February 11, 2009 4:46 PM
- Text
Americans Without A Vote
(CBS)
In the last month alone, Congress voted to increase the minimum wage, passed ethics and lobbying reform and approved a multibillion-dollar spending bill for the war in Iraq.
But, as CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric reports, one congressional district — the District of Columbia — could offer neither a yea or a nay on these, or any other House measures … because it has no voting rights in Congress.
"It is really almost on the verge of hypocritical for us to call ourselves the world's greatest democracy but not give the District residents an opportunity to have representation," D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty said.
Instead, D.C. has a delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton. She may not have a vote, but she certainly has a voice.
"I will not yield, sir!" she said on the floor of the House of Representatives during a debate. "The District of Columbia has spent 206 years yielding!"
She's used that voice to get a bill passed in the House that would give the District its first full vote on the House floor.
"You would think that the one vote everybody was entitled to is a vote in the people's House," she said.
But in Washington, principle is peppered with politics. Norton's would be a Democratic seat. So a compromise in her bill offers an additional seat to the Republican-leaning state of Utah, the next state in line to enlarge its Congressional delegation based on its population. But that hasn't stopped some conservatives from calling the measure unconstitutional.
"Clearly, the constitution states that any individual who serves in the Unites States House of Representatives must represent a state," said Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga. "And the District of Columbia is not a state."
That's what has historians pondering. Did the Founding Fathers intend to deny a vote to the residents of their own capitol? Or did they assume they'd be counted among Maryland and Virginia? — that's how it was before the federal government assumed jurisdiction over the city in 1801.
"I just think they saw it as business as usual," said historian Chuck DiGiacomantonio of the First Federal Congress Project. "If you were on the Maryland side of the Potomac River, in the federal district, you were considered part of Maryland."
Arguably, the country's balance of power won't change. Norton's bill doesn't provide for a district seat in the Senate, and it's the Senate that must still approve the bill, which President Bush has threatened to veto. But that hasn't dampened D.C.'s hopes that it will one day have both taxation and representation.
But, as CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric reports, one congressional district — the District of Columbia — could offer neither a yea or a nay on these, or any other House measures … because it has no voting rights in Congress.
"It is really almost on the verge of hypocritical for us to call ourselves the world's greatest democracy but not give the District residents an opportunity to have representation," D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty said.
Instead, D.C. has a delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton. She may not have a vote, but she certainly has a voice.
"I will not yield, sir!" she said on the floor of the House of Representatives during a debate. "The District of Columbia has spent 206 years yielding!"
She's used that voice to get a bill passed in the House that would give the District its first full vote on the House floor.
"You would think that the one vote everybody was entitled to is a vote in the people's House," she said.
But in Washington, principle is peppered with politics. Norton's would be a Democratic seat. So a compromise in her bill offers an additional seat to the Republican-leaning state of Utah, the next state in line to enlarge its Congressional delegation based on its population. But that hasn't stopped some conservatives from calling the measure unconstitutional.
"Clearly, the constitution states that any individual who serves in the Unites States House of Representatives must represent a state," said Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga. "And the District of Columbia is not a state."
That's what has historians pondering. Did the Founding Fathers intend to deny a vote to the residents of their own capitol? Or did they assume they'd be counted among Maryland and Virginia? — that's how it was before the federal government assumed jurisdiction over the city in 1801.
"I just think they saw it as business as usual," said historian Chuck DiGiacomantonio of the First Federal Congress Project. "If you were on the Maryland side of the Potomac River, in the federal district, you were considered part of Maryland."
Arguably, the country's balance of power won't change. Norton's bill doesn't provide for a district seat in the Senate, and it's the Senate that must still approve the bill, which President Bush has threatened to veto. But that hasn't dampened D.C.'s hopes that it will one day have both taxation and representation.
Latest Now in CBS Evening News
- Evening News Online, 02.09.12
- One mortgage mess culprit: Signature mills
- Remembering Kodak cameras
- Obama frees 10 states from "No Child Left Behind"
- Assad continues relentless attack on Homs
- Inside the job of a robo-signer
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- Civilians bear the brunt of Syrian assault
- Oral history of N. Ireland strife raises dilemma
- Repairman reminisces as Kodak retires its cameras
- Evening News Online, 02.08.12
- Female soldiers tell stories from the frontlines
- Behind winter's wild weather
- Gas prices continue to creep up
- GOP turns up heat on Obama contraceptive law
- Do Santorum wins signal fundamental change in GOP?
- Are Santorum wins good for GOP's future?
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Summary Box: EU pact danger to India pharmas
- AP Top Extended Financial Headlines At 1:52 p.m. EST
- Turkey to propose Syria strategy to Clinton
- XL Group posts big quarterly loss, shares drop
on Facebook
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Notorious teacher sex scandals
on CBS News






