February 11, 2009 4:52 PM

Bush Acts On Greenhouse Gas Issue

(CBS/AP)  President Bush responded Monday to a Supreme Court ruling by ordering federal agencies to find a way to begin regulating vehicle emissions by the time he leaves office.

In a Rose Garden announcement, Mr. Bush said he wanted to move ahead, pending any separate legislative approaches. The new rules will "cut gasoline consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles," he said.

But he called it a "complex legal and technical matter" that's "going to take time to fully resolve," so he said he was ordering his administration "to complete the process by the end of 2008."

That amounts to the final days of his administration, reports CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller, leaving little if any time for implementation on his watch.

Mr. Bush said the agencies must take into account the views of the general public, the impact the new rules would have on safety, scientific knowledge, available technology and the cost.

The agencies involved include the departments of Transportation, Agriculture and Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Last month, the Supreme Court rebuked the Bush administration for its inaction on global warming. In a 5-4 decision, it declared that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases qualify as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and thus can be regulated by the EPA.

The court also said that the "laundry list" of reasons the administration has given for declining to do so are insufficient, and that the EPA must regulate carbon dioxide, the leading gas linked to global warming, if it finds that it endangers public health.

Democrats who control Congress have been pressuring the administration to say when it will comply with the high court's ruling and decide whether to regulate carbon dioxide. It was unlikely they would be satisfied with the lengthy process laid out by the president.

Mr. Bush has said previously that he recognizes the serious environmental problems created by such emissions and other so-called greenhouse gases. But he has urged against anything other than a voluntary approach, saying regulations could undercut economic activity.

There were few details immediately available about how the rules might look, but White House press secretary Tony Snow said Monday that the president's position has not changed.

"The market-based approach seems to work," Snow said. "The question is: do you try to set up a mandatory system or do you try to set up an innovation-based system. The president prefers innovation."

The environmental group Environmental Defense said the effort "will fall far short of fixing the climate problem" without mandatory caps on carbon emissions.

"Whether EPA will lead the fight against global warming or lead us to a hotter planet remains to be seen," said Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp. "It's time for this administration to join with the mainstream of American businesses and support a cap on carbon."

In his State of the Union address in January, Mr. Bush set a goal of reducing gasoline consumption by 20 percent over 10 years. Under his plan, this would be accomplished by increasing the use of alternative fuels to 35 billion gallons by 2017 and boosting fuel efficiency standards in new vehicles.

The president said Monday that the agencies should use this so-called "20-in-10 plan" as a starting point for the new regulations, while saying he still wants Congress to approve the plan legislatively.

"When it comes to energy and the environment, the American people expect common sense and they expect action," Mr. Bush said. "We're taking action by taking the first steps toward rules that will make our economy stronger, our environment cleaner and our nation more secure for generations to come."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 65 Comments
by infidel_us May 16, 2007 1:04 PM EDT
May 15, 2007
Posted by Marc Morano %u2013 9:14 PM ET

"Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics. Growing Number of Scientists Convert to Skeptics After Reviewing New Research"

The data is flawed. The models are flawed. The results are flawed. The earth is warming like it did before and will do again....then it will cool down like it did before and will do again.

It is NOT man made! What a bunch of wacko leftists.


Reply to this comment
by zykracosmos May 16, 2007 11:13 AM EDT
badaxmofo...
I think I could assume from your sign-in name that your are a qualified climatologist
Reply to this comment
by rickstas May 15, 2007 8:40 PM EDT
The American people are getting just what they deserved for elected and re-electing Bush and Cheney. Too bad the rest of the world has to suffers the consequences these scum bring outside US borders.
Reply to this comment
by venkata4--2008 May 15, 2007 4:02 PM EDT
"Bush was correct to abandon it. The Kyoto treaty was useless, senseless, and the costs would outweigh the benefits, which we now know are zero.
Posted by mike71067 at 12:05 PM : May 15, 2007
"

This planet will useless anyway in 50 years so use it up now right ?

Intead no control some treaty could have saved say 15 or 20 years. Our grand kids are going to pay the price, remeber.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 15, 2007 3:05 PM EDT
"ARTICLE - 2001 CNN
DISMAY AS U.S. DROPS CLIMATE PACT
Dismay is being expressed across the world at the decision by U.S. President George W. Bush to abandon the 1997 Kyoto Treaty aimed at staving off global warming."
-Posted by mascarponi at 11:53 AM : May 15, 2007

You must have missed the recent news that the Kyoto treaty has been deemed totally useless, because many of the countries who ratified it are violating it. Bush was correct to abandon it. The Kyoto treaty was useless, senseless, and the costs would outweigh the benefits, which we now know are zero.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 15, 2007 2:56 PM EDT
extra extra bush,cheney,rumsfeld,rice, rove, should be put in front of a fireing squad and shot for treason and murder...."
we the people have the power to get it done
-Posted by forthepeopl1 at 10:13 AM : May 15, 2007

Uh, aren't statements like this illegal, big time? Funny how the left criticizes "right-wing gun nuts" and want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, but have no problem inciting the assassination of elected officials. This type of hypocracy is the very reason I turned from a liberal to a conservative about 20 years ago.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 15, 2007 2:52 PM EDT
extra extra bush,cheney,rumsfeld,rice, rove, should be put in front of a fireing squad and shot for treason and murder...."
we the people have the power to get it done
-Posted by forthepeopl1 at 10:13 AM : May 15, 2007

Uh, aren't statements like this illegal, big time? Funny how the left criticizes "right-wing gun nuts" and want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, but have no problem inciting the assassination of elected officials. This type of hypocracy is the very reason I turned from a liberal to a conservative about 20 years ago.

Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 May 15, 2007 2:46 PM EDT
Same old tired song for everyone it is too late now anyway.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 15, 2007 2:45 PM EDT
"This new plan of Boy Geoge's has already been shot down by Time magazine."
-Posted by akpals at 09:17 AM : May 15, 2007

Gee, what a shock! A left-wing publication criticizing the President's policies. Ooooh. What's next? Salon.com or the New York Times bashing Bush as well? My goodness!
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 May 15, 2007 2:41 PM EDT
"This new plan of Boy Geoge's has already been shot down by Time magazine."
-Posted by akpals at 09:17 AM : May 15, 2007

Gee, what a shock! A left-wing publication criticizing the President's policies. Ooooh. What's next? Salon.com or the New York Times bashing Bush as well? My goodness!
Reply to this comment
See all 65 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook