.
My suggestion that any politician found guilty of putting their hands into the cookie jar get a minimum of five years and an fine of two times what they were found to have stolen from the coffers.
Posted by rushlimpdrug at 11:17 AM : Jun 08, 2007
Chocolate, no doubt - like the city! :)
Posted by bogusbones at 11:37 AM : Jun 08, 2007
These issues don't matter. The REAL issue is the disparity of how the different party's suspects are treated in the MSM. So what you see when a democrat is involved is a sort of "knee jerk" reaction by conservatives.....sort of like, "YEAH, it's about time!" If the MSM were fair, I think you'd see a lot more civility by conservative citizens.
I hope congress does vote to oust him, which I belive requires a two thirds vote to take effect.
-Posted by infidel_us at 11:42 AM : Jun 08, 2007
So true. This story will be off the front pages by the middle of next week, if not sooner. If William Jefferson had an (R) after his name instead of a (D), it would be in the front pages until the 2008 elections.
You know that would be a crime.
They are so energy inefficient.
What a load of fertilizer! You guys kept Clinton on the front pages for his 8 years, and every problem Bush creates for himself you continue to blame on Clinton. What whiners neocons are! This guy is on the front pages. Yet with your spin, you are complaining about next week. This guy has been front page news for a few weeks. It is in a neocons nature to act repugnantly. Civility would work. But no, you guys continue childish and boorish behavior up every day.
You aren't even getting "liberal" complaints about this guy being charged. Yet charge Scooter Libby, file war crimes charges against Rumsfeld, indict Wolfowicz, and you neocons think you are being persecuted. Please.
Posted by nolalou at 11:48 AM : Jun 08, 2007
Thanks foe the update. I was not aware of this info.
I meant, thanks for the updates on his committee musical chairs. I was not aware that he was off the 2nd committee. Thanks!
Posted by billysmith6 at 12:57 PM : Jun 08, 2007
Wishful thinking....better get a conviction, first. Actually, you better have charges first. Actually, you need to have an investigation, first.
Posted by infidel_us
Actually they need to have probable cause. But they can always invent that.
Posted by billysmith6 at 01:24 PM : Jun 08, 2007
You mean a "Rove-ing" target! LOL
Perhaps it's "entrapment"??
Yeah I know that's all foolish.
Sorry....Delay (even Foley) not only withdraw but RESIGN. What does "cold cash" do? Stays in, pleads not guilty. Please. This is like trying to plead not guilty to having an expired license.
Ain't gonna happen. The last time Dems had the moral high ground was during Roosevelt's administration.
Apparently not today. Lots of Neocons publishing support for the Alabama Republican State Senator. Try again neocon. Clinton beats Bush (either one). Hillary and Obama beat Giuliani and McCain.
Posted by bigsk8fan
And this is your interpretation of the moral high ground?
How about Dem. Berger who openly stole documents that made the Clintons at fault for 9 -11 ? No jail time. Nothing. Story buried. Another Democrat.
And so on, and so on.
The Democrats are not for the working people of America, if they were , why are they backing the taking of jobs by illegals ?
Posted by bigsk8fan at 01:48 PM : Jun 08, 2007
I'm not a neocon. I'm a Reagan-o-con! :)
Democrats will not disappoint
We pledge to make this the most honest, ethical, and open Congress in history. By Nancy Pelosi
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1114/p09s01-coop.html
typical new orleans corruption
Rep. William Jefferson pleaded not guilty Friday to charges of soliciting more than $500,000 in bribes while using his office to broker business deals in Africa.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070608/D8PKMVN81.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/08/politics/main2902116.shtml
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Rep.+William Jefferson%2C D-La&btnG=Search
like%u2026 I did not have *** with that woman%u2026 hahahaha
Just like Sandy Berger!
Just like Sandy Berger!
Posted by Terrapin78
Nah, Scooter is going to be pardoned. Valerie Plame's covertness was never fully established and the prosecutor, the jury and the judge had before them a case that purported to stand alone, a trial of one man's memory and recollections. The case has always been about Iraq and Scooter was the fall guy. Disbarred, nah, I don't think so.
Posted by mudrose at 04:39 PM : Jun 08, 2007
Mudrose, are you lying intentionally, or just crazy?
Both Tenet (the former CIA head) AND Hayden (the current CIA head) testified to Congress that she was covert. Not to mention that an unclassified CIA review of her work history released May 29 of this year confirms - yet again - that she was covert.
The only thing that has never been "fully established" is how people can be so woefully ignorant (or intentionally misleading) that they still say Plame wasn't covert, when the facts prove conclusively otherwise.
I don't know how we got on the Scooter Libby issue in this thread, but here you go again, repeating the BS that "Valerie Plame's covertness was never fully established". The CIA said she was covert, isn't that enough for you F-ing jerk-offs! Her 'outting' was a CRIME!
This quote is from news reports at the time of the trial:
"In new court filings, special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has finally resolved one of the most disputed issues at the core of the long-running CIA leak controversy: Valerie Plame Wilson, he asserts, was a %u201Ccovert%u201D CIA officer who repeatedly traveled overseas using a %u201Ccover identity%u201D in order to disguise her relationship with the agency."
I won't be surprised however, if Libby is pardoned eventualy, mabye right before Bush leaves office.
Guy doesn't even know where to stash his cash.
He looks like all the rest of the crooked politicians.
Perhaps he can become a radio talk show host.
He's already bald and stupid looking.
All he needs now is to lose weight, take viagra,
and chase chicks on the internet
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 65 Comments