June 10, 2007

Barry Diller's Third Act

Lesley Stahl Profile's One Of America's Top Internet CEOs

  • In The Spotlight CEO Wealthmeter

    Chart the biggest winners and losers in the business world.

  • Special Report Money Matters

    Get words to the wise, from the wise, on handling, making and saving money.

  • Photo Essay Celebrity Circuit

    Jessica's stadium cheer, Celine's swan song and Ashley Tisdale's new nose

(CBS)  "A lot of people from the outside look at your company and say it's a hodge-podge. How do these things fit together?" Stahl asks.

"We are an interactive conglomerate and we're proud of being a conglomerate, which is we operate in financial services and flirt services with Match.com, so you know, we run the gamut," Diller says.

"How much did you understand this when you started or has it been a journey to figure out what your company is?" Stahl asks.

"Of course it is," Diller replies.

Asked if he has figured it out, Diller tells Stahl, "I hope we're figuring it out. I know this now. I know now that in fact many of our businesses relate to each other."

Everything he bought was interactive, but beyond that he made it up as he went along, and is only now trying to create a sense of oneness by linking his brands together through his search engine, Ask.com. Here, you can check local listings from Citysearch, get tickets, find a date, and even buy a pair of shoes.

"We're tying location to event, to ticketing, to reviews, to all of these different things," Diller says.

He's also uniting his brands under one roof, in new headquarters designed by world famous architect Frank Gehry, not only changing Manhattan's skyline, but trying to give IAC the same kind of cache that other big internet companies have.

"Why do you think that Google is such a sexy story…" Stahl asks.

"'Cause it is!" Diller replies.

"…and IAC isn't a sexy story?" Stahl continues.

"Nobody knows from IAC. IAC is brand by brand by brand by brand. We are an endlessly multi-product company. Endlessly. So, Google is Google. Googling. Googled. All of that," Diller says. "You know, one-product companies will be known by their one product."

Asked if he doesn't want IAC to be a “sexy company,” Diller says, "Yes, would I like that? Sure. And I'd like to have ice cream every third hour. But here's the thing: I'll be quite happy to be kind of similar to Procter and Gamble, someday, which also nobody knows."

With IAC, Diller has amassed a personal fortune of well over a billion dollars. He works hard, but enjoys his time off, whether hiking, biking, or sailing on his luxurious yacht. But he says it isn’t the money that drives him. He was born the son of a wealthy real estate developer, and went to Beverly Hills High School, sort of.

Stahl had heard a story that Diller routinely skipped classes on Mondays and Fridays. He confirms that it is true. Asked where his parents were and what was going on, Diller says, "It wasn't that my parents were Britney Spears. But they had a very laissez-faire concept. And so, I had no actual supervision."

After he dropped out of UCLA, family connections got him a job at the William Morris talent agency. He worked in the mailroom. It turned out to be just the education he was looking for.

"I literally read the file room from, you know, A to Z," Diller says. "I read the entire history of the entertainment business."

The mailroom kid proved to be an innovator with great instincts about popular taste. He became a Hollywood player, churning out hits when he ran Paramount like "Saturday Night Fever," "Urban Cowboy," "Raiders of the Lost Ark," and "Beverly Hills Cop."

Then, he did it again when he created Fox TV, the fourth network. He says none of this came easy. "Every single thing that I did, first I had to figure it out. Which meant, you know, I mucked around and I made lotsa mistakes. And then I would figure it out. Not that fast, by the way," Diller says.

That goes for his personal life, too. It was back in those Hollywood heydays that he first met Diane.

"I was 28, and he was 33. We were both kind of famous," von Furstenberg recalls. "He was a tycoon, and I was a little tycooness, and we were young."

After six years they broke up, but later became best friends and he became close to her children.
Then on his 59th birthday, von Furstenberg says, "I said, 'If you want, I marry for your birthday. I’ll be your gift.'"

When the New York Times announced their marriage, they called it a "merger" and said that the relationship was "assumed to be platonic."

"We married because it is the culmination of a long relationship and we have a family together. And it just felt right," says von Furstenberg, who also considers her husband her best friend.

"You're also said to be each other's closest business advisers," Stahl adds.

"We are everything for each other," von Furstenberg replies.

Asked what she thinks drivers her husband, von Furstenberg tells Stahl, "What drives him is the vision. It's definitely not the money. He has a vision, and he's not quite sure what it is. You know, and then he kind of fakes it until he makes it."

Continued



Produced by Shachar Bar-On
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by solow8 June 13, 2007 4:32 AM EDT
Gosh Leslie, you went light on this guy. He feels good about 1/2 a billion dollars a year and says money isn't important, its the vision. What vision. I never heard one. He could afford to give each of his 22,000 employees a raise of $20,000 each and still draw 30 million salary. He makes as much as 14,000 of his employees, combined. If the 14,000 didn't show up to work for a week Barry would quickly earn who earns the money and who just collects it.

In fact, it is exactly what America needs to do, a workers strike so people like Barry can see that the unfairness has gone too far.

Leslie, you really had an opportunity to tell the extremely rich that they are inappropriate, and you missed it.

Let's not pretend that Savage Capitalism is okay, it isn't. It is ruining our society and your story made a big deal out of a unworthy figure
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 10:42 PM EDT
Oh yah.. ******* unbelievable. Der ******* heroes.. Wit de ******* fancy houses and de ******* fancy cloths.. Deyz got me ******* admirations too. It's just people I admire.. I pee down der ******* backs.

Its just de way I am.
Reply to this comment
by c1264648 June 11, 2007 7:21 PM EDT
We must applaud and give a standing ovation to anyone that works hard to grow a business, and that creates job formation for tens of thousands of individuals around the world. Individuals such as Barry Diller and Diane Von Furstenberg must also be compensated for taking financial and psychological risk to create something from nothing. Moreover, Mr. Diller is being compensated more for the psychological risk that he and Diane Von Furstenberg took to actuate their vision. The rewards are commensurable with the risk. More power to them! From the creators of I DO SPORTS. COM and I DO SPORTS WITHOUT FEAR AND WITHOUT REPROACH.
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 6:06 PM EDT
.. I'll pee on ya. Pee right down yer freak'n back der pal.
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 6:03 PM EDT
You just.. suck me left nut der pal, and git de hell outta my neighborhood. I'll spit on ya.. Dis is just fer people live'n in cardboard boxes. Know my name? Huh? Uh-uh.. Dats cuz I'm de only guy 'round here whos farts stink!
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 6:00 PM EDT
I'm gonna give yaz me poor man's speech! DIS IS WHERE I LIVE! AND NOT YOU! Yer the guy that sells me my food! Yer the guy that sells me my medicine! And you gonna hide no more from no one.

Yer a record album, pal. You and yer subsidiaries can suck my nub..
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 5:57 PM EDT
Subsidiaries? Tax shelters? Overseas endeavors? These people do nothing but hide! And people who hide are afraid of something.

When you put your name on something, thats not just your pride. That's your guarantee! "This product is something I market, and I'll put my name on it."

You people! You corporate bigwigs! You used to be something special! You used to be something to admire! Now you're running away from home.
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 June 11, 2007 5:53 PM EDT
Why don't companies want anybody to know who they are anymore?
Reply to this comment
by greedwar June 11, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
Upon viewing Leslie Stahl's story on Barry Diller, I've learned who's behind such monopolies as Ticketmaster. Leslie Stahl always asks the easy questions, and is by far the most nonconfrontational, uninteresting interviewer on 60 Minutes.
If Leslie's interview suggests that Barry Diller feels he is a CEO for the "vision" and not the "money", then why would there be such complacency with his company's convenience charges? If Barry Diller is so concerned with Ticketmaster's vision, then why does he represent a company that collects $10 on every $30 ticket charge? Cleary Barry Diller's vision is that music fans should expect to pay a 25% sum for something unrelated to music or the venue. Is his use of words like "convenience charge" an example of this vision? This story was painted like he was a unique icon as oppossed to the stereotypical power and money hungry CEO.

Ed Green
Musician
Reply to this comment
by avantinet June 11, 2007 10:46 AM EDT
Barry Diller can afford to be a visionary.You can make hugh financial mistakes and proceed on to the next venture. Thanks 60 Minutes for that wonderful profile. How about How Paris Hilton worked here way up through the business world next?
Reply to this comment
by truthinbiz June 11, 2007 2:54 AM EDT
I work for a Barry Diller company. While his "incentive" may motivate him, it has the opposite effect on employees.
Reply to this comment
by lovelymom1 June 11, 2007 2:34 AM EDT

HE Should Have never even been asked was it for money. Yes, we all work for money.(for the challenge of the impossible.) Some dream, some do. some work for those who do. Shame on America for being hard on smart men and women who actually make it and take it. He has earned it. He said during the interview he wasn't worth what they where paying him.(shame on HIM) for allowing anyone to make HIM feel bad for earning a healthy living. Everyone in the World is worth that kind of money. If people would stop whinning and give all they have and get off their duff, we would all have. We could all be happy. The Bible says there will always be poor among us. It will rain on the just and unjust. All money belongs to God. Isn't it good he allows us to keep 90% of what we earn. I live paycheck to paycheck and barely do that. So I am not a rich person defending a rich person. Americans Have created a stock exchange system that people think they should be able to invest, sit on a couch and the men and women that earn all that money for them get what the invester thinks is fair? They work 60-80 hour, week don't see their famlies. I think The system is broke. Most of those companies he ownes he didn't have to take to the stocks except for tax reasons and other things. He doesn't need you to buy his stock to live. Could you not see he loved what he did. The America system made it so he could not be a propriter.
Reply to this comment
by solojojo June 10, 2007 11:10 PM EDT
"It's not the money, it's not the money, it's not the money" How many times did the Dillers say that? Why not take 70 million, divide it amongst his 20,000 employees who work hard because it "is" about the money and take "only" 400 million for the Diller household? Did he ever think of that? Was that ever one of his visions? Can you say "corporate greed"?
Reply to this comment
by jweihe June 10, 2007 11:09 PM EDT
Everyone agrees of course that if you start and make something you desearve to be compensated for it. In fact compensated with all profits after taxes, bills and payroll. But once you sell it, or go public, it no longer belongs to just you. It belongs to whomever bought it, in this case, the shareholders. This was not an inspiring story about a great American business person, but just another story, in a long line, of CEO and management greed and over compensation where once again shareholders pay the price. Oh yeah, and it's not about the money. Whatever!
Reply to this comment
by blimeylimey-2009 June 10, 2007 10:49 PM EDT
Barry is a very bright man. Good luck to him and his ideas. Of course he said the dreaded sentence - "it isnt about money". Okay. What I would like to know is how he compensates his employees. I know person totally responsible for an entire magazine. His CEO takes home a bonu;s of seven million. He doesn't get $30,000. Now that would have been a good question Lesley.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed