May 28, 2007

Expert: Lohan Charges No Big Deal

Defense Lawyer Mickey Sherman: Would Be First Offense, And Tiny Amount Of Cocaine Allegedly Involved

  • Play CBS Video Video Lohan's New Legal Troubles

    Actress Linday Lohan was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving and the possession of cocaine in her car on Sunday. She was subsequently released on this misdemeanor charge. Bill Whitaker reports.

  • Video Legal Analyst: Lohan's Trouble

    CBS' Legal Analyst Mickey Sherman tells Hannah Storm that Lindsay Lohan's recent trouble with the law is not as much of a problem as she does not have a record for DWI.

  • Video Lindsay Lohan In Accident

    Lohan struck a curb on Sunset Boulevard, police suspect DUI. The case will be presented to the D.A.'s Office where the actress could face charges, including felonies.

  • Photo

     (GETTY IMAGES/Evan Agostini)

  • Photo Essay A Year Of Lohan

    The young actress ends a whirl of activity by entering rehab. Here's a glance at her year.

  • Photo Essay Lucky Lindsay

    The teen screen star attends the premiere her new romantic comedy "Just My Luck."

(CBS)  Charges stemming from Lindsay Lohan's latest vehicular accident probably won't amount to much, a leading defense attorney said Monday.

CBS News consultant Mickey Sherman says Lohan isn't "in as deep problems as you would think."

Lohan was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence after her 2005 Mercedes SL-65 convertible hit a curb at 5:30 Saturday morning. Authorities said they found what they believe to be cocaine at the scene.

The actress, 20, and two other people were in the car her when it crashed on Sunset Boulevard, and it appeared she was speeding, police said.

Officers at the scene found a "usable amount" of a drug tentatively identified as cocaine, a police spokesman said.

Photos: Celebrity Mug Shots
Lohan, who spent time in rehab earlier this year, was driven in another car to a hospital for treatment of minor injuries, police said. The two other people in her car weren't hurt.

Officers got a 911 call about the accident and arrested Lohan at the hospital for investigation of misdemeanor driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, police said.

Photos: A Year of Lohan
She was released from custody because she was admitted to the hospital, they added.

"As far as we know," Sherman told co-anchor Hannah Storm on The Early Show Monday, "she doesn't have a record for DWI (driving while intoxicated), she doesn't have a prior conviction and, unlike Paris Hilton, to our knowledge, she's not on probation for any of these things.

"So, even listless, misguided, spoiled celebrities are often entitled to, you know, a first bite at the apple. In all likelihood she'll get some type of diversionary program or first offender program.

"But the fact that it's just a usable quality, (as opposed to) a selling quantity, she's not going to be charged with anything extraordinarily serious, as far as the cocaine's concerned..

Photos: Livin' La Vida Lohan
"Plus, you have a gap. She wasn't in the car. She went to get help. You know, she could always say, (and it) may or may not be true, that she had drinks after, in fact, the accident and before she got to the emergency room. Sounds contrived, but it often happens."

So, Storm asked, there might not be any sort of blood alcohol test that would be admissible in court?

"Well," Smerman responded, "(there) may be, but the question is, how relevant can it be, because if she says, 'Just before I went to the hospital, I was so upset, I went across the street to the bar and had drinks.' You know, that may not be supported by facts, but, you know, eventually the police are going to get to the hospital, get the records, find out if there's alcohol in her system — and don't forget the charge is under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. So, if they can show that she had an opiate in her system, that could convict her as well. Then again, it appears to be a first offense and the key thing is, nobody got hurt except a couple of trees off Sunset (Blvd.)."

Technically, Sherman noted, when Lohan left the scene to go to the hospital, "That's a crime. Then again, it's not like she took the plates off the car or had somebody remove the car. She left the car there, her Mercedes is there, registered to her or her people, as we say, so I don't think that's a big deal, (that) she left the scene. It would be had she hit somebody and there were injuries. But just herself, it's a crime, but it's like an infraction, not a big deal."

Sherman added, "The Internet is filled with her coming from the bar, running from the -- from her car after the accident. This woman doesn't do anything that's not videoed. So, she's under enormous pressure. In all likelihood, a judge will order her, or her lawyer will say, 'Get some help before they even order you to do it.' "

The weekend crash was Lohan's third accident in roughly two years.

In October 2005, Lohan and a passenger sustained minor injuries when her convertible hit a van in West Hollywood. Authorities said the van driver, who also received minor injuries, was at fault.

Months earlier, Lohan collided with a minivan when she made a U-turn as the van, carrying paparazzi, followed her from a Los Angeles restaurant. A photographer was arrested for investigation of assault with a deadly weapon but prosecutors declined to charge him.

That crash was credited with prompting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign a law that set steep financial penalties for paparazzi who commit assaults while trying to obtain celebrity photos.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from Celeb Spot

Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by vinepetal904 May 28, 2007 10:57 AM PDT
if first responets are always those with the free dare and free shock and awe instead of those with the free food and free medicine, then for how long has civiliazation been conquered, whisked away, and tortured in the names of god and heaven and security?
Reply to this comment
by xzavierbrown May 28, 2007 11:48 AM PDT
***"So, even listless, misguided, spoiled celebrities are often entitled to, you know, a first bite at the apple."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mickey Sherman****


quoted by a true reckless left winged liberal..its all gravy till it is his/her own children is hurt or killed by that 'first bite of the apple' AND IN TURN immedietly demand FORGIVNESS after a short and cheap APOLOGY.
Reply to this comment
by rohink-2009 May 28, 2007 12:13 PM PDT
I find it interesting that Mickey Sherman thinks that it is no big deal. Didn't she just get out of rehab?
Reply to this comment
by cruises44 May 28, 2007 12:16 PM PDT
Mickey Sherman is a "nappy haired hoe"
Reply to this comment
by May 28, 2007 12:32 PM PDT
The charges against this pop tart won't amount to much because the judicial system is inherently sexist, and that means that men go to jail and women go to the spa.
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw May 28, 2007 12:49 PM PDT
All you need is someplace where you can keep reporters and paparazzi out. Isnt that what rehab means? .....hiding out?

Posted by ainttaken at 12:25 PM : May 28, 2007

Actually, you need to be related to a powerful hollywood producer, politician or other well connected person.

If the average Joe Schmuck opened a rehab center, his only clients with be other Joe Schmucks, most without money or employment.
Reply to this comment
by bc123 May 28, 2007 12:53 PM PDT
Liberal-haters amuse me. They probably the biggest dupes on the planet. Brainwashed by their right-wing radio or TV talk show host, they have no idea how the real world operates. They live in a bubble. They are ruining this country because they are the ones who politicians have to suck up to. It is the reason Congress is infested with phony-baloney conservatives (Republicans AND Democrats, by the way) who pretend to care about the working class and then turn around and serve only the ruling class.
Reply to this comment
by klewt May 28, 2007 1:05 PM PDT
Why don't any of these bar owners every get in trouble for serving these underage actors? Who on this planet is not aware that Little Lohan is not old enough to be in a bar?
Reply to this comment
by njlawyer12 May 28, 2007 1:07 PM PDT
xzavierbrown,

You sound like Rush Limbaugh before he was charged with a crime for being a druggie, which caused him to hire a "left wing[ed] liberal" lawyer to save his butt.

What you are unwilling to understand (likely because of your political blindness) is that Sherman isn't justifying or excusing what will happen to Lohan, he is merely outlining how the system now works, especially for people of privilege, unlike poor minorities whose cause I'm sure you champion.

If you want to stop privileged people from getting this kind of treatment, petition both liberal and conservative politicians, who have created the current system.
Reply to this comment
by njlawyer12 May 28, 2007 1:11 PM PDT
xzavierbrown,

You sound like Rush Limbaugh before he was charged with a crime for being a druggie, which caused him to hire a "left wing[ed] liberal" lawyer to save his butt.

What you are unwilling to understand (likely because of your political blindness) is that Sherman isn't justifying or excusing what will happen to Lohan, he is merely outlining how the system now works, especially for people of privilege, unlike poor minorities whose cause I'm sure you champion.

If you want to stop privileged people from getting this kind of treatment, petition both liberal and conservative politicians, who have created the current system.
Reply to this comment
by ladyephesus1 May 28, 2007 1:34 PM PDT
I say lock her up with Paris Hilton in the same *** cell!!
This *** it getting way out of hand with all these celebrities.
Reply to this comment
by kevzgrl May 28, 2007 1:54 PM PDT
"its all gravy till it is his/her own children is hurt or killed by that 'first bite of the apple'

How true. If Mr. Sherman or someone he knows/loves were hit by this drunken, drugged-out little 'ho, he would be singing a different song. I think it is pitiful that the justice system can be bought and sold this way - in the article yesterday, it said her arraignment wouldn't be until late August - you know if it had been you or me, we would still be IN jail (not arrested at the hospital and then turned loose without setting foot in the jail house, because she was "injured") and our arraignment and would be very quick. Seems like out in Hollyweird, they can put the nastiness off for a while - hmmmm, maybe all the fuss will blow over by then, right?

Would sure be nice to get a "get out of jail free" pass like these little pop princesses do all the time - looks like California is overflowing with heroin addicts, drunks & trashy wh**es who make a game out of breaking the laws all the rest of us have to abide by. If you do the crime, you should at least have to serve SOME of the time.
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 May 28, 2007 2:44 PM PDT
bY ALL means, let's wait until she's killed someone before we get serious about making her step up and be accountable! What a crock! It certainly pays to have a really crafty lawyer on your payroll. The whole point of penalties being so tough on drinking and driving is because innocent people get killed in the process. I wonder how the parents of the other two passengers feel about her getting a casual brush with the legal system over something that could have killed them. She's just another rich *** getting special consideration...probably won't even have to appear in court if her PR person explains she's making another movie. Garbage.
Reply to this comment
by sue88-2009 May 28, 2007 3:18 PM PDT
No big deal? Wonder if this reporter would have the same opinion if a loved was hurt in this crash?

Reply to this comment
by Syndicate May 28, 2007 3:23 PM PDT
Some expert. Fleeing the scene of an accident is worth 45 days in jail.
Reply to this comment
by coffeebiz May 28, 2007 4:01 PM PDT
Well should we be surprised? She's lucky she didn't kill any innoccent people with her serious BAD CHOICE!! Let's hope that JUSTICE is served fairly and appropriately!!
Reply to this comment
by arohanui-2009 May 28, 2007 4:53 PM PDT
Another spoilt, mindless, empty headed brat. No thoughts for anyone but herself. Why would she be worried about something happening that could affect innocent bystanders whilst driving drunk and high? Always a high priced lawyer in the wings to dumb everything down and say it was no big deal. Cocaine possession and drink driving no big deal?!! Only in Amerikey.
Reply to this comment
by May 28, 2007 5:04 PM PDT
Sherman is doing the same job that any defense lawyer would do for 2500 dollars. Lindsey gets the humiliation of a DUI on a national level which isn't always enough for a rich young drug addict
Reply to this comment
by lescrivens May 28, 2007 5:06 PM PDT
When does a story about celebrity DUI turn into a political discussion? I mean come on people.

Since our county has open access to certain court records, I did some research into what an average first time offender gets. She will probably get $335 fine, 3 months of first-time offender alcohol and 3 years of informal probation [non-supervise]. The drug charge will result in 3 years [formal, supervisied probation] with 1X day AA court-order attendance, and entrance in a drug diversion program. What Lindsey actually gets a whole different story but that is what average joe would get in the OC

Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 May 28, 2007 5:54 PM PDT
"So, even listless, misguided, spoiled celebrities are often entitled to, you know, a first bite at the apple. In all likelihood she'll get some type of diversionary program or first offender program.

"But the fact that it's just a usable quality, (as opposed to) a selling quantity, she's not going to be charged with anything extraordinarily serious, as far as the cocaine's concerned.."

This attorney better take a walk into the real world and the criminal justice system especially in small town America.... first time possessors of drugs are often charged with crimes and either spend time in jail--or get probation--but what they also get is a criminal record which will haunt them for the rest of their lives. But I guess it is no big deal--because the Public chooses not to treat it as a big deal. And who said the Peasant mentality was defunct? America craves a king (Bush) and royalty (celebrities)and are willing to accept any crime (Including murder) as the right of their adored elite. Pathetic.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 May 28, 2007 5:57 PM PDT
The charges against this pop tart won't amount to much because the judicial system is inherently sexist, and that means that men go to jail and women go to the spa.
Posted by techresmgt at 12:32 PM : May 28, 2007


right. Which is why Stallone got off, and many others. The fact is--it is not women who walk (the womens' prisons are full of nonwalkers) it is those who are elite. The old story of the power of money. If you have it, you can do no wrong--it is not the rich who are fvcked up in this country--it is the mindset of those who excuse them and think they deserve different rules than the rest of society.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 May 28, 2007 5:59 PM PDT
Some expert. Fleeing the scene of an accident is worth 45 days in jail.
Posted by cbscrash07 at 03:23 PM : May 28, 2007


A few years ago, Halle Berry hit a pedestrian while on a drunk. She left the scene of the accident. No time in Jail, but she did bat her eyes and say she was "really, really sorry" Really.
Reply to this comment
by vinepetal904 May 28, 2007 7:49 PM PDT
' ... i was in a restaurant with my parents. more than several small children walked out of the bar area and directly passed our table. not all at once, but one or two or three every now and then. my mom asked why there were nothing but children coming out of the bar. i told her that a child dies each 3.6 seconds by hunger alone and that bars were invented to serve war sheros. ... '
Reply to this comment
by nyckate May 28, 2007 7:54 PM PDT
If the average 'jane citizen' had done this she'd have spent the weekend in jail waiting to go before a judge and get bail...

I don't know if Lohan belong in jail but she does need her butt kicked - she's got everything a young woman could wnat and yet she's a mess. No excuse for this.
Reply to this comment
by cindygoetz May 28, 2007 10:03 PM PDT
It's sad that's it's no longer a "big deal" to take drugs, drink, and then drive. How do we keep all these potential "killers" off our roads when it's not a "big deal"?
Reply to this comment
by perimogi May 28, 2007 11:35 PM PDT
This is what is wrong in our society. A little bit of drunk driving, a little bit of cocaine and no problem. It may not affect her greatly criminally, but it is destroying her life. It does make a difference.
Reply to this comment
by perimogi May 28, 2007 11:47 PM PDT
This is what is wrong in our society. A little bit of drunk driving, a little bit of cocaine and no problem. It may not affect her greatly criminally, but it is destroying her life. It does make a difference.
Reply to this comment
by kalenakalena May 29, 2007 12:10 AM PDT
She's already pitiful and washed up before she's even legal to drink. What a waste of newsprint. She, Paris and Britney are all sad and pathetic. I think they are all in competition for who can be the worst example of Hollywood idiocy.
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 May 29, 2007 12:57 AM PDT
california has the largest collection of the dumbest drivers i've ever seen in my life.

my hobby when i was there was to write down the tag numbers of the COP cars that broke driving rules.
Reply to this comment
by sherbear178 May 29, 2007 1:26 AM PDT
I hate to see people saying this is no big deal. Many innocent people are killed daily by people driving under the influence. I know she didnt kill anyone...this time but what about all the next times. When does it become a big deal?
Reply to this comment
by jbf1973 May 29, 2007 2:23 AM PDT
What's wrong with this picture? She is 20 yrs. old legal drinking age is 21. She left the scene of an accident. She was DUI. They found cocaine a controled substance. Then to top it off why are the clubs that serve her not being prosecuted it is a well known fact she is UNDER AGE!!! So why would she not continue to do as she pleases there are no consiquenses!!!! Let's get a grip people and prosecute these kids before they kill someone!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 May 29, 2007 4:31 AM PDT
Let me be found in CA under the same circumstances. I would still be a guest of the sheriff. These laws apply to her as well as to me or they do not apply to anyone. I hope the authorities keep this in mind.
Reply to this comment
by jsmithcsa May 29, 2007 7:15 AM PDT
How can it not be important that someone below the legal age was drunk? How can it be not a big deal that this person was driving a car? As others have said already, if it were one of us reg'lar joes, we'd be locked up. If she skates on this, LA should fire their prosecutor for favoritism.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 May 29, 2007 8:23 AM PDT
Only 20 years old, just out of rehab and gets a DUI, with coke found. Naw, no big deal at all. I'm sure she's headed for a long and fruitful life.
Reply to this comment
by firebirdguns May 29, 2007 10:02 AM PDT
Why is there a double set of standards for these people she needs to do the same time any other person caughnt under the same conditions.
Reply to this comment
by sweetsher29 May 30, 2007 5:10 PM PDT
Ok so she can go out and do drugs and cocaine and get what...a slap on the wrist. What does she have to do kill someone in her drunkeness to get put in her place? Who does she think she is GOD??? Where is MADD when you need them? I bet they could get results and then it wouldn't be "no big deal". What a crock!
Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs