By

James M Klatell /

CBS/ February 11, 2009, 4:47 PM

Expert: Lohan Charges No Big Deal

Charges stemming from Lindsay Lohan's latest vehicular accident probably won't amount to much, a leading defense attorney said Monday.

CBS News consultant Mickey Sherman says Lohan isn't "in as deep problems as you would think."

Lohan was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence after her 2005 Mercedes SL-65 convertible hit a curb at 5:30 Saturday morning. Authorities said they found what they believe to be cocaine at the scene.

The actress, 20, and two other people were in the car her when it crashed on Sunset Boulevard, and it appeared she was speeding, police said.

Officers at the scene found a "usable amount" of a drug tentatively identified as cocaine, a police spokesman said.

Photos: Celebrity Mug Shots
Lohan, who spent time in rehab earlier this year, was driven in another car to a hospital for treatment of minor injuries, police said. The two other people in her car weren't hurt.

Officers got a 911 call about the accident and arrested Lohan at the hospital for investigation of misdemeanor driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, police said.

Photos: A Year of Lohan
She was released from custody because she was admitted to the hospital, they added.

"As far as we know," Sherman told co-anchor Hannah Storm on The Early Show Monday, "she doesn't have a record for DWI (driving while intoxicated), she doesn't have a prior conviction and, unlike Paris Hilton, to our knowledge, she's not on probation for any of these things.

"So, even listless, misguided, spoiled celebrities are often entitled to, you know, a first bite at the apple. In all likelihood she'll get some type of diversionary program or first offender program.

"But the fact that it's just a usable quality, (as opposed to) a selling quantity, she's not going to be charged with anything extraordinarily serious, as far as the cocaine's concerned..

Photos: Livin' La Vida Lohan
"Plus, you have a gap. She wasn't in the car. She went to get help. You know, she could always say, (and it) may or may not be true, that she had drinks after, in fact, the accident and before she got to the emergency room. Sounds contrived, but it often happens."

So, Storm asked, there might not be any sort of blood alcohol test that would be admissible in court?

"Well," Smerman responded, "(there) may be, but the question is, how relevant can it be, because if she says, 'Just before I went to the hospital, I was so upset, I went across the street to the bar and had drinks.' You know, that may not be supported by facts, but, you know, eventually the police are going to get to the hospital, get the records, find out if there's alcohol in her system — and don't forget the charge is under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. So, if they can show that she had an opiate in her system, that could convict her as well. Then again, it appears to be a first offense and the key thing is, nobody got hurt except a couple of trees off Sunset (Blvd.)."

Technically, Sherman noted, when Lohan left the scene to go to the hospital, "That's a crime. Then again, it's not like she took the plates off the car or had somebody remove the car. She left the car there, her Mercedes is there, registered to her or her people, as we say, so I don't think that's a big deal, (that) she left the scene. It would be had she hit somebody and there were injuries. But just herself, it's a crime, but it's like an infraction, not a big deal."

Sherman added, "The Internet is filled with her coming from the bar, running from the -- from her car after the accident. This woman doesn't do anything that's not videoed. So, she's under enormous pressure. In all likelihood, a judge will order her, or her lawyer will say, 'Get some help before they even order you to do it.' "

The weekend crash was Lohan's third accident in roughly two years.

In October 2005, Lohan and a passenger sustained minor injuries when her convertible hit a van in West Hollywood. Authorities said the van driver, who also received minor injuries, was at fault.

Months earlier, Lohan collided with a minivan when she made a U-turn as the van, carrying paparazzi, followed her from a Los Angeles restaurant. A photographer was arrested for investigation of assault with a deadly weapon but prosecutors declined to charge him.

That crash was credited with prompting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign a law that set steep financial penalties for paparazzi who commit assaults while trying to obtain celebrity photos.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
34 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sweetsher29 says:
Ok so she can go out and do drugs and cocaine and get what...a slap on the wrist. What does she have to do kill someone in her drunkeness to get put in her place? Who does she think she is GOD??? Where is MADD when you need them? I bet they could get results and then it wouldn't be "no big deal". What a crock!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
firebirdguns says:
Why is there a double set of standards for these people she needs to do the same time any other person caughnt under the same conditions.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsmithcsa says:
How can it not be important that someone below the legal age was drunk? How can it be not a big deal that this person was driving a car? As others have said already, if it were one of us reg'lar joes, we'd be locked up. If she skates on this, LA should fire their prosecutor for favoritism.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ramos937 says:
Let me be found in CA under the same circumstances. I would still be a guest of the sheriff. These laws apply to her as well as to me or they do not apply to anyone. I hope the authorities keep this in mind.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jbf1973 says:
What's wrong with this picture? She is 20 yrs. old legal drinking age is 21. She left the scene of an accident. She was DUI. They found cocaine a controled substance. Then to top it off why are the clubs that serve her not being prosecuted it is a well known fact she is UNDER AGE!!! So why would she not continue to do as she pleases there are no consiquenses!!!! Let's get a grip people and prosecute these kids before they kill someone!!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sherbear178 says:
I hate to see people saying this is no big deal. Many innocent people are killed daily by people driving under the influence. I know she didnt kill anyone...this time but what about all the next times. When does it become a big deal?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hermit22 says:
california has the largest collection of the dumbest drivers i've ever seen in my life.

my hobby when i was there was to write down the tag numbers of the COP cars that broke driving rules.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kalenakalena says:
She's already pitiful and washed up before she's even legal to drink. What a waste of newsprint. She, Paris and Britney are all sad and pathetic. I think they are all in competition for who can be the worst example of Hollywood idiocy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
perimogi says:
This is what is wrong in our society. A little bit of drunk driving, a little bit of cocaine and no problem. It may not affect her greatly criminally, but it is destroying her life. It does make a difference.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
perimogi says:
This is what is wrong in our society. A little bit of drunk driving, a little bit of cocaine and no problem. It may not affect her greatly criminally, but it is destroying her life. It does make a difference.
reply
See all 34 Comments