September 22, 2009 11:11 AM

Bordering On Insanity

By
David L Miller
(National Review Online)  This column was written by Brian Darling.


"Sellout." It may be harsh, but it's the most accurate and succinct way to sum up how conservatives feel right now about President Bush and Senate Republicans, who have cut a deal that would grant amnesty to the estimated 12 million illegal aliens living in the U.S. — not to mention the parents, spouses, and children of these illegals.

Title VI of a draft copy of the bill breaks down amnesty visas into three categories:

  • Z-1 — Illegal aliens present and working in the United States up to Jan. 1, 2007.
  • Z-2 — Parents and spouses of illegal aliens qualifying under the Z-1 category.
  • Z-3 — Children of illegal aliens qualifying under the Z-1 category.

    These "Z Visa" holders can stay in the "Z" status indefinitely, which means they never have to pursue "a pathway to citizenship." They also would be able to get Social Security numbers and benefit from some welfare programs. Shockingly, there is no cap on the numbers of amnesty recipients in the draft language. The only thing the Z Visa holder can't do is vote — until, that is, a liberal judge declares this limitation unconstitutional or until a liberal president can railroad through a "technical corrections" bill.

    Notwithstanding all you are going to hear to the contrary from President Bush, Sen. John McCain, and their new ideological partner, Sen. Ted Kennedy, Title VI of this bill is amnesty, plain and simple. According to an op-ed by former attorney general Ed Meese that appeared last year in The New York Times discussing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, "the difference is that President Reagan called this what it was: amnesty. Indeed, look up the term 'amnesty' in Black's Law Dictionary, and you'll find it says, 'the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already in the country.'" It was amnesty then, and it's amnesty now.

    Why would Republicans negotiate with Ted Kennedy, a senator with impeccable credentials with the far Left of the immigration movement? And why would John McCain imperil his wobbly campaign for the presidency by allying himself with a Kennedy-drafted immigration bill? It simply defies common sense.

    Some of these Republicans, I believe, have convinced themselves that they can convince the American people that "triggers," "tough border enforcement," and the Y Visa "temporary guest worker program" were concessions from the Left that balance out the amnesty part of the bill. Unfortunately, they're wrong. And Senator McCain's prospects to woo conservatives will suffer dearly.

    The prospect of amnesty for illegal immigrants and their families outweighs any tough border initiative that may be in the bill, or the get-tough employment-enforcement provisions. All that will matter, if the bill passes, is that President Bush and presidential wannabe John McCain enabled and are responsible for a historic giveaway — for a program that grants amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who are being rewarded for breaking the law.

    In the name of bipartisanship, they have given away the farm to Ted Kennedy and the left wing of the Democrat party in the Senate. I can't imagine any self-respecting conservative in America who would not hold this against McCain, Bush, and any other politician who supports this terrible idea.
    By Brian Darling
    Reprinted with permission from National Review Online
  • National Review Online
    Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
    by frankinaz May 21, 2007 12:47 PM EDT
    Again, illegal immigrants and the businesses that hire these people will be rewarded for breaking the law; neither party will be punished for their illegal actions.
    It also seems as if nothing will be done to keep illegal immigrants from staying in this country either. They can still find housing, bank accounts, and in some states, college tuition at that state's resident's rates, and possibly
    driver's licenses and car ownership. Illegal immigrant women can still have their "Anchor Babies" here, thanks to an antiquated law that needs to be changed.
    With no background and disease checks, and with no control of their numbers, illegal immigrants are all but invading this country. No doubt some of those people enter this country with criminal
    and terrorist intent on their minds. If 9/11, the failed Fort Dix plot, the numbers of illegal immigrants incarcerated across the country, and all the other costs associated with illegal immigrants doesn't convince government at all levels to end illegal immigration, then another 9/11 or other terrorist-type attack on this country just might.
    Reply to this comment
    by rich1620 May 20, 2007 3:56 PM EDT
    When most people think of illegal immigrates they think of Mexicans who are uneducated, work cheap and hard workers. However, illegal immigrants also included an estimated 50,000 to 70,000 terrorists who are within our borders.

    I can%u2019t understand those politicians who want to give them amnesty which would allow them to come out of hiding and seek jobs and penetrate our work force so that they can financially support their terrorist cells. However, I am hoping that this is a ploy my the federal government to get them to come out of hiding so that they can be arrested.

    We have been sending all our troops including the National Guard, reserve units and some of our Border Patrol to Iraq and Afghanistan to stomp out terrorism; however, our biggest threat of terrorism is these illegal immigrant terrorist.

    Our only defense that we have here at home is the few Federal, state and local law enforcement agencies which are staffed with just enough personnel to respond to isolated incidents.

    The only exception to this is our war veterans. I believe that the computer disks that were stolen from our VA hospitals were done for the purpose of finding out how many veterans are healthy enough to still bear arms as the final level of our defense.
    Reply to this comment
    by steve_holden May 20, 2007 3:32 PM EDT
    Legal applicants get kicked n the teeth.

    US blue collar workers get kicked in the teeth.

    Our government lies thru their teeth.
    Reply to this comment
    by wmb57 May 20, 2007 12:46 PM EDT
    Most immigrants vote Democrat, this is a Dem as well as a GOP sellout.

    The benefits of this will go to those who want globalization to move forward, that is the political elite of not only this country but the world.

    Those that are so partisan that they only see it as the others party problem are being fooled.

    I see nothing to say this bill is for the benefit of the U.S. citizens and that is the purpose of our government. If they want to work for another countries citizens, they don't belong in our government, if they want to work for business, they don't belong in our government. Our government is there for our benefit only.
    Reply to this comment
    by halturner May 20, 2007 10:20 AM EDT
    This Immigration Bill is an outright BETRAYAL of America. It rewards millions o flaw-breakers and allows them to cut-in-line ahead of millions of others who patiently wait legal entry to the U.S.

    Writing in the Federalist Papers, specifically Federalist 28, Alexander Hamilton told us what We The People must do when betrayed by our Representatives. In Paragraph 6 of Federalist 28, Hamilton wrote: ""If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, . . . . . The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. "

    It is time we implement Alexander Hamilton's advice. It is time for We the people to defend ourselves from betrayal by federal government.

    Kill those who betray us.

    If it was good enough for the Founding Fathers, it is good enough for us.

    Hal Turner
    1906 Paterson Plank Road
    North Bergen, NJ 07047
    http://www.HalTurnerShow.com
    Reply to this comment
    by lorinkundert May 19, 2007 11:59 PM EDT
    Nothing will ever change with the two sellout parties that currently dominate politics, we need to look at other alternatives before force becomes the only way left to the people. Go to http://www.unity08.com I have become a delegate and plan on doing something.
    Reply to this comment
    by lorinkundert May 19, 2007 11:55 PM EDT
    If congress passes any form of amnesty whatsoever, we will remove them from office.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 May 19, 2007 9:08 PM EDT
    Re: "Bordering On Insanity"

    Finally a subject that the dead-brained disgraces at the National Review Online have some expertise in!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by wmb57 May 19, 2007 7:15 PM EDT
    Both sides, Dems and GOP have sold out. They aren't looking to the best
    interestest of the U.S. citizens.

    They are listening to Business, Special interest groups of foriegn nationals,
    foriegn governments, and in the Dem's case political advisors since
    hispanic/latino vote democratic most often.

    Its a good time to call your government officials and let them know how you
    feel about this.


    Reply to this comment
    by makeafence May 19, 2007 7:07 PM EDT
    This latest scamnesty bill is a sham. It claims to provide for 18K border patrol and ~300 miles of fencing, but 20K border patrol and 700+ miles of fencing are already authorized. None of the enforcement will ever happen and the day this bill is signed 12 million illegal aliens immediately become legal. The cost of this bill to the taxpayers is something like $2.5 trillion. Odd, but I thought McCain said he was against spending like a drunken sailor.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 20 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook