MySpace Won't Provide Sex Offenders' Names
Social Networking Site Says It Won't Comply With Request From State Attorneys General
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Sex Offenders On MySpace
MySpace has refused to hand over the names of known sex offenders, who some fear are using the networking site as a means to meet potential underage victims. Daniel Sieberg reports.
-
Video
Decoding Child Safety Online
Julie Chen speaks with psychologist David Walsh from the National Institute on Media and the Family about what precautions parents can take to protect kids from online predators.
-
Photo
In December, MySpace announced it was partnering with Sentinel Tech Holding Corp. to build a database with information on sex offenders in the United States. (CBS/AP)
-
Photo Essay
MySpace Is Your Space
Satisfy your voyeuristic urges and get a glimpse inside MySpace.
MySpace's chief security officer said the company regularly discloses information to law enforcement officials but said the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act says it can only do so when proper legal processes are followed.
"We're truly disheartened that the AGs chose to send out a letter ... when there was an existing legal process that could have been followed," the security officer, Hemanshu Nigam, said in an interview.
In a letter Monday, attorneys general from North Carolina, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania asked MySpace to provide the number of registered sex offenders using the site and where they live.
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Tuesday blasted MySpace for refusing to share the information and said no subpoena is needed for MySpace to tell the attorneys general how many registered sex offenders use the site "or other information relating to possible parole violations."
"I am deeply disappointed and troubled by this unreasonable and unfounded rejection of our request for critical information about convicted sex offenders whose profiles are on MySpace," Blumenthal said. "By refusing this information, MySpace is precluding effective enforcement of parole and probation restrictions that safeguard society."
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper echoed the sentiment, saying "it's sad that MySpace is going to protect the privacy of sex offenders over the safety of children."
Nigam said MySpace is serious about identifying and removing sex offenders from its Web site and wants to work with the attorneys general.
"Everybody needs to get together and delete online predators," Nigam said, adding that MySpace supports state and federal legislation requiring sex offenders to register e-mail addresses. "The attorneys' general concerns and our concerns are exactly the same."
In December, MySpace announced it was partnering with Sentinel Tech Holding Corp. to build a database with information on sex offenders in the United States.
Software to identify and remove sex offenders from the site has been used for 12 days, and MySpace has "removed every registered sex offender that we identified out of our more than 175 million profiles," Nigam said.
It is also working with Sentinel to share the sex offender database and technology with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which works directly with law enforcement officials, Nigam said.
Christian Genetski, an attorney who has represented MySpace, said the Electronic Communications Privacy Act requires subpoenas, court orders or search warrants, depending on the information sought.
"It's a clearly defined law that most providers and prosecutors understand and work with on a daily basis," said Genetski, who covers information security and Internet enforcement at a firm in Washington, D.C. "My understanding is (the attorneys general) want the private personal information, and that's clearly the information the ECPA protects."
Blumenthal said will be aggressive in their pursuit of the information.
"We will take ...forceful action, including subpoenas if necessary to protect children," Blumenthal said.
MySpace, which is owned by News Corp., and other social networking sites allow users to create online profiles with photos, music and personal information, including hometowns and education. Users can send messages to one another and, in many cases, browse other profiles.
MySpace's policy prevents children under 14 from setting up profiles, but it relies on users to specify their ages.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 51 CommentsPosted by FARTKNOCKER2 at 04:15 PM : May 16, 2007
I AGREE.
_________________________
That is EXACTLY what Myspace is saying they should do! The ECPA is a law, and if Myspace violates it any action taken upon information given to the attorney general will be overturned by the courts. Don't they understand that Myspace wants it all to go through the proper legal channels so that when *** offenders are caught violating parole/probation, they can be punished to the fullest extent?
Try closing down shopping malls, city parks, sports arenas, movie theatres, Starbucks, state beaches and all the other places s-xoffenders can go without identifying themselves.
you people are idiots as well as the AG's for trying to pull off such a ridiculous stunt.
Shutting down MTV and most cable companies would be more effective and practical. Unplugging the computers would work too.
How would MySpace know who the *** offenders are anyway? It's easy to set up a bogus account. People need to see what their kids are doing and MySpace shouldn't have to be a mommy or daddy to the world. Don't take your kids to the bar if you don't want them drinking, so don't have them surf alone. Online privacy for teens is asking for trouble. Some family fights are worth having.
-North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper
Yes, it's sad that Americans don't just knuckle under and kiss the government's fascist @ss every time it tries to whittle down our civil rights a little more. And you morons that are saying MySpace is the bad guy are the same people that have swallowed the lie that the ACLU is evil. You people claim to love and defend America, but you don't respect the only thing that sets it apart, which is protections of the Constitution. If the Constitution is to have any meaning must be upheld ALL THE TIME, it can't just be ignored when you get frightened of terrorists, *** offenders, communists or boogiemen. That's how it works. Love It or Leave It.
It's up to the parents to monitor their children and try and make sure they are not giving out information. NO child should be on the computer after 9:00 at night if you are under the age of 16. Too bad - there are curfews and too many parents don't monitor this. It's up to the parents IF they feel their kid is going to far on My Space or any other space to shut their computer down and it's taboo until the kid learns. Parents need to be held responsible for what their kids do and say ... that's the way it's always been
GOd help us all
Isn't Rupert Murdoch the owner of myspace? Why is he doing a Cam'ron and not doing society a favor and hiding the names of *** offenders, who doubtlessly use myspace to find children to sexually offend? They did it once, letting the world know about them only helps assure they won't do it again.
This isn't your average website. There are times when hiding such information isn't wrong, I agree. But this is myspace; a place kids often go. That makes this a different situation entirely.
Finally, I was... sexually abused as a child. I do not want to see other children hurt by such filthy monsters. Mr. Murdoch is giving them free passage and you bet I'm angry. He is wrong in this instance. *** offenders, on a site that children frequently visit and may be lured, really should be pointed out. I'm sorry.
Mr Murdoch does not own MySpace BUT you don't know who the abusers are out there... someone may be just flirting with danger to see what kind of response they will get - doesn't mean they are going to act out. There are those though that are guilty BUT with the ability to use ficticious logons - no one knows who anyone is out there. Offenders should be punished - BUT (and I agree they have or shouldn't have rights) BUT if someone is convicted and has served their time... not a helllll of alot we can do about it other than keep pounding into our children the dangers of strangers. Again, it's the parents responsibility to watch and teach and set a good example - and if it means teaching them to "rat" on an uncle, aunt or any relative than so be it. But we as parents need to step up to bat and start being a little more strict with our children and take on the responsibility of being a parent
They will sing a different tune when one of thier own children are the victims!
AU contraire RIchard dearest, legally you DO need a court order or supoena but I guess being brainwashed by the Bush regime into thinking you can just ask for personal information and get it from any company (who can be SUED for violating people's privacy, especially if they make a mistake and ID the WRONG person) makes you think you can just demand whatever without a COURT ORDER.
I say follow the LAW Mr attorney general and get a court order or take a hike!
I laugh that anyone would be stupid enough to use ANY real information at all to sign up for on-line services, maybe half the i nformation is bogus to begin with.
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Security-Related/Hide-IP-Platinum.shtml
I have requested many times authorities to make some law and ban such software for public use, but who cares!!!!!
What about those who aren't on probation or parole?
What about parents monitoring their child's activities instead of making MySpace the parent?
What about just turning off the internet or access to certain sites if you don't like what's on them? This is like turning on adult movies on cable then complaining there's nudity!
There's enough "*** offender" laws on the books that are the product of fear, rushing to action, and lawmakers riding the wave of public outcry. Now we just need to make them fairer and more effective by only focusing on those who pose a real risk.
That is not the issue. The real problem is the DAs and state AGs that are more concerned of staying in office and winning votes than actually protecting us and doing their f'ing job. And quite frankly MySpace should be off limits to those under 16.
When the sexual offender laws become real and effective and reasonable and constitutional, they will be treated with the respect they deserve. When they are used by politicians to make a "statement" simply to further their career...well, I really can understand the reluctance to cooperate.
(And just in case anyone is wondering...I DON'T support pedophilia or rape or any other kind of sexual violence...so if you were thinking of derailing the conversation by drawing stupid conclusions from my post...point it elsewhere.)
"It's sad that MySpace is going to protect the privacy of *** offenders over the safety of children."
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper
Unbelievable.
Parents have to do the parenting. In the end, no one else can, no matter how many companies you complain to.
Any personalized webpage requires a certain amount of personal responsibility. MySpace does a lot to protect people from themselves, but ultimately, it's not their job. Their stance on this is admirable and completely right in the realm of real justice.
If MySpace profiles are going to be used to bust a creep, they need to be used RIGHT.
Any personalized webpage requires a certain amount of personal responsibility. MySpace does a lot to protect people from themselves, but ultimately, it's not their job. Their stance on this is admirable and completely right in the realm of real justice.
If MySpace profiles are going to be used to bust a creep, they need to be used RIGHT.
Any personalized webpage requires a certain amount of personal responsibility. MySpace does a lot to protect people from themselves, but ultimately, it's not their job. Their stance on this is admirable and completely right in the realm of real justice.
If MySpace profiles are going to be used to bust a creep, they need to be used RIGHT.
Truth, Justice, and all that Jazz...
left America as we turned from Democratic Republic to FASCIST TYRANNY.
get out your copies of 1984 Orwell, It Can't Happen Here, and Fahrenheit 451.
IT HAS HAPPENED HERE, G*O*D*D*A*M*N IT!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper
Southern Nazi's are truly unbelievable. This low life, who probably was lynching blacks a few years ago, doesn't want to follow the rules but instead does what Southern Fascist have been doing since ink met paper for the Constitution, making them up as they go along.
Ignorant fascist people who trash the Constitution don't deserve to be called Americans, and they definitely don't deserve to be citizens of the USA.
WIthout due process, the information would be thrown out in a suit anyway. They ought to be thanking Myspace for that. Parents have to do the parenting. In the end, no one else can, no matter how many companies you complain to.
Posted by Coaster26
You can become a S.O. (s. offender) by making out with a bf/gf in a park, something assanine like that could cause it.
I agree with Coaster, MySpace is doing a service by NOT releasing the info because due process is warranted in this situation AND parents need to do that parenting NOT big brother. And Besides, I did a paper on the new laws people are trying to pass against SO's and a SO MUST register with their local police, have pic taken, give address, phone #, work #/address and list any email or wed page they may have (MySpace, Yahoo) and they must list any online groups they belong too as well. So why doesn't the government just talk to all the police stations?
Did you all realize that some places, like marlborough, MA and palces in Florida are trying to make it SO difficult for SO's to live anywhere that some SO's in Florida received permission to live under bridges because there were n o legal apartments they could live in. Do you fell safer that way? In Marlborough, MA the mayor vetoed a bill that would have banned SO's from living in 95% of the city. She wants to revise the bill then put it up again. I would rather know where they are then where they are not. If they are homeless then create a special shelter.
On one hand, the government could monitor predators
However, on the other hand, they would also monitor a lot of others in the process.
I am all for protecting children. Parents really need to monitor myspace anyway with a product such as PC Pandora or similar. I am glad that myspace is sticking to their guns, because historically, when the Government is allowed to intrude they tend to leave a large footprint. My experience with myspace with my own children, has been not so much with predators, but more with malicious code, spyware and keyloggers. MySpace is FULL of malicious software in almost any photo, or file that you click.
People such as VDTD scare me because they're quite happy as long as its OTHER people's rights that get stripped away little by little.
"After all, the *** offenders gave up a lot of their rights when they committed the offense(s) they were convicted of." -- sclaires
Really? So they don't regain their rights once they've completed their sentence and repaid their debt to society as the courts who represent the interests of the people have ordered? Must be nice that you can choose who DESERVES to have their Constitutional rights abolished and who doesn't. Do you feel any safer for it? Probably not. Would you feel safer knowing that you're in the room when your kids are on the computer? Probably.
People need to stop telling the government to poke its nose into everyone else's business and start minding their own. If you raise your children to have some sense, keep an eye on what they do and who they hang out with, then you're keeping them safe. Take care of your home, your children, and your safety, and you won't have to worry about what everyone else is doing.
You said, "Must be nice that you can choose who DESERVES to have their constitutional rights abolished & who doesn't." Excuse me, but a conv. felon upon release from prison, under the LAW (depending on the state) absolutely loses some of their civil rights. We don't pick & "choose" this; the felon has "chosen" to have their civil rights stripped when they committed the felony. In some states, the convicted felon, incl. the SOs, lose their right to vote, sit on a jury or engage in a state-licensed occupation. Most felons convicted of serious crimes must wait 5 years to have those rights restored, a waiting prd to determine if felons are truly rehabilitated or still leading a life of crime. So your critique, not surprisingly, is flawed.
You also said, "And who are you to say all those labeled as an SO are as much a threat as J. Couey?" Umm, wrong. I don't know where you got that from, but (& here we go again), it's not for ME or YOU to decide -the courts decide & render the punishment!
You are naive to think that if parents simply rear their children properly & stop depending on the gov, then they will be safe. What world are you living in? So, using your logic, harm befalls children ONLY if their parents didn't teach them well. Couey broke into J's home in the mid. of the night & took her. Was that her daddy's fault b/c he didn't raise her right & b/c he depended on gov. to keep her safe? You need to wake up to reality.
So yes, I think there could have been more done to stop something like that from happening. Alarms on the windows, or at least a piece of broomstick in the track at night. All sorts of safety measures could have been taken and apparently weren't there.
Keeping your home safe for your children is a parent's responsibility. The government's job is only to deal with the aftermath when that's enough.
As for a convicted felon's rights, yes, some states have stricter guidelines than others. But what about all these mounting restrictions on where an SO can live? work? pass their free time? shop? etc? These laws are just painting SO's into a corner where they can't live anywhere, can't get a job, and can't form ties to the community, even if they really want to fit back into society. So is it any wonder they end up back in prison because they violated their parole by not having a home or job?
If you're going to let people out of jail you HAVE to at least give them an opportunity to reintegrate into society. Otherwise, what's the point of having a prison system and not just a dungeon system?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 51 Comments