May 23, 2007

Shark Gives Birth Without A Father

Scientists Add Hammerheads To List Of Species Able To Reproduce Without Male Help

  • A hammerhead shark that swims in a large tank at the Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta in this Oct. 27, 2005, file photo. This is the same species of shark scientists now say can reproduce asexually.

    A hammerhead shark that swims in a large tank at the Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta in this Oct. 27, 2005, file photo. This is the same species of shark scientists now say can reproduce asexually.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

  • Photo Essay Animal Instincts

    Photos: Take a gander at some of our favorite critters.

  • In The Spotlight Pet Planet

    Learn more about caring for your pet and see some wacky video.

(CBS/AP)  Female sharks can fertilize their own eggs and give birth without sperm from males, according to a new study of the asexual reproduction of a hammerhead in a U.S. zoo.

The joint Northern Ireland-U.S. research, being published Wednesday in the Royal Society's peer-reviewed Biology Letter journal, analyzed the DNA of a shark born in 2001 in the Henry Doorly Zoo in Omaha, Neb. The shark was born in a tank with three potential mothers, none of whom had contact with a male hammerhead for at least three years.

The baby was killed within hours of its birth by a stingray in the same tank. Analysis of its DNA found no trace of any chromosomal contribution from a male partner.

Fatherless birth by animals is known as parthenogenesis, derived from the Greek words for "virgin birth."

CBS News science and technology correspondent Daniel Sieberg reports parthenogenesis has been documented in reptiles, amphibians and birds previously, but experts said this was the first confirmed case in a shark (audio).

Asexual reproduction is also common in some insect species. It has never been documented in mammals. The list of animals documented as capable of the feat has grown along with the numbers being raised in captivity — but until now, sharks were not considered a likely candidate.

"The findings were really surprising because as far as anyone knew, all sharks reproduced only sexually by a male and female mating, requiring the embryo to get DNA from both parents for full development, just like in mammals," said marine biologist Paulo Prodohl of Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, a co-author of the report.

"As is typical with scientists, we doubted our own results and so we did it again, and then a third time using a new technique with new genetic approaches. This confirmed there was no DNA of any male," said Prodohl, an expert in fish genetics with specific knowledge of hammerhead DNA.

Before the study, many shark experts had presumed that the Nebraska birth involved a female shark's well-documented ability to store sperm for months. This seemed the most plausible scenario even though the sharks had arrived at the Nebraska zoo as immature pups.

The lack of any paternal DNA in the baby shark ruled out this possibility.

"This phenomenon has now been demonstrated in all major vertebrate groups except for mammals. Birds do it, reptiles do it, amphibians do it, fishes do it, and now sharks are known to do it," said Bob Hueter, director of the Center for Shark Research at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla., who was not involved in the project.

The report's other co-author, Mahmood Shivji of the Guy Harvey Research Institute in Dania Beach, Fla., said the finding explained growing numbers of anecdotal reports of male-free shark births in captivity.

Shivji said the research "may have solved a general mystery about shark reproduction," because it suggests that sharks can "switch from a sexual to a non-sexual mode of reproduction." But he said this was not necessarily a positive ability because baby sharks produced only by the mother suffer from reduced genetic diversity.

Genetic diversity makes living creatures better able to adapt to threats, such as disease and climate change.

Prodohl said if self-impregnation was occurring in the wild because female sharks cannot find male partners amid rapidly declining shark populations, it would represent "an evolutionary dead end that compromises the survival of the species."

He said he suspected this was "already a problem in the real world," and noted the population of blue sharks off the west coast of Ireland had fallen by 90 percent in the past 12 years.

But Hueter said he doubted it was happening anywhere besides in captivity. He also argued that the power to self-impregnate represents "an evolutionary strategy to keep the population and species going when all else fails. Genetically, it's a last resort tactic because it leads to genetic uniformity, and eventually that will catch up with the population and make it less fit.

"But as a short-term alternative to extinction, it has its benefits," he said.



© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by mikealford3 May 25, 2007 2:11 AM EDT
And all this time I thought Rosie was a whale.
Reply to this comment
by ralan40 May 24, 2007 1:09 PM EDT
This has been known for years. They even mention the incident in 2001 and that it is common in other non-mammals.
So why is this a surprize???

I can't wait to read the story about the earth being round...
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2007 9:30 AM EDT
WOW!

SO THATS HOW MARY CHENEY DID IT?
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat May 24, 2007 2:12 AM EDT
Too bad the baby shark was killed. He just might be the shark messiah they've been waiting for.
Posted by incog-nito at 07:08 PM : May 23, 2007

- a very powerful one. No Armageddon, nope. Too bad! LOL
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito May 23, 2007 10:08 PM EDT
Too bad the baby shark was killed. He just might be the shark messiah they've been waiting for.
Reply to this comment
by mkbjon May 23, 2007 8:34 PM EDT
All you guys are crazy, lol.
Reply to this comment
by mkbjon May 23, 2007 8:30 PM EDT
The stingray did it and was so ashamed he did "what a stingray has got to do."
Posted by johnpatrick9 at 02:22 PM : May 23, 2007


LOL, johnpatrick9
Reply to this comment
by DBdweeb May 23, 2007 8:04 PM EDT
The title is misleading. ALL sharks give birth without fathers. The news is that a female shark was impregnated without a male shark. Don't you guys have editors?
Reply to this comment
by johnpatrick9 May 23, 2007 5:22 PM EDT
The stingray did it and was so ashamed he did "what a stingray has got to do."
Reply to this comment
by extremophil May 23, 2007 4:59 PM EDT
Of course the little guy had a father. He just left town before anyone saw him.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings May 23, 2007 4:35 PM EDT

I assume that since no male shark was involved, the pup had to be female? I hope women don't figure out how to do this or us guys are extinct...
Reply to this comment
by downtowner97 May 23, 2007 4:30 PM EDT
And lo three wise men came to see the baby shark but found he had already been eaten by a stingray, so they took their gifts and went to the museum snack bar for elephant ears and lemonade.
Reply to this comment
by bmlott27 May 23, 2007 3:58 PM EDT
Christ Shark???
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: