February 11, 2009 4:53 PM

Smoking Will Play Role In Movie Ratings

(AP)  Smoking will be a bigger factor in determining film ratings, the Motion Picture Association of America said Thursday, but critics said the move does not go far enough to discourage teens from taking up the habit.

MPAA Chairman Dan Glickman said his group's ratings board, which previously had considered underage smoking in assigning film ratings, now will take into account smoking by adults, as well.

That adds smoking to a list of such factors as sex, violence and language in determining the MPAA's G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17 ratings.

Film raters will consider the pervasiveness of tobacco use, whether it glamorizes smoking and the context in which smoking appears, as in movies set in the past when smoking was more common.

Some critics of Hollywood's depictions of tobacco in films have urged that movies that show smoking be assigned an R rating, which would restrict those younger than 17 from seeing them.

"I'm glad it's finally an issue they're taking up, but what they're proposing does not go far enough and is not going to make a difference," said Kori Titus, spokeswoman for Breathe California, which opposes film images of tobacco use that might encourage young people to start smoking.

Glickman said a mandatory R rating for smoking would not "further the specific goal of providing information to parents on this issue."

Smoking in movies with a G, PG or PG-13 rating has been on the decline, and the "percentage of films that included even a fleeting glimpse of smoking" declined from 60 percent to 52 percent between July 2004 and July 2006," Glickman said.

Of those films, three-fourths received an R rating for other reasons, he said.

"That means there's not a great amount of films in the unrestricted category as it stands," said Joan Graves, who heads the ratings board. "We're not saying we're ignoring the issue. We're trying the best way possible according to what we've learned from parents to give them information about what's in a film."

Titus said smoking in films had declined in recent years but remains more prevalent than MPAA figures indicate.

Descriptions on sex, violence and language that accompany movie ratings now will include such phrases as "glamorized smoking" or "pervasive smoking," Glickman said.

If rated today, a film such as 2005's "Good Night, and Good Luck," about chain-smoking newsman Edward R. Murrow, would have carried a "pervasive smoking" tag but probably would have retained its PG rating because of its historical context in the 1950s, Graves said.

Titus said film raters should be as tough on smoking as they are on bad language to minimize the effects of on-screen smoking on children, including her own 5-year-old daughter.

"I don't want her using that language, but last time I checked, she's probably not going to die from that," Titus said. "If she starts smoking from these images she sees in movies, chances are she's probably going to die early from that."

While Titus' group wants tougher ratings restrictions, the MPAA released statements of support for its plan from John Seffrin, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Sen. Joe Biden and filmmaker Rob Reiner, among others.

"By placing smoking on a par with considerations of violence and sex, the rating board has acknowledged the public-health dangers to children associated with glamorized images of a toxic and lethal addiction to tobacco," Barry Bloom, dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, said in a statement.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 39 Comments
by SamThornton May 13, 2007 1:21 AM EDT
I'm so ticked off by this I had to light up. M-m-m-m-m. Smokey things.
Reply to this comment
by mo005 May 12, 2007 10:48 PM EDT
I smoked for almost thirty years. I quit last year. I don't care much for the smoke blown straight into my eyes, but It doesn't bother me to bad. I can see stopping smoking in resturants, and buildings. Just about everywhere except in bars or baseball or football arenas. I think it should be up to the bar owners to say if you can or can't smoke in a bar, not some friggin politician trying to score points.
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma May 12, 2007 6:20 PM EDT
I am a smoker...a polite one. I was at a nearly empty casino in the smoking section. I was sitting there minding my own business, smoking as I played a slot machine in a far corner. An elderly man sat down right next to me, even though there were many slot machines of the same kind available elsewhere, and he proceeded to instantly complain about my smoke. I know there are rude smokers out there but what about all the rude non smokers. Enough is enough!! Movies depict life and tell a story...what if the movie plot is about someone dying of lung cancer from smoking. Parents need to teach kids right from wrong...not just hide the wrongs from the kids.
Reply to this comment
by joelewinski May 12, 2007 2:53 PM EDT
Stupid is, as stupid does. Self-Control people. Do not impose more useless rules and regulations.
Reply to this comment
by joelewinski May 12, 2007 2:18 PM EDT
Stupid is, as stupid does. Self-Control people. Do not impose more useless rules and regulations.
Reply to this comment
by joelewinski May 12, 2007 2:09 PM EDT
Stupid is, as stupid does. Self-Control people. Do not impose more useless rules and regulations.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 May 12, 2007 6:26 AM EDT
Thats what the remote is for. We can't sanitise every thing. In real life people smoke,I don't, people drink,I don't, People cuss,I do some,.
I think they should work on the violence that are in them.There is far more of that. We know smoking is bad. The beatings,killings,abuse and the like is very bad and they need to clean that up first. The young think that is cool. I do feel the booze/beer ads should be banned just as smoke ads were in 1970.
Reply to this comment
by sparkelbutt-2009 May 12, 2007 4:43 AM EDT
Get of the tobacco kick. Leave the smokers alone for a change. The movies have more drug use, more alcohol use, and very foul language then they do tobacco.
I am appalled by the fact that out big movie industries and our elected officials can be bought by special interest groups.
Reply to this comment
by avigil2 May 11, 2007 10:51 PM EDT
Kids aren't going to be deterred by a simple rating. Stupid kids will continue to smoke because they still think it's "cool" and/or they see their trashy parents do it. The MPAA has too much of a strong hold on movies. Boycott the MPAA!!!!
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 May 11, 2007 9:33 PM EDT
Its ok to drink, do drugs, beat people up but God help you if you light one up, they will drag your addicted butt outside into the weather (what ever it is at the time) and double dare you do protest.



ssssshhhhhheeeeeeeeeessssshhhhh!!!!!!


BTW, I do not smoke.
Reply to this comment
See all 39 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook