ST. LOUIS, May 18, 2007
Anheuser-Busch Pulls "Spykes"
Production Of Alcoholic Beverage To Stop After Fierce "Unfounded" Opposition
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Teens & Underage Drinking
New alcoholic beverages are raising questions as to who the intended consumer is. Carleton Kendrick, a family therapist, shares advice with Julie Chen on how to speak to your kids about drinking.
-
Photo
The Anheuser Busch sign with it's trademark eagle and "A" along I-64 in St. Louis in this file photo from July 27, 2004. Anheuser-Busch said Thursday May 17, 2007, it will stop selling a malt beverage called Spykes, a product under fire from critics who charged that it appealed to underage drinkers. (AP Photo/James A. Finley)
-
Interactive
Substance Abuse In America
Get the facts on a national problem. Find out where to get help, learn how drugs affect the body and compare state drunk-driving laws.
Chief Executive August Busch IV made the announcement during a panel discussion at the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association annual conference in La Quinta, Calif., the brewery confirmed.
"Due to its limited volume potential and unfounded criticism, we have ceased production of Spykes," Michael J. Owens, Anheuser-Busch Cos.' marketing vice president, said in a statement.
He said Spykes was introduced about two years ago in test markets, and nationwide in January, but had not performed to expectations. Critics said the product was designed to attract underage drinkers.
Owens rejected that criticism, saying that Spykes was the lowest-alcohol content product in its market segment. The brewer has said younger drinkers favor products with higher alcohol content.
"Nonetheless, it was unduly attacked by perennial anti-alcohol groups, such as the Center for Science in the Public Interest and the Marin Institute," he said.
The Marin Institute, an alcohol industry watchdog based in San Rafael, Calif., said it was pleased with Anheuser-Busch's decision after many organizations and dozens of attorneys general raised concerns that the brewer was targeting underage drinkers with the product.
"It's fine to point fingers, but it wasn't just us screaming bloody murder against this product," said research and policy director Michele Simon.
A phone call seeking comment from the Center for Science in the Public Interest was not immediately returned after business hours Thursday.
Spykes is a 2-ounce bottle of flavored-malt beverage meant to be mixed with beer or other drinks, or consumed as a shot. Packaged in colorful bottles, Spykes contains 12 percent alcohol by volume.
Critics, including more than two dozen state attorneys general, say those characteristics are attractive to underage drinkers. They say the flavor masks the strong taste of alcohol.
Spykes comes in four flavors — lime, mango, melon and hot chocolate. It also contains caffeine, ginseng and guarana, which are components of energy drinks popular among teens and young adults.
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said, "This move by Anheuser-Busch, ceasing sales of Spykes after attorneys general raised significant concerns, is a significant victory in the fight against underage drinking."
He said Spykes appealed to children in taste, packaging and marketing.
"Anheuser-Busch is doing the right thing about Spykes — and should become a model for the entire industry by stopping marketing of all caffeinated alcoholic drinks that appeal to underage drinkers," Blumenthal said.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Posted by Griking at 09:03 AM : May 18, 2007
Oh really? In California, they're sold in grocery stores....right along with the beer, wine and vodka.
Posted by Griking at 09:03 AM : May 18, 2007
Oh really? In California, they're sold in grocery stores....right along with the beer, wine and vodka.
'Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said, "This move by Anheuser-Busch, ceasing sales of Spykes after attorneys general raised significant concerns, is a significant victory in the fight against underage drinking."'
Hollow victory. Parents let their kids flout drinking age laws. Teenagers will get their hands on just about any drink out there from "Spykes" to Everclear. Prohibition has always been a failed policy. Restore minimum driking age to what they were in the 1970s: 18.
Flavored 12% alcohol is expensive cause a good deal of wear and tear on the pluming and most of it leaves you with a industrial strength hangover compared to Old Crow, Jim Beam or other modestly priced whiskey.
Anyone of any age interested in the effects of alcohol doesn't drink 12% stuff very long once they they try something better.
Kids are not stupid.
GC.
We're so worried that these products are going to corrupt the "innocence" of the kids and/or pro-athletes of our country.
GUESS WHAT..... IT'S TOO LATE!
If they don't hurt anyone else, then have a blast!
Inject all the steroids you want. Drink all the booze you want. JUST DON'T HURT ANYONE ELSE...
... and let God determine the outcome!
There is no doubt that Spykes wouldn't appeal to a whiskey drinker or even a beer drinker. It's designed to bring someone over from Coke or Fanta. I doubt anyone could even drink Spykes for very long, the idea isn't to build a loyal following of Spykes drinkers, but get people over the hump of the body's natural revulsion to alcohol, so that they can become Bud Drinkers.
Spykes will disappear, but something else will appear to replace it, these brands aren't long term investments, and the next primary demand product will be even slicker, based on the marketing information generated by the Spykes experiment.
Posted by Verla2 at 02:04 PM : May 18, 2007
.....
That's exactly right! Children do learn from what they see, more so than someone shaking a finger at them. Unfortunately, that's all we seem to be doing in this society.
As I've said in a previous post, perhaps some things should be allowed in our society. Steroids, for example, is thankfully a drug that only destroys the person who is taking them, and has not been the cause (that I know of) of any disaster that kills innocent by-standers.
I know this subject is not about athletes and steroids, but as an example, would our children learn better when they see the consequences of the actions of others right in their face? Would the children learn when seeing their favorite athlete collapse half way between second and third base from an overdose of steroids, blood flowing from their ears, DEAD?
Very few children to young adults learn by having someone shake a finger at them.
More learn when the consequences of poor judgement is put right in their face. From a dead pro-athelete that they worshipped, to a dead best-friend that they loved.
It's sad it has to come to that, but learning is best done by visualization. The saying "you have to see it to believe it" definitely holds true. From overdosing on alcohol to overdosing on steroids or whatever, most humans have to see the consequences before we believe them.
-
by peaceforusa
May 19, 2007 10:34 AM PDT
- sanfelz said "Before it continues making alcohol beverages marketed to kids, Anhueser-Busch should learn how to make beer for adults."
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 20 CommentsAmen to that!