May 23, 2007

If Gonzales Won't Leave, Force Him Out

The Nation: Impeaching The Attorney General Is Congress' Best Option

  • Play CBS Video Video Alberto Gonzales' Future

    Bob Schieffer talks to Senators Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Arlen Specter, R-Penn., about whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will resign.

  • Video Gonzales' House Testimony

    CBS News RAW: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the firing of eight U.S. attorneys. He defended his actions as head of the Justice Department.

  • Video Bush: Gonzales Is Staying

    President Bush reiterated his confidence in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, calling him "an honest, honorable man." Gonzales is under fire for the firing of 8 U.S. attorneys. Jim Axelrod has more.

  • Who's Who Firings Firestorm

    Justice Department at center of controversy over firing of eight U.S. attorneys.

  • Interactive Bush Presidency

    The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.

(The Nation)  This column was written by John Nichols.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has lied so many times and in so many circumstances that he now finds himself lying about the lies.

All of his deceptive statements have been uttered in an official capacity, many of them under oath.

But as lawless as his language has been, the actions of the attorney general may well be the more serious of his high crimes and misdemeanors. Indeed, the worst crime of Alberto Gonzales may be that — with the revelations about his ghoulish visit to the sickbed of his constitutionally-inclined predecessor — this attorney general has actually forced millions of Americans to wrap their heads around the notion that John Ashcroft may have been, at least by comparison, a good guy.

What this all adds up to is the most sordid circumstance of a sitting Cabinet member since Albert Bacon Fall, Warren's Harding's Secretary of the Interior, tried to talk his way out of the Teapot Dome scandal. Fall was notoriously "so crooked they had to screw him into the ground" when he died.

With Gonzales, it is hard to say whether he is crooked or delusional, or both.

But one thing is certain: The attorney general's determination to cling to his office at this point marks him as a man who poses a threat not merely to his own reputation but to the Department of Justice, which is degenerating into crisis as top administrators exit at an alarming rate, and to the rule of law in America.

George Bush, who has been linked to many if not all of the scandals that have so vexed Gonzales, is not about to ask his former White House counsel to vacate his current digs at Justice.

So it falls to Congress to act. And while a proposed Senate vote of "no confidence" might finally tip the balance against Gonzales, it is certainly appropriate to prepare for the next act of the sorry soap opera that the attorney general's tenure has become.

The founders established clear procedures for impeaching members of the Cabinet. "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors," reads Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution.

No serious scholar of the original intent of the authors of the essential document of the American experiment would question that the seemingly vague "high crimes and misdemeanors" section refers to precisely the sort of deceptive and destructive activities in which Gonzales has engaged. There is simply no question that lying to Congress is an impeachable offense, and there is every reason to believe that rendering the department you head fully dysfunctional should be.

The national activist group Democracy for America, working in conjunction with Robert Greenwald's Brave New Films operation, has launched a campaign to: "Impeach Gonzales and restore accountability and ethical leadership to the United States Justice Department." This is a classic "it's-about-time" development.

As Democracy for America chair Jim Dean says, "Americans around the country are standing up to voice opposition to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and his politicization of the Department of Justice," Our message is clear: Impeach Gonzales."

Within a day of the launch of the campaign, more than 40,000 Americans had already signed the online petition to impeach Gonzales, which will eventually be forwarded to members of Congress. The number of signers will rise exponentially as Greenwald's devastating series of YouTube reviews of the attorney general's incredible explanations for his actions — overlaid with the words "false" and "perjury" — makes the rounds on the internet. The videos are debuting at the new www.impeachgonzales.org.

As Democracy for America says: "Impeachment puts everything back on the table. Illegal domestic eavesdropping, illegally deleted government e-mails, voter suppression, signing statements, torture recommendations, you name it — if Gonzales had his fingerprints on it, Congress will shine the spotlight at it."

The "on the table" reference is to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's declaration that impeachment is "off the table." Up to now, Pelosi's pronouncement has kept a lot of national groups from uttering the "I" word. But no more.

Democracy for America and Greenwald are not putting impeachment on the table; Alberto Gonzales did that when he lied to Congress and the American people. But Democracy for America and Greenwald are giving the American people an opportunity to demand that Congress get serious about holding an errant executive branch to account.

Greenwald recognizes the genius of impeachment when he says, "President Bush will not fire the Attorney General, but the American people can call for his Impeachment."

Impeachment was always intended to be an organic process of the American republic. The wisest of the founders, fresh from waging revolutionary war against a lawless King George, never imagined that the impeachment and trial of errant executives would be a dull bureaucratic procedure carried out in the cloistered halls of Congress. It was supposed to be an official response to a popular call for accountability.

The call is being issued. And the greater its volume, the greater will be the likelihood that this battered republic will be rescued not merely from the dark interregnum that is the Bush era but from the misguided notion that a president and his appointees can govern as regally as did the kings of old.


By John Nichols
Reprinted with permission from the The Nation.



If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns

Video and Galleries from Opinion

Add a Comment See all 50 Comments
by observantx May 23, 2007 4:50 PM EDT

Little Georgie will never tell his lapdog Alberto to leave.

He has been all too useful in his campaign to undermine the basic concept of government that this nation has observed and exercised since the Constitution was ratified.

We need to pry this craven stooge out of George's grasp and dropkick him over the White House fence.

Congress stands by and murmurs disapproval. Boy, what a strategy. Everyone who reads this column needs to sign the petition and then badger their Senator and Representatives to get rid of this little thug.

All this is in preparation for getting rid of the thugs higher up the food chain.

Do it now. I'm doing it right now after I submit this.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 May 23, 2007 5:16 PM EDT
Considering how "spineless" the Democrats have been on issues like the Iraq war bill, I am willing to bet that after all the dust settles on Gonzogate, that absolutely nothing is going to happen to Gonzo, and if some Congressmen/women want a "No confidence" vote on him, Bush will just refuse to accept it and call it "irrelevant", like he called Jimmy Carter. Let's face it people, the average American doesn't matter anymore, there's no hope for change in direction in government, so we may as well get used to Bush and the Republicans staying in power for life and we will all have to march in step with him or march to Gitmo. HEIL, BUSH!
Reply to this comment
by johnpatrick9 May 23, 2007 5:32 PM EDT
Just treat the toady with the disrespect he so richly deserves and he will go. How thick can his skin be??? Uh-oh ! People like this have no character and so their is nothing to address here but a braindead "functionairre." Amazing how all societies can produce these automatons to do the "dirty deeds" for their masters.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 May 23, 2007 5:40 PM EDT
Impeach Gonzo, then Rove, then Cheney and finally dubya. Sounds like a plan to me.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 23, 2007 6:17 PM EDT
Not to shock you, but nobody cares about this. With the possible exception of the liberals in Congress and in the media (The Nation, etc.). Really. Nobody could give a rat's arse about the firings of 9 lawyers. In fact, I would argue that many Americans would applaud the idea of lawyers being out of a job. But that's beside the point. The point is that this is becoming the Dumbocrats' Whitewater investigation. Lots of time and money spent, and for nothing. This is why the new Congress is less popular than even the President in the most recent poll I've seen.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 May 23, 2007 6:27 PM EDT
mike71067 it is not the firing the 9 attornies that people care about. It is what is behind that. The hiring of incompetents, the deliberately politicizing the justice dept, the law breaking. The Bill of Rights, seperation of powers.

The complete disregard for what this country is suppose to stand for. And yes, that is something a lot of people care about.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 23, 2007 6:37 PM EDT
mike71067 it is not the firing the 9 attornies that people care about. It is what is behind that. The hiring of incompetents, the deliberately politicizing the justice dept, the law breaking. The Bill of Rights, seperation of powers."
-Posted by clestes at 03:27 PM : May 23, 2007

Again, nobody cares about this. Most Americans believe there are more important things that Congress should be working to fix - and they're not. Thus, that is why their approval ratings are below Bush's.
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 23, 2007 7:55 PM EDT
It's okay to impeach Gonzales for lying under oath but not Clinton? Such double standards here.
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 23, 2007 8:08 PM EDT
Alright, I would like to know exactly what he lied about under oath? The writer makes claims here but doesn't specifically state what Gonzales did wrong. Typical democratic ***...they love to use the word LIE.
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit May 23, 2007 9:51 PM EDT
Americans do care - although with so many scandals, so much this administration is doing to destroy America and all our fathers have fought for, it's hard paying proper attention to all of them. All the same, this attempt to corrupt the entire justice branch of our government is not some little thing that we don't care about!
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 23, 2007 10:17 PM EDT
Americans do care - although with so many scandals, so much this administration is doing to destroy America and all our fathers have fought for, it's hard paying proper attention to all of them.
Posted by SusanHelit at 06:51 PM : May 23, 2007

What scandals? Try as they may, the dems haven't pinned anything on this administration. It's all rhetoric. Be specific if you can instead of regurgitating the nonsense that's being fed to you from the 5:00 news.
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit May 23, 2007 10:43 PM EDT
Part 2:
Then there's the only one that has gotten through the court system - the exposure of a covert mission, cover business and agent in order to try to maintain the lie of nuclear WMD - that's like 3 or 4 separate scandals - treason to expose the agent herself. Treason to go one step further and expose the cover business our agencies were using for our intelligence gathering. The lies told trying to cover up who committed this treason. Then there's the pure fact that all this was done to attempt to discredit a completely accurate report, requested by Cheney of the CIA, about whether or not there was any evidence of a nuclear purchase - so it's all part of the worst one...

The lies of WMD to get us into a war! This here is also several scandals - not only the pointless deaths of our soldiers, not only the discrediting of our nation internationally, not only giving AlQueda a new home while eliminating one of their enemies (Saddam - no good guy, but he didn't like AlQueda), but worst of all, distracting us, taking soldiers and effort away from our true enemy, still happily home in Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden!
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit May 23, 2007 10:45 PM EDT
What scandals? Let's start with the outright lies told to Congress. Now I can't tell you which is a lie, because Gonzales has fed Congress several different stories about how involved he was, how many prosecutors were considered for firing, and why they were fired. So, which is the lie? I don't know, I just know that some of them are, because they contradict each other.

Now those lies are to cover up another scandal - firing prosecutors based on political considerations - a very serious crime called obstruction of justice, and part of what took Nixon down.

And in investigating this, we've just found another scandal - hiring prosecutors based on political allegiance - a clearly defined, illegal, no-no.
(continued in Part 2)
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 23, 2007 11:02 PM EDT
Where's part one? Look, as I have said, non of this has been proven. Saddam used WMD's on the Kurds and that's a FACT. Everything you have stated is purely speculation. The witch hunt of a trial that you speak of fell apart, FACT.

WMD's were used so what's the lie? The UN gave Saddam plenty of time to get the weapons out of the country; at least 2 months. It's foolish to think that he didn't take advantage of that. Believe what you will.
Reply to this comment
by johnshaft4 May 23, 2007 11:34 PM EDT
As Bush's chief henchman in Texas, Gonzo oversaw the executions of many poeple. What's good for the goose, is good for the gander. Execute this pig.
Reply to this comment
by aaabee-2009 May 23, 2007 11:48 PM EDT
katg21, hey you ever read Ann Coulter? She is over on Human Events. Your positions seem to be similar to hers.



Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 May 24, 2007 12:16 AM EDT
Pelosi said impeachment is off the table.

With the crimes this administration done impeachment should be all over the table.

If she won't do her job throw her asss out. Does bush cheney gonzales have to get a bj before she would put it on the table?
Pelosi is not representing the people that put her there.
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 24, 2007 12:32 AM EDT
katg21, hey you ever read Ann Coulter? She is over on Human Events. Your positions seem to be similar to hers.




Posted by AaaBee at 08:48 PM : May 23, 2007

Haven't read her books but have seen her on the news, very smart woman. The dems hate her so she must make sense.
Reply to this comment
by cruzn66 May 24, 2007 1:37 AM EDT
katg21

Life in wonderland must be good for you!! Do the neocons send you your own pair of rose-colored glasses, or did you make them all for yourself? If the folks on this blog have to point out the obvious to you, then there is nothing anyone can say here which will make you see differently. And if you think this administration has worked to make life better for tha average american, then get out of the mall, put down the cell phone, park the SUV, and take a ggod, close look at what is happening to the numbers of children who continue to fall inot poverty, lack adequate health care, and fall victim to abusive adults. Yes Congress can legislate, and for 6 years the Republicans ruled Washington. Take a close look beyond your own life and then tell me that GW and company have led America on the right path!
Reply to this comment
by texmexborderswimmer May 24, 2007 1:38 AM EDT
The least they should do is Impeach Gonzales, for swimming the Rio Grand.
Reply to this comment
by trillion1 May 24, 2007 3:19 AM EDT
When I read the posts of those pathetically trying to defend bush, gonzo, rummy, #erkoff It's plain to see how far the right has fallen and with each of those posts they give more proof.
Reply to this comment
by xzavierbrown May 24, 2007 3:37 AM EDT
The DNC has to grow some *b*alls as big as Rosie O'donnel before they can do anything.
Reply to this comment
by xzavierbrown May 24, 2007 3:45 AM EDT
is this what liberals voted for?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/23/the_skinny/main2840951.shtml

next time look for a party that actually has the gutts..

Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk May 24, 2007 4:50 AM EDT
Is it illegal to fire someone for political reasons, or just unpopular?

Federal Marshals are fired and hired based on administration changes all the time.

What happened is not popular, but not illegal.
It happened often in the Clinton administration.

Get some perspective. Janet Reno made mistakes and kids were burned alive at Waco. Gonzales makes a mistakes and a few lawyers are unemployed for a few weeks.

I think Gonzales should say, "Yeah, I did it some, and I'm glad I did it. My only regret is that I could not out do Janet Reno."

Get over it. If there is no crime, all the investigation will achieve is to get a guy to admit he did something people don't like, but that the Democrats did even worse.
Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk May 24, 2007 6:04 AM EDT
Fact:

Janet Reno supervised the following Department of Justice action:

The firing of all 93 U.S. attorneys, about which she commented, "I have asked for their resignations at the request of the President%u2026"
Reply to this comment
by r9119111 May 24, 2007 6:43 AM EDT
I am an Independent Voter and I will remain that way. I shall never vote again for a Republican again after being exposed to their eloquent line of B.S..
Reply to this comment
by socrates392 May 24, 2007 6:49 AM EDT
Prelgovisk,

The firing issue aside, what do you have to say about Gonzales' role in authorizing the wiretapping of innocent Americans' telephones?
I was horrified when I heard that Gonzales had
even attempted to force Ashcroft into signing an authorization for even more invasive spying while on his hospital bed! How disgraceful! Behavior like that is clearly immoral and should be illegal, even if it isn't.

Besides, I thought the Republicans were the party of personal accountibility?! Gonzales admits no accountibility. He can't even remember what he had for breakfast yesterday, let alone his reasons for firing federal attorneys! He's a liability. I hope congress impeaches him and anyone else who tramples on the constitution like he has.
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa May 24, 2007 6:50 AM EDT
Illegal Wiretapping.

Lying under oath.

Torture.

Not doing his job.

Cover ups. The attorney firing scandal is the least of the illegal activity coming out of the Department of Injustice. Remember, this guy is in charge of the FBI, SS, and the CIA. Scary.

Being a FASCIST Elitist.

Plenty of reasons to fire Gonzales. Then, Lord Bush will just hire another lackey.

There will be another 9/11. The Corporate Mass Media will LIE about who did it. We will Invade Iran. America will go into MArtial Law.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet May 24, 2007 10:15 AM EDT
Janet Reno supervised the following Department of Justice action:

The firing of all 93 U.S. attorneys, about which she commented, "I have asked for their resignations at the request of the President%u2026"
Posted by Prelgovisk at 03:04 AM : May 24, 2007

How many lies did she tell about this act? How many laws did she break with this action? Replacing the Attorneys of another President, as in this case, is and always has been acceptable. That is NOT what happened here. Gonzo is a LIAR and a Criminal PERIOD!!
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug May 24, 2007 11:01 AM EDT
Americans should at least get an Attorney General that can remember something. The least he can do is remember that he is an AMERICAN.
For now the guy is a pathetic joke.
He is an example of someone whose brain runs on the methane fumes of his boss.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 May 24, 2007 11:57 AM EDT
We should deport Gonzales to Mexico and give one illegal alien citizenship to replace him.
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 24, 2007 12:51 PM EDT
Illegal Wiretapping.

Lying under oath.

Torture.

Not doing his job.
Posted by fascistusa at 03:50 AM : May 24, 2007

- You condemn wiretapping our enemy after 9/11? Oh you think our government was listening to YOUR private conversations...please. It's their job to protect us and that's what they were doing...seems to have worked now hasn't it?

- Lying under oath...NOT PROVEN if so he would have suffered the consequences and I would have supported that. No one is above the law and Clinton learned that the hard way. ( no pun intended there)

-Torture...this one's my favorite!! Are you talking about the naked pictures at Abu Grhaib? Oh ,no forcing them to act like a dog and listen to rock music. Man that's some torture there. So much worse than what they have done to over 3,000 Americans on 9/11, to the beheadings of captured americans. Go on defend those a$$holes they really deserve it.

Not doing his job...okay, don't know what the hell you're talking about here. He did the same job that every attorney general has done in history which is fire attorneys from previous administrations. Oh, and we haven't had another attack on our soil since 9/11...it seems he's done his job.

Anything else?
Reply to this comment
by dancergal213 May 24, 2007 1:23 PM EDT
Weellll, now that Ms Monica has said the both Mr, Gonzales and Mr. McNulty gave incorrect testimony, they are guilty of purjury. Mr Gonzales attempted to discuss Ms goodling testimony with her, that is witness tampering. Now I am no attorney but I believe those are both crimes. If the Attorney General of the United States of America has no more respect for our laws that what he has shown, He Needs to be FIRED.
Reply to this comment
by yory-2009 May 24, 2007 1:25 PM EDT
fascistusa-
Don't waste your time trying to convince katg21.
Haven't you learned yet? When a republican supporter is pushed on these issues, they just move the moral line a little further. They always.... and I mean always talk about Clinton(get over it, geez) and will never see how questioning our elected leaders makes this, free country, free. IMO
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith May 24, 2007 1:46 PM EDT
the fact that there has not been anothr 911 speaks more to the overplayed capabilities of the terrorists than anything the chimp or his circus is doing.
All this shreiking about fighting em over here is playing to mouth breathers for their votes. We need a president who will pay more attention to terrorists in an intelligent manner than money for his own pockets.
Posted by ainttaken at 10:33 AM : May 24, 2007
+ report abuse

Your analysis is sooooo predictable from the LIB viewpoint. Have you considered that the President's strategy is working and THAT is why the homeland has not been attacked? Of course not. It's all Bush's fault, right?
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug May 24, 2007 2:22 PM EDT
Last I checked 911 happened during a Republican conservative christian watch.
Everything after 911 was a REACTION.
The fact that there was a 911 speaks more to the capabilities of the terrorists than anything the Prez or his circus did before 911.
Reply to this comment
by jjp735i May 24, 2007 2:31 PM EDT
Those in office only want to keep their jobs.
Those in office know that to keep that job all they really have to do is hold hearings, find nothing wrong and move on.

How do they know this? Because we keep voting in the same type of people time after time after time.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 May 24, 2007 3:06 PM EDT
"Anything else?
Posted by katg21 at 09:51 AM : May 24, 2007"

Not hiring attorneys or firing attorneys because of political affiliation is a felony.

Acording to Ms. Goodlings testimony that's exactly what she did under Gonzos direction.

It's nice to know that you are at least consistant in supporting felons.



Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk May 24, 2007 3:58 PM EDT
Fact:

Janet Reno supervised the following Department of Justice action:

The firing of all 93 U.S. attorneys, about which she commented, "I have asked for their resignations at the request of the President"

Get some perspective. Janet Reno made mistakes and kids were burned alive at Waco. Gonzales makes a mistakes and a few lawyers are unemployed for a few weeks.
Reply to this comment
by r9119111 May 24, 2007 4:11 PM EDT
Doing the Republican Twist, Prelgovisk? We're not talking about Reno, we're talking about AG Gonzales. I suspect he'll resign shortly, and for good reason.
Reply to this comment
by May 24, 2007 4:33 PM EDT
Gonzales, poster boy for corrupt administration who was given a plumb position because he could be counted upon to be a lackey for his boss who has no concept of the rule of law. Gonzales is Bush's stooge in the Justice Department and Bush claims his AG has done nothing wrong because he is too shallow to understand that illegal, unethical behavior by an attorney general undermines the well being of a democracy.
Reply to this comment
by juliemd May 24, 2007 5:01 PM EDT
Fact:
Gonzales is a weasel. Don't even attempt to compare his and this administration's corrupt, stupid, evil-doing with anything during the Reno/Clintion Admins. You are lying to yourself and it is obvious.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 May 24, 2007 5:48 PM EDT
Reno never tried to obstruct justice and change the justice system to suit the Pres.and the administration. He is getting away with it and the Pres loves this scoundrel who is a disgrace to this country. What does he care we are only Americans and the whole world is watching .The Pres. calls this Political theatre I call it and him very sad.
Reply to this comment
by jonny_chaos May 24, 2007 6:02 PM EDT
i think we deserve these clowns. What does it say, when those that can read and think beyond the surface are ridiculed? the basis of our democracy requires literate and knowledgeable citizens. the fact most Americans are unable to feed themselves correctly and expect someone to protect them shows that its a nation of children. bush and company are the perfect leaders for a society too stupid and lazy to think. personally, i wouldn%u2019t trust these clowns to be able to identify the enemy. So, I assume the wiretap all of us. Most of the people were fighting in iraq just don%u2019t like being occupied. Americans should understand this desire not to be occupied. What were doing in the world today is commonly known as in stepping on your d.i.c.k. or *** the pooch. but it would require thinking to see we may not always be right and that requires being more than a reactionary selfish child who expects Jesus to save them. thing is, everything that the so called %u201CChristians%u201D in office advance would give Jesus hives. right up until they crucified him again. Peace and loving your enimies, that requires work. bombing and following the crowd is simple. As far as torture and eavesdropping, were supposed to be better than that as a society. Same as adultery, thievery, lying, cheating, etc. if you dont agree, don%u2019t vote, the Electoral College was formed to protect us from the uneducated masses.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 May 24, 2007 11:37 PM EDT
Prelgovisk......Bravo! Tell it like it is. Janet Reno should not have been eligible for the AG post after being caught in the backseat of a car with an underaged girl by a Florida State Trooper. Isnt that against the law?..... You see, they have two standards of judgement. Liberal for them and by the book for conservatives. This is what these hearings are for to see if AG Gonzales broke a law. So far all they have is just what they started with......Their hatred for him.
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 24, 2007 11:52 PM EDT
fascistusa-
Don't waste your time trying to convince katg21.
Haven't you learned yet? When a republican supporter is pushed on these issues, they just move the moral line a little further. They always.... and I mean always talk about Clinton(get over it, geez) and will never see how questioning our elected leaders makes this, free country, free. IMO
Posted by Yory at 10:25 AM : May 24, 2007

Where did I bring up Clinton? Ainttaken asked me a question about him and I answered. GEEZ, you democrats!
Reply to this comment
by katg21 May 24, 2007 11:56 PM EDT
It's nice to know that you are at least consistant in supporting felons.




Posted by taddles at 12:06 PM : May 24, 2007

I have said, Mr. Taddles, that if it is PROVEN that he did something illegal then I would support impeachment. Has it been proven? NO, just your wishful thinking.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 May 25, 2007 12:32 AM EDT
I would like to make another point. A good boss expects a full days work for a full days pay. These attornies did not want to pursue the bosses wishes and were let go.....If you still think that this is out of the norm,......why dont you go to work tomorrow and just do what you feel like doing from now on...... I dare you...... I TRIPLE DOG DARE YOU! LOL
Reply to this comment
by texmexborderswimmer May 25, 2007 1:52 AM EDT
omega39 Thats Bushies defence he has people who CRS(can't remember sh t).
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 May 25, 2007 2:01 AM EDT
mpmike.....Dont forget Hitlery could'nt "recall" a few things too. They ALL play that game.
Reply to this comment
See all 50 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs