Life For Killing Boy Who Tread On Lawn
Ohio Man Sentenced In Shooting Of 15-Year-Old Who Crossed His Yard
-
Photo
Larry Mugrage is shown in an undated yearbook photo. (AP Photo/The Cincinnati Enquirer)
-
Interactive
Guns In America
State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.
-
Interactive
Crime Beat
Statistics and specifics on crime in America.
Charles Martin, 67, must serve 18 years before he can be considered for parole, Clermont County Common Pleas Judge William Walker ordered, adding that he would urge that Martin never be considered for parole.
The man was convicted last month of murder in the March 2006 shotgun killing of 15-year-old Larry Mugrage Jr., a high school freshman.
Martin told the court he was sorry the shooting occurred but said the teen knew how much Martin cared for his lawn and provoked him.
"He stepped on it and he walked 40 feet through it," Martin said. "I cared about it. I cut it every five days."
Prosecutors said Martin had confronted the teen earlier in the day when he walked into Martin's yard on his way to a friend's house, then loaded his .410-gauge shotgun and waited more than three hours for him to return.
When the boy stepped on the lawn again, Martin fired at him twice, according to testimony. He then called 911, telling a dispatcher: "I just killed a kid."
Martin was tried on aggravated murder but convicted of murder, a lesser count, because jurors because could not agree the killing was planned.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 127 CommentsI know defiant 15 to 21 year olds who Love to provoke people.
Certainly what this Man did was criminal and he needs to pay the price but this defiant youth who provoked him also paid a price he did not expect for provoking the Man.
He Paid with his life!
Posted by animalfarm2
What is the point of your question?
jurors could not agree the killing was planned?
he waited for over three hours with a loaded shotgun to talk to him?
Thats what happens when kids arent disciplined and adults are antagonized... I dont agree with it ... but ... thats what happens.
Teach kids to respect adults and other peoples space.
I didn't know this kid and I bet none of you did either, so maybe you shouldn't assume he was an obnoxious disrespectful punk kid that got what was coming to him.
a crazy old man shot him for walking accross his yard and as far as we know it was the second time he had done it.
Gun control nuts often claim that self defense laws will be used to justify this kind of killing, and as you clearly see in this case, it is not true.
Posted by cathaleen at 11:02 AM : May 25, 2007
He could be dead by knive or bow or car or god knows how many means could be used. To say that only firearms can be used to kill is moronic.
*waited more than three hours for him to return*
Clearly this guy waited to kill the boy, and would have used whatever means required.
yeah, and if this kid wasnt a punk #sshole he'd be alive, whose to say he coulnt have beat him with a four iron. This isnt about guns. Years ago, that kid would have been clocked, and and rightfully so. Now a days, kids act like jerks, their parents dont care, and if you do anything, your gonna get sued. We need to stop coddling kids and go back to beating them.
This teenager was just being an unruly teenager and the old man should have went to his parents and complained to them first. If that didn't work call police. This old man sounds like he let his compulsive disorder take charge and now many people are paying the price.
The fact that you think this is fodder for some type of highbrow discussion disturbs me more than the incident. If this isn't well beyond your limits of rationality, THAT might explain what this "civilization" has come to.
I'm disappointed at how little reading it took. We can probably all agree (or at least those of us over 20), that most teenagers are ***** with legs attached. However, to kill one of them over a well tended lawn, (or toi defend it) has got to be the height of insanity.
I'm, fearful that people like him (and you) actually exist in this world.
USA gives anyone a gun and then senseless stuff like this happens.
That's exactly what I was thinking jetlizhan...
Maybe this kid was provoking him, but he was just that, a kid. This guy was a full grown adult. Provoked or not, there's absolutely no reason to shoot someone for something so petty.
That is their choice. I have no choice about their being my relative. Let Judge Judy embarrass them on national TV. Keep the guns in the gun store.
I think the guy was wrong; however there is a time when his actions would be warranted. It is a matter of where do you draw the line. How about if the kid had walked up to the porch, or thrown a rock would the gentleman then be justified? How about a BB gun, a pellet gun or a 22? The best place to draw the line is at the sidewalk. So maybe he wasn't wrong. I really think if it was my child, the man overreacted, and if it was my grandfather, he was right.
Have fun with the discussion.
Posted by AllahRaghead at 11:22 AM : May 25, 2007"
What's the matter, AllahRaghead ... did Daddy touch you in the bad place? Did mommy not like you?
You are one twisted ***. Shooting a kid to death for walking on your lawn is "a bit extreme"?
I'd hate to see what you would consider really over the top. Just your nickname alone kind of shows you as an a$$ ... then your post confirms it.
Didn't he sit there for three huors with a shotgun waiting for the boy to return ?? And then shoot him ??
Maybe he was sleep walking.
I agree with "Jimibear'.
I hope he gets what he deserves in prison. A little yard justice.
I have no argument with the man (pre-felony conviction) having a gun to defend his home. His error was in shooting someone who was no threat to him or his home. It's clearly a case of over-reaction and doesn't reflect gun owners nationwide.
Posted by i_am_emac at 11:21 AM : May 25, 2007
This is the truth....
WHAT KIND OF KID CAUSES AN ALTERCATION WITH A 67 YR OLD MAN ANYWAY?
The old man was probably scared of the kid.. how big is the old man.. how big is the kid... the kid is already encroaching on his property with blatant disrespect... dam... not saying it was right but the old man is not Adolf Hitler reincarnated.
I'll be watching the news to see when you kill some poor kid for walking on your lawn, pudd54. You show nearly as much disregard for human life as the convicted murderer in the story.
There is no defense I am a gun owner and I would not have done this. I would have called the cops in this case he was 15 years old and there was no danger involved.
Being stupid does not warrent death.
The man treasured his lawn and the kid knew it and was disrespectful and antagonizing the man... it is sad that it ended this way though.
Someone brought out a good point, 15yo gets into an argument with a 67 yo man about trespassing and three hours later comes back, sees the guy with a gun, and trespasses again. Sounds like Darwinism at its best.
I don't know if the kid was provoking the old man, or just being a thoughtless kid going about his business without regard to others, and being a little lazy cutting through yards to get where he was going. Either way he was very slightly in the wrong.
On the other hand the old man was very much in the wrong. His reaction was not proportional to the threat. The perfect punishment for him should he ever be paroled would be for him to tend the grass on the boy's grave, for the rest of his life.
I am not for banning guns, but I believe in reasonable laws regulating responsibility for your actions and ensuring minimum safety standards. Although I don't know what gun law could have helped here. He was using a weapon easily defended as one commonly used for hunting, not one just for mass killing such as an automatic. He had plenty of time to get and load the weapon [yes some indication of premediatation!], so laws about locking up unused weapons and/or storing the ammo separately would not have helped. I wonder if there was any history in the old man's history that would have shown up in a background check. Maybe something as simple as a recommendation he take an anger management class.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 127 Comments