February 11, 2009 4:48 PM

U.S. Said To Squash Greenhouse Gas Cuts

(AP)  The United States is preparing to reject new targets on climate change at a Group of Eight summit next month, dashing German and British hopes for a new global pact on carbon emissions, according to a document released by environmentalists.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, holding the rotating presidency of both the G-8 bloc of industrialized nations and the European Union, wants the June meeting to agree on targets for cuts in greenhouse gas output and a timetable for a major agreement on emissions reduction to succeed the Kyoto Protocol.

But unattributed comments written on a draft summit communique, which Greenpeace said were written by U.S. officials and handed to the group by an undisclosed third party, suggest the White House has major reservations.

"The U.S. still has serious, fundamental concerns about this draft statement," the notes on the document read. "The treatment of climate change runs counter to our overall position and crosses multiple 'red lines' in terms of what we simply cannot agree to."

The 27 EU members have agreed to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent by 2020 — building on Kyoto, which runs through 2012 — and by 30 percent if a broader international agreement can be reached.

Though Merkel and outgoing British leader Tony Blair — who made climate change a key priority for his final weeks in office — have pressed President Bush to back a new agreement, the document claimed the White House is "fundamentally opposed" to many of the European objectives.

The U.S., the world's biggest polluter, did not ratify the Kyoto agreement through which developed countries agreed to cut emissions by 5 percent below their 1990 level by 2012.

Merkel is seeking to win agreements for a global reduction in emissions of 50 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 and bold commitments to energy efficiency strategies at the summit in Heiligendamm, on Germany's Baltic Sea coast, June 6-8.

The draft communique also included a commitment to curb the rise in average temperatures this century to 3.6 degrees, said the environmental group Greenpeace — which has published two leaked versions of the document. Without significant efforts, the rise is estimated to rise as much as 11 degrees, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Following talks in Washington with Bush on May 17, Blair said he believed "it is possible that we will see action — and at least the beginnings of that action at the G-8."

James Turner, a Greenpeace spokesman, said the group was confident the leaked comments were made by a U.S. official. "The document is from a stable and trusted source," he said.

Merkel on Thursday acknowledged negotiations could be problematic. "On the international level, the array of interests is more contradictory," she said. "I don't yet know, if there will be a success in Heiligendamm," where the G-8 summit is being held.

Comments Greenpeace attributed to U.S. officials said the White House had "never agreed to any of the climate language present" in the draft communique.

"We have tried to 'tread lightly' but there is only so far we can go given our fundamental opposition to the German position," read the comments.

Germany's minister for the environment, Sigmar Gabriel, warned in remarks released Saturday that the U.S. stance could create problems for successful talks at the upcoming G-8 summit.

"Discussions will be more than difficult," Gabriel told the Frankfurter Allgemeine's Sunday edition. "Although many in the USA would like to see a different policy toward global warming, the administration in Washington has not embraced this movement. For that reason, success in Heiligendamm will be very difficult."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 57 Comments
by socrates392 May 28, 2007 4:24 AM EDT
"Canada is the greatest polluter of the Great Lakes, they also emit higher levels of greenhouse gases than us."

Posted by janem4 at 10:02 AM : May 27, 2007

Huh? Care to back up your ravings with some sort documentation?
Reply to this comment
by rickstas May 27, 2007 8:55 PM EDT
Ralph Nader was right - Bush is a corporation masquerading as a human being.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 May 27, 2007 7:32 PM EDT
I know the world has changed over years. I have noticed it. We used have pretty blue sky that is not seen today. It is hazy. Cars every where. There were few cars years ago. People took care of their things. Then they came up with throw away /use it once and toss. That became a problem.
I never had children. I do think the human race needs to have less children,learn to be a one car household.I can hear the buts coming. I think sanctions on the rich would be in order and the US of A should to step upto the plate and do her part. The sanctions would hurt the poor the worse. Her leaders know this but don't care. They will whine when it is too late to turn back from the damages. Noney and greed.
Reply to this comment
by younastybw May 27, 2007 2:28 PM EDT
The U.S. is a big joke. Our government talks big about global warming, but, when it comes time to show and prove, we puzzy out. It's all about big business. The Republicans are hand in hand with big business. They don't want to spend the money or lose the money improving the environment. Big business are Republicans buggest supporters. So they stand by their sides.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 May 27, 2007 2:04 PM EDT
The naysayers on this thread are the same type of people that long ago vehemently argued that the world was flat and that the sun revolved around the planet.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet May 27, 2007 10:56 AM EDT
Anyone who can't see that our enviroment is changing and is doing so at an accelerated rate isn't looking. We can not just sit back and watch as the earth turns hot and we are faced with terrible results. I know fascist hate change and they can not deal with change that does NOT fit their ideals and beliefs but that isn't new. We must elect people with the ability to addapt and adjust, not people who will just turn their heads and deny the problem exist. Sieg Heil Y'all.
Reply to this comment
by acauble1 May 27, 2007 6:13 AM EDT
President Bush will never never never never never ever sign or support ANYTHING...

...that harms, reduces, or threatens...









...the profits of his corporate doners/friends.
Reply to this comment
by acauble1 May 27, 2007 6:00 AM EDT
Not an immediate solution, but now, more than ever, stopping the massive growth of population worldwide will reduce consumers of environmentally unsafe products, & detrimental destruction/overbuilding.
2 parents - just 2 children, NOW!!

Contact www.PopulationConnection.org .
Posted by Trojanny at 11:20 PM : May 26, 2007
........

First, to all Christians and other religious folk...

...when your holy book says something like, "be fruitful and multiply."

Us educated people say to all of you, "BE MINDFUL AND PLUG IT UP!"

Second,

Watch the movie called: "Idiocracy"

Even though it's a satirical commedy, the move accurately predicts the future of the United States within 50 years.
Reply to this comment
by ne_patriot7 May 27, 2007 5:18 AM EDT
I think the G8 should become the G7 by kicking out the US... then they can proceed with a responsible treaty on reducing emissions causing global warming... and when the US fails to comply, hit us with sanctions...

Bush has not been bashful about championing sanctions against everyone else when they refuse to kowtow to his whims..

Let's face it... as long as this arrogant, stupid, son ofa b*tch we call a president and his corporate whoring Republicans are still in office... nothing will be progressing forward in this country or the world for that matter... only regression, calamity, terror, murder and sh*tting on the little guy... that's what this administration is good for...



Reply to this comment
by trojanny May 27, 2007 2:20 AM EDT
Not an immediate solution, but now, more than ever, stopping the massive growth of population worldwide will reduce consumers of environmentally unsafe products, & detrimental destruction/overbuilding.
2 parents - just 2 children, NOW!!

Contact www.PopulationConnection.org .
Reply to this comment
See all 57 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook