Mideast Conflict Spawns D.C. Ad Battle

Pro-Palestinian And Pro-Israeli Posters Line Walls Of 16 Washington D.C. Subway Stations

(AP)  A Middle East conflict is playing out in Washington's subway stations with a blitz of pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel ads that have drawn complaints from commuters in the U.S. capital.

In early May, pro-Palestinian posters began appearing on the walls of 16 subway stations, promoting a June 10 rally at the U.S. Capitol to mark the 40 years since Israel took control of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.

The 20 posters, which cost $10,000 to run for a month, were paid for by the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation. They depict a young Palestinian boy with his schoolbag walking in front of a towering Israeli tank. The posters read: "The world says no to Israeli occupation."

Soon after, pro-Israel groups paid $17,500 for 35 of their own ads, some of which show Palestinian children in military attire carrying what appear to be plastic toy guns and grenades. "Teaching children to hate will never lead to peace," one ad reads.

Officials at the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority said the agency has received about 40 comments about the ads, most of which have been complaints.

One person who complained about the pro-Palestinian ads wrote "Don't be pawns to these radical groups!" Several complaints provided by Metro criticized both campaigns as "racist."

While transit systems in cities such as Los Angeles and San Francisco do not allow political ads, Metro has a "content neutral" policy, allowing any ads that are protected by the constitutional right to freedom of expression.

Metro spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein said that policy is unlikely to change. "This is Washington," she said. "Everything is political."

StandWithUs, one of the pro-Israel groups that placed the ads, said it decided not to ignore the first ads because of concerns about the message people might take away from the image of the tank and the child.

"We were concerned about the everyday person who would pass those posters with zero information and see the tanks and have a very poisoned image of Israel," executive director Roz Rothstein said. "We didn't want to be boiled down to one little picture."

Ron Halber, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, said he was worried that the counter-campaign would give the pro-Palestinian rally more visibility.

"We don't believe that pro-Israel advocacy depends on trashing the Palestinians," said Halber, whose organization represents more than 200 Jewish groups and synagogues in the region.

Sut Jhally, an advertising expert and professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said the subway ads were unlikely to change anyone's opinions.

"One message doesn't work on its own," he said. "Advertising is about the accumulation of messages and the context in which it appears."

Some commuters passing through the one of the downtown Washington stations this week said they would have preferred not to encounter the ads.

Matt Bernhart, 36, who was visiting from Minnesota, said he did not like either campaign. "We're plastered with this stuff every day in the newspapers and on TV. It's likely to just rile people up."

Adi Greif, 23, of Arlington, Va., also criticized the tone of the ads in a place already sensitive to terrorism. "Whether or not you agree with the message, it inspires a lot of fear, whether or not the specific facts are true," she said.

[susanhelit]

If your home and all you owned was given away to someone else, who kicked you out - you'd fight them too. The Palestinians deserve a truely fair settlement, and that has never yet even been offered.

[juwboy]

SusanHelit:

In the late 1930s, the Palestinian leader, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, fomented an insurrection with the intention of driving the British occupiers and the Jews out of Palestine.

After a period of bloody fighting, during which the British used a variety of unsavory, brutal, but necessary and appropriate methods, the revolt was crushed.

The defeated Grand Mufti fled to Berlin where he spent the duration of World War II as an honored guest and friend of Adolf Hitler.

Meanwhile, the Grand Mufti's former subjects waited with eager anticipation as they watched Rommel's Afrika Korps advance eastwards across North Africa towards Palestine only to see him defeated in western Egypt by the British general, Bernard Montgomery. who'd put down their own rebellion.

If Rommel had continued his advance, there is no doubt that the Palestinians would have allied themselves with the Axis powers against the U.S. and Britain and collaborated willingly in Hitler's "Final Solution to the Jewish Problem".

It is therefore entirely appropriate that Israel has been established on land that was once led by an out-and-out Nazi collaborator, whose subjects were virulent Nazi collaborators-in-waiting.

Let's face it, the Palestinians are still Nazis. There's nothing they'd like more than to see all Jews wiped off the face of the Earth.

[galaxiana]

The advertising professor they interviewed for this story doesn't know what he's talking about (or perhaps CBS, in its typical lack of accuracy, incorrectly charactertized his comments.)

The claim that advertising isn't about a single message is a crock! If this were true, scores of top companies wouldn't be spending millions of dollars each for ONE MINUTE of Superbowl advertising time! A single poignant, well-crafted message that resonates with consumers is the whole POINT of these ads, and most other advertising.

However, the discipline of BRANDING, where you convey to consumers the culture and values of a specific BRAND, actually IS the type of advertising message that relies on a longer-term accumulation of impressions.

It appears that this professor was talking about BRANDING and perhaps some reporter who doesn't pay too close attention to the details of his facts conflated this into advertising in general.

My point is that a powerful single image CAN create lasting impressions in people's minds, and sway them very effectively to a given "side" of an argument, especially when you employ emotionally charged subjects such as small schoolkids being overshadowed by the Big, Bad Military Tank (read: violence.)

[zoltaric]

Israel is the Jewish homeland. They were there before the Palistine pigs.

[gunownerdan]

Can't we all just get along?

Sadly we never will when religion dominates governments around the world.