February 11, 2009 4:49 PM

Baghdad Market Blast Kills 25

(CBS/AP)  A parked car bomb ripped through a packed outdoor market in southwestern Baghdad on Tuesday morning, killing 25 people and injuring 60 others, police said.

The deadly blast occurred in the Shiite-dominated neighborhood of Amil, damaging a nearby medical center and other buildings and setting cars on fire, police said.

The neighborhood has seen an increase in violence in recent weeks, and Sunni politicians have expressed fears that Amil was witnessing a resumption of sectarian cleansing by Shiite militiamen.

Meanwhile, a military spokesman said Tuesday that U.S. soldiers had raided suspected safehouses near the Euphrates River south of Baghdad in their search for three captured comrades.

But the spokesman says soldiers found the safehouses empty after the militants were apparently tipped off and fled.

It's the latest in a series of frustrations for exhausted U.S. troops hunting for any sign of the missing soldiers, who haven't been seen since a May 12th assault on an outpost by insurgents linked to al Qaeda. Four other Americans and an Iraqi soldier died in the attack.

The military spokesman says 27 airborne operations have been staged during the widespread search in an effort to gain the element of surprise and to avoid roadside bombs.

(CBS)
Tuesday's market blast came amid a 3-month-old U.S. and Iraqi security crackdown, meant to flush out insurgents and restore order to the capital. U.S. military officials said that insurgent groups, feeling the pressure from the crackdown, have fought back by carrying out more car bombings targeting civilians with devastating death tolls.

Earlier, in the nearby Khadra neighborhood, gunmen in two cars ambushed a civilian car carrying three plainclothes police officers from the major crimes unit, killing two and wounding the third, police said.

Police and other Iraqi security officers have been targeted by insurgents, who accuse them of collaborating with U.S.-led forces in the country.

Another police officer was killed when a roadside bomb exploded next to a police patrol driving through an eastern Baghdad neighborhood about 9 a.m., police said. Three other officers were injured in the attack.

In other developments:

  • A few minutes before the bombing in Amil, gunmen in two cars drove through the nearby Khadra neighborhood and ambushed a civilian car carrying three plainclothes police officers from the major crimes unit, killing two and wounding the third, police said.

  • Another police officer was killed when a roadside bomb exploded next to a police patrol driving through an eastern Baghdad neighborhood, police said. Three other officers were wounded in the attack.

  • In the Sunni-dominated Waziriya neighborhood in northern Baghdad, gunmen disguised as soldiers set up a fake checkpoint and stopped a minibus bringing college students to the Shiite neighborhood of Sadr City. The militants killed five of the students and wounded six others, police said.

  • Later Tuesday, two mortar shells slammed into a teacher's college affiliated with Baghdad University, killing three students and injuring seven others, police said. And in the Baghdad neighborhood of Dora, a sniper shot two civilians, killing one and wounding the other, police said.

    In Washington, after weeks of refusing to back down to President Bush on setting a timetable on the Iraq war, House Democratic leaders soon will be in the awkward position of explaining to members why they feel they must.

    Party officials said Monday the next war spending bill most likely will fund military operations and not demand a timeline to bring troops home, although it will contain other restrictions on Bush's Iraq policies.

    On May 1, Bush vetoed a $124.2 billion bill that would have paid for combat in Iraq and Afghanistan through September as Bush requested, but demanded that troops start coming home this fall.

    Democrats say they hope to send Bush a new bill by the end of the week he will sign, and troops in combat will get the resources they need without disruption.

    "I'm frustrated" with the war, said Rep. Joe Baca, D-Calif., a member of the Blue Dog coalition, a group of conservative Democrats. "But we realize too we have a responsibility to fund our troops and make sure they have the right equipment."

    But Democratic leaders first will have to sway a large number of Democrats who want to end the war immediately — or pick up enough Republican votes to make up for the losses. Earlier this month, 171 House members voted to order the withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq within nine months.

    The details of the Democrats' new bill remained in flux late Monday, as Rep. David Obey was tasked with negotiating with the Senate and White House. Obey, D-Wis., is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

    Officials said the legislation was expected to include political and military goals for the Iraqi government to meet toward establishment of a more democratic society. Failure to make progress toward the goals could cost the Iraqis some of the reconstruction aid the United States has promised, although it was not clear whether Democrats intended to give Bush power to order the aid to be spent regardless of progress.
  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
    by retiredinmex May 23, 2007 1:50 PM EDT
    micma: Save your breath on notblue
    Reply to this comment
    by micma-2009 May 23, 2007 2:18 AM EDT


    "...the point is Bush isn't the one eliminating the Iraqis freedom it's the radicals."


    notblue

    The real point is that after toppling Sadam's regime and creating a power vacume, it was Bush's responsiblity to create order and security in the country in order for there to be a successful transition. The fact that Bu$hco should have known that and absolutely failed to prepare for that is their fault. The insurgency would not have taken hold had their been adequite preparation for the occupation and transition of power.





    Reply to this comment
    by notblue May 22, 2007 3:35 PM EDT
    Micma, the point is Bush isn't the one eliminating the Iraqis freedom it's the radicals. Why you refuse to acknowledge that point is beyond comprehension. The Iraq war would be over if the militants stopped blowing themselves and innocent civilians up, not if the U.S. abandons the iraqis.
    Reply to this comment
    by activstudent May 22, 2007 3:35 PM EDT
    so...
    remind me why we are still in Iraq? even though we were never asked to help out Iraq we are still there, wasting billions of dollars while people die every day, even though the US supposedly has clamped down on terrorists. time to pull out BU$H, your wating your time.
    Reply to this comment
    by micma-2009 May 22, 2007 3:19 PM EDT


    "12 million iraqi citizens that voted for freedom"


    notblue


    I'm sure that these poor people had great hope that this vote for "freedom" would change their lives. However, thanks to the arrogance, incompetence, and outright corruption of Bu$hco, they have only seen their lives get worse. Nearly five years after the invasion, there is no security, no rebuilding, and no end in sight.

    Bu$hco failed to listen to experts and send in enough troops to establish security. They continued to ignore experts that advised that troop strength was not adequite to establish security and only after nearly five years of total failure did they agree to a modest but inadequite boost.

    How many more failed Bush/GOP plans should the American and Iraqi people be forced to pay for?


    Reply to this comment
    by conplan6022 May 22, 2007 3:15 PM EDT
    Another good day of mass murder in Iraq by the 'Religion of Peace.' Seems muslims love to kill each other as much as they do non-muslims.

    Keep watching America/Europe, because that's what these religious lunatics want to do in our streets. Kick them out of our countries-shut down their mosques, or we'll be fighting them soon also and things might start looking like the movie "Children of Men" in our cities.

    I hope everyone fully realizes the value of freedom and liberty and that it must be defended at any cost. Iran also must be prevented from getting nuclear weapons or we're headed for even bigger problems.
    Reply to this comment
    by micma-2009 May 22, 2007 3:06 PM EDT


    "...the Iraqis can't go to the market because the militants are targetting them there, hello!"


    notblue


    Thanks for restating my point. If Iraqis don't have the "freedom" to leave their homes then they don't have freedom. You must have basic security for there to be freedom of any kind. More Iraqis have died under Bush's ocupation than under Sadam. There is no freedom because there's no security and there is no Democracy because the Iraqi government is absolutely ineffective at governing.

    How many more failed Bush/GOP plans should Americans and Iraqis pay for?

    How much are you paid to come here and spin?


    Reply to this comment
    by notblue May 22, 2007 2:59 PM EDT
    I meant small minority of radicals not small majority.
    Reply to this comment
    by notblue May 22, 2007 2:56 PM EDT
    micma, the Iraqis can't go to the market because the militants are targetting them there, hello! The U.S. soldiers are not being killed in the markets, it's the small radical majority of barbarians who are killing innocent Iraqis, so how does the U.S. abandonment of the Iraqis help stop the militants?????
    Reply to this comment
    by micma-2009 May 22, 2007 2:53 PM EDT


    notblue


    The Iraqi people don't even have the "freedom" to go to the local market without being kidnapped, shot, or blown up. This was not happening before Bush invaded on a pack of lies.

    How many more failed Bush plans must the American people pay for?




    Reply to this comment
    See all 28 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook